Complex analysis of GPR signals to control contact zone of concrete lining and rock mass

Abstract

Nondestructive sensing technologies are essential for assessing the condition and structural integrity of concrete linings and their surrounding rock. This study utilized ground-penetrating radar (GPR SIR-3000) to detect defects, specifically a dry sand-filled void embedded within a concrete lining. Recognizing that accurate characterization of GPR signals is crucial for understanding the interface between concrete linings and rock mass, the researchers employed the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method to simulate electromagnetic wave propagation through concrete models. This approach allowed them to investigate defects in the form of internal thin layers or voids within concrete structures. By combining experimental measurements with forward simulations, the study focused on determining defect thickness using the amplitude ratio method, which enhances measurement accuracy. The experimental findings were found to be consistent with the simulation predictions. Further signal processing techniques, including time delay analysis and spectral analysis, were also applied. The results of this research demonstrate the potential of GPR technology for characterizing defects at the interface between concrete linings and rock mass, or within the surrounding rock mass itself, providing valuable insights into defect thickness and the electromagnetic properties of the materials filling these voids.

Keywords

GPR / Electromagnetic properties / Reflection coefficient / Void thickness / Finite difference time domain method (FDTD) / gprMax software

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Ekaterina V. Denisova: Methodology, Investigation, Project administration, Conceptualization. Alexey P. Khmelinin: Software, Resources, Writing - review & editing. Kirill O. Sokolov: Supervision, Formal analysis, Validation. Anton I. Konurin: Visualization, Data curation, Writing - original draft. Alexander A. Voitenko: Software.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The study was carried out in the framework of the Basic Research Program, project state registration (No. 121052500138-4 and 122011800086-1).

References

[1] L. De-Chun, X. Chong, C. Zhen-Dong, et al., Mechanical properties of functionally graded concrete lining for deep underground structures, Adv. Civ. Eng. (2022) 1-21, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2363989.

[2] Sh Shuai Y. Wu F. Helin, et al., Numerical investigation of longitudinal through voids in tunnel secondary lining vaults and steel plate strengthening, Materials 16 (2023) 4248, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16124248.

[3] J. Chen, X. Yu, Sh Liu, et al., Tunnel SAM adapter: adapting segment anything model for tunnel water leakage inspection, Geohazard Mechanics, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ghm.2024.01.001.

[4] L. Hai, X. Xiongyao, S. Motoyuki, Accurate thickness estimation of a backfill grouting layer behind shield tunnel lining by CMP measurement using GPR. 14th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, GPR, 2012, pp. 137-142, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2012.6254848.

[5] Q. Hui, X. Xiongyao, T. Yu, W. Zhengzheng, Experimental study on GPR detection of voids inside and behind tunnel linings, J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 25 (2020) 65-74, https://doi.org/10.2113/jeeg18-085.

[6] W. Xianlong, B. Xiaohua, Sh Jun, et al., Evaluation of void defects behind tunnel lining through GPR forward simulation, Sensors (22) (2022) 9702, https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249702.

[7] Z. Sheng, H. Wenchao, L. Yongsuo, Z. Yuchi, Thickness identification of tunnel lining structure by time-energy density analysis based on wavelet transform, J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev. 12 (2019) 28-37, https://doi.org/10.25103/jestr.124.04.

[8] H. Regidestyoko, L. Sung-Jin, K. Seong-Hoon, K. Sungmo, Evaluation of air-cavities behind concrete tunnel linings using GPR measurements, Remote Sens. 14 (2022) 5348, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14215348.

[9] A. Lalague, M. Lebens, I. Hoff, E. Grov, Detection of rockfall on a tunnel concrete lining with ground-penetrating radar (GPR), Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 49 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-0943-y.

[10] I. Saricicek, A. Seren, Investigation concrete quality of zigana and torul tunnels by using GPR method. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201413689, 2015

[11] D. Arosio, S. Munda, L. Zanzi, L. Longoni, M. Papini, GPR investigations to assess the state of damage of a concrete water tunnel, J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 17 (2012) 159-169, https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG17.3.159.

[12] P. Lazinski, M. Jasinski, M. Uscilowski, et al., GPR in damage identification of concrete elements—A case study of diagnostics in a prestressed bridge, Remote Sens. 17 (2024) 35, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010035.

[13] Z. Yiming, T. Zheng, S. Xuhui, et al., SWC-net and multi-phase heterogeneous FDTD model for void detection underneath airport pavement slab, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. (2024) 1-17, https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2024.3459004.

