Spatial suitability assessment of restored vegetation and sustainable restoration strategies in China

Jialan Nan , Wenqi Han , Qinggong Han , Yongxia Ding , Shouzhang Peng

Geography and Sustainability ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (3) : 100449

PDF
Geography and Sustainability ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (3) :100449 DOI: 10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100449
Research Article
research-article
Spatial suitability assessment of restored vegetation and sustainable restoration strategies in China
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

China’s large-scale ecological restoration programs have markedly increased vegetation cover, but their ecological suitability and long-term sustainability remain insufficiently evaluated. To support the development of science-based restoration strategies, this study introduced potential natural vegetation (PNV) as a reference and developed an innovative hybrid model combining random forest algorithm and process-based model (i.e., LPJ-GUESS) to map PNV distributions. Results showed that the hybrid model achieved high predictive accuracy, with an overall classification accuracy of 0.89 and kappa coefficient of 0.87. A comparative analysis of the spatial distribution of the restored (and existing) vegetation and that of the PNV under both the current and the future period was conducted. It revealed that 6.7% of restored forests and 48.8 % of restored grasslands were mismatched with PNV, indicating widespread misallocation of restoration efforts under current ecological restoration programs. Moreover, 2.5 % of existing forests and 34.2 % of existing grasslands were mismatched with PNV in the current period (1993–2022), while 0.5 %–1.4 % of existing forests and 50.8 %–70.4 % of existing grasslands are projected to be mismatched with PNV in the future period (2071–2100) under different SSP scenarios. About 32.4 %–41.5 % of China’s land area was identified as unstable PNV region under future climate change, within which various vegetation transitions are likely to occur. These findings highlight the necessity to align ecological restoration programs with ecological suitability and sustainability criteria to achieve long-term resilience and cost-effectiveness. The hybrid modeling framework offers a robust tool for guiding adaptive restoration planning across China.

Keywords

Sustainable vegetation restoration / Potential natural vegetation / Future climate scenarios / Hybrid model / LPJ-GUESS model

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jialan Nan, Wenqi Han, Qinggong Han, Yongxia Ding, Shouzhang Peng. Spatial suitability assessment of restored vegetation and sustainable restoration strategies in China. Geography and Sustainability, 2026, 7 (3) : 100449 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100449

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Data availability statement

The historic climate data we used are from the Climatic Research Unit (https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/hrg/cru_ts_4.07) and the future climate data are from CMIP6 (https://aims2.llnl.gov/search). The atmospheric CO 2 concentration data for 1851–1958, 1959–2022 and 2023–2100 are available at https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406982101, https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/ and https://iiasa.ac.at/models-tools-data/ssp, respectively. The soil property data driving the LPJ-GUESS model are available at https://web.nateko.lu.se/lpj-guess, with the model source code included. The nitrogen deposition data are from CMIP6 forcing datasets (https://aims2.llnl.gov/search). The historic and future land-use data are from https://blogs.exeter.ac.uk/trendy/protocol/ and https://luh.umd.edu/, respectively. The 1-km soil property data used to build the hybrid model are available at http://www.isric.org/content/isric-releases-upgraded-soilgrids-system-two-times-improved-accuracy-predictions. The topography data are available at https://worldclim.org/. The 30-m annual land cover data are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4417810. The moisture recycling dataset (UTrack) is from https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.912710.

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jialan Nan: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualization. Wenqi Han: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. Qinggong Han: Investigation. Yongxia Ding: Writing – review & editing. Shouzhang Peng: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Funding acquisition.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Open Foundation of the Key Laboratory of Coupling Process and Effect of Natural Resources Elements (Grant No. 2025264), the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (Grant No. 2022QZKK0101), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 42077451 and 42401338).

References

[1]

Berghuijs, W.R., Luijendijk, E., Moeck, C., van der Velde, Y., Allen, S.T., 2022. Global recharge data set indicates strengthened groundwater connection to surface fluxes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49 (23), e2022GL099010. doi: 10.1029/2022gl099010.

[2]

Bestelmeyer, B.T., Ellison, A.M., Fraser, W.R., Gorman, K.B., Holbrook, S.J., Laney, C.M., Ohman, M.D., Peters, D.P.C., Pillsbury, F.C., Rassweiler, A., Schmitt, R.J., Sharma, S., 2011. Analysis of abrupt transitions in ecological systems. Ecosphere 2 (12), art129. doi: 10.1890/ES11-00216.1.

