Dynamic patterns and driving factors of productive cropland in Ukraine before and after Russia-Ukraine conflict

Yiliang Li , Kaixuan Yao , Qingxiang Meng , Yujie Wang , Rui Xiao , Yuhang Liu , Sensen Wu , Yansheng Li

Geography and Sustainability ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) : 100401

PDF
Geography and Sustainability ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) :100401 DOI: 10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100401
Research Article
research-article
Dynamic patterns and driving factors of productive cropland in Ukraine before and after Russia-Ukraine conflict
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Ukraine, as one of the world’s largest agricultural producers and exporters, plays a critical role in global food security. It is essential to understand the spatiotemporal dynamics and drivers of productive cropland in Ukraine, particularly in the context of the 2022 Russia-Ukraine conflict. We provide the first comprehensive assessment of both conflict- and non-conflict-related factors that influenced the distribution and productivity of Ukraine’s cropland from 2013 to 2023. In addition, we propose a novel method using machine learning models to isolate the impact of conflict on cropland. Our findings reveal that, prior to the conflict, the spatial pattern of Ukraine’s mean cultivation rate was primarily shaped by natural factors—such as climate, soil properties, and elevation—whereas socio-economic factors (e.g., GDP and population size) exerted a weaker influence. Interannual dynamics in productive cropland area were largely driven by climate variability. The onset of conflict in 2022 dramatically altered this landscape, with nearly half of the cropland grid cells experiencing a conflict-induced reduction. Notably, almost half of the interannual reduction in productive cropland in 2022 was attributed to climate change. Remarkably, in 2023, the return of displaced populations and favorable climatic conditions in many oblasts contributed to a positive trend in cropland reclamation. Despite this, the total area of productive cropland in 2023 remained below expected levels, due to ongoing conflict and localized droughts. Finally, we highlight the urgent need to adopt a two-pronged approach that addresses both the immediate impacts of conflict and the ongoing threats posed by climate change to ensure the resilience and sustainability of agricultural systems in post-conflict areas.

Keywords

Ukraine’s cropland dynamics / Driving factors analysis / Time-series remote sensing / Russia-Ukraine conflict

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yiliang Li, Kaixuan Yao, Qingxiang Meng, Yujie Wang, Rui Xiao, Yuhang Liu, Sensen Wu, Yansheng Li. Dynamic patterns and driving factors of productive cropland in Ukraine before and after Russia-Ukraine conflict. Geography and Sustainability, 2026, 7(1): 100401 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100401

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yiliang Li: Writing - review & editing, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Methodology, Investigation. Kaixuan Yao: Writing - original draft, Visualization, Validation, Investigation, Data curation. Qingxiang Meng: Visualization, Investigation. Yujie Wang: Validation, Writing - review & editing. Rui Xiao: Methodology, Conceptualization. Yuhang Liu: Investigation, Data curation. Sensen Wu: Writing - review & editing, Methodology. Yansheng Li: Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 41971284 and 42371321), and the Key Research and Development Program of Hubei Province (Grant No. 2025BAB024). Additionally, we thank Google Earth Engine for providing satellite data and computational resources (https://earthengine.google.com/).

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100401.

References

[1]

Abay K.A., Breisinger C., Glauber J., Kurdi S., Laborde D., Siddig K., 2023. The Russia- Ukraine war: implications for global and regional food security and potential policy responses. Glob. Food Secur. 36, 100675. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2023.100675.

[2]

Anderson W., Taylor C., McDermid S., Ilboudo-Nébié E., Seager R., Schlenker W., Cottier F., de Sherbinin A., Mendeloff D., Markey K., 2021. Violent conflict exacerbated drought-related food insecurity between 2009 and 2019 in sub-Saharan Africa. Nat. Food 2 (8), 603-615. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00327-4.

[3]

Baumann M., Kuemmerle T., Elbakidze M., Ozdogan M., Radeloff V.C., Keuler N.S., Prishchepov A.V., Kruhlov I., Hostert P., 2011. Patterns and drivers of post-socialist farmland abandonment in Western Ukraine. Land Use Policy 28 (3), 552-562. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.11.003.

[4]

Better Regulation Delivery Office, 2022. Ukrainian fruits and vegetables: how can farmers provide the world with food during the war? https://brdo.com.ua/en/analytics/ukrayinski-frukty-ta-ovochi-yak-agrariyam-zabezpechyty-svit-harchamy-v-umovahvijny/.

