Predicting the mangrove adaptability and resilience to sea level rise and quantifying anthropogenic exposures: A case study in Guangdong, China

Shanshan Liang , Shangke Su , Xinqing Zheng , Wenjia Hu , Guanqiong Ye , Bin Chen

Geography and Sustainability ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 100425

PDF
Geography and Sustainability ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) :100425 DOI: 10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100425
Research Article
research-article
Predicting the mangrove adaptability and resilience to sea level rise and quantifying anthropogenic exposures: A case study in Guangdong, China
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Mangrove forests possess the capacity to respond to sea level rise, which can be decomposed into adaptability and resilience. Adaptability is primarily measured by the suitable habitat area of mangroves following landward migration, while resilience refers to the ability of mature mangrove forests to maintain their original distribution and functions under sea level rise. However, existing research rarely distinguishes between adaptability and resilience, nor explicitly differentiates the impacts of anthropogenic pressures on these two aspects. This study developed an integrated framework using Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model (SLAMM) to predict mangrove adaptability and resilience under sea level rise scenarios and Geographical Detectors for Assessing Spatial Factors (GeoDetector) to assess their exposure to anthropogenic disturbances. The research focused on Guangdong Province, the largest mangrove area in China, and provided projections for 2070 under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios. The results suggest that under the combined effects of sea level rise and coastal land use, mangrove resilience would decline more markedly than adaptability. By 2070, suitable mangrove habitat is projected to decline to 49.73 %-72.01 % of the current extent, with only 31.26 %-68.67 % of the present mangrove area persisting as resilient mangroves. A significant portion of the lost mangroves would consist of highly diverse, mature mangrove communities. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of terrestrial anthropogenic pressures, primarily from aquaculture ponds and industrial centers, would exert differential impacts on mangrove responses. Aquaculture would mainly affect mangrove adaptability, while industrial development would primarily influence mangrove resilience. By 2070, 28.89 %-40.23 % of the suitable mangrove habitats would be subjected to high levels of anthropogenic pressure, compared to only 0.92 %-2.08 % of the resilient mangroves. The study’s findings suggest that enhancing mangrove adaptability and resilience in response to sea level rise will require differentiated approaches and measures. The proposed framework, which can be adapted to mangrove habitat studies in other regions with appropriate local datasets, provides practical tools for the adaptive management of mangrove ecosystems under global change.

Keywords

Sea level rise / Mangrove migration / Anthropogenic impact / SLAMM / GeoDetector

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shanshan Liang, Shangke Su, Xinqing Zheng, Wenjia Hu, Guanqiong Ye, Bin Chen. Predicting the mangrove adaptability and resilience to sea level rise and quantifying anthropogenic exposures: A case study in Guangdong, China. Geography and Sustainability, 2026, 7(2): 100425 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100425

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Shanshan Liang: Writing - original draft, Software, Methodology, Formal analysis. Shangke Su: Validation, Software, Data curation. Xinqing Zheng: Methodology, Investigation. Wenjia Hu: Writing - original draft, Supervision, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Guanqiong Ye: Supervision, Resources. Bin Chen: Supervision, Resources, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

This study was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFF0802204), Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Fujian (Grant No. 2024J02023), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42576260), the Scientific Research Foundation of the Third Institute of Oceanography, MNR (Grant No. 2025060), and Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. 2023C03119).

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100425.

References

[1]

Akram H., Hussain S., Mazumdar P., Chua K.O., Butt T.E., Harikrishna J.A., 2023. Mangrove health: a review of functions, threats, and challenges associated with mangrove management practices. Forests 14 (9), 1698. doi: 10.3390/f14091698.

[2]

Akumu C.E., Pathirana S., Baban S., Bucher D., 2011. Examining the potential impacts of sea level rise on coastal wetlands in north-eastern NSW, Australia. J. Coast. Conserv. 15 (1), 15-22. doi: 10.1007/s11852-010-0114-3.

