Regional economic assessment of a novel place-based model for sustainable food systems

Abstract

Several actions from both the environmental and human viewpoints have already been made to meet the sustainability goals targeted at food systems. Still, new place-based ideas to improve sustainability are needed. Agroecological symbiosis (AES), a novel food system model, is an example of a suggested system-level change to attain sustainability targets; it is a symbiosis of food production and processing using renewable energy that uses its own feedstock. AES has already been found advantageous from the ecological and biophysical viewpoints, but a regional economic evaluation of the model is still lacking. Thus, the aim of our paper is to assess the regional economic impact of a possible systemic change in the food system using the network of agroecological symbiosis (NAES) as an example. We applied scenarios representing different ways of moving towards envisioned NAES models in Mäntsälä, Finland, and a computable general equilibrium model to evaluate the regional economic impact. According to our results, both regional economy and employment would increase, and the regional production base would diversify with NAES implementation applied to the region, but the extent of the benefits varies between scenarios. The scenario that includes change in both public and private food demand, production of bioenergy and utilization of by-products would cause the largest impacts. However, realizing NAES requires investments that may influence the actual implementation of such models. Nonetheless, a change towards NAES can promote an economically and spatially just transition to sustainability, as NAES seems to be economically most beneficial for rural areas.

Keywords

Sustainability / Regional economy / Localized food system / Renewable energy / Circularity

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work received funding from the Finnish Ministry of the Environment (RAKI2 programme) and the Finnish Cultural Foundation. The authors wish to thank everyone who provided important help and advice regarding the article. We especially thank those who participated in the AES Networks Project. In addition, we thank Seija Virkkala, Outi Hakala and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

References

[1] Börjeson, L, Höjer, M, K-Dreborg, H, Ekvall, T, Finnveden, G., 2006. Scenario types and techniques: towards a user's guide. Futures, 38 (7), pp. 723-739. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2005.12.002.

[2] Campoy-Muñoz, P., Cardenete, M., Delgado, M., 2017. Economic impact assessment of food waste reduction on European countries through social accounting matrices. Resour. Conserv. Recyc. 122, 202–209. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.010.

[3] Caron, P, Ferrero y de Loma-Osorio, G, Nabarro, D, Hainzelin, E, Guillou, M, Andersen, I, Ardold, T, Astralaga, M, Beukeboom, M, Bickersteth, S, Bwalya, M, Cabellero, P, Campbell, B, Divine, N, Fan, S, Frick, M, Friis, A, Gallagher, M, J-Halkin, P, Hanson, C, Lasbennes, F, Ribera, T, Rockstrom, J, Schuepbach, M, Steer, A, Tutwiler, A, Verburg, G., 2018. Food systems for sustainable development: proposals for a profound four-part transformation. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 38 (41) . doi: 10.1007/s13593-018-0519-1.

[4] Cazcarro, I, Duarte, R, Sánchez Chóliz, J, Sarasa, C, Serrano, A., 2016. Modelling regional policy scenarios in the agri-food sector: a case study of a Spanish region. Appl. Econ., 48 (16), pp. 1463-1480. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2015.1102842.

[5] Cazcarro, I, Duarte, R, Sánchez Chóliz, J, Sarasa, C., 2020. Water and production reallocation in the Spanish agri-food system. Econ. Syst. Res., 32 (2), pp. 278-299. doi: 10.1080/09535314.2019.1693982.

[6] Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., Truffer, B., 2012. Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Resour. Policy 41 (6), 968–979. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014.

[7] Crippa, M, Solazzo, E, Guizzardi, D, Monforti-Ferrario, F, Tubiello, F, Leip, A., 2021. Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nat. Food, 2, pp. 198-209. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9.

[8] Derqui, B., Fernandez, V., Fayos, T., 2018. Towards more sustainable food systems. Addressing food waste at school canteens. Appetite 129, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.appet. 2018.06.022.

[9] El Bilali, H., 2019. Research on agro-food sustainability transitions: a systematic review of research themes and an analysis of research gaps. J. Clean. Prod., 221, pp. 353-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.232.

[10] European Commission, 2019. Communication from the Commission: the European Green Deal. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640&from=FI (accessed 18 November 2022).

[11] European Commission, 2020. Farm to Fork Strategy - for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system. https://ec.europa.eu/food/system/files/2020-05/f2f_action-plan_2020_strategy-info_en.pdf (accessed 18 November 2022).

[12] Fauré, E, Arushanyan, Y, Ekener, E, Miliutenko, S, Finnveden, G., 2017. Methods for assessing future scenarios from a sustainability perspective. Eur. J. Futures Res., 5 (17) . doi: 10.1007/s40309-017-0121-9.

