Detecting farmland green production efficiency considering Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the Yellow River Basin: Dynamics, drivers, and challenges

Chaoqing Chai , Yuanyuan Li , Ronghao Wen , Hui Zhang , Bangbang Zhang , Peixue Xing , Ying Sun , Huadong Zhu , Guanghui Hou , Haoyang Wang , Wenhao Niu , Weiwei Zheng , Xiangbin Kong

Geography and Sustainability ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 100418

PDF
Geography and Sustainability ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) :100418 DOI: 10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100418
Research Article
research-article
Detecting farmland green production efficiency considering Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the Yellow River Basin: Dynamics, drivers, and challenges
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Pursuing sustainable growth of Farmland Green Production Efficiency (FGPE) is crucial for achieving multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG13 (Climate Action), and SDG 15 (Life on Land) in ecologically fragile basins. However, the dynamics, drivers, and challenges of FGPE remain underexplored within the SDGs framework, especially at finer spatial scale and across coupled “society-economy-policy-climate” (SEPC) drivers. This study develops an FGPE assessment framework through SDGs lens, utilizing “elements-processes-functions-drivers” paradigm and data from 447 counties in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) from 2000 to 2022. We apply super-efficiency Slacks-Based Measure and Malmquist-Luenberger (SBM-ML), spatial correlation analysis, and geographically and temporally weighted regression models to assess FGPE growth challenges. Results reveal a “U-shaped” trend in the number of high-FGPE counties, with a rapid increase after 2016. Specifically, FGPE across the YRB increased by 97.6 % from 2000 to 2022, though spatial correlation declined by 44.7 %, indicating weakening spatial spillover effect. Despite the overall progress, the YRB still faces multiple challenges, including uneven regional development, weakening spatial correlation, climate sensitivity, economic structural shift, and weak policy effect. The findings highlight that FGPE improvement align with key SDGs targets, including enhancing food security (SDG 2), promoting sustainable production (SDG 12), increasing climate resilience (SDG 13), and conserving land ecosystems (SDG 15). Region-specific strategies are recommended: enhancing climate resilience and ecological conservation in the upper reaches, promoting technological diffusion via urban-industrial transformation in the middle reaches, and advancing green agricultural technologies with more local financial support in the lower reaches.

Keywords

Farmland Green Production Efficiency (FGPE) / Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) / Spatial-temporal evolution dynamics / Society-economy-policy-climate (SEPC) coupled drivers / Key challenges / Yellow River Basin (YRB)

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chaoqing Chai, Yuanyuan Li, Ronghao Wen, Hui Zhang, Bangbang Zhang, Peixue Xing, Ying Sun, Huadong Zhu, Guanghui Hou, Haoyang Wang, Wenhao Niu, Weiwei Zheng, Xiangbin Kong. Detecting farmland green production efficiency considering Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the Yellow River Basin: Dynamics, drivers, and challenges. Geography and Sustainability, 2026, 7(2): 100418 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100418

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Data availability statement

Data are available upon request from the authors.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Chaoqing Chai: Writing - review & editing, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Validation, Software, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Yuanyuan Li: Writing - review & editing, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Validation, Software, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Ronghao Wen: Software, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Hui Zhang: Writing - review & editing, Software, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Bangbang Zhang: Writing - review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Peixue Xing: Validation, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Ying Sun: Validation, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Huadong Zhu: Validation, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Guanghui Hou: Validation, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Haoyang Wang: Investigation, Data curation. Wenhao Niu: Investigation, Data curation. Weiwei Zheng: Funding acquisition. Xiangbin Kong: Resources, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 42171267 and 42201291), the Innovation Capability Support Program of Shaanxi in China - Youth Science and Technology Star Project (Grant No. 2024ZC-KJXX-052), the Social Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (Grant No. 2023R032), and the Northwest A&F University Doctoral Candidates’ Independent Innovation Research Project Funding (Grant No. 2025KYCXZ28).

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100418.

References

[1]

Chai Q., Nemecek T., Liang C., Zhao C., Yu A., Coulter J.A., Wang Y., Hu F., Wang L., Siddique K.H.M., Gan Y., 2021. Integrated farming with intercropping increases food production while reducing environmental footprint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2106382118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2106382118.