[3]

Bongers, F.J., Schmid, B., Bruelheide, H., Bongers, F., Li, S., von Oheimb, G., Li, Y., Cheng, A.P., Ma, K.P., Liu, X.J., 2021. Functional diversity effects on productivity increase with age in a forest biodiversity experiment. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5 (12), 1594-1603. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01564-3.

[4]

Brubaker, K.L., Entekhabi, D., Eagleson, P.S., 1993. Estimation of continental precipitation recycling. J. Clim. 6 (6), 1077-1089. doi: 10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<1077:EOCPR>2.0.CO;2.

[5]

Bryan, B.A., Gao, L., Ye, Y.Q., Sun, X.F., Connor, J.D., Crossman, N.D., Stafford-Smith, M., Wu, J.G., He, C.Y., Yu, D.Y., Liu, Z.F., Li, A., Huang, Q.X., Ren, H., Deng, X.Z., Zheng, H., Niu, J.M., Han, G.D., Hou, X.Y., 2018. China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency. Nature 559 (7713), 193-204. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0280-2.

[6]

Cao, S.X., 2008. Why large-scale afforestation efforts in China have failed to solve the desertification problem. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (6), 1826-1831. doi: 10.1021/es0870597.

[7]

Cao, S.X., Chen, L., Shankman, D., Wang, C.M., Wang, X.B., Zhang, H., 2011. Excessive reliance on afforestation in China’s arid and semi-arid regions: lessons in ecological restoration. Earth-Sci. Rev. 104 (4), 240-245. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.11.002.

[8]

Checa-Garcia, R., Hegglin, M.I., Kinnison, D., Plummer, D.A., Shine, K.P., 2018. Historical and future ozone database (1850-2100) in support of CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 45 (7), 3264-3273. doi: 10.1002/2017GL076770.

[9]

Chini, L., Hurtt, G., Sahajpal, R., Frolking, S., Goldewijk, K.K., Sitch, S., Ganzenmüller, R., Ma, L., Ott, L., Pongratz, J., Poulter, B., 2021. Land-use harmonization datasets for annual global carbon budgets. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13 (8), 4175-4189. doi: 10.5194/essd-13-4175-2021.

[10]

Connell, J.H., 1979. Intermediate-disturbance hypothesis. Science 204 (4399), 1345. doi: 10.1126/science.204.4399.1345.

[11]

Crouzeilles, R., Beyer, H.L., Monteiro, L.M., Feltran-Barbieri, R., Pessôa, A.C.M., Barros, F.S.M., Lindenmayer, D.B., Lino, E.D.S.M., Grelle, C.E.V., Chazdon, R.L., Matsumoto, M., Rosa, M., Latawiec, A.E., Strassburg, B.B.N., 2020. Achieving cost-effective landscape-scale forest restoration through targeted natural regeneration. Conserv. Lett. 13 (3), e12709. doi: 10.1111/conl.12709.

[12]

Deng, L., Liu, G.B., Shangguan, Z.P., 2014. Land-use conversion and changing soil carbon stocks in China’s ‘Grain-for-Green’ Program: a synthesis. Glob. Change Biol. 20 (11), 3544-3556. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12508.

[13]

Díaz, S., Settele, J., Brondízio, E.S., Ngo, H.T., Agard, J., Arneth, A., Balvanera, P., Brauman, K.A., Butchart, S.H.M., Chan, K.M.A., Garibaldi, L.A., Ichii, K., Liu, J.G., Subramanian, S.M., Midgley, G.F., Miloslavich, P., Molnár, Z., Obura, D., Pfaff, A., Polasky, S., Purvis, A., Razzaque, J., Reyers, B., Chowdhury, R.R., Shin, Y.-J., Visseren-Hamakers, I., Willis, K.J., Zayas, C.N., 2019. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366 (6471), eaax3100. doi: 10.1126/science.aax3100.

[14]

Ding, X., Xu, Z., Wang, Y., 2023. Application of MaxEnt model in biomass estimation: an example of spruce forest in the Tianshan Mountains of the central-western part of Xinjiang, China. Forests 14 (5), 953. doi: 10.3390/f14050953.