[3]

Alongi D.M., 2015. The impact of climate change on mangrove forests. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 1 (1), 30-39. doi: 10.1007/s40641-015-0002-x.

[4]

Barbier E.B., 2006. Natural barriers to natural disasters: replanting mangroves after the tsunami. Front. Ecol. Environ. 4 (3), 124-131. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0124:NBTNDR]2.0.CO;2.

[5]

Blanco-Sacristán J., Johansen K., Duarte C.M., Daffonchio D., Hoteit I., McCabe M.F., 2022. Mangrove distribution and afforestation potential in the Red Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 843, 157098. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157098.

[6]

Brander L.M., Wagtendonk A.J., Hussain S.S., McVittie A., Verburg P.H., de Groot R.S., van der Ploeg S., 2012. Ecosystem service values for mangroves in Southeast Asia: a meta-analysis and value transfer application. Ecosyst. Serv. 1 (1), 62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.003.

[7]

Campbell A.D., Fatoyinbo L., Goldberg L., Lagomasino D., 2022. Global hotspots of salt marsh change and carbon emissions. Nature 612 (7941), 701-706. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05355-z.

[8]

Church J.A., Clark P.U., Cazanave A., Gregory J.M., Jevrejeva S., Levermann A., Merrifield M.A., Milne G.A., Nerem R.S., Nunn P.D., Payne A.J., Pfeffer W.T., Stammer D., Unnikrishnan A.S, 2013. Sea level change. In: Stocker T.F., Qin D., Plattner G.-K., Tignor M., Allen S.K., Boschung J., Nauels A., Xia Y., Bex V., Midgley P.M. ( Climate Change 2013:Eds.), The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

[9]

Clough J., Park R.A., Propato M., Polaczyk A., Brennan M., Behrens D., Battalio B., Fuller R., 2016a. SLAMM 6.7 technical documentation, version 6.7 Beta. Warren Pinnacle Consulting, Inc., USA.

[10]

Clough J., Polaczyk A., Propato M., 2016b. Modeling the potential effects of sea-level rise on the coast of New York: integrating mechanistic accretion and stochastic uncertainty. Environ. Model. Softw. 84, 349-362. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.06.023.

[11]

Dai Z.J., Long C.Q., Mei X.F., Xiong Y., 2024. Overestimation of mangroves deterioration from sea level rise in tropical deltas. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51 (19), e2024GL109675. doi: 10.1029/2024GL109675.

[12]

Dan X.Q., Liao B.W., Wu Z.B, Wu H.J., Bao D.M., Dan W.Y., Liu S.H., 2016. Resources, conservation status and main threats of mangrove wetlands in China. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 25 (7), 1237-1243. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2016.07.021, (in Chinese).

[13]

Dang A.T.N., Reid M., Kumar L., 2022. Assessing potential impacts of sea level rise on mangrove ecosystems in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Reg. Environ. Change 22 (2), 70. doi: 10.1007/s10113-022-01925-z.

[14]

Dangendorf S., Hay C., Calafat F.M., Marcos M., Piecuch C.G., Berk K., Jensen J., 2019. Persistent acceleration in global sea-level rise since the 1960s. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9 (9), 705-710. doi: 10.1038/s41558-019-0531-8.

[15]

Deng X.D., Liu Y., Gao F., Liao S.Y., Zhou F., Cai G.F., 2021. Spatial distribution and mechanism of urban occupation mixture in Guangzhou: an optimized GeoDetectorbased index to compare individual and interactive effects. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 10 (10), 659. doi: 10.3390/ijgi10100659.

[16]

Department of Marine Early Warning and Monitoring, 2022. Sea level rise bulletin. PRC (accessed 10 May 2023).

