Sustainable living neighbourhoods: Measuring public space quality and walking environment in Lisbon

Abstract

Obesity and global warming are two major challenges that affect communities’ health and quality of life. Providing good walking environments, with appropriate pedestrian infrastructure, green areas and access to commercial retail and transport hubs favour liveable, healthy, and sustainable cities. The Lisbon City Hall has implemented an intervention program in the public space as a strategy to improve environmental quality and mitigate the effects of climate change. The program “A square in each neighbourhood” intends not only to reinforce the economic base of Lisbon, namely tourism, restaurants, commerce, and creative activities but also to promote physical activity and improve the quality of living of all citizens. For studying the impact of the public space quality on the walking environment, Campolide, a typical Lisbon neighbourhood, Portugal, which includes one of the requalified squares, was selected. A two-step methodology based on spatial modelling is proposed. In the first step, the public space quality was evaluated based on a set of 13 urban quality attributes. Attributes, intended for the street level, were collected from open data platforms and complemented with a field survey. Then, through spatial analysis, these attributes were used to build the Pedestrian Environment Quality Indicator and the Priority Intervention Indicator. Using these indicators, walking-friendly streets were mapped and the most critical sites that require priority intervention were identified to prepare for the requalification planning process. The street with the highest quality in the study area according to the dimensions evaluated - connectivity, convenience, comfort, cleanliness, and conviviality - has a great offer of trees, bus stops, commercial establishments, commercial diversity, crossings, paper bins/eco points and esplanades. On the opposite side of the rank, the street with the lowest quality has no trees or green areas, transport stops, benches and tables, or commercial activity. The urban quality indicators constitute a helpful tool for city planners and policymakers when planning sustainable living neighbourhoods.

Keywords

Public space / Walking environment / Spatial modelling / Urban quality indicators / Geographic Information Systems

Declaration of Competing Interests

The author declares that there are no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that influenced the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was financed by national Funds through FCT-Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., within the scope of the project “UIDB/04647/2020” of CICS. NOVA-Interdisciplinary Centre of Social Sciences from Universidade NOVA de Lisboa. The first author was financed by national Funds through the FCT, under the Norma Transitória-DL 57/2016/CP1453/CT0004.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2022.09.002.

References

[1] Albert, C., Schröter, B., Haase, D., Brillinger, M., Henze, J., Herrmann, S., Gottwald, S., Guerrero, P., Nicolas, C., Matzdorf, B., 2019. Addressing societal challenges through nature-based solutions: How can landscape planning and governance research contribute? Landsc. Urban Plan. 182, 12-21.

[2] Arioli, M., Fulton, L., Lah, O., 2020. Transportation strategies for a 1.5°C world: A comparison of four countries. Transp. Res. Part Transp. Environ. 87, 102526.

[3] Asadi-Shekari, Z., Moeinaddini, M., Zaly Shah, M., 2015. Pedestrian safety index for evaluating street facilities in urban areas. Saf. Sci. 74, 1-14.

[4] Babic, N., 2021. Superblocks -The future of walkability in cities? Acad. Lett. doi: 10.20935/AL747.

[5] Blečić I., Congiu, T., Fancello, G., Trunfio, G.A., 2020. Planning and design support tools for walkability: A guide for urban analysts. Sustainability 12, 4405.

[6] Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., Eyre, N., 2013. Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy 53, 331-340.

[7] Brownson, R.C., Hoehner, C.M., Day, K., Forsyth, A., Sallis, J.F., 2009. Measuring the built environment for physical activity: State of the science. Am. J. Prev. Med. 36, S99-S123.

[8] Christian, H.E., Bull, F.C., Middleton, N.J., Knuiman, M.W., Divitini, M.L., Hooper, P., Amarasinghe, A., Giles-Corti, B., 2011. How important is the land use mix measure in understanding walking behaviour? Results from the RESIDE study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 8, 55.

[9] Clifton, K.J., Livi Smith, A.D., Rodriguez, D., 2007. The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment. Landsc. Urban Plan. 80, 95-110.

[10] Cutts, B.B., Darby, K.J., Boone, C.G., Brewis, A., 2009. City structure, obesity, and environmental justice: An integrated analysis of physical and social barriers to walkable streets and park access. Soc. Sci. Med. 69, 1314-1322.

