The spatial coupling characteristics between the construction of Qingzang National Park Cluster and the sustainable development of local communities

Abstract

The development of Qingzang national park cluster is part of China’s efforts to establish a major ecological civilization project in the Qingzang Plateau, in line with global sustainable development goals. Based on preliminary scientific investigation and research in the Qingzang Plateau, the construction of the park cluster will include 21 national parks. To mitigate the conflict between conservation of the national park cluster and the development of local communities, this study proposes an analysis framework to identify the spatial coupling features between the national park cluster and sustainable development of communities. Four elements were selected to construct the analysis framework, including natural conditions, geographic location, cultural background, and national policies. This framework was applied to the 457 township communities within the 21 national parks. Results show the weak influence of the construction of the national park cluster for approximately 304 township communities, without significant spatial coupling traits, while the remaining 153 communities demonstrated significant spatial coupling features. These latter townships had developed four types of spatial coupling with national parks, including eco-migrants, transportation hubs, characteristic cultures, and border development, which account for 17.4%, 35.3%, 19.8%, and 27.5% of the 153 townships respectively. A composite type with more than one spatial coupling feature was also found for 14 communities within the 153 townships. This provides a reference for policy making towards four major types of interactive modes between townships and the national park construction for the sustainable development of Qingzang Plateau.

Keywords

Qingzang Plateau / National park (cluster) / Community / Spatial coupling / Sustainable development

Decalartion of competing of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study was sponsored by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (2019QZKK0404), the Chinese Academy of Sciences Strategy Priority Research Program (Category A) (XDA20020300) and National Natural Science Foundation of China key projects (41630644)

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to this work. In particular, conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, R.G.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, R.G., Y.Z., D.Z., B.L., H.L., Y.S.; Writing-Review & Editing, R.G., Y.Z., and J.F.; Visualization, Y.Z.; Supervision, J.F., D.C.; Project Administration, J.F.; Funding Acquisition, J.F..

References

[1] Akyeampong, O.A., 2011. Pro-poor tourism: Residents’ expectations, experiences and perceptions in the Kakum National Park Area of Ghana. J. Sustain. Tour. 19 (2), 197-213.

[2] Aymoz, B.G.P., Randrianjafy, V.R., Randrianjafy, Z.J.N., Khasa, D.P., 2013. Community management of natural resources: A case etudy from Ankarafantsika National Park. Madagascar. AMBIO 42 (6), 767-775.

[3] Baumgartner, R., Hogger, R., 2004. Search of Sustainable Livelihood Systems. Sage Publications Ltd, London.

[4] Brook, B.W., Bowman, D.M.J.S., Bradshaw, C.J.A., Campbell, B.M., Whitehead, P.J., 2006. Managing an endangered Asian bovid in an Australian National Park: The role and limitations of ecological-economic models in decision-making. Environ. Manag. 38 (3), 463-469.

[5] Chen, Y., Huang, D., Yan, S., 2014. Discussions on public welfare, state dominance and scientificity of National Park. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 34 (03), 257-264.

[6] Cetin, M., Sevik, H., 2016. Evaluating the recreation potential of Ilgaz Mountain National Park in Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 188 (1), 52.

[7] Cupul-Magaña, A.L., Rodríguez-Troncoso, A.P., 2017. Tourist carrying capacity at Islas Marietas National Park: An essential tool to protect the coral community. Appl. Geogr. 88, 15-23.

[8] Cherni, J.A., Hill, Y., 2009. Energy and policy providing for sustainable rural livelihoods in remote locations: The case of Cuba. Geoforum 40 (4), 645-654.

[9] China Government Network, 2006. List of China’s Land Border Counties (Banners) and Cities (Municipal Districts) http://www.gov.cn/test/2006-07/14/content_335831.htm.

[10] Ellis, F., Bahiigwa, G., 2003. Livelihoods and rural poverty reduction in Uganda. World. Dev. 31 (6), 997-1013.

[11] Foggin, J., 2018. Environmental Conservation in the Tibetan Plateau Region: Lessons for China’s Belt and Road Initiative in the Mountains of Central Asia. Land 7 (2), 52.

