Recognizing ecosystem service's contribution to SDGs: Ecological foundation of sustainable development

Zihan Xu , Jian Peng

Geography and Sustainability ›› 2024, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 511 -525.

PDF
Geography and Sustainability ›› 2024, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) :511 -525. DOI: 10.1016/j.geosus.2024.05.001
Review Article
review-article

Recognizing ecosystem service's contribution to SDGs: Ecological foundation of sustainable development

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

There is less than half the time left to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and progress toward SDGs is obviously insufficient. The contribution of ecosystem services (ES) to SDGs realization has received extensive attentions, but systematic generalization and recognition are still lacking. Based on a review of the progress and challenge of sustainable development, this study summarized ES’s potential contribution to 17 SDGs, and systematically reviewed empirical researches focused on the ES’s contribution to SDGs based on the RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES). The results showed that from the 1960s to the 2020s, the ES’s contribution has gradually become more important in sustainable development. ES has potential contribution to all SDGs, but the contribution to different SDGs varies. In the empirical study, ES’s contribution to SDG2, SDG6, SDG13, and SDG15 were strongly focused. ES’s contribution to SDG4, SDG5, SDG10, SDG16, and SDG17 were weakly focused. Most researches have explored the ES’s contribution to SDGs based on ES supply at a single scale, lacking attentions to ES demand and scale differences, and insufficient attentions to intervention factors affecting the ES’s contribution to SDGs. Faced with the above deficiencies, future research could deepen the exploration of ES’s contribution to SDGs from the following four perspectives: clarifying true contributions, exploring leverage point, integrating multi-scale differences, and focusing on intervention factors.

Keywords

Ecosystem services / Sustainable development goals / Contribution / Challenge

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zihan Xu, Jian Peng. Recognizing ecosystem service's contribution to SDGs: Ecological foundation of sustainable development. Geography and Sustainability, 2024, 5(4): 511-525 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2024.05.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Zihan Xu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft. Jian Peng: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42361144888) and Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF (Grant No. GZB20230060).

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.geosus.2024.05.001.

References

[1]

Abbas, H. S. M., Xu, X, Sun, C, Ullah, A, Gillani, S, Raza, M. A. A., 2021. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sustainability determinants: a global trend. Heliyon 7(2), e05912.

[2]

Affek, A, Degórski, M, Wolski, J, Solon, J, Kowalska, A, Roo-Zielińska, E, Grabińska, B, Kruczkowska, B. 2020. CICES V5.1 classification. A. Affek, M. Degórski, J. Wolski, J. Solon, A. Kowalska, E. Roo-Zielińska (Eds.), Ecosystem Service Potentials and Their Indicators in Postglacial Landscapes: Assessment and Mapping, Elsevier, pp.113-115.

[3]

Agudelo, C. A. R., Bustos, S. L. H., Moreno, C. A. P., 2020. Modeling interactions among multiple ecosystem services. A critical review. Ecol. Modell., 429, 109103.

[4]

Alemu, W. G., Melesse, A. M., 2020. Impacts of longterm conservation measures on ecosystem services in Northwest Ethiopia. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res., 8(1), 47-55.

[5]

Allen, C, Metternicht, G, Wiedmann, T, Pedercini, M., 2019. Greater gains for Australia by tackling all SDGs but the last steps will be the most challenging. Nat. Sustain., 2(11), 1041-1050.

[6]

Ammari, T. G., 2014. Utilization of a natural ecosystem bio-waste; leaves of Arundo donax reed, as a raw material of low-cost eco-biosorbent for cadmium removal from aqueous phase. Ecol. Eng., 71, 466-473.

[7]

Anderson, C. B., Seixas, C. S., Barbosa, O, Fennessy, M. S., Herrera-F, B., 2019. Determining nature's contributions to achieve the sustainable development goals. Sustain. Sci., 14(2), 543-547.

[8]

Aronson, M. F. J., Lepczyk, C. A., Evans, K. L., Goddard, M. A., Lerman, S. B., Maclvor, J. S., Nilon, C. H., Vargo, T., 2017. Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management. Front. Ecol. Environ., 15(4), 189-196.

[9]

Asche, F, Garlock, T. M., Anderson, J. L., Bush, S. R., Smith, M. D., Anderson, C. M., Chu, J. J., Garrett, K. A., Lem, A, Lorenzen, K., 2018. Three pillars of sustainability in fisheries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 115(44), 11221-11225.

[10]

Babayomi, O. O., Dahoro, D. A., Zhang, Z., 2022. Affordable clean energy transition in developing countries: pathways and technologies. iScience 25(5), 104178.

[11]

Bagstad, K. J., Villa, F, Batker, D, Jennifer, H, Brain, V, Gary, W. J., 2014. From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecol. Soc., 19(2), 64.

[12]

Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., Plaza-Úbeda, J. A., Vazquez-Brust, D, Yakovleva, N., 2021. Circular economy, degrowth and green growth as pathways for research on sustainable development goals: a global analysis and future agenda. Ecol. Econ., 185, 107050.

[13]

Biemans, H, Siderius, C., 2019. Advances in global hydrology–crop modelling to support the UN's Sustainable Development Goals in South Asia. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 40, 108-116.

[14]

Brauman, K. A., Garibaldi, L. A., Polasky, S, Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y, Brancalion, P. H. S., DeClerk, F, Jacob, U, Mastrangelo, M. E., Nkongolo, N. V., Palang, H, Pérez-Méndez, N, Shannon, L, Shrestha, U. B., Strombom, E, Verma, M., 2020. Global trends in nature's contributions to people. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 117(51), 32799-32805.

[15]

Brundtland, G. H., 1987. World commission on environment and development. Environ. Policy Law 14(1), 26-30.

[16]

Campbell, L. M., 1999. Ecotourism in rural developing communities. Ann. Tour. Res., 26(3), 534-553.

[17]

Cao, M, Chen, M, Zhang, J, Pardhan, P, Guo, H, Fu, B, Li, Y, Bai, Y, Chang, L, Chen, Y, Sun, Z, Xu, Z, Zhu, R, Meadows, M. E., , G., 2023. Spatio-temporal changes in the causal interactions among Sustainable Development Goals in China. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., 10, 450.

[18]

Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J, Capistrano, D, Defries, R. S., Díaz, S, Dietz, T, Duraiappah, A. K., Oteng-Yeboah, A, Pereira, H. M., Perrings, C, Reid, W, Sarukhan, J, Scholes, R. J., Whyte, A., 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 106(5), 1305-1312.

[19]

Carson, R., 1962. Silent Spring. Fawcett Publications, Inc., Creenwich, Conn

[20]

Cernev, T, Fenner, R., 2020. The importance of achieving foundational Sustainable Development Goals in reducing global risk. Futures 115, 102492.

[21]

Chaplin-Kramer, R, Sharp, R. P., Weil, C, Bennett, E. M., Pascual, U, Arkema, K. K., Brauman, K. A., Bryant, B. P., Guerry, A. D., Haddad, N. M., Hamann, M, Hamel, P, Johnson, J. A., Mandle, L, Pereira, H. M., Polasky, S, Puckelshaus, M, Shaw, M. R., Silver, J. M., Vogl, A. L., Daily, G. C., 2019. Global modeling of nature's contributions to people. Science 366(6462), 255-258.

[22]

Costanza, R, Arge, R, de Groot, R, Farber, S, Grasso, M, Hannon, B, Limburg, K, Naeem, S, O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J, Cleveland, C. J., 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253-260.

[23]

Costanza, R, de Groot, R, Braat, L, Kubiszewski, I, Fioramonti, L, Sutton, P, Farber, S, Grasso, M., 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go?. Ecosyst. Serv., 28, 1-16.

[24]

Daily, G. C., 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, D.C

[25]

Dangles, O, Casas, J., 2019. Ecosystem services provided by insects for achieving sustainable development goals. Ecosyst. Serv., 35, 109-115.

[26]

DeClerck, F. A. J., Jones, S. K., Attwood, S, Bossio, D, Girvetz, E, Chaplin-Kramer, B, Enfors, E, Fremier, A, Gordon, L, Kizito, F, Noriega, I. L., Matthews, N, McCartney, M, Meacham, M, Noble, A, Quintero, M, Remans, R, Soppe, R, Willemen, L, Wood, S, Zhang, W., 2016. Agricultural ecosystems and their services: the vanguard of sustainability?. Curr. Opini. Environ. Sustain., 23, 92-99.

[27]

Department for International Development (DFID), 2017. Agenda 2030: the UK Government’s approach to delivering the Global Goals for Sustainable Development – at home and around the world. Department for International Development, UK Government.

[28]

Diaz, S, Pascual, U, Stenseke, M, Martin-Lopez, B, Watson, R. T., Molnar, Z, Hill, R, Chan, K. M. A., Baste, I. A., Brauman, K. A., Polasky, S, Church, A, Lonsdale, M, Larigauderie, A, Leadley, P. W., van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., van der Plaat, F, Schroter, M, Lavorel, S, Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y, Bukvareva, E, Davies, K, Demissew, S, Erpul, G, Failler, P, Guerra, C. A., Hewitt, C. L., Keune, H, Lindley, S, Shiryama, Y., 2018. Assessing nature's contributions to people. Science 359(6373), 270-272.

