Five trends of education and technology in a sustainable future

Nicholas C. Burbules , Guorui Fan , Philip Repp

Geography and Sustainability ›› 2020, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) : 93 -97.

PDF
Geography and Sustainability ›› 2020, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) :93 -97. DOI: 10.1016/j.geosus.2020.05.001
Prespective
research-article

Five trends of education and technology in a sustainable future

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Quality education is one of the pillars in the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which aims to ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. This overall goal can be connected to some general trends affecting education in the information age. We argue that education is key to the future quality of human life and the sustainability of the world. Generally, education is being transformed in both formal and informal learning contexts by new digital technologies. Overall, some of these major innovations and how they are changing education can be summarized into the following aspects: 1) our educational aims and objectives; 2) educational ecologies and contexts of learning; 3) the processes of learning; 4) the processes of teaching; and 5) educational governance and policy. Meanwhile, we note some of the potential risks and downsides of these technology trends. From the sustainable perspective, our review points to a great potential for educational reform, but it can only be achieved if we are willing to rethink and even abandon some of our traditional ways of doing things in education.

Keywords

Education for sustainable development / Educational technology / Educational transformation / Learning and teaching / Governmental policy

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Nicholas C. Burbules, Guorui Fan, Philip Repp. Five trends of education and technology in a sustainable future. Geography and Sustainability, 2020, 1(2): 93-97 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2020.05.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

This paper grew out of the Sino-American Symposium on Future Issues Affecting Quality of Life, organized and sponsored by the Timothy Light Center for Chinese Studies, on the Western Michigan University campus, May 4-5, 2019. It was benefited enormously by comments and suggestions from the reviewers of this journal.

References

[1]

Burbules, N.C., 2009. Meanings of “ubiquitous learning ”. In: Cope B., Kalantzis M. (Ubiquitous Learning.Eds.), University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 15-20.

[2]

Burbules, N.C., 2014a. El aprendizaje ubicuo: nuevos contextos, nuevos procesos. Revista Entramados: Educacion y Sociedad 1, 131-135 (in Spanish).

[3]

Burbules, N.C., 2014b. Ubiquitous learning and the future of teaching. In: Bruno-Jofre, R., Johnston, S. (Eds.), Teacher Education in a Transnational World. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 177-187.

[4]

Burbules, N.C., 2016. How we use and are used by social media in education. Educ. Theory 66 (4), 551-565.

[5]

Care, E, 2017. Global initiative around assessment of 21st century skills. http://bangkok.unesco.org/content/global-initiative-around-assessment-21st-century-skills (accessed 25 January 2020).

[6]

Chen, H., Ling, L., Ma, Y., Wen, Y., Gao, X., Gu, X., 2020. Suggestions for Chinese university freshmen based on adaptability analysis and sustainable development education. Sustainability 12, 1371.

[7]

Collins, A., Halverson, R., 2009. Rethinking education in the age of technology:The digital revolution and the schools. Teachers College Press, New York.

[8]

de Castell, S., Droumeva, M., Jenson, J., 2014. Building as interface: Sustainable educational ecologies. Medien Pädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung 24, 75-93.

[9]

He, K., 2011. Learning and thinking on the 2010 national educational technology plan of the United States. Electrif. Educ. Res. 4, 8-23.

[10]

Kioupi, V., Voulvoulis, N., 2019. Education for sustainable development: A systemic framework for connecting the SDGs to educational outcomes. Sustainability 11, 6104.

[11]

Korsakienė, R., Breivytė, I., Wamboye, E., 2011. Sustainable development and human development index. J. Secur. Sustain. Issues. 1, 103-112.

[12]

Lemke, J.L., 1998. Metamedia literacy:Transforming meanings and media. In: Reinking, D., McKenna, M., Labbo, L., Kieffer, R.D. (Eds.), Handbook of Literacy and Technology: Transformations in a Post-Typographic World. Routledge, Abingdon, pp. 283-301.

[13]

Lewin, K.M., 2019. The sustainable development goals for education: Commonwealth perspectives and opportunities. The Round Table 108 (4), 367-382.

[14]

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., Jones, K, 2009. Evaluation of evidence-based practice in online learning. U.S. Department of Education, Washington DC.

[15]

Michael, E.M., 2020. Geography education for sustainable development. Geogr. Sustain. 1 (1), 88-92.

[16]

Mulà, I., Tilbury, D., Ryan, A., Mader, M., Dlouhá, J., Mader, C., Benayas, J., Dlouhý, J., Alba, D., 2017. Catalysing change in higher education for sustainable development. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 18 (5), 798-820.

[17]

OECD, 2012. Education at a glance 2012. OECD Publishing, Paris doi: 10.1787/eag_highlights-2012-en (accessed 25 January 2020).

[18]

OECD, 2015. Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris doi: 10.1787/9789264239555-en (accessed 25 January 2020).

[19]

Eurydice, 2002. Key competencies: A developing concept in general compulsory education. European Commission, Paris. http://biblioteka-krk.ibe.edu. pl/opac_css/doc_num.php?explnum_id = 503 (accessed 25 January 2020).

[20]

Puentedura, R.R., 2015. SAMR: A brief introduction. http://hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2015/10/SAMR_ABriefIntro.pdf (accessed 25 January 2020).

[21]

OECD, 2019. Trends shaping education 2019. OECD Publishing, Paris doi: 10.1787/trends_edu-2019-en (accessed 25 January 2020).

[22]

Selwyn, N., 2012. School 2.0:Rethinking the future of schools in the digital age. In: Jimoyiannis, A. (eds). Research On E-Learning and ICT in Education. Springer, New York, pp. 3-16.

[23]

Sharples, M., de Roock, R., Ferguson, R., Gaved, M., Herodotou, C., Koh, E., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Looi, C., McAndrew, P., Rienties, B., Weller, M., Wong, L., 2016. Innovating pedagogy 2016: Open university innovation report 5. Institute of Educational Technology. The Open University, Milton Keynes.

[24]

UN General Assembly, 2015. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations, New York.

[25]

Van Poeck, K., Vandenabeele, J., 2012. Learning from sustainable development: Education in the light of public issues. Environ. Educ. Res. 18, 541-552.

[26]

Watson, J., Gemin, B., Ryan, J., 2008. Keeping pace with K-12 online Learning: A review of state-level policy and practice. Evergreen Consulting Associates, Philadelphia PA. 142-152.

[27]

National Education Association, 2012. An educator’s guide to the “Four Cs ”: Preparing 21st century students for a global society. http://www.nea.org/tools/52217.htm (accessed 25 January 2020).

[28]

O’Brien, M., 2019. MIT researcher exposing bias in facial recognition tech triggers Amazon’s wrath. https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2019/04/08/523153.htm (accessed 25 January 2020).

PDF

32

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/