[12] Fan, J., 2019. Technical Regulation for Major Function Zoning. Sci. Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)

[13] Fan, J., Zhong, L., Li, J., Chen, T., Huang, B., Yu, H., Chen, D., Wang, Y., Guo, R., 2017. Third pole national park group construction is scientific choice for implementing strategy of major function zoning and green development in Tibet, China. Bull. Chin. Acad. Sci. 32 (09), 932-944. (in Chinese)

[14] Fan, J., Wang, H., Chen, D., Zhang, W., Wang, C., 2010. Discussion on sustainable urbanization in Tibet. Chinese. Geogr. Sci. 20 (3), 258-268. (in Chinese)

[15] Fan, J., Zhong, L., Huang, B., Yu, H., Wang, Y., Chen, D., Guo, R., Liu, B., 2019. Territorial function and feasibility of the Earth’s Third Pole National Park Cluster. Chin. Sci. Bull. 64 (27), 2938-2948. (in Chinese)

[16] Fancy, S.G., Gross, J.E., Carter, S.L., 2009. Monitoring the condition of natural resources in US national parks. Environ. Monit. Assess. 151 (1-4), 161-174.

[17] Huang, B., Wang, Y., Su, L., Zhang, C., Cheng, D., Sun, J., He, S., 2018. Pilot programs for national park system in China: Progress, problems and recommendations. Bull. Chin. Acad. Sci. 33 (01), 76-85. (in Chinese)

[18] He, S., Wei, Y., Su, Y., Min, Q., 2020. Guaranteeing fair and sustainable benefit sharing for communities in the national park: A study from perception of meanings of social-ecological system. Acta Ecol. Sin. 40 (07), 2450-2462. (in Chinese)

[19] He, R., Li, G., Liu, S., Xu, D., Li, L., 2017. A literature review of China’s rural poverty governance from the perspective of sustainable livelihood. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 27 (11), 69-85. (in Chinese)

[20] Locke, H., Dearden, P., 2005. Rethinking protected area categories and the new paradigm. Environ. Conserv. 32 (1), 1-10.

[21] Liu, X., Long, R., Shang, Z., 2012. Interactive mechanism of service function of alpine rangeland ecosystems in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Acta Ecol. Sin. 32 (24), 7688-7697. (in Chinese)

[22] Leslie, D., 1986. Tourism and conservation in national parks. Tour. Manag. 7 (1), 52-56.

[23] Li, S., Sun, X., Fang, Y., Zhang, Y., Cao, M., 2019. Evaluation of the spatial characteristics of farmer livelihood assets in the Qianjiangyuan National Park pilot. Biodivers. Sci. 27 (01), 64-75.

[24] Liu, H., 2016. Experience and inspiration from construction of United States National Parks and gateway communities. Engin. Sci. 18 (5), 100-108. (in Chinese)

[25] Li, H., Shi, J., 2017. Research on the management mode of China’s national parks based on the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS). Environ. Prot. 45 (14), 45-50.

[26] Lu, D, 2003. The Theory and Practice of Regional Development in China. Sci. Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)

[27] Merce, I., Radac, B., Milin, A., Gherman, R., Tonea, E., 2016. Forest National Park —an ecotourism destination. J. Biotechnol. 231, S96.

[28] Monz, C., D’Antonio, A., Lawson, S., Barber, J., Newman, P., 2016. The ecological implications of visitor transportation in parks and protected areas: Examples from research in US National Parks. J. Transp. Geogr. 51, 27-35.

[29] Mylonopoulos, D., Moira, P., Parthenis, S., 2011. The legislative framework of the management of the protected areas in Greece. The case of the National Marine Park of Zakynthos. J. Coastal. Res. 61, 173-182.

[30] Ministry of Civil Affairs (MCA), 2020.Code of administrative divisions of the People’s Republic of China in 2020. http://www.mca.gov.cn/article/sj/xzqh/2020. (accessed 2 November 2020). (in Chinese)

[31] MHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development), 2017a. The seventh batch of Chinese historical and cultural towns and villages. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201901/t20190130_239368.html. (accessed 2 November 2020). (in Chinese)

[32] MHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development), 2003. The first batch of Chinese historical and cultural towns and villages. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/200611/t20061101_157345.html.(accessed 2 November 2020). (in Chinese)

[33] National Tibetan Plateau Data Center, 2019. Third pole 1:100,000 road dataset (2014). http://data.tpdc.ac.cn/zh-hans/data/c2395641-0fd5-491b-8741-36a6cfc6401e/?q = %E9%81%93%E8%B7%AF. (accessed 2 November 2020). (in Chinese)

[34] Xizang Education Network, 2008. List of border counties and border townships in the Xizang Autonomous Region. http://www.2exam.com/gaokao/XZ/183977.shtml. (accessed 2 November 2020). (in Chinese)

[35] National People’s Commission, 2019. The list of Chinese ethnic villages and towns. https://www.maigoo.com/news/538194.html. (accessed 2 November 2020). (in Chinese)

[36] NFGA (National Forestry and Grassland Administration), 2019. Tibet will start construction of Earth’s Third Pole National Park Cluster this year. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id = 1626791210381641552&wfr = spider&for = p. (accessed 2 November 2020). (in Chinese)

[37] Obua, J., 1997. The potential, development and ecological impact of ecotourism in Kibale National Park. Uganda. J. Environ. Manag. 50 (1), 27-38.