[29]

Dick, J, Turkelboom, F, Woods, H, Iniesta-Arandia, I, Primmer, E, Saarela, S, Bezák, P, Mederly, P, Leone, M, Verheyden, W, Kelemen, E, Hauck, J, Andrews, C, Antunes, P, Aszalós, R, Baró, F, Barton, D. N., Berry, P, Bugter, R, Carvalho, L, Czúcz, B, Dunford, R, Blanco, G, Geamana, N, Giuca, R, Grizzetti, B, Izakovicová, Z, Kertész, M, Kopperoinen, L, Langemeyer, J, Lapola, D. M., Liquete, C, Luque, S, Pastur, G. M., Martin-Lopez, B, Mukhopadhyay, R, Niemela, J, Odee, D, Peri, P. L., Pinho, P, Patrício-Roberto, G. B., Preda, E, Priess, J, Röckmann, C, Santos, R, Silaghi, D, Smith, R, Vadineanu, A, van der Wal, J. T., Arany, I, Badea, O, Bela, G, Boros, E, Bucur, M, Blumentrath, S, Calvache, M, Carmen, E, Clemente, P, Fernandes, J, Ferraz, D, Fongar, C, García-Llorente, M, Gómez-Baggethun, E, Gundersen, V, Haavardsholm, O, Kalóczkai, Á, Khalalwe, T, Kiss, G, Köhler, B, Lazányi, O, Lellei-Kovács, E, Lichungu, R, Lindhjem, H, Magare, C, Mustajoki, J, Ndege, C, Nowell, M, Girona, S. N., Ochieng, J, Often, A, Palomo, I, Pataki, G, Reinvang, R, Pusch, G, Saarikoski, H, Smith, A, Massoni, E. S., Stange, E, Traaholt, N. V, Vári, Á, Verweij, P, Vikström, S, Yli-Pelkonen, V, Zulian, G., 2018. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: results from 27 case studies. Ecosyst. Serv., 29, 552-565.

[30]

Fanning, A. L., O'Neill, D. W., Hickel, J, Roux, N., 2022. The social shortfall and ecological overshoot of nations. Nat. Sustain., 5, 26-36.

[31]

Feld, C. K., da Silva, P. M., Sousa, J. P., de Bello, F, Bugter, R, Grandin, U, Hering, D, Lavorel, S, Mountford, O, Pardo, I, Partel, M, Rombke, J, Sandin, L, Jones, K. B., Harrison, P., 2009. Indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem services: a synthesis across ecosystems and spatial scales. OIKOS 118(12), 1862-1871.

[32]

Fenner, R, Cernev, T., 2021. The implications of the Covid-19 pandemic for delivering the Sustainable Development Goals. Futures 128, 102726.

[33]

Fischer, J, Riechers, M, Loos, J, Martin-Lopez, B, Temperton, V. M., 2021. Making the UN decade on ecosystem restoration a social-ecological endeavour. Trends Ecol. Evol 36(1), 20-28.

[34]

Freeman, C, Stein, A, Hand, K, van Heezik, Y., 2017. City children's nature knowledge and contact: it is not just about biodiversity provision. Environ. Behav., 50(10), 1145-1171.

[35]

Fu, B., 2020. Promoting Geography for Sustainability. Geogr. Sustain., 1(1), 1-7.

[36]

Gates, W. L.World climate research program. Encyclopedia Atmos. Sci. 2003; 2602-2605.

[37]

Geijzendorffer, I. R., Cohen-Shacham, E, Cord, A. F., Cramer, W, Guerra, C, Martín-López, B., 2017. Ecosystem services in global sustainability policies. Environ. Sci. Policy 74, 40-48.

[38]

Goodwin, S, Olazabal, M, Castro, A. J., Pascual, U., 2023. Global mapping of urban nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation. Nat. Sustain., 6, 458-469.

[39]

Gosler, A. G., Tilling, S. M., 2021. Knowledge of nature and the nature of knowledge: student natural history knowledge and the significance of birds. People Nat., 4(1), 127-142.

[40]

Griggs, D, Smith, M. S., Rockström, J, Öhman, M. C., Gaffney, O, Glaser, G, Kanie, N, Noble, I, Steffen, W, Shyamsundar, P., 2014. An integrated framework for sustainable development goals. Ecol. Soc., 19(4), 49.

[41]

Griggs, D, Stafford-Smith, M, Gaffney, O, Rockström, J, Noble, I., 2013. Sustainable Development Goals for people and planet. Nature 495(7441), 305-307.