[14] C. Weixia, S. Haihan, T. Kang-Hai, F. Zheng, Early detection of corrosion damage in reinforced concrete using GPR array imaging method, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. (2024), https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2024.3383496, 1-1

[15] K. Tesic, A. Baricevic, M. Serdar, N. Gucunski, Characterization of ground penetrating radar signal during simulated corrosion of concrete reinforcement, Autom. ConStruct. 143 (2022) 104548, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104548.

[16] G. Fornasari, L. Capozzoli, E. Rizzo, Combined GPR and self-potential techniques for monitoring steel rebar corrosion in reinforced concrete structures: a laboratory study, Remote Sens. (2023), https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15082206, 2206.18

[17] M. Oudeika, E. Ilkimen, S. Tasdelen, A. Aydin, Distinguishing groundwater flow paths in fractured rock aquifers formed under tectonic stress using geophysical techniques: cankurtaran basin, Denizli, Turkey, Int. J. Environ. Res. 14 (2020) 1-15, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-020-00279-w.

[18] J. Molron, N. Linde, P. Davy, et al., GPR-inferred fracture aperture widening in response to a high-pressure tracer injection test at the aspo hard rock laboratory, Sweden, Eng. Geol. 292 (2021) 106249, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106249.

[19] W. Tin Wai, W.L. Lai Wallace, Characterization of complex dielectric permittivity of concrete by GPR numerical Simulation and spectral analysis, J. Nondestruct. Eval. 41 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-021-00836-z.

[20] Li Bo, Zhan Peng, Shilei Wang, Linyan Guo, Identification of ballast fouling status and mechanized cleaning efficiency using FDTD method, Remote Sens. 15 (2023) 3437, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133437.

[21] M.B. Widess, How thin is a thin bed? Geophysics 38 (1973) 1176-1180, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440403.

[22] J. Bradford, J. Deeds, Ground-penetrating radar theory and application of thin-bed offset-dependent reflectivity, John H. Bradford (2006) 71, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2194524.

[23] J. Deparis, S. Garambois, On the use of dispersive APVO GPR curves for thin-bed properties estimation: theory and application to fracture characterization, Geophysics 74 (1) (2009) J1-J12, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3008545.

[24] R. Kadlec, P. Fiala, The response of layered materials to EMG waves from a pulse source, Prog. Electromagn. Res. M (42) (2015) 179-187, https://doi.org/10.2528/PIERM15042904.

[25] D. Feng, X. Wang, B. Zhang, Specifific evaluation of tunnel lining multi-defects by all-refifined GPR simulation method using hybrid algorithm of FETD and FDTD, Constr. Build. Mater. 185 (2018) 220-229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.039.

[26] A. Giannopoulos, Modelling ground-penetrating radar by GprMax, Constr. Build. Mater. 19 (2005) 755-762, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.007.

[27] K. Yee, Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell's equations in isotropic media, IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. 14 (1966) 302-307, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.1966.1138693.

[28] K. Kunz, R. Luebbers, The Finite Difference Time Domain Method for Electrodynamics, 1996.

[29] A. Taflove, S. C. Hagness Computational Electrodynamics, Artech house, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012170960-0/50046-3.

[30] C. Warren, A. Giannopoulos, I. Giannakis GprMax, Open source software to simulate electromagnetic wave propagation for ground penetrating radar, Comput. Phys. Commun. 209 (2016) 163-170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2016.08.020.

[31] I. Giannakis, A. Giannopoulos, C. Warren, A realistic FDTD numerical modeling framework of ground penetrating radar for landmine detection, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Rem. Sens. (9) (2015) 37-51, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2468597.

[32] R. Courant, K. Friedrichs, H. Lewy, On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics, IBM J. Res. Dev. 11 (2) (1967) 215-234, https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.112.0215.

[33] A. Van der Wielen,Characterization of thin layers into concrete with ground penetrating radar, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Liege, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3729.1609.

[34] I. Gilmutdinov, I. Schlogel, A. Hinterleitner, et al., Assessment of material layers in building walls using GeoRadar, Remote Sens. 14 (2022) 5038, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14195038.

[35] Bin Liu, Yuxiao Ren, Hanchi Liu, Xu Hui, Zhengfang Wang, Cohn Anthony, Peng Jiang, GPRInvNet: deep learning-based ground-penetrating radar data inversion for tunnel linings, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. (2021) 1-21, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.3046454.

[36] L. Lianbaichao, S. Zhanping, L. Xu, Artificial intelligence in tunnel construction: a comprehensive review of hotspots and frontier topics, Geohazard Mech. 2 (1) (2024) 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ghm.2023.11.004.