[38] Schwartz, Z., Lin, L., 2006. The impact of fees on visitation of national parks. Tour. Manag. 27 (6), 1386-1396.

[39] Sun, H., Zheng, D., Yao, T., Zhang, Y., 2012. Protection and construction of the national ecological security shelter zone on Tibetan Plateau. Acta Geogr. Sin. 67 (1), 3-12. (in Chinese)

[40] Shang, T., Cao, Y., 2019. The evaluation and analysis on sustainable livelihoods of residents in Northeast Tiger and Leopard National Park. For. Econ. 41 (10), 17-22.

[41] Southworth, J., Nagendra, H., Carlson, L.A., Tucker, C., 2004. Assessing the impact of Celaque National Park on forest fragmentation in western Honduras. Appl. Geogr. 24 (4), 303-322.

[42] SFB (State Forestry Bureau, now restructured as National Forestry and Grassland Administration), 2018. Experts call for the creation of a national park cluster to guard the "third pole of the earth". http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/4293/20180912/150252446152498.html. (accessed 2 November 2020). (in Chinese)

[43] Thede, A.K., Haider, W., Rutherford, M.B., 2014. Zoning in national parks: Are Canadian zoning practices outdated? J. Sustain. Tour. 22 (4), 626-645.

[44] Tsinghua University, 2017. Finer resolution observation and monitoring global land cover. http://data.ess.tsinghua.edu.cn/fromglc2017v1.html. (accessed 2 November 2020). (in Chinese)

[45] Wang, G., Innes, J., Wu, S., Krzyzanowski, J., Yin, Y., Dai, S., Zhang, X., Liu, S., 2012. National park development in China: Conservation or commercialization? AMBIO 41 (3), 247-261.

[46] Xie, N., 2005. The development, conservation and use of function for national famous scenic areas. China Landsc. Archit. 07, 1-8. (in Chinese)

[47] Xu, Z., Zhang, Y., Cheng, S., Zheng, D., 2017. Scientific basis and the strategy of sustainable development in Tibetan Plateau. Sci. Technol. Rev. 35 (06), 108-114. (in Chinese)

[48] Yu, Y., Guo, Z., Wang, Y., 2019. Spatial patterns and driving forces of land change in Tibetan-inhabited Three Rivers Headwaters region. J. Mt. Sci. 16 (1), 207-225. (in Chinese)

[49] Zheng, D, Zhang, Q., Wu, S., 2000. Mountain Geoecology and Sustainable Development of the Tibetan Plateau. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht.

[50] Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., Yan, J., Wu, Y., 2008. Livelihood diversification and cropland use pattern in agro-pastoral mountainous region of eastern Tibetan Plateau. J. Geogr. Sci. 18 (4), 499-509. (in Chinese)

[51] Zhang, H., Wang, J., Rao, S, 2012. The Study on Ecology Conservation and Environmental Protection in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. China Environ. Sci. Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)

[52] Yunnan Provincial Government Network, 2018. 2018. Yunnan Province’s Three-Year Action Plan to deepen the implementation of the Border Enrichment Project (2018-2020). http://www.yn.gov.cn/zwgk/zfgb/2018/2018ndsbq/szfbgtwj_1484/201809/t20180919_145997.html. (accessed 2 November 2020). (in Chinese)

[53] RESDC (Resource and Environment Science and Data Center), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, 2000. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) 30m DEM. http://www.resdc.cn/data.aspx?DATAID = 217 (accessed 2 November 2020). (in Chinese)

[54] MHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development), 2017. The second batches of Chinese characteristic towns. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201708/t20170828_233078.html. (accessed 2 November 2020). (in Chinese)

[55] MHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development), 2016. The first batches of Chinese characteristic towns. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/201610/t20161014_229170.html. (accessed 2 November 2020). (in Chinese)