[5]

Blickensdörfer L., Oehmichen K., Pflugmacher D., Kleinschmit B., Hostert P., 2024. National tree species mapping using Sentinel-1/ 2 time series and German National Forest Inventory data. Remote Sens. Environ. 304, 114069. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114069.

[6]

Chen J., Gao M., Cheng S., Hou W., Song M., Liu X., Liu Y., 2022. Global 1 km × 1 km gridded revised real gross domestic product and electricity consumption during 1992-2019 based on calibrated nighttime light data. Sci. Data 9 (1), 202. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01322-5.

[7]

Chen X., Shuai C., Wu Y., 2023. Global food stability and its socio-economic determinants towards sustainable development goal 2 (Zero Hunger). Sustain. Dev. 31 (3), 1768-1780. doi: 10.1002/sd.2482.

[8]

Chen B., Tu Y., An J., Wu S., Lin C., Gong P., 2024. Quantification of losses in agriculture production in eastern Ukraine due to the Russia-Ukraine war. Commun. Earth. Environ. 5 (1), 336. doi: 10.1038/s43247-024-01488-3.

[9]

Christian J.I., Martin E.R., Basara J.B., Furtado J.C., Otkin J.A., Lowman L.E., Hunt E.D., Mishra V., Xiao X., 2023. Global projections of flash drought show increased risk in a warming climate. Commun. Earth Environ. 4 (1), 165. doi: 10.1038/s43247-023-00826-1.

[10]

Devadoss S., Ridley W., 2024. Impacts of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on the global wheat market. World Dev. 173, 106396. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106396.

[11]

Didan K., 2021. MODIS/Aqua vegetation indices 16-day L 3 global 250m SIN grid V061. NASA EOSDIS land processes DAAC. https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD13Q1.061.

[12]

Dobson J.E., Bright E.A., Coleman P.R., Bhaduri B.L., 2000. LandScan: a global population database for estimating populations at risk. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 66 (7), 849-857. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-9-4.

[13]

FAO, IFAD, UNICEF,WFP and WHO, 2023. The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2023: urbanization, agrifood systems transformation and healthy diets across the rural-urban continuum. FAO, Rome. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/8b27c570-2f8b-4350-8d5a-8e82432e6db7/content.

[14]

Gao F., Anderson M.C., Zhang X., Yang Z., Alfieri J.G., Kustas W.P., Mueller R., Johnson D.M., Prueger J.H., 2017. Toward mapping crop progress at field scales through fusion of Landsat and MODIS imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 188, 9-25. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.11.004.

[15]

Han J., Luo Y., Zhang Z., Xu J., Chen Y., Asseng S., Jägermeyr J., Müller C., Olesen J., Rötter R., Tao F., 2024. Planting area and production decreased for winter-triticeae crops but increased for rapeseed in Ukraine with climatic impacts dominating. Geogr. Sustain. 6 (2), 100226. doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2024.08.006.

[16]

He T., Zhang M., Xiao W., Zhai G., Wang Y., Guo A., Wu C., 2023. Quantitative analysis of abandonment and grain production loss under armed conflict in Ukraine. J. Clean. Prod. 412, 137367. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137367.

[17]

Heino M., Puma M.J., Ward P.J., Gerten D., Heck V., Siebert S., Kummu M., 2018. Two-thirds of global cropland area impacted by climate oscillations. Nat. Commun. 9 (1), 1257. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02071-5.

[18]

Hengl T., Mendes de Jesus J., Heuvelink G.B., Ruiperez Gonzalez M., Kilibarda M., Blagoti ć A., Shangguan W., Wright M.N., Geng X., Bauer-Marschallinger B., Guevara M.A., Vargas R., MacMillan R.A., Batjes N.H., Leenaars J.G., Ribeiro E., Wheeler I., Mantel S., Kempen B., 2017. SoilGrids250m: global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS One 12 (2), e0169748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169748.

[19]

Hrabchuk K., Galouchka A., Martins A., 2023. In fields seeded with mines, Ukraine’s farmers face deadly planting season. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/05/28/ukraine-farms-unexplodedordnance-mines/.

[20]

Hunt M.L., Blackburn G.A., Carrasco L., Redhead J.W., Rowland C.S., 2019. High resolution wheat yield mapping using Sentinel-2. Remote Sens. Environ. 233, 111410. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111410.

