Evaluating the accessibility and equity of basic educational facilities in China during the poverty alleviation and elimination campaign (2015-2021)

Yichen Yang , Qiang Wang , Xiaoliang Dai , Shu Wang , Shifeng Fang , Yunqiang Zhu

Geography and Sustainability ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 100422

PDF
Geography and Sustainability ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) :100422 DOI: 10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100422
Research Article
research-article
Evaluating the accessibility and equity of basic educational facilities in China during the poverty alleviation and elimination campaign (2015-2021)
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

China’s poverty alleviation and elimination campaign (PAEC, 2015-2021) aimed to eliminate absolute poverty and reduce social inequality, making improvements in the accessibility and equity of basic educational facilities a key component. However, existing research on the accessibility of educational facilities in China has predominantly focused on developed urban areas or specific regions, lacking nationwide spatiotemporal assessments. To address this gap, this study systematically evaluates the accessibility and equity of basic educational facilities (kindergartens, primary, and secondary schools) across mainland of China during the PAEC. Travel time cost, derived using multi-source geospatial datasets and the nearest neighbor method, was adopted as the primary indicator for assessing educational accessibility and equity. The results revealed pronounced disparities in accessibility between Eastern and Western China. Overall, both the accessibility and equity of basic educational facilities improved substantially during the campaign, with the average travel time per person reducing by approximately 50 %. Notably, the rate of improvement in impoverished regions was nearly double that observed in non-impoverished areas. Although widespread improvements in educational equity have occurred, the urban-rural disparity persists as a primary barrier to achieving comprehensive educational fairness. This study offers empirical evidence and methodological innovations for optimizing educational resource allocation and provides high-resolution temporal data to support the monitoring and evaluation of progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in education.

Keywords

Basic educational facility accessibility / Educational equity / Poverty alleviation and elimination campaign / Spatiotemporal dynamics / Regional disparities / Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yichen Yang, Qiang Wang, Xiaoliang Dai, Shu Wang, Shifeng Fang, Yunqiang Zhu. Evaluating the accessibility and equity of basic educational facilities in China during the poverty alleviation and elimination campaign (2015-2021). Geography and Sustainability, 2026, 7(2): 100422 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100422

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Data availability

The code related to this article and method has been uploaded to GitHub (https://github.com/YYCCY7/educationAccessibility). The data has uploaded to Figshare repository (https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/education_Accessibility/29180180).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yichen Yang: Writing - original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Qiang Wang: Writing - review & editing, Software, Methodology. Xiaoliang Dai: Writing - review & editing, Visualization. Shu Wang: Writing - review & editing, Supervision. Shifeng Fang: Writing - review & editing, Supervision. Yunqiang Zhu: Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB0740000); and the Key Project of Innovation LREIS (Grant No. KPI009).

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100422.

References

[1]

Appels L., De Maeyer S., Faddar J., Van Petegem P., 2023. Unpacking equity. Educational equity in secondary analyses of international large-scale assessments: a systematic review. Educ. Res. Rev. 38, 100494. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100494.

[2]

Børrestad L.A.B., Andersen L.B., Bere E., 2011. Seasonal and sociodemographic determinants of school commuting. Prev. Med. 52 (2), 133-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.12.006.

[3]

Cao W.R., Shakya P., Karmacharya B., Xu D.R., Hao Y.T., Lai Y.S., 2021. Equity of geographical access to public health facilities in Nepal. BMJ Glob. Health 6 (10), e006786. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006786.

[4]

Chen X., Pei T., Song C., Shu H., Guo S.H., Wang X., Liu Y.X., Chen J., Zhou C.H., 2022. Accessing public transportation service coverage by walking accessibility to public transportation under flow buffering. Cities 125, 103646. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103646.

[5]

Cheng L., Chen Y.H., He S.Y., Wang Z.Y., Jin T.H., Yang M., 2025. Comparing accessibility to high-speed rail stations by public transit and cars: a national-scale analysis. J. Transp. Geogr. 123, 104105. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104105.

[6]

Colbert J., Chuang I.T., Sila-Nowicka K., 2024. Measuring spatial inequality of urban park accessibility and utilisation: a case study of public housing developments in Auckland, New Zealand. Landsc. Urban Plan. 247, 105070. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105070.

[7]

Cui X.J., Ma L.B., Tao T.M., Zhang W.B., 2022. Do the supply of and demand for rural public service facilities match? Assessment based on the perspective of rural residents. Sust. Cities Soc. 82, 103905. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103905.

[8]

Deng Y., Luo A., Liu J.P., Wang Y., 2019. Point of interest matching between different geospatial datasets. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 8 (10), 435. doi: 10.3390/ijgi8100435.

[9]

Gao Y., He Q.S., Liu Y.L., Zhang L.Y., Wang H.F., Cai E.X., 2016. Imbalance in spatial accessibility to primary and secondary schools in China: guidance for education sustainability. Sustainability 8 (12), 1236. doi: 10.3390/su8121236.

