Understanding Policy Instruments as Rules of Interaction in Social-Ecological System Frameworks

Abstract

Government interventions to manage and improve trade-offs in social and ecological systems are made through various policy instruments. The conditions of the social ecological system (SES) are a function of the cumulatively implemented policy instruments. Although both policy instruments and social ecological system frameworks have played important roles in theoretical developments in resource management, they have largely been considered in isolation from each other. By including policy instruments into the SES framework, the proposed conceptual model serves as a template to examine how governing takes place by deciphering: 1) how the biophysical system has been understood in resource governance; 2) how the social system has been set up in resource governance; and 3) how the trade-off between dynamic biophysical and social systems has been managed in the governance of SESs. This model can assist identifying any absent, overlapping or contradictory policy instruments in the governance of an SES.

Keywords

Governance system / Governance mode / Resource governance / Policy instrument / Social-ecological system

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financialinterestsor personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal which may be considered as potential competing interests:

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Commonwealth of Australia under the Australia Awards Scholarship and was partly supported through the Australian Research Council Future Fellowship Program (FT130100274).

References

[1] Acar S., 2017. The Curse of Natural Resources —A Developmental Analysis in a Comparative Context. Palgrave Macmillan, US.

[2] Adams V.M., Pressey R.L., Álvarez-Romero J.G., 2016. Using optimal land-use scenarios to assess trade-offs between conservation, development, and social values. PLoS One. 11 (6), 1-20.

[3] Adams V.M., Pressey R.L., Stoeckl N., 2014. Navigating trade-offs in land-use planning: Integrating human well-being into objective setting. Ecol. Soc. 19 (4), 1-21.

[4] Alkemade F., Hekkert M.P., Negro S.O., 2011. Transition policy and innovation policy: Friends or foes? Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 1 (1), 125-129.

[5] Anderies J.M., Janssen M.A., Ostrom E., 2004. A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecol. Soc. 9 (1), 18.

[6] Anne S., Helen I., 1990. Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. The Journal of Politics 52 (2), 510.

[7] Ansell C., Doberstein C., Henderson H., Siddiki S., 2020. Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: Amixed methods approach. Policy Soc. 39 (4), 570-591.

[8] Araral E., 2013. What makes socio-ecological systems robust? An institutional analysis of the 2,000 year-old Ifugao society. Hum. Ecol. Interdiscip. J. 41 (6), 859-870.

[9] Armitage D., 2008. Governance and the commons in a multi-level world. Int. J. Commons. 2 (1), 7-32.

[10] Asmamaw L.B., Mohammed A.A., Lulseged T.D., 2011. Land use/cover dynamics and their effects in the Gerado catchment, northeastern Ethiopia. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 68 (6), 883-900.

[11] Baggio J.A., 2016. Explaining success and failure in the commons: The configural nature of Ostrom’s insitutional design principles. Int. J. Commons. 10 (2), 417-437.

[12] Baker D.M., Murray G., Agyare A.K., 2018. Governance and the making and breaking of social-ecological traps. Ecol. Soc. 23 (1), 38.

[13] Bieger K., Hörmann G., Fohrer N., 2013. The impact of land use change in the Xiangxi catchment (China) on water balance and sediment transport. Reg. Environ. Change. 15 (3), 485-498.

[14] Blomquist W., Dinar A., Kemper K., 2005. Comparison of institutional arrangements for river basin management in eight basins/comparison of institutional arrangements for river basin management in eight basins. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, p. 3636.

[15] Borrás S., Edquist C., 2013. The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 80, 1513-1522.

[16] Briassoulis H., 2005. Policy integration for complex environmental problems: The example of mediterranean desertification. Routledge, New York.

[17] Bressers H.T.A., O’toole L.J., 1998. The selection of policy instruments: A network-based perspective. J. Public Policy Mark. 18 (3), 213.

[18] Bulkeley H., Watson M., Hudson R., 2007. Modes of governing municipal waste. Environ. Plan. A. 39 (11), 2733-2753.