[42]

Haddaway, N.R., Macura, B., Whaley, P., Pullin, A.S., 2017. ROSES flow diagram for systematic reviews. Version 1.0. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5897389

[43]

Haines-oung, Y., Potschin, M., 2018. Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICE, S) V5.1 and, Guidance on the application of the revised structure. Fabis, Consultingtd., L, Nottingham, U, K. Available from www.cices.eu.

[44]

Halkos, G, Gkampoura, E. C., 2021. Where do we stand on the 17 Sustainable Development Goals? An overview on progress. Econ. Anal. Policy 70, 94-122.

[45]

Han, J. H., Lee, M. J., Hwang, Y. S., 2016. Tourists’ environmentally responsible behavior in response to climate change and tourist experiences in nature-based tourism. Sustainability 8(7), 644.

[46]

Hautier, Y, Tilman, D, Isbell, F, Seabloom, E. W., Borer, E. T., Reich, P. B., 2015. Anthropogenic environmental changes affect ecosystem stability via biodiversity. Science 348(6232), 336-340.

[47]

Herrera, V., 2019. Reconciling global aspirations and local realities: challenges facing the Sustainable Development Goals for water and sanitation. World Dev., 118, 106-117.

[48]

Hester, R. E., Harrison, R. M., Houghton, S. J. 2002. An overview of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and its process of science assessment. R.E. Hester, R.M. Harrison (Eds.), Global Environmental Change, The Royal Society, pp.1-20.

[49]

Howie, P, Atakhanova, Z., 2014. Resource boom and inequality: Kazakhstan as a case study. Resour. Policy 39, 71-79.

[50]

Iacobuţă, G. I., Brandi, C, Dzebo, A, Duron, S. D. E., 2022. Aligning climate and sustainable development finance through an SDG lens. The role of development assistance in implementing the Paris Agreement. Glob. Environ. Change 74, 102509.

[51]

International Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), 2016. Decision and scoping report for the IPBES global assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services. http://www.ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/pdf/Scoping_Global%20assessment.pdf (accessed 9 November 2016).

[52]

Jäger, J., 2003. The international human dimensions programme on global environmental change (IHDP). Glob. Environ. Change 13(1), 69-73.

[53]

Karger, D. N., Kessler, M, Lehnert, M, Jetz, W., 2021. Limited protection and ongoing loss of tropical cloud forest biodiversity and ecosystems worldwide. Nat. Ecol. Evol., 5, 854-862.

[54]

Kates, R, Frosch, R, Clark, W., 2000. Our common journey: a transition toward sustainability. Renew. Resour. J., 18(1), 8-15.

[55]

Keys, P. W., Galaz, V, Dyer, M, Matthews, N, Cornell, S. E., 2019. Anthropocene risk. Nat. Sustain., 2(8), 667-673.

[56]

Kihara, J, Bolo, P, Kinyua, M, Nyawira, S. S., Sommer, R., 2020. Soil health and ecosystem services: lessons from sub-Sahara Africa (SSA). Geoderma 370, 114342.

[57]

Kleemann, J, Schröter, M, Bagstad, K. J., Kuhlicke, C, Bonn, A., 2020. Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services – a case study for Germany. Glob. Environ. Change 61, 102051.

[58]

Kroll, C, Warchold, A, Pradhan, P., 2019. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): are we successful in turning trade-offs into synergies?. Palgrave Commun., 5, 140.

[59]

Kusi, K. K., Khattabi, A, Mhammdi, N, Lahssini, S., 2020. Prospective evaluation of the impact of land use change on ecosystem services in the Ourika watershed, Morocco. Land Use Policy 97, 104796.

[60]

Liao, S, Widowait, R, Puttong, P., 2022. Data mining analytics investigate Facebook Live stream users’ behaviors and business models: the evidence from Thailand. Entertain. Comput., 41, 100478.

[61]

Liu, Y, Du, J, Wang, Y, Cui, X, Dong, J, Hao, Y, Xue, K, Duan, H, Xia, A, Hu, Y, Dong, Z, Wu, B, Zhao, X, Fu, B., 2020. Evenness is important in assessing progress towards Sustainable Development Goals. Natl. Sci. Rev., 8(8), nwaa238.

[62]

Llopis, J. C., Chastonay, J. F., Birrer, F. C., Bär, R, Andriatsitohaina, N. N., Messerli, P, Heinimann, A, Zaehriner, J. G., 2021. Year-to-year ecosystem services supply in conservation contexts in north-eastern Madagascar: trade-offs between global demands and local needs. Ecosyst. Serv., 48, 101249.