[10]

Geurs K.T., De Montis A., Reggiani A., 2015. Recent advances and applications in accessibility modelling. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 49, 82-85. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.09.003.

[11]

Guo C.M., Zhou W.Q., Jing C.B., Zhaxi D.W., 2024. Mapping and measuring urbanrural inequalities in accessibility to social infrastructures. Geogr. Sustain. 5 (1), 41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2023.11.004.

[12]

Guo Y.Z., Zhou Y., Liu Y.S., 2020. The inequality of educational resources and its countermeasures for rural revitalization in southwest China. J. Mt. Sci. 17 (2), 304-315. doi: 10.1007/s11629-019-5664-8.

[13]

Han Z.G., Cui C.H., Kong Y.F., Li Q., Chen Y.H., Chen X., 2023. Improving educational equity by maximizing service coverage in rural Changyuan, China: an evaluationoptimization- validation framework based on spatial accessibility to schools. Appl. Geogr. 152, 102891. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102891.

[14]

Handy S., 2020. Is accessibility an idea whose time has finally come? Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 83, 102319. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102319.

[15]

Hasan S., Wang X.M., Khoo Y.B., Foliente G., 2017. Accessibility and socio-economic development of human settlements. PLoS One 12 (6), e0179620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179620.

[16]

He G., Huang Q.S., 2021. Geospatial analysis and research on social and spatial inequality of compulsory education: a case study of Hangzhou, China. Complexity 2021 (1), 6265751. doi: 10.1155/2021/6265751.

[17]

Hu H.Y., 1935. The distribution of population in China, with statistics and maps. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2 (2), 33-74. doi: 10.11821/xb193502002,. (in Chinese).

[18]

Hu H.Y., Wang L.J., Chen Y.L., Zhao P.J., 2024. Accessibility and its spatial equity of basic education in China. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 44 (9), 1513-1523. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.20230238, (in Chinese).

[19]

Hu S., Zhao R.T., Cui Y.X., Zhang D., Ge Y., 2023. Identifying the uneven distribution of health and education services in China using open geospatial data. Geogr. Sustain. 4 (2), 91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2023.01.002.

[20]

Huang C.L., Feng Y.Y., Wei Y., Sun D.N., Li X.H., Zhong F.L., 2024. Assessing regional public service facility accessibility using multisource geospatial data: a case study of underdeveloped areas in China. Remote Sens. 16 (2), 409. doi: 10.3390/rs16020409.

[21]

Jiang L.L., Niu H.W., Ru Y.F., Tong A.H., Wang Y.F., 2023. Can carbon finance promote high quality economic development: evidence from China. Heliyon 9 (12), e22698. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22698.

[22]

Jin J.R., 2019. From capital gap to field separation: a study of the family support gap in urban and rural education. Educ. Sci. 35 (1), 1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8064.2019.01.001,. (in Chinese).

[23]

Kelobonye K., Zhou H., McCarney G., Xia J.H.C., 2020. Measuring the accessibility and spatial equity of urban services under competition using the cumulative opportunities measure. J. Transp. Geogr. 85, 102706. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102706.

[24]

Kong X.S., Fu M.X., Zhao X., Wang J., Jiang P., 2022. Ecological effects of land-use change on two sides of the Hu Huanyong Line in China. Land Use Policy 113, 105895. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105895.

[25]

la Velle L., 2023. The role of initial and continuing professional education in recruitment and retention of teachers: the importance of a basis of social justice. J. Educ. Teach. 49 (2), 177-179. doi: 10.1080/02607476.2023.2191470.

[26]

Lanza G., Pucci P., Carboni L., 2023. Measuring accessibility by proximity for an inclusive city. Cities 143, 104581. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104581.

[27]

Li C.M., Liu L., Dai Z.X., Liu X.L., 2020. Different sourcing point of interest matching method considering multiple constraints. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9 (4), 214. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9040214.

[28]

Liu Q.Q., Yu M., Wang X.L., 2015. Poverty reduction within the framework of SDGs and Post-2015 Development Agenda. Adv. Clim. Chang. Res. 6 (1), 67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.accre.2015.09.004.

[29]

Mouratidis K., 2024. Time to challenge the 15-minute city: seven pitfalls for sustainability, equity, livability, and spatial analysis. Cities 153, 105274. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105274.

[30]

Mu H.W., Li X.C., Wen Y.N., Huang J.X., Du P.J., Su W., Miao S.X., Geng M.Q., 2022. A global record of annual terrestrial Human Footprint dataset from 2000 to 2018. Sci. Data 9 (1), 176. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01284-8.

[31]

Nong H.F., Zhang Q., Zhu H.J., Zhu R., 2022. Targeted poverty alleviation and children’s academic performance in China. Rev. Income Wealth. 68 (4), 951-969. doi: 10.1111/roiw.12517.