[2]

Chai C., Zhang B., Li Y., Niu W., Zheng W., Kong X., Yu Q., Zhao M., Xia X., 2023. A new multi-dimensional framework considering environmental impacts to assess green development level of cultivated land during 1990 to 2018 in China. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 98, 106927. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106927.

[3]

Chai C., Wen R., Zhu H., He Y., Xing P., Li Y., Sun Y., Liu Z., Wang H., Niu W., Zheng W., Hou G., Kong X., Zhang B., 2025. Assessing technology’s influence on cropland green production efficiency in the Yellow River basin, China. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 112, 107838. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107838.

[4]

Chai C., Zhu H., Wang H., Zhang H., Wen R., Li Y., Xing P., Niu W., Liu Z., Liu L., Kong X., Zhang B., 2026. Assessing the impact of farmland fragmentation on green productivity in Yellow River Basin: a “quantity-spatial ” scale effects perspective and EKC hypothesis test. Habitat Int. 167, 103653. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103653.

[5]

Chelli G., 2023. Stemming droughts in China’s Yellow River. Nat. Water 1, 488. doi: 10.1038/s44221-023-00101-9.

[6]

Chen P., Li J., 2024. Sustainable agricultural management: how to achieve carbon neutrality in agriculture —evidence from China agricultural sustainable development plan. Sustain. Dev. 32, 2846-2857. doi: 10.1002/sd.2821.

[7]

Chen Y., Miao J., Zhu Z., 2021. Measuring green total factor productivity of China’s agricultural sector: a three-stage SBM-DEA model with non-point source pollution and CO2 emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 318, 128543. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128543.

[8]

Chung Y.H., Färe R., Grosskopf S., 1997. Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J. Environ. Manage. 51, 229-240. doi: 10.1006/jema.1997.0146.

[9]

Coomes O.T., Barham B.L., MacDonald G.K., Ramankutty N., Chavas J.-P., 2019. Leveraging total factor productivity growth for sustainable and resilient farming. Nat. Sustain. 2, 22-28. doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0200-3.

[10]

Costanza R., d’Arge R., de Groot R., Farberl S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O’Neill R.O., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Suttonl P., van den Belt M., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0.

[11]

Cui S., Adamowski J.F., Wu M., Zhang P., Yue Q., Cao X., 2024. An integrated framework for improving green agricultural production sustainability in human-natural systems. Sci. Total Environ. 945, 174153. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174153.

[12]

Deng O., Wang S., Ran J., Huang S., Zhang X., Duan J., Zhang L., Xia Y., Reis S., Xu, Jiayu Xu, J.M., de Vries W., Sutton M.A., Gu B., 2024. Managing urban development could halve nitrogen pollution in China. Nat. Commun. 15, 401. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44685-y.

[13]

Donkor M., Kong Y., Manu E.K., 2024. Natural resource abundance, governance, and government expenditure: empirical insights from environmental sustainability. Sustain. Dev. 33 (1), 733-757. doi: 10.1002/sd.3116.

[14]

Duncan R., 2014. Regulating agricultural land use to manage water quality: the challenges for science and policy in enforcing limits on non-point source pollution in New Zealand. Land Use Policy 41, 378-387. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.003.

[15]

Feng G.H., Serletis A., 2014. Undesirable outputs and a primal Divisia productivity index based on the directional output distance function. J. Econom. 183, 135-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.06.014.

[16]

Feng S., Zhao W., Yan J., Xia F., Pereira P., 2024. Land degradation neutrality assessment and factors influencing it in China’s arid and semiarid regions. Sci. Total Environ. 925, 171735. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171735.

[17]

Fishman R., Giné X., Jacoby H.G., 2023. Efficient irrigation and water conservation: evidence from South India. J. Dev. Econ. 162, 103051. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103051.

