Integrating GIS and machine learning for seismic vulnerability mapping in Al Hoceima, Morocco

Hanane Azour , Mohamed Mansoum , Marouane Benmakhlouf , Aboubakr Chaaraoui , Mimoun Chourak

Geohazard Mechanics ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : 206 -217.

PDF (15439KB)
Geohazard Mechanics ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) :206 -217. DOI: 10.1016/j.ghm.2026.08.001
Research article
research-article
Integrating GIS and machine learning for seismic vulnerability mapping in Al Hoceima, Morocco
Author information +
History +
PDF (15439KB)

Abstract

Urban centers along the Alboran-Rif margin face recurring seismic losses, yet city-scale vulnerability mapping often lacks event-informed labels and operational detail. We develop a reproducible framework for Al Hoceima that couples supervised machine learning with a curated inventory of 664 georeferenced buildings damaged during the 2004 and 2016 earthquakes and entries from the Risk-UE program. Seventeen predictors capture the structural, geotechnical, physical, social, and emergency-access conditions. After correlation screening to limit redundancy, four classifiers—Random Forest, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine, and Artificial Neural Network—were trained and validated, and their outputs were aggregated into five vulnerability classes using Jenks natural breaks. All models recover a coherent geography of risk, with very-high and high classes concentrated in the central, eastern, and south-western sectors, and low or safe classes dominant across northern and peripheral belts. Random Forest delivered the strongest performance with accuracy of 0.94, F1-score of 0.943, Kappa of 0.925, and area under the ROC curve of 0.98, while XGBoost performed closely and the remaining models were moderate. Feature-importance analysis identifies population density, distance to the epicenter, and peak ground acceleration as primary drivers, followed by access to fire stations, lithological site effects, and building age. The maps provide decision-grade guidance for retrofit targeting, land-use control, and emergency access planning. Remaining limitations include incomplete building-stock attributes in informal districts, scale and temporal inconsistencies among predictors, label scarcity, and class imbalance. The framework is immediately transferable to data-constrained Mediterranean and North African cities and can be strengthened by harmonized inventories, event-derived labels from UAV and SAR, and multi-hazard integration.

Keywords

Seismic vulnerability / Machine learning / Random forest / GIS / Urban risk / Morocco

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hanane Azour, Mohamed Mansoum, Marouane Benmakhlouf, Aboubakr Chaaraoui, Mimoun Chourak. Integrating GIS and machine learning for seismic vulnerability mapping in Al Hoceima, Morocco. Geohazard Mechanics, 2026, 4 (3) : 206-217 DOI:10.1016/j.ghm.2026.08.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

J. Galindo-Zaldívar, A. Chalouan, O. Azzouz, C.S. De Galdeano, F. Anahnah, L. Ameza, et al., Are the seismological and geological observations of the Al Hoceima (Morocco, Rif) 2004 earthquake (M= 6.3) contradictory? Tectonophysics 475 (1) (2009) 59-67.

[2]

S. Cherif, M. Chourak, M. Abed, L. Pujades, Seismic risk in the city of Al Hoceima (north of Morocco) using the vulnerability index method, applied in Risk-UE project, Nat. Hazards 85 (2017) 329-347, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2566-8.

[3]

J. Galindo-Zaldivar, G. Ercilla, F. Estrada, M. Cataláan, E. d'Acremont, O. Azzouz, et al., Imaging the growth of recent faults: the case of 2016-2017 seismic Sequence sea bottom deformation in the Alboran Sea (Western mediterranean), Tectonics 37 (2018) 2513-2530, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017TC004941.

[4]

O. Hamdy, H. Gaber, M.S. Abdalzaher, M. Elhadidy, Identifying exposure of urban area to certain seismic hazard using machine learning and GIS: a case study of greater Cairo, Sustainability 14 (2022) 10722.