[13] Finnish, Biocycle and, Biogasssociation, A.Tilastot/Statistics.https://biokierto.fi/tilastot/(accessed 30 January 2023). (in, Finnish).

[14] Fu, B., Meadows, M., Zhao, W., 2022. Geography in the Anthropocene: transforming our world for sustainable development. Geogr. Sustain. 3 (1), 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.geosus. 2021.12.004.

[15] Ghaith, Z, Kulshreshtha, S, Natcher, D, Cameron, B., 2021. Regional computable general equilibrium models: a review. J. Policy Model., 43 (3), pp. 710-724. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.03.005.

[16] Guo, C, Dai, H, Liu, X, Wu, Y, Liu, X, Liu, Y., 2020. Impacts of climate change mitigation on agriculture water use: a provincial analysis in China. Geogr. Sustain., 1 (3), pp. 189-199. doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2020.07.001.

[17] Haas, W, Krausmann, F, Wiedenhofer, D, Heinz, M., 2015. How circular is the global economy? An assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European union and the world in 2005. J. Ind. Ecol., 19, pp. 765-777. doi: 10.1111/jiec.12244.

[18] Helenius, J, Aro-Heinilä, E, Hietala, R, Mikkola, M, Risku-Norja, H, Seppänen, L, Sinkkonen, M, Vihma, A., 2007. Systems frame for multidisciplinary study on sustainability of localizing food. Prog. Ind. Ecol., Int. J., 4 (5), pp. 328-347. doi: 10.1504/PIE.2007.015615.

[19] Helenius, J., Hagolani-Albov, S., Koppelmäki, K., 2020. Co-creating agroecological symbioses (AES) for sustainable food system networks. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 4, 229. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.588715.

[20] Horridge, M., 2012. The TERM model and its database. In: Wittwer G. (Ed.) Economic Modeling of Water. Global Issues in Water Policy, 3. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2876-9_2.

[21] Horridge, M., Jerie, M., Mustakinov, D., Schiffmann, F., 2018. GEMPACK manual, GEMPACK Software, ISBN 978-1-921654-34-3.

[22] Huan-Niemi, E, Kaljonen, M, Knuuttila, M, Niemi, J, Saarinen, M., 2020. The impacts of dietary change in Finland: food system approach. Agric. Food Sci., 29 (4), pp. 372-382. doi: 10.23986/afsci.95282.

[23] Jurgilevich, A, Birge, T, Kentala-Lehtonen, J, Korhonen-Kurki, K, Pietikäinen, J, Saikku, L, Schöler, H., 2016. Transition towards circular economy in the food system. Sustainability, 8 (1), p. 69. doi: 10.3390/su8010069.

[24] Kattilakoski, M., Husberg, A., Kuhmonen, H-M., Rutanen, J., Vihinen, H., Töyli, P., Lukkari, T., Osmonen, E., Väre, T., Åström, C., 2022. Countryside renewing with the times: rural policy programme 2021–2027. Publications of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2022:13, Helsinki. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-366-380-0.

[25] Kiss, K., Ruszkai, C., Takács-György, K., 2019. Examination of short supply chains based on circular economy and sustainability aspects. Resources 8 (4), 161. doi: 10.3390/resources8040161.

[26] Koppelmäki, K., Helenius, J., Schulte, R., 2021a. Nested circularity in food systems: a Nordic case study on connecting biomass, nutrient and energy flows from field scale to continent. Resour. Conserv. Recyc. 164, 105218. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020. 105218

[27] Koppelmäki, K., Lamminen, M., Helenius, J., Schulte, R., 2021b. Smart integration of food and bioenergy production delivers on multiple ecosystem services. Food Energy Secur. 10 (2), 351–367. doi: 10.1002/fes3.279.

[28] Koppelmäki, K, Parviainen, T, Virkkunen, E, Winquist, E, Schulte, R, Helenius, J., 2019. Ecological intensification by integrating biogas production into nutrient cycling: modeling the case of Agroecological Symbiosis. Agri. Syst., 170, pp. 39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.12.007.

[29] Koppelmäki, K, Hendriks, M, Helenius, J, Kujala, S, Schulte, R., 2023. Food-energy integration in primary production and food processing results in a more equal distribution of economic value across regional food systems: nordic case study from circular perspective. Circul. Econ. Sust., 3, pp. 1385-1403. doi: 10.1007/s43615-022-00233-2.

[30] Kuokkanen, A, Mikkilä, M, Kuisma, M, Kahiluoto, H, Linnanen, L., 2017. The need for policy to address the food system lock-in: a case study of the Finnish context. J. Clean. Prod., 140 (2), pp. 933-944. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.171.