[15]

Ding, Y.X., Fu, D.R., Jiao, P.X., Zhang, J.L., Peng, S.Z., 2025. Predicting planting suitability of globally important grain crops using a hybrid model. Eur. J. Agron. 170, 127754. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2025.127754.

[16]

Dornelas, M., Gotelli, N.J., McGill, B., Shimadzu, H., Moyes, F., Sievers, C., Magurran, A.E., 2014. Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss. Science 344 (6181), 296-299. doi: 10.1126/science.1248484.

[17]

Edwards, T.C., Cutler, D.R., Zimmermann, N.E., Geiser, L., Moisen, G.G., 2006. Effects of sample survey design on the accuracy of classification tree models in species distribution models. Ecol. Model. 199, 132-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.016.

[18]

Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G.A., Senior, C.A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R.J., Taylor, K.E., 2016. Overview of the coupled model intercomparison project phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9 (5), 1937-1958. doi: 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016.

[19]

Feng, X.M., Fu, B.J., Piao, S.L., Wang, S., Ciais, P., Zeng, Z.Z., Lü, Y.H., Zeng, Y., Li, Y., Jiang, X.H., Wu, B.F., 2016. Revegetation in China’s loess plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6 (11), 1019-1022. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3092.

[20]

Feng, Y.H., Schmid, B., Loreau, M., Forrester, D.I., Fei, S.L., Zhu, J.X., Tang, Z.Y., Zhu, J.L., Hong, P.B., Ji, C.J., Shi, Y., Su, H.J., Xiong, X.Y., Xiao, J., Wang, S.P., Fang, J.Y., 2022. Multispecies forest plantations outyield monocultures across a broad range of conditions. Science 376 (6595), 865-868. doi: 10.1126/science.abm6363.

[21]

Fick, S.E., Hijmans, R.J., 2017. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37 (12), 4302-4315. doi: 10.1002/joc.5086.

[22]

Fisher, R.A., Koven, C.D., Anderegg, W.R.L., Christoffersen, B.O., Dietze, M.C., Farrior, C.E., Holm, J.A., Hurtt, G.C., Knox, R.G., Lawrence, P.J., Lichstein, J.W., Longo, M., Matheny, A.M., Medvigy, D., Muller-Landau, H.C., Powell, T.L., Serbin, S.P., Sato, H., Shuman, J.K., Smith, B., Trugman, A.T., Viskari, T., Verbeeck, H., Weng, E.S., Xu, C.G., Xu, X.T., Zhang, T., Moorcroft, P.R., 2018. Vegetation demographics in earth system models: a review of progress and priorities. Glob. Change Biol. 24 (1), 35-54. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13910.

[23]

Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C.S., 2004. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 557-581. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711.

[24]

Han, Q.G., Liu, B., Liu, Y.N., Zhang, J.L., Ding, Y.X., Peng, S.Z., 2025. Rooting depth projections of global plant functional types and driving factors analysis based on a hybrid modeling framework. Ecol. Indic. 176, 113674. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113674.

[25]

Han, Q.G., Peng, S., 2021. Spatial pattern and habitat suitability of potential natural vegetation in the Loess Plateau. J. Soil Water Conserv. 35 (5), 188-193. doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.05.026, (in Chinese).

[26]

Han, Q.G., Ding, Y.X., Peng, S.Z., 2021. Sustainable and cost-effective vegetation restoration framework under climate change. For. Ecol. Manage. 496, 119436. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119436.

[27]

Hansen, J., Sato, M., 2004. Greenhouse gas growth rates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (46), 16109-16114. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406982101.

[28]

Harris, I., Osborn, T.J., Jones, P., Lister, D., 2020. Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset. Sci. Data 7 (1), 109. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3.

[29]

He, X.Y., Ziegler, A.D., Elsen, P.R., Feng, Y., Baker, J.C.A., Liang, S.J., Holden, J., Spracklen, D.V., Zeng, Z.Z., 2023. Accelerating global mountain forest loss threatens biodiversity hotspots. One Earth 6 (3), 303-315. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.02.005.

