Trajectories of deagrarianization in South Africa−Past, current and emerging trends: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review

Abstract

Inquiries into rural households’ engagement with smallholder agriculture remain ambiguous and complex. For this reason, research on cultivation patterns has been informed by numerous articles published in recent decades. However, studies detailing the development and progress of deagrarianization remain understudied. In attempts to bridge this knowledge gap, the study aims to provide empirical insights into the trajectories of deagrarianization in South Africa. Studies published between 1996 and 2021 were retrieved from Clarivate Web of Science for analysis. A combination of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and bibliometric analysis was adopted to provide a comprehensive review of deagrarianization dynamics. The findings emphasize that the field of deagrarianization is gaining momentum as publications gradually emerge to indicate that although cultivation is dominant among rural households, there is a reduction in field cultivation and an increase in home-gardening in former homelands of South Africa. Furthermore, common keywords in deagrarianization literature, from a global, African and South African perspective include poverty and livelihoods. Considering that majority of deagrarianization studies analyze patterns, drivers and consequences of the phenomenon, future research needs to consider novel methodologies such as participatory GIS and new avenues that incorporate, but are not limited to, other livelihood issues such as social identities and food security. It is advised that strategies for enhancing rural development and agricultural policies focus on broader solutions that do not only sustain home-gardens but also revitalize both active and abandoned fields.

Keywords

Bibliometric analysis / Deagrarianization / PRISMA / South Africa / VOSviewer

Declaration of Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that influenced the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the National Research Foundation for Funding PhD qualification for Felicity Aphiwe Mkhongi.

References

[1] Andrew, M., Fox, R.C., 2004. ‘Undercultivation’ and intensification in the Transkei: A case study of historical changes in the use of arable land in Nompa, Shixini. Dev. South. Afr. 21 (4), 687-706.

[2] Appiah, D.O., Asante, F., Nketiah, B., 2019. Perspectives on agricultural land use conversion and food security in rural Ghana. Sci 1 (1), 14.

[3] Baumgartner, H., Pieters, R., 2003. The structural influence of marketing journals: A citation analysis of the discipline and its subareas over time. J. Mark. 67 (2), 123-139.

[4] Bezu, S., Holden, S., 2014. Are rural youth in Ethiopia abandoning agriculture? World Dev. 64, 259-272.

[5] Blair, D., Shackleton, C.M., Mograbi, P.J.,2018. Cropland abandonment in South African smallholder communal lands: Land cover change (1950-2010) and farmer perceptions of contributing factors. Land 7 (4), 121.

[6] Bryceson, D.F., 1996. Deagrarianization and rural employment in sub-Saharan Africa: A sectoral perspective. World Dev. 24 (1), 97-111.

[7] Bryceson, D.F., 2002. The scramble in Africa: Reorienting rural livelihoods. World Dev. 30 (5), 725-739.

[8] Bryceson, D.F., 2004. Agrarian vista or vortex: African rural livelihood policies. Rev. Afr. Polit. Econ. 31 (102), 617-629.

[9] Bryceson, D.F., 2018. Deagrarianization and depeasantization in Africa: Tracing sectoral transformation and rural income diversification. In:Rouledge Handbook of African Development. Routledge, London, pp. 368-377.

[10] Bryceson, D.F., Jamal, V., 2019. Farewell to Farms: De-agrarianisation and Employment in Africa. Routledge, Farnham.

[11] Burgoyne, C., Kelso, C., Ahmed, F., 2016. Human activity and vegetation change around Mkuze Game Reserve, South Africa. S. Afr. Geogr. J. 98 (2), 217-234.

[12] Burnham, J.F., 2006. Scopus database: A review. Biomed. Digit. Libr. 3 (1), 1.

[13] Chapman, R., Tripp, R., 2004. Background paper on rural livelihood diversity and agriculture. In:Proceedings of the AgREN Electronic Conference on the Implication of Rural Livelihood Diversity for Pro-Poor Agricultural Initiatives.

[14] Chen, D., Liu, Z., Luo, Z., Webber, M., Chen, J., 2016. Bibliometric and visualized analysis of emergy research. Ecol. Eng. 90, 285-293.

[15] Chen, W., Geng, Y., Zhong, S., Zhuang, M., Pan, H., 2020. A bibliometric analysis of ecosystem services evaluation from 1997 to 2016. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27 (19), 23503-23513.

[16] Chen, W., Liu, W., Geng, Y., Brown, M.T., Gao, C., Wu, R., 2017. Recent progress on emergy research: A bibliometric analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 73, 1051-1060.

[17] Connor, T., Mtwana, N., 2018. Vestige garden production and deagrarianization in three villages in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. S. Afr. Geogr. J. 100 (1), 82-103.

[18] Cousins, B., 2013. Smallholder irrigation schemes, agrarian reform and ‘accumulation from above and from below’ in South Africa. J. Agrar. Change 13 (1), 116-139.