[32]

Pan Y., Shi K., Zhao Z.X., Li Y., Wu J.X., 2024. The effects of China’s poverty eradication program on sustainability and inequality. Hum. Soc. Sci. Commun. 11 (1), 119. doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-02631-3.

[33]

Papadopoulos E., Sdoukopoulos A., Politis I., 2023. Measuring compliance with the 15- minute city concept: state-of-the-art, major components and further requirements. Sust. Cities Soc. 99, 104875. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104875.

[34]

Qin X., Zou H., Wang L., Shang W.L., 2021. Changing regional inequality patterns in western China: a case study of Xinjiang. Complexity 2021 (1), 9160354. doi: 10.1155/2021/9160354.

[35]

Schiavina M., Melchiorri M., Pesaresi M., Politis P., Freire S., Maffenini L., Florio P., Ehrlich D., Goch K., Tommasi P., 2022. GHSL data package 2022. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

[36]

Sharma G., Patil G.R., 2022. Spatial and social inequities for educational services accessibility —a case study for schools in Greater Mumbai. Cities 122, 103543. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103543.

[37]

Shulla K., Filho W.L., Lardjane S., Sommer J.H., Borgemeister C., 2020. Sustainable development education in the context of the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 27 (5), 458-468. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2020.1721378.

[38]

Sims K., Reith A., Bright E., Kaufman J., Pyle J., Epting J., Gonzales J., Adams D., Powell E., Urban M., Rose A., 2023. LandScan Global 2022, 2022 ed. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN Dataset.

[39]

St ępniak M., Pritchard J.P., Geurs K.T., Goliszek S., 2019. The impact of temporal resolution on public transport accessibility measurement: review and case study in Poland. J. Transp. Geogr. 75, 8-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.01.007.

[40]

Tang P., Xiang J., Luo J., Chen G., 2017. Spatial accessibility analysis of primary schools at the county level based on the improved potential model: a case study of Xiantao City, Hubei Province. Prog. Geogr. 36 (6), 697-708. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.06.005,. (in Chinese).

[41]

Vecchio G., Martens K., 2021. Accessibility and the Capabilities Approach: a review of the literature and proposal for conceptual advancements. Transp. Rev. 41 (6), 833-854. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2021.1931551.

[42]

Wan J.J., Sun H.Y., Fan X.R., Phillips A., Zhao Y.T., Chen Y.T., Wang Z.M., Xiao H., Dong X.Y., Zhu W., 2024. Refining the 15-minute community living circle: an innovative evaluation method for medical facility allocation in Chengdu. Land Use Policy 145, 107286. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107286.

[43]

Wei H.K., Wu G.B., Tan X.W., 2022. Targeted poverty alleviation:China’s road of poverty reduction toward common prosperity. In: Wei H., Wang L. ( Poverty reduction in China.Eds.), International research on poverty reduction. Springer Nature, Singapore, Singapore, pp. 1-35. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-5994-3_1.

[44]

Weiss D.J., Nelson A., Gibson H.S., Temperley W., Peedell S., Lieber A., Hancher M., Poyart E., Belchior S., Fullman N., Mappin B., Dalrymple U., Rozier J., Lucas T.C.D., Howes R.E., Tusting L.S., Kang S.Y., Cameron E., Bisanzio D., Battle K.E., Bhatt S., Gething P.W., 2018. A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015. Nature 553 (7688), 333-336. doi: 10.1038/nature25181.

[45]

Xu R.H., Yue W.Z., Wei F.Y., Yang G.F., Chen Y., Pan K.X., 2022. Inequality of public facilities between urban and rural areas and its driving factors in ten cities of China. Sci. Rep. 12 (1), 13244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17569-2.

[46]

Xue E.Y., Zhou X.P., 2018. Education and anti-poverty: Policy theory and strategy of poverty alleviation through education in China. Educ. Philos. Theory 50 (12), 1101-1112. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2018.1438889.

[47]

Yang J., Huang X., 2021. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13 (8), 3907-3925. doi: 10.5194/essd-13-3907-2021.

[48]

Yang Y.P., Guo X.D., 2020. Universal basic education and the vulnerability to poverty: evidence from compulsory education in rural China. J. Asia. Pac. Econ. 25 (4), 611-633. doi: 10.1080/13547860.2019.1699495.

[49]

Ye P., Ye Z.Q., Xia J.Z., Zhong L., Zhang M., Lv L., Tu W., Yue Y., Li Q.Q., 2024. National-scale 1-km maps of hospital travel time and hospital accessibility in China. Sci. Data 11 (1), 1130. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03981-y.

[50]

Zhang L., 2020. A new landscape for basic education entering a stage of high-quality development. China Education Newspaper (accessed 10 March 2025). (in Chinese)

[51]

Zhu J., Liu S.Y., Li Y.H., 2021. Removing the “Hats of Poverty ”: effects of ending the national poverty county program on fiscal expenditures. China Econ. Rev. 69, 101673. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101673.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/