Prioritizing sustainable development goals and linking them to ecosystem services: A global expert's knowledge evaluation

Siqi Yang , Wenwu Zhao , Yanxu Liu , Francesco Cherubini , Bojie Fu , Paulo Pereira

Geography and Sustainability ›› 2020, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (4) : 321 -330.

PDF
Geography and Sustainability ›› 2020, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (4) :321 -330. DOI: 10.1016/j.geosus.2020.09.004
Article
research-article

Prioritizing sustainable development goals and linking them to ecosystem services: A global expert's knowledge evaluation

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The implementation of strategies to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is frequently hindered by potential trade-offs between priorities for either environmental protection or human well-being. However, ecosystem services (ES)-based solutions can offer possible co-benefits for SDGs implementation that are often overlooked or underexploited. In this study, we cover this gap and investigate how experts from different countries value the SDGs and relate them with ES. A total of 66 countries participated to the survey, and answers were grouped into three macro-regions: Asia; Europe, North America, and Oceania (ENO); Latin America, Caribbean and Africa (LA). Results show that the most prioritized SDGs in the three macro-regions are usually those related to essential material needs and environmental conditions, such as SDG2 (Zero Hunger), SDG1 (No Poverty), and SDG6 (Clean Water). At a global scale, the number of prioritized synergies between SDGs and ES largely exceeded trade-offs. The highest amount of synergies was observed for SDG1 (No Poverty), mainly with SDG2, SDG3 (Good Health), SDG5 (Gender Equality), and SDG8 (Economic Growth). Other major synergies among SDGs include SDG14-15 (Life below water - Life on land), SDG5-10 (Gender Equity - Reduced Inequality), and SDG1-2 (No poverty - Zero Hunger). At a global scale, SDG15, SDG13, SDG14, and SDG6 were closely related to ES like climate regulation, freshwater, food, water purification, biodiversity, and education. SDG11 (Sustainable Cities) and SDG3 were also relevant in Asia and in LA, respectively. Overall, this study shows the potential to couple future policies that can implement SDGs' strategies while adopting ES-based solutions in different regions of the world.

Keywords

Sustainable development goals (SDGs) / Ecosystem services / Priority / Expert's knowledge / Network analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Siqi Yang, Wenwu Zhao, Yanxu Liu, Francesco Cherubini, Bojie Fu, Paulo Pereira. Prioritizing sustainable development goals and linking them to ecosystem services: A global expert's knowledge evaluation. Geography and Sustainability, 2020, 1(4): 321-330 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2020.09.004

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Siqi Yang: Methodology, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - original draft. Wenwu Zhao: Conceptualization, Methodology. Yanxu Liu: Writing - review & editing. Francesco Cherubini: Conceptualization. Bojie Fu: Writing - review & editing. Paulo Pereira:.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0604700), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 4181101243), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. Francesco Cherubini was supported by Norwegian Research Council (Grant No. 286773). Paulo Pereira was supported by the European Social Fund project LINESAM (Grant No. 09.3.3-LMT-K-712-01-0104). We are grateful to Prof. Shuai Wang, also, Prof. Yan Li, Dr. Changjia Li and Dr. Ting Hua for the insightful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. We thank all scientists whose questionnaire answers are included in this survey. The data set for this evaluation can be found in supplementary materials.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2020.09.004.

References

[1]

Arnold, A., Steentjes, K., 2017. Perception of Climate Change and the Energy Transition: Results from a European Survey. GAIA 26 (3), 280-281.

[2]

Bain, P., Kroonenberg, P., Johansson, L., Milfont, T., Crimston, C., Kurz, T., Bushina, T., Calligaro, C., Demarque, C., Guan, Y., Park, J., 2019. Public views of the Sustainable Development Goals across countries. Nat. Sustain. 2 (9), 819-825.

[3]

Bastianoni, S., Niccolucci, V., Pulselli, R., Marchettini, N., 2012. Indicator and indicandum: “Sustainable way ”vs “prevailing conditions ”in the Ecological Footprint. Ecol. Indic. 16, 47-50.

[4]

Bryan, B., Gao, L., Ye, Y., Sun, X., Connor, J., Crossman, N., Stafford-Smith, M., Wu, J., He, C., Yu, D., Liu, Z., Li, A., Huang, Q., Ren, H., Deng, X., Zheng, H., Niu, J., Han, G., Hou, X., 2018. China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency. Nature 559 (7713), 193-204.

[5]

Costanza, R., Fioramonti, L., Kubiszewski, I., 2016. The UN Sustainable Development Goals and the dynamics of well-being. Front Ecol. Environ. 14 (2), 59.

[6]

Costanza, R., McGlade, J., Lovins, H., Kubiszewski, I., 2014. An overarching goal for the UN sustainable development goals. Solutions 5 (4), 13-16.