[21]

International Organization for Migration (IOM), 2023. DTM Ukraine — Snapshot report: population figures and Geographic distribution — General population Survey round 13 (11- 23 May). https://dtm.iom.int/reports/ukraine-snapshotreport-population-figures-and-geographic-distribution-general-population.

[22]

International Organization for Migration (IOM), 2024. DTM Ukraine — Internal Displacement Report — General Population Survey Round 15 (November - December 2023). https://dtm.iom.int/reports/ukraine-internal-displacement-report-generalpopulation-survey-round-15-november-december.

[23]

Ivushkin K., Bartholomeus H., Bregt A.K., Pulatov A., Kempen B., De Sousa L., 2019. Global mapping of soil salinity change. Remote Sens. Environ. 231, 111260. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111260.

[24]

Kussul N., Shelestov A., Yailymov B., Yailymova H., 2022. Analysis of cultivated areas in Ukraine during the war. In: 2022 12th International Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies (DESSERT), Athens, Greece, pp. 1-4. doi: 10.1109/DESSERT58054.2022.10018813.

[25]

Lei L., Wang X., Zhong Y., Zhao H., Hu X., Luo C., 2021. DOCC: deep one-class crop classification via positive and unlabeled learning for multi-modal satellite imagery. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 105, 102598. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102598.

[26]

Li X.Y., Li X., Fan Z., Mi L., Kandakji T., Song Z., Li D., Song X.P., 2022a. Civil war hinders crop production and threatens food security in Syria. Nat. Food 3 (1), 38-46. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00432-4.

[27]

Li A., Song K., Chen S., Mu Y., Xu Z., Zeng Q., 2022b. Mapping African wetlands for 2020 using multiple spectral, geo-ecological features and Google Earth Engine. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 193, 252-268. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.09.009.

[28]

Li Y., Zhou Y., Zhang Y., Zhong L., Wang J., Chen J., 2022c. DKDFN: domain knowledge-guided deep collaborative fusion network for multimodal unitemporal remote sensing land cover classification. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 186, 170-189. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.02.013.

[29]

Li Y., Chen W., Huang X., Gao Z., Li S., He T., Zhang Y., 2023. MFVNet: a deep adaptive fusion network with multiple field-of-views for remote sensing image semantic segmentation. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 66 (4), 140305. doi: 10.1007/s11432-022-3599-y.

[30]

Li Z., Zhang A., Sun G., Han Z., Jia X., 2024. Automatic impervious surface mapping in subtropical China via a terrain-guided gated fusion network. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 127, 103608. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2023.103608.

[31]

Lin F., Li X., Jia N., Feng F., Huang H., Huang J., Fan S., Ciais P., Song X.P., 2023. The impact of Russia-Ukraine conflict on global food security. Glob. Food Secur. 36, 100661. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100661.

[32]

Lu D., Wang Z., Li X., Zhou Y., 2024. Evaluation of the efficiency and drivers of complemented cropland in Southwest China over the past 30 years from the perspective of cropland abandonment. J. Environ. Manage. 351, 119909. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.11.

[33]

Ma Y., Lyu D., Sun K., Li S., Zhu B., Zhao R., Zheng M., Song K., 2022. Spatiotemporal analysis and war impact assessment of agricultural land in Ukraine using RS and GIS technology. Land 11 (10), 1810. doi: 10.3390/land11101810.

[34]

Meyfroidt P., Schierhorn F., Prishchepov A.V., Müller D., Kuemmerle T., 2016. Drivers, constraints and trade-offs associated with recultivating abandoned cropland in Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan. Glob. Environ. Change 37, 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.01.003.

[35]

Muñoz-Sabater J., Dutra E., Agustí-Panareda A., Albergel C., Arduini G., Balsamo G., Boussetta S., Choulga M., Harrigan S., Martens B., Miralles D.G., Piles M., Rodríguez-Fernández N.J., Zsoter E., Buontempo C., Thépaut J.N., 2021. ERA5- Land: a state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13 (9), 4349-4383. doi: 10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021.

[36]

Nicas J., 2022. War threatens to cause a global food crisis. The New York Times, A1- L. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A697570200/AONE?u = anon-e197f6b9&sid = googleScholar&xid = f6b48e77.

[37]

United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), 2022. Ukraine - subnational edge-matched administrative boundaries. Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX). https://data.humdata.org/dataset/cod-em-ukr.

[38]

Olsen V.M., Fensholt R., Olofsson P., Bonifacio R., Butsic V., Druce D., Ray D., Prishchepov A.V., 2021. The impact of conflict-driven cropland abandonment on food insecurity in South Sudan revealed using satellite remote sensing. Nat. Food 2 (12), 990-996. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00417-3.