[17]

Di Nitto D., Neukermans G., Koedam N., Defever H., Pattyn F., Kairo J.G., Dahdouh- Guebas F., 2014. Mangroves facing climate change: landward migration potential in response to projected scenarios of sea level rise. Biogeosciences 11 (3), 857-871. doi: 10.5194/bg-11-857-2014.

[18]

Doyle T.W., Krauss K.W., Conner W.H., From A.S., 2010. Predicting the retreat and migration of tidal forests along the northern Gulf of Mexico under sea-level rise. For. Ecol. Manag. 259 (4), 770-777. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.023.

[19]

Duncan C., Owen H.J., Thompson J.R., Koldewey H.J., Primavera J.H., Pettorelli N., 2018. Satellite remote sensing to monitor mangrove forest resilience and resistance to sea level rise. Meth. Ecol. Evol. 9 (8), 1837-1852. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12923.

[20]

Durango-Cordero J.S., Satyanarayana B., Zhang J., Wang J., Chen M., Fanghong X., Chan J.C., Kangying L., Bogaert J., Koedam N., 2013. Vegetation structure at Zhanjiang Mangrove National Nature Reserve (ZMMNR), P.R. China: comparison between original and non-original trees using ground-truthing, remote sensing and GIS techniques. Meeting on Mangrove ecology, functioning and Management ( MMM3).

[21]

FAO, 2007. The world’s mangroves 1980-2005. FAO, Rome.

[22]

Feng Z.Y., Tan G.M., Xia J.Q., Shu C.W., Chen P., Wu M.W., Wu X.M., 2020. Dynamics of mangrove forests in Shenzhen Bay in response to natural and anthropogenic factors from 1988 to 2017. J. Hydrol. 591, 125271. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125271.

[23]

Friess D.A., 2017. Mangrove rehabilitation along urban coastlines: a Singapore case study. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 16, 279-289. doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2017.09.013.

[24]

Gilman E.L., Ellison J., Duke N.C., Field C., 2008. Threats to mangroves from climate change and adaptation options: a review. Aquat. Bot. 89 (2), 237-250. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.009.

[25]

Godoy M.D.P., de Andrade Meireles A.J., de Lacerda L.D., 2018. Mangrove response to land use change in estuaries along the semiarid coast of Ceará Brazil. J. Coast. Res. 34 (3), 524-533. doi: 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-16-00138.1.

[26]

Goldberg L., Lagomasino D., Thomas N., Fatoyinbo T., 2020. Global declines in human-driven mangrove loss. Glob. Change Biol. 26 (10), 5844-5855. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15275.

[27]

Guangdong Provincial Bureau of Statistics, 2021. Guangdong Population Census Yearbook (accessed 10 May 2023).

[28]

Haddou Y., Mancy R., Matthiopoulos J., Spatharis S., Dominoni D.M., 2022. Widespread extinction debts and colonization credits in United States breeding bird communities. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6 (3), 324-331. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01653-3.

[29]

Hamilton S., 2013. Assessing the role of commercial aquaculture in displacing mangrove forest. Bull. Mar. Sci. 89 (2), 585-601. doi: 10.5343/bms.2012.1069.

[30]

Hayashi S.N., Souza P.W.M., Nascimento W.R., Fernandes M.E.B., 2019. The effect of anthropogenic drivers on spatial patterns of mangrove land use on the Amazon coast. PLoS One 14 (6), e0217754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217754.

[31]

He Q., Silliman B.R., 2019. Climate change, human impacts, and coastal ecosystems in the Anthropocene. Curr. Biol. 29 (19), R1021-R1035. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.042.

[32]

Horstman E.M., Lundquist C.J., Bryan K.R., Bulmer R.H., Mullarney J.C., Stokes D.J., 2018. The dynamics of expanding mangroves in New Zealand. In: Makowski C., Finkl C. ( Threats to Mangrove Forests: Vulnerability, and Management.Eds.), Hazards, Springer, Cham, pp. 23-51. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-73016-5_2.

