Comparison of water resources management between China and the United States
Chansheng He , Carol P. Harden , Yanxu Liu
Geography and Sustainability ›› 2020, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) : 98 -108.
Comparison of water resources management between China and the United States
As the world's top two economies, the United States (U.S.) and China face a number of similar water resources problems. Yet, few studies have been done to systematically compare policies and approaches on water resources management between China and the U.S. This study compares water resources policies of China and the U.S. in the areas of national authority, water supply, water quality, and ecosystem use of the water to draw lessons learned and shed light on water resources management in China, the U.S., and the rest of the world. The lessons learned from the comparison include six aspects. 1) New paradigms of people-water harmony and a water-saving society are urgently needed to address the pressing water crisis and achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs). 2) A comprehensive, consistent, forward-looking national policy is necessary to achieve sustainable use of water resources. 3) Empowerment of river basin commissions with comprehensive authority over the integrative management of air, land, water, and biological resources in the river basin could significantly enhance the benefits and effectiveness of economic development and environmental protection. 4) Expansion of water exchange through market mechanisms among water users promotes efficient and beneficial water uses. 5) Use of water for ecosystem services should be an integral part of water resources management. China has set up a national blueprint for achieving ecological civilization; maintaining appropriate amounts of flow in rivers and lakes for maintenance of wildlife and fisheries and ecosystems should be institutionalized as part of this national strategy as well. 6) By sharing their rich experiences and lessons in water resources management, economic development, and ecological protection with other countries, China and the U.S. can help the world to achieve global human-water harmony and the UN SDGs.
Water resources management / Comparative analysis / China / The United States
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
American Water Works Association, 2012. Buried no longer: Confronting America’s water infrastructure challenge. http://www.awwa.org/infrastructure. (accessed 12 January 2020). |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Congressional Research Service, 2019. Management of the Colorado River: Water allocations, drought, and the federal role. United States Congress, Washington DC Updated November 25, 2019 https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45546. (accessed 20 January 2020). |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
MEE, 2019. China’s ecology and environment bulletin 2018. Ministry of Ecology and Environment, China. http://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/ (accessed 11 January 2020). |
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
MWR, 2017. China Water Development Report 2017. Ministry of Water Resources, China.. China Water and Power Press, Beijing, p. 397. (in Chinese) |
| [46] |
National Academy of Science, 2007. Colorado River Basin Water Management:Evaluating and Adjusting to Hydroclimatic Variability. National Academy of Science Press, Washington DC. https://www.nap.edu/read/11857/chapter/5. |
| [47] |
NRC |
| [48] |
NRC (National Research Council), 2005. The Science of Instream flows: A review of the Texas Instream Flow program. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.. |
| [49] |
O’Connor, J. E., Duda, J. J., Grant, G. E., 2015. 1000 dams down and counting. Science 348 (6234), 496-497. |
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
The Global Water Partnership, 2004. Catalyzing change:A handbook for developing integrated water resources management (IWRM) and water efficiency strategies. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York. |
| [62] |
The World Economic Forum,2013. The Global Risks 2013, Eighth Edition. Geneva, Switzerland. https://reports.weforum.org/global-risks-2013/ (accessed 11 January 2020). |
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
UN, 2010. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 17 December 2010. 70/169. The human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation. United Nations, New York. https://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol = A/RES/70/169 (accessed 20 January 2020). |
| [65] |
UN, 2019. The Sustainable Development Goals Report. United Nations, New York. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment (accessed 11 January 2020). |
| [66] |
USACE, 2012. Water in the U.S. American West: 150 years of adaptive strategies, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. http://naturalresourcespolicy.org/docs/water-inthe-west.pdf (accessed 11 January 2020). |
| [67] |
USBR, 2013. Quality of water Colorado River Basin Progress Report No. 24. Upper Colorado Region, Colorado. https://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/salinity/pdfs/PR24final.pdf (accessed 20 January 2020). |
| [68] |
USEPA, 1999. Protocol for Developing Nutrient TMDLs. Report No EPA 841-B-99-007, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. |
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
WWAP, 2017. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2017. Wastewater: The Untapped Resource. United Nations World Water Assessment Programme, UNESCO, Paris. |
| [73] |
WWAP (United Nations World Water Assessment Programme), 2019. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2019:Leaving No One Behind. UNESCO, Paris. |
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |