Stepwise Ecological Restoration: A framework for improving restoration outcomes^☆

Abstract

Ecosystem degradation is one of the critical constraints for the sustainable development of our planet. However, recovering an ecosystem to a pre-impairment condition is often not practical. The International Restoration Standards provide the first framework for practical guidance on what constitutes the process of ecological repair and how this repair process can be influenced to improve net ecological benefits. In these Standards, Restorative Continuum is highlighted and it recognises that many do not, yet there is still value in aspiring to improvements to the highest extent possible, with some sites potentially being able to be improved in a stepwise manner. Here we elaborate on these Standards by providing a cross-ecosystem theoretical framework of Stepwise Ecological Restoration (STERE) for promoting higher environmental benefits. STERE allows the selection of suitable restorative modes by considering the degree of degradation while encouraging a transition to a higher state. These models include environmental remediation for completely modified and degraded ecosystems, ecological rehabilitation for highly modified and degraded ecosystems, and ecological restoration for degraded native ecosystems. STERE requires selecting tailored restorative modes, setting clear restorative targets and reference ecosystems, applying a systematic-thinking approach, and implementing a continuous monitoring program at all process stages to achieve a resilient trajectory. STERE allows adaptive management in the context of climate change, and when the evidence is available, to “adapt to the future” to ensure climate resilience. The STERE framework could assist in initiating and implementing restoration projects worldwide, especially in developing countries.

Keywords

Ecological restoration / Reference ecosystem / Restorative modes / Sustainable development

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work received support from the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Grant No. KCXFZ20201221173601003) and the Henan Provincial Key Laboratory of Hydrosphere and Watershed Water Security.

References

[1] Alexander, S, Nelson, C. R., Aronson, J, Lamb, D, Cliquet, A, Erwin, K. L., Finlayson, C. M., de Groot, R. S., Harris, J. A., Higgs, E. S., Hobbs, R. J., Robin Lewis III, R. R., Martinez, D, Murcia, C., 2011. Opportunities and challenges for ecological restoration within REDD+. Restor. Ecol., 19, 683-689.

[2] Aronson, J, Alexander, S., 2013. Ecosystem restoration is now a global priority: time to roll up our sleeves. Restor. Ecol., 21(2), 293-296.

[3] Blanco, V, Brown, C, Holzhauer, S, Vulturius, G, Rounsevell, M., 2017. The importance of socio-ecological system dynamics in understanding adaptation to global change in the forestry sector. J. Environ. Manage., 196, 36-47.

[4] Borja, Á, Dauer, D, Grémare, A., 2012. The importance of setting targets and reference conditions in assessing marine ecosystem quality. Ecol. Indic., 12(1), 1-7.

[5] Caretta, M, Rothrock, B, Zegre, N., 2022. Exploring climate change perspectives. An analysis of undergraduate students’ place-based attachment in Appalachia, USA. Rural Sociol., 87(3), 847-872.

[6] Chazdon, R., 2008. Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320, 1458-1460.

[7] Clewell, A, Aronson, J., 2011. Ecological Restoration. Island Press, Washington

[8] Cooke, J, Johnson, M., 2002. Ecological restoration of land with particular reference to the mining of metals and industrial minerals: a review of theory and practice. Environ. Rev., 10(1), 41-71.

[9] Coleman, M, Wood, G, Filbee-Dexter, K, Minne, A. J., Goold, H. D., Vergés, A, Marzinelli, E, Steinberg, P, Wernberg, T., 2020. Restore or redefine: future trajectories for restoration. Front. Mar. Sci., 7, 237.

[10] Crouzeilles, R, Ferreira, M, Chazdon, R, Lindenmayer, D, Sansevero, J, Monteiro, L, Iribarrem, A, Latawiec, A, Strassburg, B., 2017. Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests. Sci. Adv., 3, e1701345.

[11] Dou, Y, Yu, X, Liu, Y., 2021. Rethinking non-material links between people and drylands from a cultural ecosystem services perspective. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 48, 110-114.

[12] Gann, G, McDonald, T, Walder, B, Aronson, J, Nelson, C, Jonson, J, Hallett, J, Eisenberg, C, Guariguata, M, Liu, J, Hua, F., 2019. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Restor. Ecol., 27, S1-S46.

[13] GDEE, 2021. Ecological Restorarion of Maozhou River, a Perspective of Environmental Monitoring. Department of Ecology and Environment of Guangdong Province.

[14] Goebel, P, Wyse, T, Corace, R., 2005. Determining reference ecosystem conditions for disturbed landscapes within the context of contemporary resource management issues. J. For., 103(7), 351-356.