[18]

Foley J.A., Ramankutty N., Brauman K.A., Cassidy E.S., Gerber J.S., Johnston M., Mueller N.D., O’Connell C., Ray D.K., West P.C., Balzer C., Bennett E.M., Carpenter S.R., Hill J., Monfreda C., Polasky S., Rockström J., Sheehan J., Siebert S., Tilman D., Zaks D.P.M., 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337-342. doi: 10.1038/nature10452.

[19]

Fu B., Wu X., Wang S., Zhao W., 2024. Scientific principles for accelerating the sustainable development goals. Geogr. Sustain. 5, 157-159. doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2024.01.005.

[20]

Garnett T., Appleby M.C., Balmford A., Bateman I.J., Benton T.G., Bloomer P., Burlingame B., Dawkins M., Dolan L., Fraser D., Herrero M., Hoffmann I., Smith P., Thornton P.K., Toulmin C., Vermeulen S.J., Godfray H.C.J., 2013. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies. Science 341, 33-34. doi: 10.1126/science.1234485.

[21]

Guo L., Song X., Wang Q., 2024. Simulation of population size and economic scale supportable by the Yellow River’s available freshwater in 2030 under multiple scenarios. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 11, 26. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-02520-1.

[22]

Halperin S., Castro A.J., Quintas-Soriano C., Brandt J.S., 2023. Assessing high quality agricultural lands through the ecosystem services lens: insights from a rapidly urbanizing agricultural region in the western United States. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 349, 108435. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2023.108435.

[23]

Holden E., Linnerud K., Bøe V., 2024. Sustainable development: notions, numbers, and narratives. Sustain. Dev. 33(2), 2812-2815. doi: 10.1002/sd.3261.

[24]

IPCC, 2019. 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. The Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (TFI), Kyoto.

[25]

Jónsdóttir S., Gísladóttir G., 2023. Land use planning, sustainable food production and rural development: a literature analysis. Geogr. Sustain. 4, 391-403. doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2023.09.004.

[26]

Ji Q., Feng X., Sun S., Zhang J., Li S., Fu B., 2024. Cross-scale coupling of ecosystem service flows and socio-ecological interactions in the Yellow River Basin. J. Environ. Manage. 367, 122071. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122071.

[27]

Kalibata A., 2021. Transforming food systems is within reach. Nat. Food 2, 313-314. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00291-z.

[28]

Karner K., Schmid E., Schneider U.A., Mitter H., 2021. Computing stochastic Pareto frontiers between economic and environmental goals for a semiarid agricultural production region in Austria. Ecol. Econ. 185, 107044. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107044.

[29]

Kong L., Wu T., Xiao Y., Xu W., Zhang X., Daily G.C., Ouyang Z., 2023. Natural capital investments in China undermined by reclamation for cropland. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1771-1777. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02198-3.

[30]

Kuang B., Lu X., Zhou M., Chen D., 2020. Provincial cultivated land use efficiency in China: empirical analysis based on the SBM-DEA model with carbon emissions considered. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 151, 119874. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119874.

[31]

Lamba J., Gupta B., Dzever S., 2020. Sustainable agricultural development and rural poverty in India. In: Andreosso-O’Callaghan B., Dzever S., Jaussaud J., Taylor R. ( Sustainable Development and Energy Transition in Europe and Asia. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.,Eds.), pp.183-195. doi: 10.1002/9781119705222.ch10.

[32]

Le T.L., Lee P.-P., Peng K.C., Chung R.H., 2019. Evaluation of total factor productivity and environmental efficiency of agriculture in nine East Asian countries. Agric. Econ. Zem ěd ělská Ekon. 65, 249-258. doi: 10.17221/50/2018-AGRICECON.

[33]

Li Y., Xue C., Chai C., Li W., Li N., Yao S., 2023. Influencing factors and spatiotemporal heterogeneity of net carbon sink of conservation tillage: evidence from China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 110913-110930. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29969-6.

[34]

Liu Y., Feng C., 2019. What drives the fluctuations of “green ” productivity in China’s agricultural sector? A weighted Russell directional distance approach. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 147, 201-213. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.013.

[35]

Liu J., Wang M., Yang L., Rahman S., Sriboonchitta S., 2020a. Agricultural productivity growth and its determinants in South and Southeast Asian countries. Sustainability 12, 4981. doi: 10.3390/su12124981.