[19] Van Dalen, H., Henkens, K., 2001. What makes a scientific article influential? The case of demographers. Scientometrics 50 (3), 455-482.

[20] Davis, B., Gaarder, M., Handa, S., Yablonski, J., 2012. Evaluating the impact of cash transfer programmes in sub-Saharan Africa: An introduction to the special issue. J. Dev. Effect. 4 (1), 1-8.

[21] Dess, H.M., 2006. Database reviews and reports. Issues Sci. Technol. Librariansh doi: 10.5062/F4x0650T.

[22] Van Eck, N., Waltman, L., 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84 (2), 523-538.

[23] Van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L., 2018. Manual For VOSviewer Version 1.6. 8. Leiden University and CWTS Meaningful Metrics.

[24] Estel, S., Kuemmerle, T., Alcantara, C., Levers, C., Prishchepov, A., Hostert, P., 2015. Mapping farmland abandonment and recultivation across Europe using MODIS NDVI time series. Remote Sens. Environ. 163, 312-325.

[25] Geng, Y., Chen, W., Liu, Z., Chiu, A.S., Han, W., Liu, Z., Zhong, S., Qian, Y., You, W., Cui, X., 2017. A bibliometric review: Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in the residential sector. J. Clean. Prod. 159, 301-316.

[26] Giannecchini, M., Twine, W., Vogel, C., 2007. Land-cover change and human-environment interactions in a rural cultural landscape in South Africa. Geogr. J. 173 (1), 26-42.

[27] Gouws, A.J., Shackleton, C.M., 2019. A spatio-temporal, landscape perspective on Acacia dealbata invasions and broader land use and cover changes in the northern Eastern Cape, South Africa. Environ. Monit. Assess. 191 (2), 1-20.

[28] Hajdu, F., 2005. Relying on jobs instead of the environment? Patterns of local securities in rural Eastern Cape, South Africa. Soc. Dyn. 31 (1), 235-260.

[29] Hajdu, F., 2006. Local Worlds: Rural Livelihood Strategies in Eastern Cape. South Africa. Linköping University, Linköping.

[30] Hajdu, F., Granlund, S., Neves, D., Hochfeld, T., Amuakwa-Mensah, F., Sandstrom, E., 2020. Cash transfers for sustainable rural livelihoods? Examining the long-term productive effects of the Child Support Grant in South Africa. World Dev. Perspect. 19, 100227.

[31] Hebinck, P., Mtati, N., Shackleton, C., 2018. More than just fields: Reframing deagrarianisation in landscapes and livelihoods. J. Rural Stud. 61, 323-334.

[32] Herd-Hoare, S., 2018. The relative roles of ecosystem services and disservices in rural livelihoods in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. M.S. thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa. Hill, V., Carley, K.M., 1999. An approach to identifying consensus in a subfield: The case of organizational culture. Poetics 27 (1), 1-30.

[33] De Klerk, H., 2007. The mutual embodiment of landscape and livelihoods: An environmental history of Nqabara. PhD thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa.

[34] de la, Hey, M., Beinart, W., 2017. Why have South African smallholders largely abandoned arable production in fields? A case study. J. South Afr. Stud. 43 (4), 753-770.

[35] LaGuardia, C., 2005. Scopus vs. Web of Science. Libr. J. 130, 40-42.

[36] Lent, P.C., Mupakati, G., 2007. The view from above: A history of land use in Guquka and Koloni, 1938-1996. In: Livelihoods and Landscapes: The People of Guquka and Koloni and Their Resources. Brill Academic Publishers, Leiden, pp. 165-179.

[37] Li, J., Burnham, J.F., Lemley, T., Britton, R.M., 2010. Citation analysis: Comparison of Web of Science® ScopusTM, SciFinder® and Google scholar. J. Electron. Resour. Med. Libr. 7 (3), 196-217.

[38] Locke, J., Perera, H., 2001. The intellectual structure of international accounting in the early 1990s. Int. J. Account. 36 (2), 223-249.

[39] Manyevere, A., Muchaonyerwa, P., Laker, M.C., Mnkeni, P.N.S., 2014. Farmers’ perspectives with regard to crop production: An analysis of Nkonkobe municipality, South Africa. J. Agric. Rural Dev. Trop. Subtrop. 115 (1), 41-53.

[40] Margolis, J.D., Walsh, J.P., 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Adm. Sci. Q. 48 (2), 268-305.

[41] Masunungure, C., Shackleton, S.E., 2018. Exploring long-term livelihood and landscape change in two semi-arid sites in Southern Africa: Drivers and consequences for social- ecological vulnerability. Land (Basel) 7 (2), 8-16.

[42] Matsika, R., 2012. The spatio-temporal dynamics of woody biomass supply and demand in response to human utilisation in an African savanna woodland. PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg, South Africa.

[43] McAllister, P.A., 1991. Reversing the effects of ‘betterment planning’ in South Africa’s black rural areas. Afr. Insight. 21 (2), 116-119.