[33]

Hu L.J., Li W.Y., Xu B., 2018. Monitoring mangrove forest change in China from 1990 to 2015 using Landsat-derived spectral-temporal variability metrics. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 73, 88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2018.04.001.

[34]

Hu W., Zhou Q., Chen B., Yang S., Xiao J., Du J., Huang H., Yu W., Ma Z., 2021. Progress in marine habitat mapping: concept, methods, and applications. Biodivers. Sci. 29 (4), 531-544. doi: 10.17520/biods.2020176, (in Chinese).

[35]

IUCN, 2024. Red list of mangrove ecosystems ( accessed 10 June 2024).

[36]

Jia M.M., Liu M.Y., Wang Z.M., Mao D.H., Ren C.Y., Cui H.S., 2016. Evaluating the effectiveness of conservation on mangroves: a remote sensing-based comparison for two adjacent protected areas in Shenzhen and Hong Kong, China. Remote Sens. 8 (8), 627. doi: 10.3390/rs8080627.

[37]

Jiang Y.F., Li J., Xin R.R., Li Y., 2022a. Spatial-temporal dynamics of coastal aquaculture ponds and its impacts on mangrove ecosystems. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 46 (10), 1268. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0234 , (in Chinese).

[38]

Jiang B.Q., Li R.L., Shen X.X., Zhang Z., Zhang Y.Q., 2022b. Meta-analysis of mangrove salt-waterlogging tolerance and application strategies. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Pekin. 58 (4), 687-699. doi: 10.13209/j.0479-8023.2022.062, (in Chinese).

[39]

Kirwan M.L., Murray A.B., 2007. A coupled geomorphic and ecological model of tidal marsh evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (15), 6118-6122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700958104.

[40]

Kondolf G.M., Rubin Z.K., Minear J.T., 2014. Dams on the Mekong: cumulative sediment starvation. Water Resour. Res. 50 (6), 5158-5169. doi: 10.1002/2013WR014651.

[41]

Krauss K.W., Chambers J.L., Allen J.A., Soileau D.M., DeBosier A.S., 2000. Growth and nutrition of baldcypress families planted under varying salinity regimes in Louisiana, USA. J. Coast. Res. 16 (1), 153-163.

[42]

Kulp S., Strauss B.H., 2021. CoastalDEM v2.1: a high-accuracy and -resolution global coastal elevation model trained on ICESat-2 Lidar ( accessed 10 December 2023).

[43]

López-Angarita J., Roberts C.M., Tilley A., Hawkins J.P., Cooke R.G., 2016. Mangroves and people: lessons from a history of use and abuse in four Latin American countries. For. Ecol. Manage. 368, 151-162. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.020.

[44]

López-Medellín X., Ezcurra E., González-Abraham C., Hak J., Santiago L.S., Sickman J.O., 2011. Oceanographic anomalies and sea-level rise drive mangroves inland in the Pacific coast of Mexico. J. Veg. Sci. 22 (1), 143-151. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01232.x.

[45]

Leo K.L., Gillies C.L., Fitzsimons J.A., Hale L.Z., Beck M.W., 2019. Coastal habitat squeeze: a review of adaptation solutions for saltmarsh, mangrove and beach habitats. Ocean Coast. Manage. 175, 180-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.03.019.

[46]

Liang Y.T., Xu C.D., 2023. Knowledge diffusion of Geodetector: a perspective of the literature review and Geotree. Heliyon 9 (9), e19651. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19651.

[47]

Liang S., Hu W., Wu P., Wang J., Su S., Chen G., Du J., Liu W., Chen B., 2023. Prediction of the joint impacts of sea level rise and land development on distribution patterns of mangrove communities. For. Ecosyst. 10, 100100. doi: 10.1016/j.fecs.2023.100100.

[48]

Liang X.X., Dai Z.J., Mei X.F., Wang R.M., Zeng W.J., Fagherazzi S., 2025. Hurricanes induced irreversible large-scale loss of mangrove forests. Geophys. Res. Lett. 52 (9), e2025GL115692. doi: 10.1029/2025GL115692.

