Spatial scale-dependence and controlling factors of ecosystem service supply-demand relationships in the Loess Plateau of China

Xiaojia Han , Guangyao Gao , Junze Zhang , Zhuangzhuang Wang , Xutong Wu , Yihe Lü

Geography and Sustainability ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (4) : 100297

PDF
Geography and Sustainability ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (4) :100297 DOI: 10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100297
Research Article
research-article

Spatial scale-dependence and controlling factors of ecosystem service supply-demand relationships in the Loess Plateau of China

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Integrating the supply and demand of ecosystem services (ESs) across various scales is crucial for regional sustainable development. However, the relationships between ESs supply and demand, along with their determinants, have not been thoroughly investigated from a multi-spatial perspective. In this study, we quantified four ESs (carbon sequestration, water yield, food supply, and soil conservation) at six spatial scales (pixel, 10 km, 50 km, county, municipality and watershed scale) in China’s Loess Plateau (LP), characterized by fragile ecological environment and high human activity. The ESs supply-demand matches and their trade-offs or synergies as well as the dominant influencing factors at different scales were identified. There was significant spatial heterogeneity in the distribution of ESs supply and demand across the LP. The balance between ESs supply and demand became obvious from pixel to watershed (municipality) scale, with the area proportion increased by 66.78 %, 57.85 %, and 17.89 % for carbon sequestration, water yield and food supply, respectively. The supply-demand match of paired ESs was dominated by synergistic effects at the grid scales and county scale, and their trade-offs mainly occurred in municipality and watershed scales. Population and GDP emerged as the primary factors influencing the supply-demand matches for carbon sequestration, water yield, and food supply, whereas soil conservation was primarily shaped by natural factors. Furthermore, the influence of dominant factors strengthened as the spatial scale increases. The load coefficient of GDP, land use degree and human activities index increased by 0.5057, 0.6985 and 0.6705 from pixel scale to watershed scale, respectively. Thus, implementation of specific management measures should consider both the overall situation of ESs at large scale and influencing factors at small scale. This multi-scale study sheds light on understanding the interactions between supply and demand in different ESs, and provides new insights for hierarchical ecosystem management.

Keywords

Ecosystem services / Supply-demand matching / Trade-offs or synergies / Multiscale / Driving factors / Loess Plateau

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaojia Han, Guangyao Gao, Junze Zhang, Zhuangzhuang Wang, Xutong Wu, Yihe Lü. Spatial scale-dependence and controlling factors of ecosystem service supply-demand relationships in the Loess Plateau of China. Geography and Sustainability, 2025, 6(4): 100297 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100297

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Xiaojia Han: Writing - original draft, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Guangyao Gao: Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Methodology, Conceptualization. Junze Zhang: Writing - review & editing, Formal analysis. Zhuangzhuang Wang: Writing - review & editing, Formal analysis. Xutong Wu: Writing - review & editing, Formal analysis. Yihe Lü:.

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. W2412141, U2243231, and 42301323), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (Grant No. Y202013). We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their professional comments which greatly improved the quality of the manuscript.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100297.

References

[1]

Assis, J.C., Hohlenwerger, C., Metzger, J.P., Rhodes, J.R., Duarte, G.T., da Silva, R.A., Boesing, A.L., Prist, P.R., Ribeiro, M.C., 2023. Linking landscape structure and ecosystem service flow. Ecosyst. Serv. 62, 101535.

[2]

Bellezoni, R.A., Meng, F.X., He, P., Seto, K.C., 2021. Understanding and conceptualizing how urban green and blue infrastructure affects the food, water, and energy nexus: a synthesis of the literature. J. Clean. Prod. 289, 125825.

[3]

Boerema, A., Rebelo, A.J., Bodi, M.B., Esler, K.J., Meire, P., 2017. Are ecosystem services adequately quantified? J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 358-370.

[4]

Boyd, J., Banzhaf, S., 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol. Econ. 63, 616-626.