[30]

Hengl, T., Mendes de Jesus, J., Heuvelink, G.B.M., Ruiperez Gonzalez, M., Kilibarda, M., Blagotić, A., Shangguan, W., Wright, M.N., Geng, X.Y., Bauer-Marschallinger, B., Guevara, M.A., Vargas, R., MacMillan, R.A., Batjes, N.H., Leenaars, J.G.B., Ribeiro, E., Wheeler, I., Mantel, S., Kempen, B., 2017. SoilGrids250m: global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS One 12 (2), e0169748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169748.

[31]

Hickler, T., Vohland, K., Feehan, J., Miller, P.A., Smith, B., Costa, L., Giesecke, T., Fronzek, S., Carter, T.R., Cramer, W., Kühn, I., Sykes, M.T., 2012. Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21 (1), 50-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00613.x.

[32]

Hilty, J.A., Keeley, A.T.H., Lidicker, W.Z., Merenlender, A.M., 2019. Corridor Ecology: Linking Landscapes for Biodiversity Conservation and Climate Adaptation, 2nd ed. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

[33]

Hirzel, A.H., Le Lay, G., 2008. Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory. J. Appl. Ecol. 45 (5), 1372-1381. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01524.x.

[34]

Hoek van Dijke, A.J., Herold, M., Mallick, K., Benedict, I., Machwitz, M., Schlerf, M., Pranindita, A., Theeuwen, J.J.E., Bastin, J.-F., Teuling, A.J., 2022. Shifts in regional water availability due to global tree restoration. Nat. Geosci. 15 (5), 363-368. doi: 10.1038/s41561-022-00935-0.

[35]

Hooper, D.U., Adair, E.C., Cardinale, B.J., Byrnes, J.E.K., Hungate, B.A., Matulich, K.L., Gonzalez, A., Duffy, J.E., Gamfeldt, L., O’Connor, M.I., 2012. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486 (7401), 105-108. doi: 10.1038/nature11118.

[36]

Hou, L., 2007. A study on the changes of physiological and biochemical indexes of sea buckthorn under drought stress. M.S. Thesis, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot (in Chinese).

[37]

Hou, X.. 1:1 million vegetation map of China. http://data.tpdc.ac.cn/.

[38]

Hurtt, G.C., Chini, L., Sahajpal, R., Frolking, S., Bodirsky, B.L., Calvin, K., Doelman, J.C., Fisk, J., Fujimori, S., Goldewijk, K.K., Hasegawa, T., Havlik, P., Heinimann, A., Humpenöder, F., Jungclaus, J., Kaplan, J.O., Kennedy, J., Krisztin, T., Lawrence, D., Lawrence, P., Ma, L., Mertz, O., Pongratz, J., Popp, A., Poulter, B., Riahi, K., Shevliakova, E., Stehfest, E., Thornton, P., Tubiello, F.N., van Vuuren, D.P., Zhang, X., 2020. Harmonization of global land use change and management for the period 850-2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 13 (11), 5425-5464. doi: 10.5194/gmd-13-5425-2020.

[39]

Jackson, R.B., Jobbágy, E.G., Avissar, R., Roy, S.B., Barrett, D.J., Cook, C.W., Farley, K.A., le Maitre, D.C., McCarl, B.A., Murray, B.C., 2005. Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration. Science 310 (5756), 1944-1947. doi: 10.1126/science.1119282.

[40]

Jin, H., 2005. Study on transpiration water consumption of four main afforestation shrubs in arid sandy areas of northwest China. M.S. Thesis, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou (in Chinese).

[41]

Keppel, G., van Niel, K.P., Wardell-Johnson, G.W., Yates, C.J., Byrne, M., Mucina, L., Schut, A.G.T., Hopper, S.D., Franklin, S.E., 2012. Refugia: identifying and understanding safe havens for biodiversity under climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21 (4), 393-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00686.x.

[42]

Kodero, J.M., Felzer, B.S., Shi, Y.N., 2024. Future transition from forests to shrublands and grasslands in the western United States is expected to reduce carbon storage. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 78. doi: 10.1038/s43247-024-01253-6.

[43]

Levis, S., Foley, J.A., Pollard, D., 1999. Potential high-latitude vegetation feedbacks on CO 2-induced climate change . Geophys. Res. Lett. 26 (6), 747-750. doi: 10.1029/1999gl900107.