[63]

Loreau, M, Olivieri, I., 1999. Diversitas: an international programme of biodiversity science. Trends Ecol. Evol., 14(1), 2-3.

[64]

Lu, Y, Zhang, Y, Cao, X, Wang, C, Wang, Y, Zhang, M, Ferrier, R. C., Jenkins, A, Yuan, J, Bailey, M. J., Chen, D, Tian, H, Li, H, Weizsäcker, E. U., Zhang, Z., 2019. Forty years of reform and opening up: China’s progress toward a sustainable path. Sci. Adv., 5(8), eaau9413.

[65]

Lund, M. P., 2002. Performance of the species listed in the European Community ‘Habitats’ Directive as indicators of species richness in Denmark. Environ. Sci. Policy 5, 105-112.

[66]

Mandle, L, Shields-Estrada, A, Chaplin-Kramer, R, Mitchell, M. G. E., Ricketts, T. H., 2020. Increasing decision relevance of ecosystem service science. Nat. Sustain., 4, 161-169.

[67]

Mathie, A, Cunningham, G., 2003. From clients to citizens: asset-based community development as a strategy for community-driven development. Dev. Pract., 13(5), 474-486.

[68]

McCauley, D. J., Pinsky, M. L., Palumbi, S. R., Estes, J. A., Joyce, F. H., Warner, R. R., 2015. Marine defaunation: animal loss in the global ocean. Science 347(6219), 1255641.

[69]

Meadows, D. H., Goldsmith, E, Meadow, P. 1972. The limits to growth. L. Robin, S. Sörlin, P. Warde (Eds.), The Future of Nature: Documents of Global Change, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp.101-116.

[70]

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

[71]

Moyer, J. D., Hedden, S., 2020. Are we on the right path to achieve the sustainable development goals?. World Dev., 127, 104749.

[72]

Mulligan, M, van Soesbergen, A, Hole, D. G., Brooks, T. M., Burke, S, Hutton, J., 2020. Mapping nature's contribution to SDG 6 and implications for other SDGs at policy relevant scales. Remote Sens. Environ., 239, 111671.

[73]

Ono, A. J., Boyd, D. R., Chan, K., 2021. Acculturation as an ecosystem service? Urban natural space supports evolving relational values and identity in new female migrants. People Nat., 5(2), 313-325.

[74]

Osman, A, Mensah, E. A., Mensah, C. A., Asamoah, Y, Dauda, S, Adu-Boahen, K, Adongo, C. A., 2022. Spatial analysis of synergies and trade-offs between the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Africa. Geogr. Sustain., 3(3), 220-231.

[75]

Ouyang, Z, Song, C, Zheng, H, Polasky, S, Xiao, Y, Bateman, I. J., Liu, J, Ruckelshaus, M, Shi, F, Xiao, Y, Xu, W, Zou, Z, Daily, G. C., 2020. Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 117(25), 14593-14601.

[76]

Pagdee, A, Kawasaki, J., 2021. The importance of community perceptions and capacity building in payment for ecosystems services: a case study at Phu Kao, Thailand. Ecosyst. Serv., 47, 101224.

[77]

Palmer, L., 2022. Solving twin crises. Nat. Sustain., 5, 816-817.

[78]

Pascual, U, Balvanera, P, Díaz, S, Pataki, G, Roth, E, Stenseke, M, Watson, R. T., Dessane, E. B., Islar, M, Kelemen, E, Maris, V, Quaas, M, Subramanian, S. M., Wittmer, H, Adlan, A, Ahn, S, Al-Hafedh, Y. S., Amankwah, E, Asah, S. T., Berry, P, Bilgin, A, Breslow, S. J., Bullock, C, Caceres, D, Daly-Hassen, H, Figueroa, E, Golden, C. D., Gomez-Baggethum, E, Gonzalezz-Jimenez, D, Houdet, J, Keune, H, Kumar, R, Ma, K, May, P. H., Mead, A, O'Farrell, P, Pandit, R, Pengue, S, Pacheco-Balanza, D, Saarikoski, H, Strassburg, B. B., van den Belt, M, Verma, M, Wickson, F, Yagi, N. 2017. Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 26-27, pp.7-16.

[79]

Pata, U. K., 2021. Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: a sustainability perspective. Renew. Energy 173, 197-208.

[80]

Patankar, V. J., 2019. Attitude, perception and awareness of stakeholders towards the protected marine species in the Andaman Islands. Ocean Coast. Manage., 179, 104830.

[81]

Patterson, M. G., 2002. Ecological production based pricing of biosphere processes. Ecol. Econ., 41(3), 457-478.