[19] Cohen M.D., March J.G., Olsen J.P., 1972. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Adm. Sci. Q. 17 (1), 1-25.

[20] Cox M., Arnold G., Tomas S.V., 2010. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecol. Soc. 15 (4).

[21] Craig R., Garmestani A.S., Allen C.R., Schlager E., 2017. Balancing stability and flexibility in adaptive governance: an analysis of tools available in U.S environmental law.. Ecol. Soc. 22 (2), 3.

[22] Dovers S., 2000. Environmental History and Policy:Still Settling Australia. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

[23] Duit A., Galaz V., Eckerberg K., Ebbesson J., 2010. Governance, complexity, and resilience. Glob. Environ. Change. 20 (3), 363-368.

[24] Ebbesson J., 2010. The rule of law in governance of complex socio-ecological changes. Glob. Environ. Change. 20 (3), 414-422.

[25] Ekstrom J.A., Young O.R., 2009. Evaluating functional fit between a set of institutions and an ecosystem. Ecol. Soc. 14 (2), 16.

[26] Elmhagen B., Eriksson O., Linborg R., 2015. Implications of climate and land-use change for landscape processes, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and governance. Ambio. 44 (SI), S1-S5.

[27] Farley K.A., Jobbágy E.G., Jackson R.B., 2005. Effects of afforestation on water yield: A global synthesis with implications for policy. Glob. Chang. Biol. 11 (10), 1565-1576.

[28] Folke C., Hahn T., Olsson P., Norberg J., 2005. Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 15 (30), 441-473.

[29] François M., 2008. Nirvana concepts, narratives and policy models: Insights from the Iwater sector. Water Altern. 1 (1), 131-156.

[30] Goudie A., 1981. The human impact:Man’s role in envirMonmental change. The MIT Press, Massachusetts.

[31] Hanlon J., Lovier T., Schlager E., 2019. Suspicious collaborators: How governments in polycentric systems monitor behaviour and enforce public good provision rules against one another. Int. J. Commons. 13 (2), 977-992.

[32] Harris G., 2007. Seeking sustainability in an age of complexity. Cambridge University Press, The United Kingdom.

[33] Hood C., 1983. The Tools of Government. Macmillan, London.

[34] Howell J.P., 2015. Modes of governing and solid waste management in Maui, Hawaii, USA. Environ. Plan. A. 47, 2153-2169.

[35] Howlett M., 2005. What is a policy Instrument? Tools, mixes, and implementation styles. In: Howlett M., Eliadis P., Hill M.M. ( Designing Government.Eds.), McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 32-50.

[36] Howlett M., 2009. Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sci. 42 (1), 73-89.

[37] Howlett M., 2010. Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. Routledge, New York.

[38] Ingold K., Moser A., Metz F., Herzog L., Bader H.-P., Scheidegger R., Stamm C., 2018. Misfit between physical affectedness and regulatory embeddedness: The case of drinking water supply along the Rhine River. Glob. Environ. Change. 48, 136-150.

[39] Kaufmann F.-X., Majone G., Ostrom V., 1986. Guidance, control, and evaluation in the public sector: The Bielefeld interdisciplinary project. de Gruyter, Berlin.

[40] Klijn E.-H., Koppenjan J., Termeer K., 1995. Managing networks in the public sector: A theoritical study of management strategies in policy networks. Public. Adm. Rev. 73 (3), 437-454.

[41] Knoke D., 1990. Political Networks:The Structural Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[42] Kobayashi K., Ari I.R.D., Schaefer A., Jeong H., 2014. Community Based Water Management and Social Capital. IWA Publishing.

[43] Linder S.H., Peters B.G., 1989. Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts. J. Public Policy Mark. 9 (1), 35-58.

[44] Martinez-Harms M.J., Bryan B.A., Balvanera P., Law E.A., Rhodes J.R., Possingham H.P., Wilson K.A., 2015. Making decisions for managing ecosystem services. Biol. Conserv. 184, 229-238.