[44]

Lindeskog, M., Arneth, A., Bondeau, A., Waha, K., Seaquist, J., Olin, S., Smith, B., 2013. Implications of accounting for land use in simulations of ecosystem carbon cycling in Africa. Earth Syst. Dynam. 4 (2), 385-407. doi: 10.5194/esd-4-385-2013.

[45]

Lu, F., Hu, H.F., Sun, W.J., Zhu, J.J., Liu, G.B., Zhou, W.M., Zhang, Q.F., Shi, P.L., Liu, X.P., Wu, X., Zhang, L., Wei, X.H., Dai, L.M., Zhang, K.R., Sun, Y.R., Xue, S., Zhang, W.J., Xiong, D.P., Deng, L., Liu, B.J., Zhou, L., Zhang, C., Zheng, X., Cao, J.S., Huang, Y., He, N.P., Zhou, G.Y., Bai, Y.F., Xie, Z.Q., Tang, Z.Y., Wu, B.F., Fang, J.Y., Liu, G.H., Yu, G.R., 2018. Effects of national ecological restoration projects on carbon sequestration in China from 2001 to 2010. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115 (16), 4039-4044. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700294115.

[46]

Merow, C., Smith, M.J., Silander, J.A., 2013. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 36 (10), 1058-1069. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x.

[47]

Mu, W., 2023. Response of leaf ecological stoichiometric characteristics of two dominant shrub species to altitude in qilian mountains. M.S. Thesis. Lanzhou University, Lanzhou (in Chinese).

[48]

Pant, G., Bhardwaj, S.K., Singh, R.K., 2021. Machine learning approaches for vegetation mapping in Himalayan ecosystems. Nat. Geosci. 14 (6), 456-461. doi: 10.1038/s41561-021-00750-x.

[49]

Pappas, C., Fatichi, S., Leuzinger, S., Wolf, A., Burlando, P., 2013. Sensitivity analysis of a process-based ecosystem model: pinpointing parameterization and structural issues. J. Geophys. Res-Biogeogr. 118 (2), 505-528. doi: 10.1002/jgrg.20035.

[50]

Paudel, B., Zhang, Y., Li, S., Wu, X., 2022. High-resolution vegetation classification using deep learning and multi-source remote sensing data. Glob. Change Biol. 28 (3), 1123-1135. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16068.

[51]

Pearson, R.G., Dawson, T.P., 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12 (5), 361-371. doi: 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00042.x.

[52]

Peng, S.Z., Li, Z., 2018. Incorporation of potential natural vegetation into revegetation programmes for sustainable land management. Land Degrad. Dev. 29 (10), 3503-3511. doi: 10.1002/ldr.3124.

[53]

Peng, S.Z., Terrer, C., Smith, B., Ciais, P., Han, Q.G., Nan, J.L., Fisher, J.B., Chen, L., Deng, L., Yu, K.L., 2024. Carbon restoration potential on global land under water resource constraints. Nat. Water 2 (11), 1-11. doi: 10.1038/S44221-024-00323-5.

[54]

Peng, S.Z., Ding, Y.X., Liu, W.Z., Li, Z., 2019. 1 km monthly temperature and precipitation dataset for China from 1901 to 2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11 (4), 1931-1946. doi: 10.5194/essd-11-1931-2019.

[55]

Peng, S.Z., Ding, Y.X., Wen, Z.M., Chen, Y.M., Cao, Y., Ren, J.Y., 2017. Spatiotemporal change and trend analysis of potential evapotranspiration over the Loess Plateau of China during 2011-2100. Agric. Forest. Meteorol. 233, 183-194. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.11.129.

[56]

Pugh, T.A.M., Lindeskog, M., Smith, B., Poulter, B., Arneth, A., Haverd, V., Calle, L., 2019. Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116 (10), 4382-4387. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810512116.

[57]

Rasp, S., Lerch, S., 2018. Neural networks for postprocessing ensemble weather forecasts. Mon. Weather Rev. 146 (11), 3885-3900. doi: 10.1175/Mwr-D-18-0187.1.

[58]

Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., Prabhat, 2019. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 566 (7743), 195-204. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1.