[82]

Peng, J, Wang, X, Liu, Y, Zhao, Y, Xu, Z, Zhao, M, Qiu, S, Wu, J., 2020. Urbanization impact on the supply-demand budget of ecosystem services: decoupling analysis. Ecosyst. Serv., 44, 101139.

[83]

Powers, A., 2012. The Rio+20 process: forward movement for the environment?. Transnat. Environ. Law 1(2), 403-412.

[84]

Pradhan, P, Costa, L, Rybski, D, Lucht, W, Kropp, J. P., 2017. A systematic study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) interactions. Earths Future 5(11), 1169-1179.

[85]

Raviv, O, Z-Shiri, S, Ido, I, Lotan, A., 2021. The effect of wildfire and land-cover changes on the economic value of ecosystem services in Mount Carmel Biosphere Reserve, Israel. Ecosyst. Serv., 49, 101291.

[86]

Remme, R. P., Frumkin, H, Guerry, A. D., King, A. C., Mandle, L, Sarabu, C, Bratman, G. N., Giles-Corti, B, Hamel, P, Han, B, Hicks, J. L., James, P, Lawler, J. J., Lindahl, T, Liu, H, Lu, Y, Oosterbrork, B, Paudel, B, Sallis, J. F., Schipperijn, J, Sosič, R, de Vries, S, Wheeler, B. W., Wood, S. A., Wu, T, Daily, G. C., 2021. An ecosystem service perspective on urban nature, physical activity, and health. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 118(22), e2018472118.

[87]

Resende, F. M., Cimon-Morin, J, Poulin, M, Meyer, L, Joner, D. C., Loyola, R., 2021. The importance of protected areas and Indigenous lands in securing ecosystem services and biodiversity in the Cerrado. Ecosyst. Serv., 49, 101282.

[88]

Reyers, B, Selig, E. R., 2020. Global targets that reveal the social-ecological interdependencies of sustainable development. Nat. Ecol. Evol., 4(8), 1011-1019.

[89]

Ricke, K. L., Caldeira, K., 2014. Natural climate variability and future climate policy. Nat. Clim. Change 4(5), 333-338.

[90]

Ried, A, Monteagudo, M. J., Benavides, P, Bon, A. L., Carmody, S, Santos, R., 2020. Key aspects of leisure experiences in protected wilderness areas: notions of nature, senses of place and perceived benefits. Sustainability 12(8), 3211.

[91]

Rockström, J, Steffen, W, Noone, K, Persson, A, Chapin III, S, Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M, Folke, C, Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B, de Wit, C. A., Hughes, T, van der Leeuw, S, Rodhe, H, Sörlin, S, Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R, Svedin, U, Falkenmark, M, Karberg, L, Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J, Walker, B, Liverman, D, Richardson, K, Crutzen, P, Jonathan, A., 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472-475.

[92]

Salvia, A. L., Leal, F. W., Brandli, L. L., Griebeler, J. S., 2019. Assessing research trends related to Sustainable Development Goals: local and global issues. J. Clean. Prod., 208, 841-849.

[93]

Sari, R, Soytas, U, Kanoglu-Ozkan, D. G., Sivrikaya, A., 2023. Improving the climate resilience of European cities via socially acceptable nature-based solutions. npj Urban Sustain., 3, 9.

[94]

Satyanarayana, B, Quispe-Zuniga, M. R., Huge, J, Sulong, I, Mohd-Lokman, H, Dahdouh-Guebas, F., 2021. Mangroves fueling livelihoods: a socio-economic stakeholder analysis of the charcoal and pole production systems in the world's longest managed mangrove forest. Front. Ecol. Evol., 9, 621721.

[95]

Scholze, M, Knorr, W, Arnell, N. W., Prentice, I. C., 2006. A climate-change risk analysis for world ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 103(35), 13116-13120.

[96]

Schröter, M, Koellner, T, Alkemade, R, Arnhold, S, Bagstad, K. J., Erb, K. H., Frank, K, Kaster, T, Kissinger, M, Liu, J., 2018. Interregional flows of ecosystem services: concepts, typology and four cases. Ecosyst. Serv., 31, 231-241.

[97]

Segre, H, Segoli, M, Carmel, Y, Shwartz, A., 2020. Experimental evidence of multiple ecosystem services and disservices provided by ecological intensification in Mediterranean agro-ecosystems. J. Appl. Ecol., 57(10), 2041-2053.

[98]

Seitzinger, S. P., Gaffney, O, Brasseur, G, Broadgate, W, Claussen, M, Erisman, J. W., Kiefer, T, Lancelot, C, Monks, P. S., 2015. International Geosphere–Biosphere Programme and Earth system science: three decades of co-evolution. Anthropocene 12, 3-16.