[49]

Liao B.W., Zhang Q.M., 2014. Area, distribution and species composition of mangroves in China. Wetl. Sci. 12 (4), 435-440. doi: 10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2014.04.005, (in Chinese).

[50]

Liu X., Liang X., Li X., Xu X., Ou J., Chen Y., Li S., Wang S., Pei F., 2017. A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects. Landsc. Urban Plan. 168, 94-116. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.019.

[51]

Livingstone T.C., Harris J., Lombard A., Smit A., Schoeman D., 2018. Classification of marine bioregions on the east coast of South Africa. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 40 (1), 51-65. doi: 10.2989/1814232X.2018.1438316.

[52]

Long X.R., Lin H., An X.X., Chen S.D., Qi S.Y., Zhang M., 2022. Evaluation and analysis of ecosystem service value based on land use/cover change in Dongting Lake wetland. Ecol. Indic. 136, 108619. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108619.

[53]

Long C.Q., Dai Z.J., Mei X.F., Liang X.X., Zhang X.W., Xi Y.Y., Wang R.M., Binh N.A., Van C.M., Cheng J.P., 2025. Machine learning-based detection of dynamic changes in mangrove forest, Beilun Estuary. Ocean Coast. Manage. 266, 107696. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107696.

[54]

Lovelock C.E., Cahoon D.R., Friess D.A., Guntenspergen G.R., Krauss K.W., Reef R., Rogers K., Saunders M.L., Sidik F., Swales A., Saintilan N., Thuyen L.X., Triet T., 2015. The vulnerability of Indo-Pacific mangrove forests to sea-level rise. Nature 526 (7574), 559-563. doi: 10.1038/nature15538.

[55]

Lu R.Q., 1997. Study on the modern crustal vertical movement in Guangdong coast. South China Jo. Seismol. 17 (1), 25-33. doi: 10.13512/j.hndz.1997.01.003 , (in Chinese).

[56]

Maina J.M., Bosire J.O., Kairo J.G., Bandeira S.O., Mangora M.M., Macamo C., Ralison H., Majambo G., 2021. Identifying global and local drivers of change in mangrove cover and the implications for management. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30 (10), 2057-2069. doi: 10.1111/geb.13368.

[57]

Mentaschi L., Vousdoukas M., Pekel J.-F., Voukouvalas E., Feyen L., 2018. Global long-term shoreline evolution. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC) Data. [Dataset], https://doi.org/10.2905/944f6d9b-2fbf-422e-ae3e-4b3aa391ed48. (accessed 10 December 2022).

[58]

Nguyen N.T.H., Friess D.A., Todd P.A., Mazor T., Lovelock C.E., Lowe R., Gilmour J., Chou L.M., Bhatia N., Jaafar Z., Tun K., Yaakub S.M., Huang D.W., 2022. Maximising resilience to sea-level rise in urban coastal ecosystems through systematic conservation planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 221, 104374. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104374.

[59]

Njiru D.M., Githaiga M.N., Nyaga J.M., Lang’at K.S., Kairo J.G., 2022. Geomorphic and climatic drivers are key determinants of structural variability of mangrove forests along the Kenyan Coast. Forests 13 (6), 870. doi: 10.3390/f13060870.

[60]

Parkinson R.W., Wdowinski S., 2022. Accelerating sea-level rise and the fate of mangrove plant communities in South Florida, U.S.A. Geomorphology 412, 108329. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108329.

[61]

Paulson Institute, 2020. Research report on mangrove protection and restoration strategy in China ( accessed 22 October 2022).

[62]

Payo A., Mukhopadhyay A., Hazra S., Ghosh T., Ghosh S., Brown S., Nicholls R.J., Bricheno L., Wolf J., Kay S., Lazar A.N., Haque A., 2016. Projected changes in area of the Sundarban mangrove forest in Bangladesh due to SLR by 2100. Clim. Change 139 (2), 279-291. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1769-z.