[59]

Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D.P., Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., O’Neill, B.C., Fujimori, S., Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Dellink, R., Fricko, O., Lutz, W., Popp, A., Cuaresma, J.C., Kc, S., Leimbach, M., Jiang, L.W., Kram, T., Rao, S., Emmerling, J., Ebi, K., Hasegawa, T., Havlik, P., Humpenöder, F., da Silva, L.A., Smith, S., Stehfest, E., Bosetti, V., Eom, J., Gernaat, D., Masui, T., Rogelj, J., Streffler, J., Drouet, L., Krey, V., Luderer, G., Harmsen, M., Takahashi, K., Baumstark, L., Doelman, J.C., Kainuma, M., Klimont, Z., Marangoni, G., Lotze-Campen, H., Obersteiner, M., Tabeau, A., Tavoni, M., 2017. The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153-168. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009.

[60]

Rosenzweig, C., Jones, J.W., Hatfield, J.L., Ruane, A.C., Boote, K.J., Thorburn, P., Antle, J.M., Nelson, G.C., Porter, C., Janssen, S., Asseng, S., Basso, B., Ewert, F., Wallach, D., Baigorria, G., Winter, J.M., 2013. The agricultural model intercomparison and improvement project (AgMIP): protocols and pilot studies. Agric. Forest. Meteorol. 170, 166-182. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.011.

[61]

Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J.A., Folke, C., Walker, B., 2001. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413 (6856), 591-596. doi: 10.1038/35098000.

[62]

Silva Dias, M.A., Avissar, R., Silva Dias, P., 2009. Modeling the regional and remote cimatic impact of deforestation. In: Keller, M., Bustamante, M., Gash, J., Silva Dias, P. (Eds.), Amazonia and Global Change. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., pp. 251-260.

[63]

Smith, B., Wårlind, D., Arneth, A., Hickler, T., Leadley, P., Siltberg, J., Zaehle, S., 2014. Implications of incorporating N cycling and N limitations on primary production in an individual-based dynamic vegetation model. Biogeosciences 11 (7), 2027-2054. doi: 10.5194/bg-11-2027-2014.

[64]

Somodi, I., Ewald, J., Bede-Fazekas, Á., Molnár, Z., 2021. The relevance of the concept of potential natural vegetation in the Anthropocene. Plant Ecol. Divers. 14 (1-2), 13-22. doi: 10.1080/17550874.2021.1984600.

[65]

Strassburg, B.B.N., Iribarrem, A., Beyer, H.L., Cordeiro, C.L., Crouzeilles, R., Jakovac, C.C., Braga Junqueira, A., Lacerda, E., Latawiec, A.E., Balmford, A., Brooks, T.M., Butchart, S.H.M., Chazdon, R.L., Erb, K.-H., Brancalion, P., Buchanan, G., Cooper, D., Díaz, S., Donald, P.F., Kapos, V., Leclère, D., Miles, L., Obersteiner, M., Plutzar, C., de, M., Scaramuzza, C.A., Scarano, F.R., Visconti, P., 2020. Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature 586 (7831), 724-729. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2784-9.

[66]

Su, Y., Chen, X., Liu, S., Liu, L., Peng, S., 2022. Spatialtemporal evolution of soil conservaton function of vegetation change on the Loess Plateau from 2001 to 2100. J. Soil Water Conserv. 36 (6), 55-62. doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.06.008, (in Chinese).

[67]

Suding, K., Higgs, E., Palmer, M., Callicott, J.B., Anderson, C.B., Baker, M., Gutrich, J.J., Hondula, K.L., LaFevor, M.C., Larson, B.M.H., Randall, A., Ruhl, J.B., Schwartz, K.Z.S., 2015. Committing to ecological restoration. Science 348 (6235), 638-640. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4216.

[68]

Terrer, C., Phillips, R.P., Hungate, B.A., Rosende, J., Pett-Ridge, J., Craig, M.E., van Groenigen, K.J., Keenan, T.F., Sulman, B.N., Stocker, B.D., Reich, P.B., Pellegrini, A.F.A., Pendall, E., Zhang, H., Evans, R.D., Carrillo, Y., Fisher, J.B., Van Sundert, K., Vicca, S., Jackson, R.B., 2021. A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO 2 . Nature 591 (7851), 599-603. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03306-8.