[36]

Liu Y., Zou L., Wang Y., 2020b. Spatial-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of agricultural eco-efficiency in China in recent 40 years. Land Use Policy 97, 104794. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104794.

[37]

Liu Y., Zhao W., Zhang Z., Hua T., Ferreira C.S.S., 2023. The role of nature reserves in conservation effectiveness of ecosystem services in China. J. Environ. Manage. 342, 118228. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118228.

[38]

Müller M.F., Penny G., Niles M.T., Ricciardi V., Chiarelli D.D., Davis K.F., Dell’Angelo J., D’Odorico P., Rosa L., Rulli M.C., Mueller N.D., 2021. Impact of transnational land acquisitions on local food security and dietary diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2020535118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020535118.

[39]

Ma H., Wang K., Fang C., 2024. How does new-type urbanization promote green development efficiency in China? The mediating role of governments, enterprises, and residents. Geogr. Sustain. 6 (3), 100241. doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2024.10.001.

[40]

Mallawaarachchi T., Auricht C., Loch A., Adamson D., Quiggin J., 2020. Water allocation in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin: managing change under heightened uncertainty. Econ. Anal. Policy 66, 345-369. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2020.01.001.

[41]

Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China, 2021. China issues outline on ecological protection, development of Yellow River basin. https://english.mee.gov.cn/News_service/media_news/202110/t20211009_955927.shtml. (accessed 1 August 2024).

[42]

Mohan G., Perarapu L.N., Chapagain S.K., Reddy A.A., Melts I., Mishra R., Avtar R., Fukushi K., 2024. Assessing determinants, challenges and perceptions to adopting water-saving technologies among agricultural households in semi-arid states of India. Curr. Res. Environ. Sustain. 7, 100255. doi: 10.1016/j.crsust.2024.100255.

[43]

Morales M.B., Díaz M., Giralt D., Sardà-Palomera F., Traba J., Mougeot F., Serrano D., Mañosa S., Gaba S., Moreira F., Pärt T., Concepción E.D., Tarjuelo R., Arroyo B., Bota G., 2022. Protect European green agricultural policies for future food security. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 1-3. doi: 10.1038/s43247-022-00550-2.

[44]

Pretty J., 2018. Intensification for redesigned and sustainable agricultural systems. Science 362, eaav0294. doi: 10.1126/science.aav0294.

[45]

Pugh T.A.M., Müller C., Elliott J., Deryng D., Folberth C., Olin S., Schmid E., Arneth A., 2016. Climate analogues suggest limited potential for intensification of production on current croplands under climate change. Nat. Commun. 7, 12608. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12608.

[46]

Röder N., Krämer C., Grajewski R., Lakner S., Matthews A., 2024. What is the environmental potential of the post-2022 common agricultural policy? Land Use Policy 144, 107219. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107219.

[47]

Robertson M., 2010. Agricutural productivity in Australia and New Zealand: trends, constraints and opportunities. Proc. N. Z. Grassl. Assoc. 72, LI-LXII. doi: 10.33584/jnzg.2010.72.2792.

[48]

Shen L., Sun R., Liu W., 2024. Examining the drivers of grain production efficiency for achieving energy transition in China. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 105, 107431. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107431.

[49]

Soergel B., Kriegler E., Weindl I., Rauner S., Dirnaichner A., Ruhe C., Hofmann M., Bauer N., Bertram C., Bodirsky B.L., Leimbach M., Leininger J., Levesque A., Luderer G., Pehl M., Wingens C., Baumstark L., Beier F., Dietrich J.P., Humpenöder F., von Jeetze P., Klein D., Koch J., Pietzcker R., Strefler J., Lotze-Campen H., Popp A., 2021. A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 Agenda. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 656-664. doi: 10.1038/s41558-021-01098-3.

[50]

Song L., Wang L., Luo D., Chen D., Zhou J., 2024. Assessing hydrothermal changes in the upper Yellow River Basin amidst permafrost degradation. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 7, 57. doi: 10.1038/s41612-024-00607-3.