[63]

Peng Y., Zheng M., Zheng Z., Wu G., Chen Y., Xu H., Tian G., Peng S., Chen G., Lee S.Y., 2016. Virtual increase or latent loss? A reassessment of mangrove populations and their conservation in Guangdong, Southern China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 109 (2), 691-699. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.083.

[64]

Qin G.M., Zhang J.F., Zhou J.G., Lu Z., Wang F.M., 2023. Soil carbon stock and potential carbon storage in the mangrove forests of Guangdong. Trop. Geogr. 43 (1), 23-30. doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003606 , (in Chinese).

[65]

Raw J.L., Riddin T., Wasserman J., Lehman T.W.K., Bornman T.G., Adams J.B., 2020. Salt marsh elevation and responses to future sea-level rise in the Knysna Estuary, South Africa. Afr. J. Aquat. Sci. 45 (1-2), 49-64. doi: 10.2989/16085914.2019.1662763.

[66]

Richards D.R., Friess D.A., 2016. Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000-2012. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113 (2), 344-349. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510272113.

[67]

Saintilan N., Khan N.S., Ashe E., Kelleway J.J., Rogers K., Woodroffe C.D., Horton B.P., 2020. Thresholds of mangrove survival under rapid sea level rise. Science 368 (6495), 1118-1121. doi: 10.1126/science.aba2656.

[68]

Sannigrahi S., Zhang Q., Pilla F., Joshi P.K., Basu B., Keesstra S., Roy P.S., Wang Y., Sutton P.C., Chakraborti S., Paul S.K., Sen S., 2020. Responses of ecosystem services to natural and anthropogenic forcings: a spatial regression based assessment in the world’s largest mangrove ecosystem. Sci. Total Environ. 715, 137004. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137004.

[69]

Sayre R., Noble S., Hamann S., Smith R., Wright D., Breyer S., Butler K., Graafeiland K Van, Frye C., Karagulle D., Hopkins D., Stephens D., Kelly K., basher Z., Burton D., Cress J., Atkins K., van Sistine D., Friesen B., Allee B., Allen T., Aniello P., Asaad I., Costello M., Goodin K., Harris P., Kavanaugh M., Lillis H., Manca E., Muller-Karger F., Nyberg B., Parsons R., Saarinen J., Steiner J., Reed A., 2019. A new 30 meter resolution global shoreline vector and associated global islands database for the development of standardized global ecological coastal units. J. Oper. Oceanogr. 12 (suppl 2), S47-S56. doi: 10.1080/1755876X.2018.1529714.

[70]

Sayre R., Butler K., VanGraafeiland K., Breyer S., Wright D., Frye C., Karagulle D., Martin M., Cress J., Allen T., Allee R., Parsons R., Nyberg B., Costello M., Muller-Karger F., Harris P., 2021. Earth’s coastlines. In: Wright D., Harder C. ( GIS for Science:Eds.), Maps for Saving the Planet. Esri Press, Redlands, California.

[71]

Schleupner C., 2008. Evaluation of coastal squeeze and its consequences for the Caribbean island Martinique. Ocean Coast. Manage. 51 (5), 383-390. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2008.01.008.

[72]

Schuerch M., Spencer T., Temmerman S., Kirwan M.L., Wolff C., Lincke D., McOwen C.J., Pickering M.D., Reef R., Vafeidis A.T., Hinkel J., Nicholls R.J., Brown S., 2018. Future response of global coastal wetlands to sea-level rise. Nature 561 (7722), 231-234. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0476-5.

[73]

Semeniuk V., Cresswell I.D., 2018. Australian mangroves:anthropogenic impacts by industry, agriculture, ports, and urbanisation. In: Makowski C., Finkl C. ( Threats to Mangrove Forests: Vulnerability, and Management.Eds.), Hazards, Springer, Cham, pp. 173-197. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-73016-5_9.