[5]

S. Lee, M. Panahi, H.R. Pourghasemi, H. Shahabi, M. Alizadeh, A. Shirzadi, et al., Sevucas: a novel gis-based machine learning software for seismic vulnerability assessment, Appl. Sci. 9 (17) (2019) 3495.

[6]

A. Chaaraoui, M. Chourak, J.A. Peláaez, S. Cherif, Seismic site effects investigation in the urban area of Nador (NE Morocco) using ambient noise measurements, Arabian J. Geosci. 14 (2021) 1937, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08245-2.

[7]

I. Khadrouf, O. El Hammoumi, N. El Goumi, M. Oukassou, Contribution of HVSR, MASW, and geotechnical investigations in seismic microzonation for safe urban extension: a case study in Ghabt Admin (Agadir), Western Morocco, J. Afr. Earth Sci. 210 (2024) 105138.

[8]

D. Asadollahzadeh, B. Behnam, Machine learning approaches for seismic vulnerability assessment of urban buildings: a comparative study with analytic hierarchy process, Prog. Disaster Sci. 25 (2025) 100398, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100398.

[9]

M.S. Shadmaan, S. Popy, An assessment of earthquake vulnerability by multi-criteria decision-making method, Geohazard Mechanics 1 (1) (2023) 94-102.

[10]

W. Chen, L. Zhang, Building vulnerability assessment in seismic areas using ensemble learning: a Nepal case study, J. Clean. Prod. 350 (2022) 131418, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131418.

[11]

A. Talhaoui, Seismic microzonation and site effects at al Hoceima city, Morocco, J. Earthq. Eng. 8 (4) (2004) 585-596, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246904001559.

[12]

J. Kariche, M. Meghraoui, Y. Timoulali, E. Cetin, R. Toussaint, The Al Hoceima earthquake sequence of 1994, 2004 and 2016: stress transfer and poroelasticity in the Rif and Alboran Sea region, Geophys. J. Int. 212 (2018) 42-53.

[13]

P. Code, Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2005.

[14]

A. Pedrera, A. Ruiz-Constan, J. Galindo-Zaldívar, A. Chalouan, C.S. De Galdeano, C. Marín-Lechado, et al., Is there an active subduction beneath the Gibraltar orogenic arc? Constraints from Pliocene to present-day stress field, J. Geodyn. 52 (2011) 83-96.

[15]

A. Michard, Elements of Moroccan Geology, 1976.

[16]

D. Do Couto, C. Gorini, L. Jolivet, N. Lebret, R. Augier, C. Gumiaux, E. d'Acremont, A. Ammar, H. Jabour, J.-L. Auxietre, Tectonic and stratigraphic evolution of the Western Alboran Sea basin in the last 25 Myrs, Tectonophysics 677 ( 2016) 280-311, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2016.03.020.

[17]

J. Andrieux, J.-M. Fontbote, M. Mattauer, An explanatory model of the Gibraltar Arc, Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 12 (2) (1971) 191-198.

[18]

T. Mourier, Geological and Structural Study of the Bokoya Massif (Eastern Rif, Morocco), University of Paris-Sud, 1982.

[19]

M. Benmakhlouf, J. Galindo-Zaldívar, A. Chalouan, C.S. de Galdeano, M. Ahmamou, A.C. López-Garrido, Inversion of transfer faults: the Jebha-Chrafate fault (Rif, Morocco), J. Afr. Earth Sci. 73 (2012) 33-43.

[20]

A. Koulali, D. Ouazar, A. Tahayt, R.W. King, P. Vernant, R.E. Reilinger, et al., New GPS constraints on active deformation along the Africa-Iberia plate boundary, Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 308 (1-2) (2011) 211-217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.05.048.

[21]

J. Galindo-Zaldivar, O. Azzouz, A. Chalouan, A. Pedrera, P. Ruano, A. Ruiz- Constan, M. Benmakhlouf, Extensional tectonics, graben development and fault terminations in the eastern Rif (Bokoya-Ras Afraou area), Tectonophysics 663 (2015) 140-149, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2015.08.029.