[99]

Seyfang, G., 2003. Environmental mega-conferences—from Stockholm to Johannesburg and beyond. Glob. Environ. Change 13(3), 223-228.

[100]

Sharma, V, Singh, P. K., 2021. Protecting humanity by providing sustainable solution for mimicking the nature in construction field. Mater. Today: Proc., 45(2), 3226-3230.

[101]

Sheng, J, Qiu, W, Han, X., 2020. China's PES-like horizontal eco-compensation program: combining market-oriented mechanisms and government interventions. Ecosyst. Serv., 45, 101164.

[102]

Sherrouse, B. C., Semmens, D. J., Clement, J. M., 2014. An application of Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecol. Ind., 36, 68-79.

[103]

Shrivastava, P, Stafford Smith, M, O'Brien, K, Zsolnai, L., 2020. Transforming sustainability science to generate positive social and environmental change globally. One Earth 2(4), 329-340.

[104]

Smith, P, Adams, J, Beerling, D. J., Beringer, T, Calvin, K, Fuss, S, Griscom, B, Hagemann, N, Kammann, N, Kraxner, F., 2019. Land-management options for greenhouse gas removal and their impacts on ecosystem services and the Sustainable Development Goals. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour., 44, 255-286.

[105]

Sousa, R, Morais, P, Dias, E, Antunes, C., 2011. Biological invasions and ecosystem functioning: time to merge. Biol. Invasions 13, 1055-1058.

[106]

Stafford-Smith, M, Griggs, D, Gaffney, O, Ullah, F, Reyers, B, Kanie, N, Stigson, B, Shrivastava, P, Leach, M, O'Connell, D., 2017. Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain. Sci., 12(6), 911-919.

[107]

Strong, M. F., 1992. The promises and challenges of UNCED '92. Ocean Coast. Manage., 18(1), 5-14.

[108]

Teh, L. C. L., Sumaila, U. R., 2013. Contribution of marine fisheries to worldwide employment. Fish Fish., 14(1), 77-88.

[109]

Thibodeau, F. R., Field, H. H., 1982. The world conservation strategy: environmental education and local initiative. Environmentalist 2(1), 35-41.

[110]

Tigchelaar, M, Cheung, W. W., Mohammed, E. Y., Phillips, M. J., Payne, H. J., Selig, E. R., Wabnitz, C. C. C., Oyinlola, M. A., Frölicher, T. L., Gephart, J. A., Golden, C. D., Allison, E. H., Bennett, A, Cao, L, Fanzo, J, Halpern, B. S., Lam, V. W. Y., Micheli, F, Naylor, R. L., Sumaila, U. R., Tagliabue, A, Troell, M., 2021. Compound climate risks threaten aquatic food system benefits. Nat. Food 2, 673-682.

[111]

International, Council for, Science (ICS), U.Review of the Sustainable Development Goals: the science perspective.International, Council forcience, S, Paris. http://www.icsu.org/publications/reports-andreviews/review-of-targets-for-the-sustainable%20development-goals-thescience-perspective-2015/SDG-, Report.pdf (accessed 23 March 2016).

[112]

United, Nations (U), N.United Nations Millennium Declaration.Millenniumummit, S, Nework, Y, 6-8 September 2000.

[113]

United Nations (UN), 2020a. The United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/31813/ERDStrat.pdf?Sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

[114]

United Nations (UN), 2020b. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. https:// unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/# sdg-goals (accessed 11 December 2020).

[115]

United Nations (UN), 2015. Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030% 20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf (accessed 21 January 2016).

[116]

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2013. Embedding the Environment in Sustainable Development Goals. UNEP Post-2015 Discussion Paper 1. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya. http://www.unep.org/pdf/embedding-environmentsin-SDGs-v2.pdf.

[117]

United Nations Development Group (UNDG), 2017. Mainstreaming the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Reference Guide to UN Country Teams. https://undg.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/03/UNDGMainstreaming-the-2030-Agenda-Reference-Guide-2017.pdf.

[118]

United Nations (UN), 2023. Independent Group of Scientists Appointed by the Secretary- General. Global Sustainable Development Report 2023: Times of Crisis, Times of Change: Science for Accelerating Transformations to Sustainable Development. United Nations, New York.

[119]

Vasseur, L, Horning, D, Thornbush, M, Cohen-Shacham, E, Jones, M., 2017. Complex problems and unchallenged solutions: bringing ecosystem governance to the forefront of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Ambio 46(7), 731-742.

[120]

Verutes, G. M., Arkema, K. K., Clarke-Samuels, C., 2017. Integrated planning that safeguards ecosystems and balances multiple objectives in coastal Belize. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manage., 13, 1-17.