[11] D’Orso, G., Migliore, M., 2020. A GIS-based method for evaluating the walkability of a pedestrian environment and prioritised investments. J. Transp. Geogr. 82, 102555.

[12] Duncan, D.T., Aldstadt, J., Whalen, J., Melly, S.J., Gortmaker, S.L., 2011. Validation of Walk Score® for estimating neighborhood walkability: An analysis of four US metropolitan areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 8, 4160-4179.

[13] EC-DG, REGIO, AEIDL, 2013. Urban Development in the EU: 50 Projects Supported by the European Regional Development Fund (Contract reference 2011. CE. 16.0.AT.035). European Union.

[14] Evans, G., 2009. Accessibility, urban design and the whole journey environment. Built Environ. 35 (3), 366-385.

[15] Fonseca, F., Ribeiro, P.J.G., Conticelli, E., Jabbari, M., Papageorgiou, G., Tondelli, S., Ramos, R.A.R., 2021. Built environment attributes and their influence on walkability. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 16 (7), 660-679.

[16] Frank, L.D., Saelens, B.E., Powell, K.E., Chapman, J.E., 2007. Stepping towards causation: Do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity? Soc. Sci. Med. 65 (9), 1898-1914.

[17] Gehl, J., Gemzøe, L., Kirknæs, S., Søndergaard, B., 2006. New City Life. Arkitektens Forlag, Denmark.

[18] Giles-Corti, B., Vernez-Moudon, A., Reis, R., Turrell, G., Dannenberg, A.L., Badland, H., Foster, S., Lowe, M., Sallis, J.F., Stevenson, M., Owen, N., 2016. City planning and population health: A global challenge. Lancet 388, 2912-2924.

[19] Hua, J., Cai, M., Shi, Y., Ren, C., Xie, J., Chung, L.C.H., Lu, Y., Chen, L., Yu, Z., Webster, C., 2022. Investigating pedestrian-level greenery in urban forms in a high-density city for urban planning. Sustain. Cities Soc. 80, 103755.

[20] Kappou, S., Souliotis, M., Papaefthimiou, S., Panaras, G., Paravantis, J.A., Michalena, E., Hills, J.M., Vouros, A.P., Ntymenou, A., Mihalakakou, G., 2022. Cool pavements: State of the art and new technologies. Sustainability 14 (9), 5159.

[21] Karim, H., Magnusson, R., Wiklund, M., 2012. Assessment of injury rates associated with road barrier collision. Procedia -Soc. Behav. Sci. 48, 52-63.

[22] Kelly, C.E., Tight, M.R., Hodgson, F.C., Page, M.W., 2011. A comparison of three methods for assessing the walkability of the pedestrian environment. J. Transp. Geogr. 19 (6), 1500-1508.

[23] Lai, Y., Kontokosta, C.E., 2018. Quantifying place: Analyzing the drivers of pedestrian activity in dense urban environments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 180, 166-178.

[24] Lamour, Q., Morelli, A.M., Marins, K.R., de, C., 2019. Improving walkability in a TOD context: Spatial strategies that enhance walking in the Belém neighbourhood, in São Paulo, Brazil. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 7 (2), 280-292.

[25] Landis, B.W., Vattikuti, V.R., Ottenberg, R.M., McLeod, D.S., Guttenplan, M., 2001. Modeling the roadside walking environment: Pedestrian level of service. Transp. Res. Rec. 1773, 82-88.

[26] London Planning Advisory Committee 1997. Putting London back on its feet: A strategy for walking in London. London Planning Advisory Committee, London.

[27] Lopes, H.S., Remoaldo, P., Ribeiro, V., Martín-Vide, J., 2022. The use of collaborative practices for climate change adaptation in the tourism sector until 2040 —A case study in the Porto Metropolitan Area (Portugal). Appl. Sci. 12 (12), 5835.

[28] Mirzaei, P.A., 2015. Recent challenges in modeling of urban heat island. Sustain. Cities Soc. 19, 200-206.

[29] Moghaddasi, H., Culp, C., Vanegas, J., Ehsani, M., 2021. Net zero energy buildings: Variations, clarifications, and requirements in response to the Paris Agreement. Energies 14 (13), 3760.