[45] Mehling M.A., Metcalf G.E., Stavins R.N., 2018. Linking heterogeneous climate policies (consistent with the Paris agreement). J. Environ. Law. 48 (4), 647-698.

[46] Mukhtarov F., Fox S., Mukhamedova N., Wegerich K., 2015. Interactive institutional design and contextual relevance: Water user groups in Turkey, Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan. Environ. Sci. Policy. 53 (Part B), 206-214.

[47] Olivier T., Scott T.A., Schlager E., 2020. Institutional design and complexity:Protocol network structure in response to different collective-action dilemmas. In: In: Fischer, M., Ingold K. ( Networks in Water Governance. Palgrave macmilan US,Eds.), pp.267-293.

[48] Ostrom E., 1990. Governing the Commons:The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York.

[49] Ostrom E., 2007. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (39), 15181-15187.

[50] Popa F., 2007. On pareto efficiency and equitable allocations of resources. Romanian J. Econ. Forecast. 10 (23), 73-79.

[51] Quinn J.D., Reed P.M., Keller K., 2017. Direct policy search for robust multi-objective management of deeply uncertain socio-ecological tipping points. Environ. Model. Softw. 92, 125-141.

[52] Salamon L.M., Elliott O.V., 2002. The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford University Press.

[53] Scheffer M., 2009. Critical transition in nature and society. Pricenton University Press, USA.

[54] Scheffer M., Carpenter S.R., 2003. Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: Linking theory to observation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 (12), 648-656.

[55] Siddiki S., Heikkila T., Weible C.M., Pacheco-Vega R., Carter D., Curley C., Deslatte A., Bennet A., 2019. Institutional Analysis with the Institutional Grammar. Policy Stud. J.

[56] Sterner T., Coria J., 2012. Policy instrument for environmental and natural resource management. RFF Press, New York.

[57] Sterner T., Motel P., Chourmet J., Minea A., 2014. Explorations in the environment-development dilemma. Environ. Resour. Econ. 57 (4), 479-485.

[58] Sterner T., Alem Y., Alpizar F., Berck C.P., Rebolledo C.A.C., Dikgang J., Kirama S., Kohlin G., Mariara-Kabubo J., Mekonnen A., Xu J., 2014. The environemnt for development initiative: Lesson learned in research, academic capacity building, and policy intervention to manage resources for sutainable growth. Environ. Dev. Econ. 19, 367-391.

[59] Therville C., Brady U., Barreteau O., Bousquet F., Mathevet R., Dhenain S., Grelot F., Bremond P., 2019. Challenges for local adaptation when governance scales overlap. Reg. Environ. Change. 19, 1865-1877.

[60] Thiel A., Adamseged M.E., Baake C., 2015. Evaluating an instrument for institutional crafting: How Ostrom’s social-ecological systems framework is applied. Environ. Sci. Policy. 53, 152-164.

[61] Thomas D., Elinor O., Paul C.S., 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science. 302 (5652), 1907-1912.

[62] Travers H., Clements T., Keane A., Milner-Gulland E.J., 2011. Incentives for cooperation: The effects of institutional controls on common pool resource extraction in Cambodia. Ecol. Econ. 71, 151-161.

[63] Turnpenny J., Radaelli C., Jordan A., Jacob K., 2009. The policy and politics of policy appraisal: Emerging trends and new directions. J. Eur. Public Policy. 16, 640-653.

[64] Underdal A., 2012. Meeting common environmental challenges:The co-evolution of policies and practices. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 13 (1), 15-30.

[65] Werdiningtyas R., Wei Y., Western A., 2020. The Evolution of Policy instruments used in water, land and environmental governances in Victoria, Australia from 1860-2016. Environ. Sci. Policy.

[66] Young A., 2000. Environmental Change in Australia Since 1788. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne.

[67] Zhang L., Dawes W.R., Walker G.R., 2001. Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour. Res. 37, 701-708.