Near-field ground motion intensity parameters of the major February 06, 2023, Türkey Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequences

Abstract

Türkey is located in a seismically active region where the Anatolia, Africa, and Arabia tectonic plates converge. The high seismic hazard causes the region to be repeatedly struck by major earthquakes. On February 06, 2023, a devastating Mw 7.7 earthquake struck Türkey at 04:17 a.m. local time (01:17 UTC). Around 9 ​h later at 10:24 a.m. local time, another destructive Mw 7.6 earthquake struck at a distance of 95 ​km towards the north of the first earthquake (www.tadas.afad.gov.tr). The strong ground motion from the Mw 7.7 event shows peak ground accelerations exceeding 1 ​g in the near-field region and affected 11 cities. The effect of the complex fault geometry on the observed high PGAs needs to be examined to understand the associated structural damage. The present study investigates the key characteristics of strong ground motions recorded from 40 stations located in the vicinity of 100 ​km which are commonly used intensity parameters for vulnerability and risk analysis. The complex interaction between fault segments significantly influenced the overall rupture process and the distribution of ground shaking and generated significant pulse-like ground motions in the near-fault region. These ground motions exhibited directivity effects, characterized by pulse-like velocities, high peak ground accelerations, and spectral accelerations. The response spectra are derived for ground motions from several stations for the present destructive/major earthquake and are observed to exceed code prescribed spectra corresponding to the 475-year and 2475-year return periods.

Keywords

Kahramanmaraş earthquake / Ground motion parameters / Response spectra

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Chenna Rajaram: Writing - original draft, Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision. Jayaprakash Vemuri: Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing. Vesile Hatun Akansel: Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding this article's research, authorship, and/or publication.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the undergraduate students K Vandana, and K Charitha for processing the ground motion records.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ghm.2025.08.002.

References

[1] M. Oral, A. Yenel, E. Oral, N. Aydin, T. Tuncay, Earthquake experience and preparedness in Türkey, Disaster Prev. Manag. 24 (1) (2015) 21-37.

[2] Turkish catastrophe insurance pool (TCIP). http://www.dask.gov.tr/, 2013. (Accessed 25 July 2025).

[3] K. Gokkaya, Geographic analysis of earthquake damage in Türkey between 1900 and 2012, Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 7 (6) (2016) 1948-1961.

[4] R.M. Rothaus, E. Reinhardt, J. Noller, Regional considerations of coastline change, tsunami damage, and recovery along the southern Coast of the Bay of Izmit, Nat. Hazards 31 (2004) 233-252.

[5] O. Murat, Field reconnaissance of the October 23, 2011, Van, Türkey, earthquake: lessons from structural damages, J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (5) (2015) 04014125.

[6] https://www.worlddata.info/asia/Türkiye/earthquakes.php. (Accessed 25 April 2023).

[7] P.G. Bakir, Proposal of a national mitigation strategy against earthquakes in Türkey, Nat. Hazards 33 (3) (2004) 405-425.

[8] B. Sengezer, E. Koç, A critical analysis of earthquakes and urban planning in Türkey, Disasters 29 (2) (2005) 171-194.

[9] I. Akengin, Pancake Failure of the RC Building in Diyabakir, Agence France-Presse (AFP), 2023.

[10] EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock, Collapse of reinforced concrete buildings. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64594349, 2023. (Accessed 22 July 2023).

[11] H. Malla, Failure of the RC building in Adana, southern Türkiye, [photograph], AP photo, 2023. https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/earthquake-death-toll-passes-5000-as-rescue-efforts-go-on-in-turkey-and-syria/807896448.html. (Accessed 20 July 2025).

[12] K.O. Cetin, M. Ilgaç, Reconnaissance Report on February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaras¸- Pazarcık (Mw=7.7) and Elbistan (Mw=7.6) Earthquakes, METU/EERC Report No. 2023- 01, Middle East Technical Univ., Türkey, 2023.

[13] I. Kazaz, I.H. Bilge, M. Gurbuz, Near-fault ground motion characteristics and its effects on a collapsed reinforced concrete structure in Hatay during the February 6, 2023 Mw7.8 Kahramanmaras¸ earthquake, Eng. Struct. 298 (2024) 117067.

[14] E. Zengin, Y. Bozorgnia, A. Tamhidi, S. Mazzoni, Spatial distribution of damage potential of the 2023 pazarcik Türkey earthquake using inelastic-response spectra of recorded and simulated ground motions, Earthq. Spectra 41 (1) (2025) 126-145.

[15] N.N. Ambraseys, J.A. Jackson, Seismicity of the Sea of Marmara (turkey) since 1500, Geophys. J. Int. 141 (3) (2000) F1-F6.

[16] F. Sertcelik, Estimation of coda wave attenuation in the east Anatolia fault zone, Türkey, Pure Appl. Geophys. 169 (7) (2012) 1189-1204.

[17] C. Bassin, G. Laske, G. Masters, The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America, EOS Trans. AGU 81 (2000) F897.

[18] United states geological survey (USGS). https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000jllz/executive, 2023. (Accessed 25 April 2023).

[19] AFAD, Turkish accelerometric database and analysis system.https://tadas.afad.gov.tr, 2023. (Accessed 7 February 2023).

[20] V.H. Akansel, F. Soysal, K. Kadas¸, P. Gulkan, Türkey earthquake hazard map evaluation from spectrum intensity perspective, Turk. Earthq. Res. J. 2 (2) (2018) 115-137, 2020.

[21] C. Rajaram, R.K. Pradeep, Numerical modeling of near fault seismic ground motion for Denali fault, Int. J. Geotech. Earthq. Eng. 12 (2) (2021) 62-82.

[22] V.D.C. Cosmos, Consortium of Organizations for Strong-Motion Observation Systems Virtual Data, Centre, 2023.

[23] Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), The Wenchuan, Sichuan Province, China, Earthquake of May 12, 2008, 2008.

[24] C. Rajaram, R.K. Pradeep, Correlation between building damage Vs ground motion parameters and input energy: a new ranking scheme using multivariate analysis, Curr. Sci. 124 (2) (2023) 190-201.

[25] R.P. Lokeswara, K.P. Manoj, N. Chereddy, V. Jayaprakash, C. Rajaram, Correlation analysis between ground motion parameters and seismic damage of buildings for near-field ground motions, Nat. Hazards Res. 2 (3) (2022) 202-209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nhres.2022.08.002.