[31] Köhler, J, Geels, F, Kern, F, Markard, J, Onsango, E, Wieczorek, A, Alkemade, F, Avelino, F, Bergek, A, Boons, F, Fünfschilling, L, Hess, D, Holtz, G, Hyysalo, S, Jenkins, K, Kivimaa, P, Martiskainen, M, McMeekin, A, Mühlemeier, M, Nyqvist, B, Pel, B, Raven, R, Rohracher, H, Sandén, B, Schot, J, Savacool, B, Turnheim, B, Welch, D, Wells, P., 2019. An agenda for sustainability transitions research: state of the art and future directions. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 31, pp. 1-32. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.

[32] Laasasenaho, K, Lensu, A, Lauhanen, R, Rintala, J., 2019. GIS-data related route optimization, hierarchical clustering, location optimization, and kernel density methods are useful for promoting distributed bioenergy plant planning in rural areas. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., 32, pp. 47-57. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2019.01.006.

[33] Lever, J, Sonnino, R., 2022. Food system transformation for sustainable city-regions: exploring the potential of circular economies. Reg. Stud., 56 (12), pp. 2019-2031. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2021.2021168.

[34] Madau, F., Furesi, R., Pulina, P., 2014. An analysis of sustainability policies in European agriculture in the long term: methods and materials using the FEEM indicators. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 38 (4), 485–501. doi: 10.1080/21683565. 2013.841608.

[35] Miles, A., DeLonge, M., Carlisle, L., 2017. Triggering a positive research and policy feedback cycle to support a transition to agroecology and sustainable food systems. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 41 (7), 855–879. doi: 10.1080/21683565.2017. 1331179.

[36] Monteleone, M., 2015. Reshaping agriculture toward a transition to a post-fossil bioeconomy. In: Monteduro, M., Buongiorno, P., Di Benedetto, S., Isoni, A. (Eds.), Law and agroecology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 359–376. doi: 10.1007/ 978- 3- 662- 46617- 9_18.

[37] Morley, A., 2021. Procuring for change: an exploration of the innovation potential of sustainable food procurement. J. Clean. Prod., 279, Article 123410. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123410.

[38] Natural Resource Institute Finland, 2023. Agricultural statistics. Statistics database . https://statdb.luke.fi/PxWeb/pxweb/en/LUKE/LUKE__02%20Maatalous/?rxid= dc711a9e- de6d- 454b- 82c2- 74ff79a3a5e0 (accessed 18 January 2023).

[39] Official Statistics of Finland, 2019a. Annual national accounts. Statistics Finland, Helsinki . http://www.stat.fi/til/vtp/index_en.html (accessed 19 November 2019).

[40] Official Statistics of Finland, 2019b. Regional Accounts. Statistics Finland, Helsinki . http://www.stat.fi/til/altp/index_en.html (accessed 19 November 2019).

[41] Official Statistics of Finland, 2020. Employment. Statistics Finland, Helsinki . http://www.stat.fi/til/tyokay/tau_en.html (accessed 12 January 2020).

[42] Official Statistics of Finland, 2021. Households’ consumption. Statistics Finland, Helsinki . http://www.stat.fi/til/ktutk/index_en.html (accessed 1 October 2021).

[43] Partridge, M, Rickman, D., 2010. Computable general equilibrium (CGE) modelling for regional economic development analysis. Reg. Stud., 44 (10), pp. 1311-1328. doi: 10.1080/00343400701654236.

[44] Peura, P, Haapanen, A, Reini, K, Törmä, H., 2018. Regional impacts of sustainable energy in western Finland. J. Clean. Prod., 187, pp. 85-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.194.

[45] Piirala, J., Taavitsainen, T., 2019. Hajautetun biokaasun tuotannon verkoston suunnittelu. https://blogs.helsinki.fi/palopuronsymbioosi/files/2019/09/AES-verkotot-TP1.pdf (accessed 30 September 2021). (in Finnish).

[46] Psaltopoulos, D., Balamou, E., Skuras, D, Ratinger, T., Sieber, S., 2011. Modelling the impacts of CAP pillar 1 and 2 measures on local economies in Europe: testing a case study-based CGE-model approach. J. Policy Model. 33 (1), 53–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.09.005.

[47] Ribeiro, L. C., De Souza, K. B., Domingues, E. P., Magalhães, A. S., 2021. Blue water turns black: economic impact of oil spill on tourism and fishing in Brazilian Northeast. Curr. Issues Tour., 24 (8), pp. 1042-1047. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2020.1760222.

[48] Rossi, J., Johnson, T., Hendrickson, M., 2017. The economic impacts of local and conventional food sales. J. Agric. Applied Econ. 49 (4), 555–570. doi: 10.1017/aae.2017.14.

[49] Rutherford, T, Törmä, H., 2010. Efficiency of fiscal measures in preventing out-migration from North Finland. Reg. Stud., 44 (4), pp. 465-475. doi: 10.1080/00343400802508786.