[74]

Sharma D., Rao K., Ramanathan A., 2021. A systematic review on the impact of urbanization and industrialization on Indian coastal mangrove ecosystem. In: Madhav S., Nazneen S., Singh P. ( Coastal Ecosystems:Eds.), Environmental Importance, Current Challenges and Conservation Measures. Springer, Cham, pp. 175-199. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-84255-0_8.

[75]

Song Y., Wang J., Ge Y., Xu C., 2020. An optimal parameters-based geographical detector model enhances geographic characteristics of explanatory variables for spatial heterogeneity analysis: cases with different types of spatial data. GISci. Remote Sens. 57 (5), 593-610. doi: 10.1080/15481603.2020.1760434.

[76]

Tang D.B., Xin C.L, Chen N., Liu X.J, Zhang L., 2023. Mangrove forest fragmentation and its ecological service value in Tongming Sea of Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China during 2000-2018. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 34 (2), 415-422. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202302.022, (in Chinese).

[77]

Tengku Hashim T.M.Z., Engku Ariff E.A.R., Suratman M.N., 2021. Aquaculture in mangroves. In: Rastogi R.P., Phulwaria M., Gupta D.K. ( Mangroves:Eds.), Ecology, Biodiversity and Management. Springer, Singapore, pp. 419-438. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-2494-0_18.

[78]

Veettil B.K., Wickramasinghe D., Amarakoon V., 2023. Mangrove forests in Sri Lanka: an updated review on distribution, diversity, current state of research and future perspectives. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 62, 102932. doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2023.102932.

[79]

Vousdoukas M., Mentaschi L., Voukouvalas E., Verlaan M., Jevrejeva S., Jackson L., Feyen L., 2018. Global extreme sea level projections. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC) Data. [Dataset], https://doi.org/10.2905/jrc-liscoast-10012. (accessed 10 December 2022).

[80]

Wang W.Q., Wang M., 2007. The Mangroves of China. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).

[81]

Wang J.F., Xu C.D., 2017. Geodetector: principle and prospective. Acta Geogr. Sin. 72 (1), 116-134. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010, (in Chinese).

[82]

Wang Y.Y., Chao B.X., Dong P., Zhang D.A., Yu W.W., Hu W.J., Ma Z.Y., Chen G.C., Liu Z.H., Chen B., 2021. Simulating spatial change of mangrove habitat under the impact of coastal land use: coupling MaxEnt and Dyna-CLUE models. Sci. Total Environ. 788, 147914. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147914.

[83]

Wilkie M.L., Fortuna S., 2003. Status and trends in mangrove area extent worldwide. Forest Resources Assessment Working Paper No. 63. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

[84]

Woodroffe C.D., Rogers K., McKee K.L., Lovelock C.E., Mendelssohn I.A., Saintilan N., 2016. Mangrove sedimentation and response to relative sea-level rise. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 8, 243-266. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-122414-034025.

[85]

Worthington T., Bunting P., Cormier N., Donnison A., Fatoyinbo L., Friess D.A., Hengl T., Hilarides L., Krauss K.W., Lagomasino D., Leinenkugel P., Longley-Wood K., Lovelock C.E., Lucas R.M., Murray N., Narayan S., Sutherland W.J., Ermgassen P.S., Spalding M., 2018. Mangrove restoration potential: a global map highlighting a critical opportunity. The 5th international Mangrove Macrobenthos and Management meeting ( MMM5). doi:10.17863/CAM.39153.

[86]

Wu R.J., Dai Z.J., Mei X.F., Luo J.J., Fagherazzi S., 2025. Profiling of mangrove forest dynamics in the Fly River delta, Papua New Guinea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 217, 118119. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118119.