[51]

Taoumi H., Lahrech K., 2023. Economic, environmental and social efficiency and effectiveness development in the sustainable crop agricultural sector: a systematic in-depth analysis review. Sci. Total Environ. 901, 165761. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165761.

[52]

Tilman D., Balzer C., Hill J., Befort B.L., 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 20260-20264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116437108.

[53]

Tone, 2003. Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: a slacks-based measure (SBM) approach. GRIPS research report series 1-2003-0005. Research supported By grant-in-aid for scientific research. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo.

[54]

Tong Y., Wang Y., Zhou J., Guo X., Wang T., Xu Y., Sun H., Zhang P., Li Z., Lauerwald R., 2024. Dataset of soil hydraulic parameters in the Yellow River basin based on in situ deep sampling. Sci. Data 11, 740. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03576-7.

[55]

Trakem V., Fan H., 2024. Agricultural trade liberalization, governance quality, and technical efficiency in the agricultural sector of Southeast Asia. Heliyon 10, e39553. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39553.

[56]

Uisso A.M., Tanr ı vermi ş H., 2021. Driving factors and assessment of changes in the use of arable land in Tanzania. Land Use Policy 104, 105359. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105359.

[57]

United Nations, 2023. The sustainable development goals report 2023: special edition. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York.

[58]

Wang S., Liu Z., Chen Y., Fang C., 2021. Factors influencing ecosystem services in the Pearl River Delta, China: spatiotemporal differentiation and varying importance. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 168, 105477. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105477.

[59]

Wang J., Wu W., Yang M., Gao Y., Shao J., Yang W., Ma G., Yu F., Yao N., Jiang H., 2024. Exploring the complex trade-offs and synergies of global ecosystem services. Env. Sci. Ecotechnol. 21, 100391. doi: 10.1016/j.ese.2024.100391.

[60]

Wu C., Ren F., Hu W., Du Q., 2019. Multiscale geographically and temporally weighted regression: exploring the spatiotemporal determinants of housing prices. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 33, 489-511. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2018.1545158.

[61]

Xie G., Zhang C., Zhang L., Chen W., Li S., 2015. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area. J. Nat. Resour. 30, 1243-1254. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001 , (in Chinese).

[62]

Xue L., Hou P., Zhang Z., Shen M., Liu F., Yang L., 2020. Application of systematic strategy for agricultural non-point source pollution control in Yangtze River basin, China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 304, 107148. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107148.

[63]

Yin C., Zhao W., Pereira P., 2025. Ecosystem restoration along the “pattern-processservice-sustainability ” path for achieving land degradation neutrality. Landsc. Urban Plan. 253, 105227. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105227.

[64]

Zhang Q., Ju X., Zhang F., 2010. Re-estimation of direct nitrous oxide emission from agricultural soils of China via revised IPCC2006 guideline method. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 18, 7-13. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2010.00007, (in Chinese).

[65]

Zhang Z., Shi K., Tang L., Su K., Zhu Z., Yang Q., 2022. Exploring the spatiotemporal evolution and coordination of agricultural green efficiency and food security in China using ESTDA and CCD models. J. Clean. Prod. 374, 133967. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133967.

[66]

Zhang H., Jin R., Chandio A.A., Twumasi M.A., 2024. A step toward the modern and sustainable agriculture: evaluating the impact of information and communication technology on cereal production in China. Sustain. Dev. 33 (2), 1989-2003. doi: 10.1002/sd.3223.

[67]

Zhao W., Yin C., Hua T., Meadows M.E., Li Y., Liu Y., Cherubini F., Pereira P., Fu B., 2022. Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in the post-pandemic era. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 9, 1-7. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01283-5.

[68]

Zhou J., Liu X., Liu X., Wang W., Wang L., 2023. Assessing agricultural nonpoint source pollution loads in typical basins of upper Yellow River by incorporating critical impacting factors. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 177, 17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2023.07.003.

[69]

Zou M., Kang S., Du T., Fu J., Niu J., 2024. Accelerated integrated watershed management enhances agricultural carbon sequestration and water use efficiency in an endorheic basin. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 202, 107393. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107393.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/