[121]

Villarreal-Rosas, J, Sonter, L. J., Runting, R, López-Cubillos, S, Dade, M. C., Possingham, H. P., Rhodes, J. R., 2020. Advancing systematic conservation planning for ecosystem services. Trends Ecol. Evol., 35(12), 1129-1139.

[122]

Wang, R. Y., Ng, C. N., Qi, X., 2020. The Chinese characteristics of payments for ecosystem services: a conceptual analysis of water eco-compensation mechanisms. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev., 36(4), 651-669.

[123]

Wang, Y, Hong, S, Wang, J, Lin, J, Mu, H, Wei, L, Wang, Z, Bryan, B. A., 2022. Complex regional telecoupling between people and nature revealed via quantification of trans-boundary ecosystem service flows. People Nat., 4, 274-292.

[124]

Wood, S. L., Jones, S. K., Johnson, J. A., Brauman, K. A., Chaplin-Kramer, R, Fremier, A, Cirvetz, E, Gordon, L. J., Kappel, C. V., Mandle, L, Mulligan, M, O'Farrell, P, Smith, W. K., Willemen, L, Zhang, W, DeClerck, F. A., 2018. Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals. Ecosyst. Serv., 29, 70-82.

[125]

Wssd, A., 2002. The johannesburg declaration on sustainable development. Environ. Prot., 25(1), 31-33.

[126]

Wu, X, Wang, S, Fu, B, Liu, J., 2021. Spatial variation and influencing factors of the effectiveness of afforestation in China's Loess Plateau. Sci. Total Environ., 771, 144904.

[127]

Xu, J, Barrett, B, Renaud, F. G., 2022. Ecosystem services and disservices in the Luanhe River Basin in China under past, current and future land uses: implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain. Sci., 17, 1347-1364.

[128]

Xu, Z, Peng, J., 2022. Ecosystem services-based decision-making: a bridge from science to practice. Environ. Sci. Policy 135, 6-15.

[129]

Xu, Z, Peng, J, Qiu, S, Liu, Y, Dong, J, Zhang, H., 2022. Responses of spatial relationships between ecosystem services and the Sustainable Development Goals to urbanization. Sci. Total Environ., 850, 157868.

[130]

Xu, Z, Peng, J, Dong, J, Liu, Y, Liu, Q, Lyu, D, Qiao, R, Zhang, Z., 2022. Spatial correlation between the changes of ecosystem service supply and demand: an ecological zoning approach. Landsc. Urban Plan., 217, 104258.

[131]

Xu, Z, Peng, J, Liu, Y, Qiu, S, Zhang, H, Dong, J., 2023. Exploring the combined impact of ecosystem services and urbanization on SDGs realization. Appl. Geogr., 153, 102907.

[132]

Xu, Z, Wei, H, Fan, W, Wang, X, Huang, B, Lu, N, Ren, J, Dong, X., 2018. Energy modeling simulation of changes in ecosystem services before and after the implementation of a Grain-for-Green program on the Loess Plateau—a case study of the Zhifanggou valley in Ansai County, Shaanxi Province, China. Ecosyst. Serv., 31, 32-43.

[133]

Yan, R, Cai, Y, Li, C, Wang, X, Liu, Q, Yan, S., 2021. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services and the identification of win-win areas at the regional scale. Ecol. Complex., 47, 100938.

[134]

Yin, C, Zhao, W, Cherubini, F, Pereira, P., 2021. Integrate ecosystem services into socio-economic development to enhance achievement of sustainable development goals in the post-pandemic era. Geogr. Sustain., 2(1), 68-73.

[135]

Zhang, S, Fan, W, Yi, Y, Zhao, Y, Liu, J., 2017. Evaluation method for regional water cycle health based on nature-society water cycle theory. J. Hydrol., 551, 352-364.

[136]

Zhang, Z, Peng, J, Xu, Z, Wang, X, Meersmans, J., 2021. Ecosystem services supply and demand response to urbanization: a case study of the Pearl River Delta, China. Ecosyst. Serv., 49, 101274.

[137]

Zhao, H, Chang, J, Havlík, P, van Dijk, M, Valin, H, Janssens, C, Ma, L, Bai, Z, Herrero, M, Smith, P, Obersteiner, M., 2021. China's future food demand and its implications for trade and environment. Nat. Sustain., 4, 1042-1051.

[138]

Zhao, W, Yin, C, Hua, T, Meadows, M. E., Li, Y, Liu, Y, Cherubini, F, Pereira, P, Fu, B., 2022. Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in the post-pandemic era. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., 9, 258.

PDF

196

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/