[5]

Capistrano, D., Lee, M.J., Raudsepphearne, C., Samper, C., 2005. Multiscale assessments:integrated assessments at multiple scales. In:Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Our Human Planet: Summary of Decision Makers. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 83-96.

[6]

Chi, G., Marcouiller, D.W., 2013. Natural amenities and their effects on migration along the urban-rural continuum. Ann. Reg. Sci. 50, 861-883.

[7]

Cordingley, J.E., Newton, A.C., Rose, R.J., Clarke, R.T., Bullock, J.M., 2016. Can landscape- scale approaches to conservation management resolve biodiversity-ecosystem service trade-offs? J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 96-105.

[8]

Cortinovis, C., Geneletti, D., 2020. A performance-based planning approach integrating supply and demand of urban ecosystem services. Landsc. Urban Plan. 201, 103842.

[9]

Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S.J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., Turner, R.K., 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Change 26, 152-158.

[10]

Cui, F., Tang, H., Zhang, Q., Wang, B., Dai, L., 2019. Integrating ecosystem services supply and demand into optimized management at different scales: a case study in Hulunbuir, China. Ecosyst. Serv. 39, 100984.

[11]

Dang, X., Gao, S., Tao, R., Liu, G., Xia, Z., Fan, L., Bi, W., 2020. Do environmental conservation programs contribute to sustainable livelihoods? Evidence from China’s grain- for-green program in northern Shaanxi province. Sci. Total Environ. 719, 137436.

[12]

Dee, L.E., Allesina, S., Bonn, A., Eklöf, A., Gaines, S.D., Hines, J., Jacob, U., McDonald- Madden, E., Possingham, H., Schröter, M., Thompson, R.M., 2017. Operationalizing network theory for ecosystem service assessments. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 32, 118-130.

[13]

Ding, T., Chen, J., Fang, Z., Wang, Y., 2023. Exploring the differences of ecosystem service values in different functional areas of metropolitan areas. Sustain. Prod. Consump. 38, 341-355.

[14]

Dou, H.S., Li, X.B., Li, S.K., Dang, D.L., 2018. How to detect scale effect of ecosystem services supply? A comprehensive insight from Xilinhot in Inner Mongolia, China. Sustainability 10, 3654.

[15]

Galler, C., Albert, C., von Haaren, C., 2016. From regional environmental planning to implementation: paths and challenges of integrating ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 18, 118-129.

[16]

Goldenberg, R., Kalantari, Z., Cvetkovic, V., Mörtberg, U., Deal, B., Destouni, G., 2017. Distinction, quantification and mapping of potential and realized supply-demand of flow-dependent ecosystem services. Sci. Total Environ. 593, 599-609.

[17]

Gonzalez-Garcia, A., Palomo, I., Gonzalez, J.A., Lopez, C.A., Montes, C., 2020. Quantifying spatial supply-demand mismatches in ecosystem services provides insights for land-use planning. Land Use Policy 94, 104493.

[18]

Hanisch, M., Schweiger, O., Cord, A.F., Volk, M., Knapp, S., 2020. Plant functional traits shape multiple ecosystem services, their trade-offs and synergies in grasslands. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 1535-1550.

[19]

Hanna, D.E.L., Roux, D.J., Currie, B., Bennett, E.M., 2020. Identifying pathways to reduce discrepancies between desired and provided ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 43, 101119.

[20]

He, G., Zhang, L., Wei, X., Jin, G., 2023. Scale effects on the supply-demand mismatches of ecosystem services in Hubei Province, China. Ecol. Indic. 153, 110461.

[21]

Honey-Rosés, J., Acuña, V., Bardina, M., Brozovi ć, N., Marcé, R., Munné, A., Sabater, S., Termes, M., Valero, F., Vega, À., Schneider, D.W., 2013. Examining the demand for ecosystem services: the value of stream restoration for drinking water treatment managers in the Llobregat River, Spain. Ecol. Econ. 90, 196-205.