[69]

Török, K., Csecserits, A., Somodi, I., Kövendi-Jakó, A., Halász, K., Rédei, T., Halassy, M., 2018. Restoration prioritization for industrial area applying multiple potential natural vegetation modeling. Restor. Ecol. 26 (3), 476-488. doi: 10.1111/rec.12584.

[70]

Tuinenburg, O.A., Theeuwen, J.J.E., Staal, A., 2020. High-resolution global atmospheric moisture connections from evaporation to precipitation. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12 (4), 3177-3188. doi: 10.5194/essd-12-3177-2020.

[71]

Tüxen, R., 1956. Die heutige potentiell natürliche Vegetation als Gegenstand der Vegetationskartierung: mit 10 Tabellen. Ber. Dtsch. Landeskd. 13, 5-42.

[72]

Verdone, M., Seidl, A., 2017. Time, space, place, and the Bonn Challenge global forest restoration target. Restor. Ecol. 25 (6), 903-911. doi: 10.1111/rec.12512.

[73]

Volk, T., 2008. CO 2 Rising: The World’s Greatest Environmental Challenge . The MIT Press.

[74]

Wan, J., Zhang, H.Y., Wang, J.-N., Ge, C.Z., Gao, S.T., Rao, S., 2005. Policy evaluation and framework discussion of ecological compensation mechanism in China. Res. Environ. Sci. 18 (2), 1-8. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-6929.2005.02.001.

[75]

Wang, G.Y., Innes, J.L., Lei, J.F., Dai, S.Y., Wu, S.W., 2007. China’s forestry reforms. Science 318 (5856), 1556-1557. doi: 10.1126/science.1147247.

[76]

Wen, G.W., Huang, Q.L., Lv, Z.W., Lai, W.F., Shi, C.Y., Zhu, X.R., Jiang, T.Y., Zhang, G.F., 2023. Potential geographical distribution and ecological suitability of Schima superba under the situation of climate change. Acta Ecol. Sin. 43 (16), 6617-6626. doi: 10.5846/stxb202201130121, (in Chinese).

[77]

Williams, M., Dumroese, R., 2013. Preparing for climate change: forestry and assisted migration. J. For. 111 (4), 287-297. doi: 10.5849/jof.13-016.

[78]

WMO, 2017. WMO guidelines on the calculation of climate normals. WMO, Geneva, Switzerland.

[79]

Yang, J., Huang, X., 2021. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13 (8), 3907-3925. doi: 10.5194/essd-13-3907-2021.

[80]

Yue, C., Ciais, P., Houghton, R.A., Nassikas, A.A., 2020. Contribution of land use to the interannual variability of the land carbon cycle. Nat. Commun. 11, 3170. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16953-8.

[81]

Zhang, K., Dang, H., Tan, S., Cheng, X., Zhang, Q., 2010. Change in soil organic carbon following the ‘Grain-for-Green’ programme in China. Land Degrad. Dev. 21 (1), 13-23. doi: 10.1002/ldr.954.

[82]

Zhang, L., Sun, P.S., Huettmann, F., Liu, S.R., 2022. Where should China practice forestry in a warming world? Glob. Change Biol. 28 (7), 2461-2475. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16065.

[83]

Zhao, C.G., Guan, C., Yu, T.F., Wang, J.Z., Li, H.Y., Wang, X., Zhang, B.J., Kou, S.M., Liu, X.J., Zhao, C.M., 2025. Feasibility of planting shrubs in arid areas from a water balance perspective. J. Hydrol. 661, 133753. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133753.

[84]

Zhao, M., A, G., Zhang, J., Velicogna, I., Liang, C.Z., Li, Z.Y., 2021. Ecological restoration impact on total terrestrial water storage. Nat. Sustain. 4 (1), 56-62. doi: 10.1038/s41893-020-00600-7.

[85]

Zhou, Q., Wen, S.Z., He, G.X., Chen, X.L., Wu, F., 2020. Distribution characteristics of biomass and carbon storage of broad-leaved forest ecosystem in Hunan Province. J. Fujian For. Sci. Technol. 47 (3), 8-13, 50. doi: 10.13428/j.cnki.fjlk.2020.03.002, (in Chinese).

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/