[44] McKendrick, B., 1987. Introduction to Social Work in South Africa. Owen Burgess Publishers.

[45] Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L.A., 2015. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 4 (1), 1-9.

[46] Pereira, L.M., Cuneo, C.N., Twine, W.C., 2014. Food and cash: Understanding the role of the retail sector in rural food security in South Africa. Food Secur. 6 (3), 339-357.

[47] Plaatje, S., 2002. British Imperialism and South African Resistance. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

[48] Rigg, J., 2006. Land, farming, livelihoods, and poverty: Rethinking the links in the Rural South. World Dev. 34 (1), 180-202.

[49] Rigg, J., Nattapoolwat, S., 2001. Embracing the global in Thailand: Activism and pragmatism in an Era of Deagrarianization. World Dev. 29 (6), 945-960.

[50] Rigg, J., Salamanca, A., Phongsiri, M., Sripun, M., 2018. More farmers, less farming? Understanding the truncated agrarian transition in Thailand. World Dev. 107, 327-337.

[51] Robson, C., McCartan, K., 2016. Real World Research, 4th ed. Wiley Global Education, United Kingdom.

[52] Salaisook, P., Faysse, N., Tsusaka, T.W., 2020. Reasons for adoption of sustainable land management practices in a changing context: A mixed approach in Thailand. Land Use Policy 96, 104676.

[53] Schramski, S., Barnes, G., 2016. Agrarian change and adaptive capacity in rural South Africa. Rev. Agrar. Stud. 6 (2), 1-41.

[54] Scoones, I., Thompson, J., 2011. The politics of seed in Africa’s green revolution: Alternative narratives and competing pathways. IDS Bull. 42 (4), 1-23.

[55] Shackleton, C.M., Mograbi, P.J., Drimie, S., Fay, D., Hebinck, P., Hoffman, M.T., Maciejewski, K., Twine, W., 2019. Deactivation of field cultivation in communal areas of South Africa: Patterns, drivers and socio-economic and ecological consequences. Land Use Policy 82, 686-699.

[56] Shackleton, R., Shackleton, C., Shackleton, S., Gambiza, J., 2013. Deagrarianisation and forest revegetation in a biodiversity hotspot on the Wild Coast, South Africa. PLoS One 8 (10), 1-12.

[57] Shackleton, S.E., Hebinck, P., 2018. Through the ‘Thick and Thin’ of farming on the Wild Coast, South Africa. J. Rural Stud. 61, 277-289.

[58] Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L.A., 2015. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ 350, g7647.

[59] Shasha, Z.T., Geng, Y., Sun, H., Musakwa, W., Sun, L., 2020. Past, current, and future perspectives on eco-tourism: A bibliometric review between 2001 and 2018. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27 (19), 23514-23528.

[60] Spierenburg, M., Brooks, S., 2014. Private game farming and its social consequences in post-apartheid South Africa: Contestations over wildlife, property and agrarian futures. J. Contemp. Afri. Stud. 32 (2), 151-172.

[61] Swemmer, A.M., Mashele, M., Ndhlovu, P.D., 2019. Evidence for ecological sustainability of fuelwood harvesting at a rural village in South Africa. Reg. Environ. Change 19 (2), 403-413.

[62] Tahai, A., Meyer, M.J., 1999. A revealed preference study of management journals’ direct influences. Strateg. Manag. J. 20 (3), 279-296.

[63] Waltman, L., Van Eck, N.J., 2013. A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity- based 25 community detection. Eur. Phys. J. B 86 (11), 1-14.

[64] Wang, X., Fang, Z., Sun, X., 2016. Usage patterns of scholarly articles on Web of Science: A study on Web of Science usage count. Scientometrics 109 (2), 917-926.

[65] De Wet, C.J., 1995. Moving Together, Drifting Apart: Betterment Planning and Villagisation in a South African Homeland. Witwatersrand University Press.

[66] Wolpe, H., 1972. Capitalism and cheap labour-power in South Africa: From segregation to apartheid. Econ. Soc. 1 (4), 425-456.

[67] Xiang, C., Wang, Y., Liu, H., 2017. A scientometrics review on nonpoint source pollution research. Ecol. Eng. 99, 400-408.

[68] Zahra, A.A., Nurmandi, A., Tenario, C.B., Rahayu, R., Benectitos, S.H., Mina, F.L.P., Haictin, K.M., 2021. Bibliometric analysis of trends in theory-related policy publications. Emerg. Sci. J. 5 (1), 96-110.

[69] Zhai, R., Zhang, C., Li, W., Zhang, X., Li, X., 2020. Evaluation of driving forces of land use and land cover change in New England area by a mixed method. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9 (6), 350.

[70] Zhu, J., Liu, W., 2020. A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics 123 (1), 321-335.

[71] Zou, X., Yue, W.L., Vu, H.L., 2018. Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domain of road safety studies. Accid. Anal. Prev. 118, 131-145.