[50] Schmitt, E, Galli, F, Menozzi, D, Maye, D, J-Touzard, M, Marescotti, A, Six, J, Brunori, G., 2017. Comparing the sustainability of local and global food products in Europe. J. Clean. Prod., 165, pp. 346-359. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.039.

[51] Schröder, P., Anggraeni, K., Weber, U., 2019. The relevance of circular economy practices to the sustainable development goals. J. Ind. Ecol. 23, 77–95. doi: 10.1111/jiec.12732.

[52] Schulte, L. A., Dale, B. E., Bozzetto, S, Liebman, M, Souza, G, Haddad, N, Richard, T, Basso, B, Brown, R, Hilbert, J, Arbuckle, J., 2022. Meeting global challenges with regenerative agriculture producing food and energy. Nat. Sustain., 5, pp. 384-388. doi: 10.1038/s41893-021-00827-y.

[53] Schwarm, W, Cutler, H., 2007. Building small city and town SAMS and CGE models. Rev. Urban Reg. Dev. Stud., 15, pp. 132-147. doi: 10.1111/1467-940X.00069.

[54] Statistics Finland, 2015. National demand and supply tables. Purchased data from Statistics Finland.

[55] Statistics Finland, 2020. Data on finances reported by municipalities and joint municipal authorities. http://pxnet2.stat.fi/PXWeb/pxweb/en/Kuntien_talous_ja_toiminta/ (accessed 30 October 2020).

[56] Statisticsinland, F.Data on finances reported by municipalities and joint municipal authorities.http://pxnet2.stat.fi/PX, Web/pxweb/en/Kuntien_talous_ja_toiminta/ (accessed 30 October 2020).

[57] Statisticsinland, F.Municipal key figures.https://pxdata.stat.fi/Px, Web/pxweb/en/Kuntien_avainluvut/(accessed 18 September 2023).

[58] Swensson, L, Tartanac, F., 2020. Public food procurement for sustainable diets and food systems: the role of the regulatory framework. Glob. Food Secur., 25, Article 100366. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100366.

[59] Tribaldos, T, Kortetmäki, T., 2022. Just transition principles and criteria for food systems and beyond. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 43, pp. 244-256. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2022.04.005.

[60] Törmä, H., 2008. Do development projects of small towns matter, and can CGE help?. Spat. Econ. Anal., 3 (2), pp. 247-268. doi: 10.1080/17421770801996698.

[61] Törmä, H., Kujala, S., Kinnunen, J., 2015. The employment and population impacts of the boom and bust of Talvivaara mine in the context of severe environmental accidents – a CGE evaluation. Resour. Policy 46, 127–138. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.09.005.

[62] UNE, P.Food systems and natural resources.A report of the working group on food systems of the international resource panel. https://www.resourcepanel.org/file/133/download?token=6dSyNtu, V (accessed 31 October 2022).

[63] Unitedations, N.Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development.A/RE, S/70/1. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf (accessed 31 October 2022).

[64] Vanhamäki, S, Virtanen, M, Luste, S, Manskinen, K., 2020. Transition towards a circular economy at a regional level: a case study on closing biological loops. Resour. Conserv. Recyc., 156, Article 104716. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104716.

[65] Willett, W, Rockström, J, Loken, B, Springmann, M, Lang, T, Vermeulen, S, Garnett, T, Tilman, D, DeClerck, F, Wood, A, Jonell, M, Clark, M, Gordon, L, Fanzo, J, Hawkes, C, Zurayk, R, Rivera, J, De Vries, W, Majele Sibanda, L, Afshin, A, Chaudhary, A, Herrero, M, Agustina, R, Branca, F, Lartey, A, Fan, S, Crona, B, Fox, E, Bignet, V, Troell, M, Lindahl, T, Singh, S, Cornell, S, Reddy, S, Narain, S, Nishtar, S, Murray, C., 2019. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet, 393 (10170), pp. 447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4.

[66] Winquist, E, Rikkonen, P, Pyysiäinen, J, Varho, V., 2019. Is biogas an energy or a sustainability product? - Business opportunities in the Finnish biogas branch. J. Clean. Prod., 233, pp. 1344-1354. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.181.

[67] Wittwer, G, Horridge, J. M., 2010. Bringing regional detail to a CGE model using census data. Spat. Econ. Anal., 5 (2), pp. 229-255. doi: 10.1080/17421771003730695.

[68] Yang, Y., Leung, P., Tseng, C., 2021. Price premium or price discount for locally produced food products? A 5W1H approach in meta-analysis. Manag. Decis. Econ. 43 (6), 2261– 2274. doi: 10.1002/mde.3523.