[7]

D’Alessandro, C., Zulu, L., 2017. From the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Africa in the post-2015 development agenda. A geographical perspective. Afr. Geogr. Rev. 36 (1), 1-18.

[8]

De Groot, R., Van der Perk, J., Chiesura, A., Van Vliet, A., 2003. Importance and threat as determining factors for criticality of natural capital. Ecol. Econ. 44 (2-3), 187-204.

[9]

Dhahri, S., Omri, A., 2018. Entrepreneurship contribution to the three pillars of sustainable development: What does the evidence really say? World Development 106, 64-77.

[10]

Ekins, P., Simon, S., Deutsch, L., Folke, C., De Groot, R., 2003. A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecol. Econ. 44 (2-3), 165-185.

[11]

Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norstrom, A., Reyers, B., Rockstrom, J., 2016. Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecol. Soc. 21 (3), 41.

[12]

Fu, B., 2020. Promiting geography for sustainablity. Geog. Sustain. 1, 1-7.

[13]

Guo, Y., Zheng, H., Wu, T., Wu, J., Robinson, B., 2020. A Review of spatial targeting methods of payment for ecosystem services. Geog. Sustain. 1, 132-140.

[14]

Hassanipour-Azgomi, S., Mohammadian-Hafshejani, A., Ghoncheh, M., Towhidi, F., Jamehshorani, S., Salehiniya, H., 2016. Incidence and mortality of prostate cancer and their relationship with the Human Development Index worldwide. Prostate Int 4 (3), 118-124.

[15]

Heimann, T., 2019. Bioeconomy and SDGs: Does the bioeconomy support the achievement of the SDGs? Earth’s Future 7 (1), 43-57.

[16]

Holden, E., Linnerud, K., Banister, D., 2014. Sustainable development: Our common future revisited. Glob. Environ. Change 26, 130-139.

[17]

Horan, D., 2019. A new approach to partnerships for SDG transformations. Sustainability 11 (18), 4947.

[18]

IPBES, 2018. The IPBES assessment report on land degradation and restoration. Bonn.

[19]

IPBES, 2019. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat, Bonn.

[20]

Jiang, L., O’Neill, B., 2017. Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Glob. Environ. Chang. 42, 193-199.

[21]

Johnson, J., Jones, S., Wood, S., Chaplin ‐Kramer, R., Hawthorne, P., Mulligan, M., Pennington, D., DeClerk, F., 2019. Mapping Ecosystem Services to Human Well ‐being: A toolkit to support integrated landscape management for the SDGs. Ecol. Appl. e01985.

[22]

Kaino, L., 2012. Quality education for social development in Africa. Afr. Geogr. Rev. 9, S1-S6.

[23]

Keesstra, S., Bouma, J., Wallinga, J., Tittonell, P., Smith, P., Cerdà, A., Montanarella, L., Quinton, J., Pachepsky, Y., van der Putten, W., Bardgett, R., Moolenaar, S., Mol, D., Jansen, B., Fresco, L., 2016. The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Soil 2, 111-128.

[24]

Keesstra, S., Nunes, J., Novara, A., Finger, D., Avelar, D., Kalantari, Z., Cerdà, A., 2018. The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. Sci. Total Environ. 610, 997-1009.

[25]

Kim, R., 2016. The nexus between international law and the sustainable development goals. RECIEL 25 (1), 15-26.

[26]

Klopp, J., Petretta, D., 2017. The urban sustainable development goal: Indicators, complexity and the politics of measuring cities. Cities 63, 92-97.

[27]

Kroll, C., 2015. Sustainable Development Goals: Are the rich countries ready? Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh, Germany.

[28]

Le Blanc, D., 2015. Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustain. Dev. 23 (3), 176-187.

[29]

Liu, J., Hull, V., Godfray, H., Tilman, D., Gleick, P., Hoff, H., Pahl-Wostl, C., Xu, Z., Chuang, M., Sun, J., Li, S., 2018. Nexus approaches to global sustainable development. Nat. Sustain. 1 (9), 466-476.

[30]

Lu, Y., Zhang, Y., Cao, X., Wang, C., Wang, Y., Zhang, M., Ferrier, R., Jenkins, A., Yuan, J., Bailry, M., Chen, D., Tian, H., Li, H., von Weizsäcker, E., Zhang, Z., 2019. Forty years of reform and opening up: China’s progress toward a sustainable path. Sci. Adv. 5 (8) eaau9413.

[31]

McElwee, P., Calvin, K., Campbell, D., Cherubini, F., Grassi, G., Korotkov, V., Le Hoang, A., Lwasa, S., Nkem, J., Nkonya, E., Saigusa, N., Soussana, J, ‐F., Taboada, M.A., Manning, F., Nampanzira, D., Smith, P., 2020. The impact of interventions in the global land and agri ‐food sectors on Nature’s Contributions to People and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26 (9), 4691-4721.

[32]

MEA, 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being:Current state and trends. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Global Assessment Reports. Washington DC.