[22]

M. Ibrahim, A. Al-Mashaqbah, B. Koch, P. Datta, An evaluation of available digital elevation models (DEMs) for geomorphological feature analysis, Environ. Earth Sci. 79 (2020) 336, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09075-3.

[23]

K. Konno, T. Ohmachi, Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88 (1998) 228-241.

[24]

Moroccan Ministry of Housing. Seismic Design Code for Buildings (RPS 2000, Revised 2011). Rabat, Morocco.

[25]

M. Wathelet, J.-L. Chatelain, C. Cornou, G. Di Giulio, B. Guillier, M. Ohrnberger, et al., Geopsy: a user-friendly open-source tool set for ambient vibration processing, Seismol Res. Lett. 91 (3) (2020) 1878-1889, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190360.

[26]

C.F. Dormann, J. Elith, S. Bacher, C. Buchmann, G. Carl, G. Carré et al., Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance, Ecography 36 (2013) 27-46, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x.

[27]

R. Genuer, J.-M. Poggi, C. Tuleau-Malot, Variable selection using random forests, Pattern Recognit. Lett. 31 (2010) 2225-2236.

[28]

L. Russo, D. Tapete, S.L. Ullo, P. Gamba, A deep learning framework for building damage assessment using VHR SAR and geospatial data: demonstration on the 2023 Türkiye earthquake, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 19 (2026) 1054-1070, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2025.3637588.

[29]

H.A. Naceur, H.G. Abdo, B. Igmoullan, M. Namous, H. Almohamad, A.A. Al Dughairi, et al., Performance assessment of the landslide susceptibility modelling using the support vector machine, radial basis function network, and weight of evidence models in the N’fis river basin, Morocco, Geosci Lett 9 (2022) 39, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-022-00249-4.

[30]

M. Benmakhlouf, Y. El Kharim, J. Galindo Zaldívar, R. Sahrane, Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in Western External Rif Chain Using Machine Learning Methods, 2023.

[31]

T. Chen, C. Guestrin, XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system,in:Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM, San Francisco California USA, 2016, pp. 785-794, https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785.

[32]

R. Bala, D. Kumar, Classification using ANN: a review, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Res. 13 (7) (2017) 1811-1820.

[33]

G.F. Jenks, F.C. Caspall, Error on choroplethic maps: definition, measurement, reduction, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 61 (2) (1971) 217-244, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1971.tb00779.x.

[34]

S. bin Rambat, Z. Shi, S.A. bin Mazlan, Seismic vulnerability assessment in Ranau, Sabah, using two different models, ISPRS Int. J. GeoInf. 10 (5) (2021) 271.

[35]

J. Han, J. Kim, S. Park, S. Son, M. Ryu, South Korea using frequency ratio, Seismic vulnerability assessment and mapping of Gyeongju, decision tree, and random forest, Sustainability 12 (18) (2020) 7787.

[36]

M. Fayaz, S. Romshoo, I. Rashid, R. Chandra, Earthquake vulnerability assessment of the built environment in Srinagar City, Kashmir Himalaya, using GIS, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2022 ( 2022) 1-35.

[37]

A. Saputra, T. Rahardianto, M.D. Revindo, I. Delikostidis, D.S. Hadmoko, J. Sartohadi, et al., Seismic vulnerability assessment of residential buildings using logistic regression and geographic information system (GIS) in Pleret Sub District (Yogyakarta, Indonesia), Geoenvironmental Disasters 4 (2017) 11, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-017-0075-z.

[38]

M. Karpouza, H.D. Skilodimou, G. Kaviris, A. Zymvragakis, A. Antonarakou, G. D. Bathrellos, Escape routes and safe points in natural hazards. A case study for soil, Eng. Geol. 340 (2024) 107683.

PDF (15439KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/