[22]

Kalinauskas, M., Bogdzevi č, K., Gomes, E., Inácio, M., Barcelo, D., Zhao, W., Pereira, P., 2023. Mapping and assessment of recreational cultural ecosystem services supply and demand in Vilnius (Lithuania). Sci. Total Environ. 855, 158590.

[23]

Larondelle, N., Lauf, S., 2016. Balancing demand and supply of multiple urban ecosystem services on different spatial scales. Ecosyst. Serv. 22, 18-31.

[24]

Li, D., Cao, W., Dou, Y., Wu, S., Liu, J., Li, S., 2022. Non-linear effects of natural and anthropogenic drivers on ecosystem services: integrating thresholds into conservation planning. J. Environ. Manage. 321, 116047.

[25]

Li, Y., Li, Y., Fan, P., Sun, J., Liu, Y., 2019. Land use and landscape change driven by gully land consolidation project: a case study of a typical watershed in the Loess Plateau. J. Geogr. Sci. 29, 719-729.

[26]

Lin, Y., Zhang, M., Gan, M.Y., Huang, L.Y., Zhu, C.M., Zheng, Q.M., You, S.X., Ye, Z.R., Shahtahmassebi, A., Li, Y.J., Deng, J.S., Zhang, J., Zhang, L., Wang, K., 2022. Fine identification of the supply-demand mismatches and matches of urban green space ecosystem services with a spatial filtering tool. J. Clean. Prod. 336, 130404.

[27]

Lindborg, R., Gordon, L.J., Malinga, R., Bengtsson, J., Peterson, G., Bommarco, R., Deutsch, L., Gren, Å., Rundlöf, M., Smith, H.G., 2017. How spatial scale shapes the generation and management of multiple ecosystem services. Ecosphere 8, e01741.

[28]

Liu, Y., Fu, B., Wang, S., Rhodes, J.R., Li, Y., Zhao, W., Li, C., Zhou, S., Wang, C., 2023. Global assessment of nature’s contributions to people. Sci. Bull. 68, 424-435.

[29]

Metzger, J.P., Villarreal-Rosas, J., Suárez-Castro, A.F., López-Cubillos, S., González-Chaves, A., Runting, R.K., Hohlenwerger, C., Rhodes, J.R., 2021. Considering landscape-level processes in ecosystem service assessments. Sci. Total Environ. 796, 149028.

[30]

Mitchell, M.G.E., Bennett, E.M., Gonzalez, A., 2014. Forest fragments modulate the provision of multiple ecosystem services. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 909-918.

[31]

Nguyen, V.T.H., McElwee, P., Le, H.T.V., Nghiem, T., Vu, H.T.D., 2022. The challenges of collective PES: insights from three community-based models in Vietnam. Ecosyst. Serv. 56, 101438.

[32]

Ni, Y., Wei, J., Wu, T., Guo, M., Han, Q., Zhang, M., 2022. Mapping and assessing ecosystem service supply-demand to identify critical areas: a case study of a waterside area in Shanghai metropolitan area. Front. Earth Sci. 10, 943910.

[33]

Pohjanmies, T., Eyvindson, K., Triviño, M., Mönkkönen, M., 2017. More is more? Forest management allocation at different spatial scales to mitigate conflicts between ecosystem services. Landsc. Ecol. 32, 2337-2349.

[34]

Qiao, X., Gu, Y., Zou, C., Xu, D., Wang, L., Ye, X., Yang, Y., Huang, X., 2019. Temporal variation and spatial scale dependency of the trade-offs and synergies among multiple ecosystem services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China. Sci. Total Environ. 651, 218-229.

[35]

Reyers, B., Biggs, R., Cumming, G.S., Elmqvist, T., Hejnowicz, A.P., Polasky, S., 2013. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social-ecological approach. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11, 268-273.

[36]

Scholes, R.J., Reyers, B., Biggs, R., Spierenburg, M.J., Duriappah, A., 2013. Multi-scale and cross-scale assessments of social-ecological systems and their ecosystem services. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5, 16-25.

[37]

Shen, J.S., Li, S.C., Wang, H., Wu, S.Y., Liang, Z., Zhang, Y.T., Wei, F.L., Li, S., Ma, L., Wang, Y.Y., Liu, L.B., Zhang, Y.J., 2023. Understanding the spatial relationships and drivers of ecosystem service supply-demand mismatches towards spatially-targeted management of social-ecological system. J. Clean. Prod. 406, 136882.

[38]

Stürck, J., Verburg, P.H., 2017. Multifunctionality at what scale? A landscape multifunctionality assessment for the European Union under conditions of land use change. Landsc. Ecol. 32, 481-500.

[39]

Su, C.H., Dong, M., Fu, B.J., Liu, G.H., 2020. Scale effects of sediment retention, water yield, and net primary production: a case-study of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Land Degrad. Dev. 31, 1408-1421.

[40]

Sun, R., Jin, X., Han, B., Liang, X., Zhang, X., Zhou, Y., 2022. Does scale matter? Analysis and measurement of ecosystem service supply and demand status based on ecological unit. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 95, 106785.

[41]

Tscharntke, T., Tylianakis, J.M., Rand, T.A., Didham, R.K., Fahrig, L., Batary, P., Bengtsson, J., Clough, Y., Crist, T.O., Dormann, C.F., Ewers, R.M., Frund, J., Holt, R.D., Holzschuh, A., Klein, A.M., Kleijn, D., Kremen, C., Landis, D.A., Laurance, W., Lindenmayer, D., Scherber, C., Sodhi, N., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Thies, C., van der Putten, W.H., Westphal, C., 2012. Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes - eight hypotheses. Biol. Rev. 87, 661-685.

[42]

Wang, Y., Dai, E., 2020. Spatial-temporal changes in ecosystem services and the trade-off relationship in mountain regions: a case study of Hengduan Mountain region in Southwest China. J. Clean. Prod. 264, 121573.

[43]

Wu, X., Wang, S., Fu, B., Feng, X., Chen, Y., 2019. Socio-ecological changes on the Loess Plateau of China after grain to green program. Sci. Total Environ. 678, 565-573.

[44]

Xu, S., Liu, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, G., 2017. Scale effect on spatial patterns of ecosystem services and associations among them in semi-arid area: a case study in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China. Sci. Total Environ. 598, 297-306.

[45]

Yang, M., Gao, X., Zhao, X., Wu, P., 2021. Scale effect and spatially explicit drivers of interactions between ecosystem services —a case study from the Loess Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 785, 147389.

[46]

Yang, M., Zhao, X., Wu, P., Hu, P., Gao, X., 2022. Quantification and spatially explicit driving forces of the incoordination between ecosystem service supply and social demand at a regional scale. Ecol. Indic. 137, 108764.

[47]

Zhang, H.Y., Jiang, C., Wang, Y.X., Zhao, Y., Gong, Q.H., Wang, J., Yang, Z.Y., 2022. Linking land degradation and restoration to ecosystem services balance by identifying landscape drivers: insights from the globally largest loess deposit area. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29, 83347-83364.

[48]

Zhang, S., Hu, W., Li, M., Guo, Z., Wang, L., Wu, L., 2021. Multiscale research on spatial supply-demand mismatches and synergic strategies of multifunctional cultivated land. J. Environ. Manage. 299, 113605.

[49]

Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Yuan, X., Shao, Y., Bai, Y., 2022. Identifying ecosystem service supply- demand imbalance for sustainable land management in China’s Loess Plateau. Land Use Policy 123, 106423.

[50]

Zhou, L., Zhang, H., Bi, G., Su, K., Wang, L., Chen, H., Yang, Q., 2022. Multiscale perspective research on the evolution characteristics of the ecosystem services supply-demand relationship in the Chongqing section of the three gorges reservoir area. Ecol. Indic. 142, 109227.

PDF

186

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/