[33]

Nilsson, M., Griggs, D., Visbeck, M., 2016. Policy: Map the interactions between sustainable development goals. Nature 534 (7607), 320-322.

[34]

O’Neill, D., Fanning, A., Lamb, W., Steinberger, J., 2018. A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nat. Sustain. 1 (2), 88.

[35]

Palomo, I., Felipe-Lucia, M., Bennett, E., Martín-López, B., Pascual, U., 2016. Disentangling the pathways and effects of ecosystem service co-production. Adv. Ecol. Res. 54, 245-283.

[36]

Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., Kropp, J., 2017. A systematic study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) interactions. Earth’s Future 5 (11), 1169-1179.

[37]

Pretty, J., 2018. Intensification for redesigned and sustainable agricultural systems. Science 362 (6417), eaav0294.

[38]

Rankoana, S., 2018. Human perception of climate change. Weather 73 (11), 367-370.

[39]

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin III, F., Lambin, E., Lenton, T., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S, Snyder, P., Constanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, P., Fabrt, V., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., Foley, J., 2009. Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and society. Ecol. Soc. 14, 292-292.

[40]

Rosen, M., 2017. How can we achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. Res. 1 (6).

[41]

Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., 2019a. Sustainable Development Report 2019. Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions. Network (SDSN), New York.

[42]

Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N., Rockström, J., 2019b. Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Sustain. 2 (9), 805-814.

[43]

Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Teksoz, K., Durand-Delacre, D., Sachs, J., 2017. National baselines for the Sustainable Development Goals assessed in the SDG Index and Dashboards. Nat. Geosci. 10 (8), 547-555.

[44]

Scoones, I., Stirling, A., Abrol, D., Atela, J., Charli-Joseph, L., Eakin, H., Ely, A., Olsson, P., Pereira, L., Priya, P., van Zwanenberg, P., Yang, L., 2018. Transformations to Sustainability. STEPS Centre, Brighton, UK STEPS Working Paper 104.

[45]

Simon, D., Arfvidsson, H., Anand, G., Bazaz, A., Fenna, G., Foster, K., Jain, G., Hansson, S., Evans, L., Moodley, N., Nyambuga, C., Oloko, M., Ombara, D., Patel, Z., Perry, B., Primo, N., Revi, A., Van Niekerk, B., Wharton, A., Wright, C., 2016. Developing and testing the Urban Sustainable Development Goal’s targets and indicators —a five-city study. Environ. Urban. 28 (1), 49-63.

[46]

Smith, M., Singh, G., Mozaffarian, D., Myers, S., 2015. Effects of decreases of animal pollinators on human nutrition and global health: A modelling analysis. The Lancet 386 (10007), 1964-1972.

[47]

Smith, P., Adams, J., Beerling, D., Beringer, T., Calvin, K., Fuss, S., Griscom, B., Hagemann, N., Kammann, C., Kraxner, F., Minx, J., Popp, A., Renforth, P., Vicente, J., Keesstra, S., 2019. Impacts of land-based greenhouse gas removal options on ecosystem services and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 44 4.1-4.32.

[48]

Titeux, N., Brotons, L., Settele, J., 2019. IPBES promotes integration of multiple threats to biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34 (11), 969-970.

[49]

United, Nations, 2015. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. General Assembley 70 session. New York.

[50]

United, Nations, 2017. Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Economic and Social Council, New York.

[51]

United, Nations, 2019. Global sustainable development report 2019: The future is now —science for achieving sustainable development. Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the Secretary-General, New York.

[52]

Vasiljevic, N., Gavrilovic, S., 2019. Cultural Ecosystem Services. In: Leal Filho W., Azul A., Brandli L., Özuyar P., Wall T. (Life on Land.Eds.), Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham.

[53]

Waage, J., Yap, C., Bell, S., Levy, C., Mace, G., Pegram, T., Unterhalter, E., Dasandi, N., Hudson, D., Kock, R., Mayhew, S., Marx, C., Poole, N., 2015. Governing the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Interactions, infrastructures, and institutions. Lancet Glob. Health 3 (5), e251-e252.

[54]

Wood, S., DeClerck, F., 2015. Ecosystems and human well ‐being in the Sustainable Development Goals. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13 (3), 123.

[55]

Wood, S., Jones, S., Johnson, J., Brauman, K., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Fremier, A., Gievetz, E., Gordon, L., Kappel, C., Mandle, L., Mulligan, M., O’Farrell, P., Smith, W., Willemen, L., Zhang, W., DeClerck, F., 2018. Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals. Ecosyst. Serv. 29, 70-82.

[56]

Wu, J., 2013. Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landsc. Ecol. 28 (6), 999-1023.

[57]

Yu, H., Wang, B., Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Wei, Y., 2013. Public perception of climate change in China: Results from the questionnaire survey. Nat. Hazards 69 (1), 459-472.

PDF

26

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/