[87]

Xia P., Meng X.W., Feng A.P., Li Z., Yang G., 2015. Sediment compaction rates in mangrove swamps of Guangxi and its mangrove migration response to sea-level rise. Acta Sedimentol. Sin. 33 (3), 551-560. doi: 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2015.03.013, (in Chinese).

[88]

Xie D.H., Schwarz C., Brückner M.Z.M., Kleinhans M.G., Urrego D.H., Zhou Z., van Maanen B., 2020. Mangrove diversity loss under sea-level rise triggered by biomorphodynamic feedbacks and anthropogenic pressures. Environ. Res. Lett. 15 (11), 114033. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abc122.

[89]

Xiong Y.M., Jiang Z.M., Xin K., Liao B.W., Chen Y.J., Li M., Guo H., Xu Y.Z., Zhai X., Zhang C.L., 2021. Factors influencing mangrove forest recruitment in rehabilitated aquaculture ponds. Ecol. Eng. 168, 106272. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106272.

[90]

Xu D.H., Zhang K., Cao L.H., Guan X.R., Zhang H.B., 2022. Driving forces and prediction of urban land use change based on the geodetector and CA-Markov model: a case study of Zhengzhou, China. Int. J. Digit. Earth 15 (1), 2246-2267. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2022.2147229.

[91]

Xu X.L., 2017. The spatial distribution of China’s GDP in kilometers grid dataset. [Dataset]. https://www.resdc.cn/DOI/DOI.aspx?DOIID = 33. (accessed 15 November 2023).

[92]

Yang J.Z., Hu Y.H., Luo Y., Xue C.Q., 2018. Study on the distribution and dynamic change of mangrove in Guangdong. For. Environ. Sci. 34 (5), 24-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2018.05.005, (in Chinese).

[93]

Zhai L., Zhang B., Roy S.S., Fuller D.O., da Silveira Lobo Sternberg L., 2019. Remote sensing of unhelpful resilience to sea level rise caused by mangrove expansion: a case study of islands in Florida Bay, USA. Ecol. Indic. 97, 51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.063.

[94]

Zhang X., Liu L., Chen X., Gao Y., Xie S., Mi J., 2021. GLC_FCS30: global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30 m using time-series Landsat imagery. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13 (6), 2753-2776. doi: 10.5194/essd-13-2753-2021.

[95]

Zhang Q.M., Sui S.Z., 2001. The mangrove wetland resources and their conservation in China. J. Nat. Resour. 16 (1), 28-36. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2001.01.005 , (in Chinese).

[96]

Zhang X., Liu L.Y., Chen X.D., Xie S., Gao Y., 2019. Fine land-cover mapping in China using Landsat datacube and an operational SPECLib-based approach. Remote Sens. 11 (9), 1056. doi:10.3390/rs11091056.

[97]

Zhang X., Liu L.Y., Wu C.S., Chen X.D., Gao Y., Xie S., Zhang B., 2020a. Development of a global 30 m impervious surface map using multisource and multitemporal remote sensing datasets with the google earth engine platform. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12 (3), 1625-1648. doi: 10.5194/essd-12-1625-2020.

[98]

Zhang Y.Y., Yang Y.J., Chen Z.X., Zhang S.L., 2020b. Multi-criteria assessment of the resilience of ecological function areas in China with a focus on ecological restoration. Ecol. Indic. 119, 106862. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106862.

[99]

Zhang Z., Xu N., Li Y.F., Li Y., 2022. Sub-continental-scale mapping of tidal wetland composition for East Asia: a novel algorithm integrating satellite tide-level and phenological features. Remote Sens. Environ. 269, 112799. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112799.

[100]

Zheng C.X., Yang W.C., Jiang X.L., Lian J.J., Hu D., Yan X., Yan L., 2024. A novel integrated Urban flood risk assessment approach coupling GeoDetector-Dematel and clustering method. J. Environ. Manage. 354, 120308. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120308.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/