[30] Mueller, N., Rojas-Rueda, D., Khreis, H., Cirach, M., Andrés, D., Ballester, J., Bartoll, X., Daher, C., Deluca, A., Echave, C., Milà C., Márquez, S., Palou, J., Pérez, K., Tonne, C., Stevenson, M., Rueda, S., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., 2020. Changing the urban design of cities for health: The superblock model. Environ. Int. 134, 105132.

[31] Neumann, B., Vafeidis, A.T., Zimmermann, J., Nicholls, R.J., 2015. Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding -A global assessment. PLoS One 10 (3), e0118571.

[32] Neves, B.M.A., 2020. From coastal defense to coastal adaptation. The role of costal boundary lines in coastal management plans: A comparative study between Portugal and South Africa. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa.

[33] Ortega, E., Martín, B., López-lambas, M.E., Soria-lara, J.A., 2021. Evaluating the impact of urban design scenarios on walking accessibility: The case of the Madrid ‘Centro’ district. Sustain. Cities Soc. 74, 103156.

[34] Otsuka, N., Wittowsky, D., Damerau, M., Gerten, C., 2021. Walkability assessment for urban areas around railway stations along the Rhine-Alpine Corridor. J. Transp. Geogr. 93, 103081.

[35] Salazar Miranda, A., Fan, Z., Duarte, F., Ratti, C., 2021. Desirable streets: Using deviations in pedestrian trajectories to measure the value of the built environment. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 86, 101563.

[36] San Francisco Department of Public Health, 2009.Pedestrian Environmental Quality Index (PEQI): An assessment of the physical condition of streets and intersections. San Francisco Department of Public Health.

[37] Santos, T., Silva, C., Tenedório, J.A., 2019. Promoting citizens’ quality of life through Green Urban Planning. In: RagiaL., LauriniR., RochaJ.G. (GeographicalInformation Systems Theory,Eds.), Applications and Management, Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer International Publishing, pp. 153-175.

[38] Stoker, P., Garfinkel-Castro, A., Khayesi, M., Odero, W., Mwangi, M.N., Peden, M., Ewing, R., 2015. Pedestrian safety and the built environment: A review of the risk factors. J. Plan. Lit. 30, 377-392.

[39] Sturiale, L., Scuderi, A., 2019. The role of green infrastructures in urban planning for climate change adaptation. Climate 7 (10), 119.

[40] Telega, A., Telega, I., Bieda, A., 2021. Measuring walkability with GIS —Methods overview and new approach proposal. Sustainability 13, 1883.

[41] EEA,2022. Urban sustainability: How can cities become sustainable? — European Environment Agency [WWW Document]. URL https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/sustainability-transitions/urban-environment/urban-sustainability (accessed 1 August 2022).

[42] CML, 2014. UMA PRAÇA EM CADA BAIRRO [WWW Document]. https://www.lisboa.pt/ fileadmin/cidade_temas/urbanismo/espaco_publico/praca_cada_bairro/Uma_praca_em_cada_bairro_enquadramento.pdf (accessed 15 May 2022).

[43] Ubalde, M., 2021. How does urban planning affect human health? Our health and the health of our planet depend on the design of our cities -Blog [WWW Document]. ISGlobal. https://www.isglobal.org/en/healthisglobal/-/custom-blog-portlet/-comoimpacta-la-planificacion-urbana-en-nuestra-salud-nuestra-salud-y-la-del-planetadependen-del-diseno-de-las-ciudades/7305043/0 (accessed 24 August 2022).

[44] Van Holle, V., Van Cauwenberg, J., Van Dyck, D., Deforche, B., Van de Weghe, N., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., 2014. Relationship between neighborhood walkability and older adults’ physical activity: Results from the Belgian Environmental Physical Activity Study in Seniors (BEPAS Seniors). Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 11, 110.

[45] Webster, P., Sanderson, D., 2013. Healthy cities indicators —A suitable instrument to measure health? J. Urban Health 90 (Suppl 1), 52-61.

[46] Williams, J., 2019. Circular cities. Urban Stud. 56, 2746-2762.

[47] Woldeamanuel, M., Kent, A., 2016. Measuring walk access to transit in terms of sidewalk availability, quality, and connectivity. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 142, 04015019.