[15] Guan, Y, Kang, R, Liu, J., 2019. Evolution of the field of ecological restoration over the last three decades: a bibliometric analysis. Restor. Ecol., 27(3), 647-660.

[16] Hanberry, B, Noss, R, Safford, H, Allison, S, Dey, D., 2015. Restoration is preparation for the future. J. For., 113(4), 425-429.

[17] Iftekhar, M. S., Polyakov, M, Ansell, D, Gibson, F, Kay, G. M., 2017. How economics can further the success of ecological restoration. Conserv. Biol., 31(2), 261-268.

[18] Jones, H. 2013. Impact of ecological restoration on ecosystem services. S.A. Levin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (2nd ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.199-208.

[19] Kaiser-Bunbury, C, Mougal, J, Whittington, A, Valentin, T, Gabriel, R, Olesen, J. M., Blüthgen, N., 2017. Ecosystem restoration strengthens pollination network resilience and function. Nature 542(7640), 223-227.

[20] Kimball, S, Lulow, M, Sorenson, Q, Balazs, K, Y-Fang, C, Davis, S. J., O'Connell, M, Huxman, T. E., 2015. Cost-effective ecological restoration. Restor. Ecol., 23, 800-810.

[21] Lake, P., 2013. Resistance, resilience and restoration. Ecol. Manag. Restor., 14(1), 20-24.

[22] Lin, Z, Huimin, Y, Yunfeng, H, Zhichao, X, Yu, X, Gaodi, X, Ma, J, Wang, J., 2017. Overview of ecological restoration technologies and evaluation systems. J. Resour. Ecol., 8(4), 315-324.

[23] Liu, J, Cui, W. H., Tian, Z, Jia, J., 2021. Theory of stepwise ecological restoration. Chin. Sci. Bull., 66, 1014-1025.

[24] Liu, J, Clewell, A., 2017. Management of Ecological Rehabilitation Projects. Science Press, Beijing

[25] Liu, J., Dou, Y., 2022. Ecological restoration of Yongding River in China. In: United Nations Environment Programme (Ed.), Good Practices on Vulnerable Ecosystem Restoration in China. Nairobi, pp 47–52.

[26] Luo, Y, Lü, Y, Fu, B, Zhang, Q, Li, T, Hu, W, Comber, A., 2019. Half century change of interactions among ecosystem services driven by ecological restoration: quantification and policy implications at a watershed scale in the Chinese Loess Plateau. Sci. Total Environ., 651(Part 2), 2546-2557.

[27] MEE, 2021. Best practice: Maozhou River. Ministry of Ecology and Environment of People’s Republic of China.

[28] Morrison, E, Lindell, C., 2011. Active or passive forest restoration? Assessing restoration alternatives with avian foraging behavior. Restor. Ecol., 19(201), 170-177.

[29] Nilsson, C, Aradottir, A, Hagen, D, Halldórsson, G, Høegh, K, Mitchell, R, Raulund-Rasmussen, K, Svavarsdóttir, K, Tolvanen, A, Wilson, S., 2016. Evaluating the process of ecological restoration. Ecol. Soc., 21(1), 41.

[30] Power, D, Watson, R, Szathmáry, E, Mills, R, Powers, S. T., Doncaster, C. P., Czapp, B., 2015. What can ecosystems learn? Expanding evolutionary ecology with learning theory. Biol. Direct., 10, 1-24.

[31] Seidl, R, Thom, D, Kautz, M, Wild, J, Ascoli, D, Petr, M, Honkaniemi, J, Lexer, M, Trotsiuk, V, Mairota, P, Svoboda, M, Fabrika, M, Nagel, T, Reye, C., 2017. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang., 7, 395-402.

[32] UN, 2019. United Nations decade on ecosystem restoration (2021–2030). General Assembly, 69th Plenary Meeting, Seventy-third Session, Agenda Item 14.

[33] Wainwright, C, Staples, T, Charles, L, Flanagan, T, Lai, H, Loy, X, Reynolds, V, Mayfield, M., 2018. Links between community ecology theory and ecological restoration are on the rise. J. Appl. Ecol., 55(2), 570-581.

[34] Weidlich, E, Nelson, C, Maron, J, Callaway, R, Delory, B, Temperton, V., 2021. Priority effects and ecological restoration. Restor. Ecol., 29(1), e1331.

[35] Wells, H, Dougill, A, Stringer, L., 2019. The importance of long-term social-ecological research for the future of restoration ecology. Restor. Ecol., 27(5), 929-933.

[36] Wohl, E, Lane, S, Wilcox, A., 2015. The science and practice of river restoration. Water Resour. Res., 51(8), 5974-5977.