[39]

Qiu B., Li H., Tang Z., Chen C., Berry J., 2020. How cropland losses shaped by unbalanced urbanization process? doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104715.

[40]

Raleigh C., Linke R., Hegre H., Karlsen J., 2010. Introducing ACLED: an armed conflict location and event dataset. J. Peace Res. 47 (5), 651-660. doi: 10.1177/0022343310378914.

[41]

Rawtani D., Gupta G., Khatri N., Rao P.K., Hussain C.M., 2022. Environmental damages due to war in Ukraine: a perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 850, 157932. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157932.

[42]

Rosa L., Ragettli S., Sinha R., Zhovtonog O., Yu W., Karimi P., 2024. Regional irrigation expansion can support climate-resilient crop production in post-invasion Ukraine. Nat. Food 5, 684-692. doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-01017-7.

[43]

Shumilova O., Tockner K., Sukhodolov A., Khilchevskyi V., De Meester L., Stepanenko S., Trokhymenko G., Hernández-Agüero J.A., Gleick P., 2023. Impact of the Russia-Ukraine armed conflict on water resources and water infrastructure. Nat. Sustain. 6, 578-586. doi: 10.1038/s41893-023-01068-x.

[44]

Smaliychuk A., Müller D., Prishchepov A.V., Levers C., Kruhlov I., Kuemmerle T., 2016. Recultivation of abandoned agricultural lands in Ukraine: patterns and drivers. Glob. Environ. Change 38, 70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.009.

[45]

Takaku J., Tadono T., Tsutsui K., 2014. Generation of high resolution global DSM from ALOS PRISM. ISPRS Archives. 40, 243-248. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-4-243-2014.

[46]

U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2022. Ukraine agricultural production and trade. https://fas.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-04/Ukraine-Factsheet-April2022.pdf.

[47]

Weldegebriel L., Negash E., Nyssen J., Lobell D.B., 2024. Eyes in the sky on Tigray, Ethiopia —monitoring the impact of armed conflict on cultivated highland using satellite imagery. Sci. Remote Sens. 9, 100133. doi: 10.1016/j.srs.2024.100133.

[48]

Wu X., Huang X., 2023. Screening of urban environmental vulnerability indicators based on coefficient of variation and anti-image correlation matrix method. Ecol. Indic. 150, 110196. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110196.

[49]

Wu K., Zhang Y., Ru L., Dang B., Lao J., Yu L., Luo J., Zhu Z., Sun Y., Zhang J., Zhu Q., Wang J., Yang M., Chen J., Zhang Y., Li Y., 2025. A semantic-enhanced multi-modal remote sensing foundation model for Earth observation. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 1235-1249. doi: 10.1038/s42256-025-01078-8.

[50]

Xie Y., Spawn-Lee S.A., Radeloff V.C., Yin H., Robertson G.P., Lark T.J., 2024. Cropland abandonment between 1986 and 2018 across the United States: spatiotemporal patterns and current land uses. Environ. Res. Lett. 19 (4), 044009. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ad2d12.

[51]

Yin H., Brandão Jr A., Buchner J., Helmers D., Iuliano B.G., Kimambo N.E., Lewi ń ska K.E., Razenkova E., Rizayeva A., Rogova N., Spawn S.A., Xie Y., Radeloff V.C., 2020. Monitoring cropland abandonment with Landsat time series. Remote Sens. Environ. 246, 111873. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111873.

[52]

You N., Dong J., Huang J., Du G., Zhang G., He Y., Yang T., Di Y., Xiao X., 2021. The 10-m crop type maps in Northeast China during 2017-2019. Sci. Data 8 (1), 41. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00827-9.

[53]

Zhang M., Li G., He T., Zhai G., Guo A., Chen H., Wu C., 2023. Reveal the severe spatial and temporal patterns of abandoned cropland in China over the past 30 years. Sci. Total Environ. 857, 159591. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159591.

[54]

Zhang T., Yang J., Zhou H., Dai A., Tan D., 2024. Abandoned cropland mapping and its influencing factors analysis: a case study in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Catena 239, 107876. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2024.107876.

[55]

Zhou Y., Li X., Liu Y., 2020. Land use change and driving factors in rural China during the period 1995-2015. Land Use Policy 99, 105048. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105048.

PDF

4

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/