Leveraging artificial neural networks for robust landslide susceptibility mapping: A geospatial modeling approach in the ecologically sensitive Nilgiri District, Tamil Nadu

Abstract

Landslides pose a significant threat to the lives and livelihoods of marginalised communities residing in rural areas and the delicate ecological balance of the environment. Implementing advanced technologies is crucial for improving hazard risk assessment and enhancing preparedness measures in regions characterised by diverse topography and complex geological formations. Geospatial applications and modelling techniques have emerged as indispensable in mitigating landslide risks, particularly in environmentally sensitive areas. This study presents a comprehensive approach to landslide susceptibility mapping in the Nilgiri District of Tamil Nadu, India, leveraging the power of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and integrating multi-dimensional geospatial datasets. Integrating ANN-based modelling and geospatial techniques offers significant advantages in terms of statistical robustness, reproducibility, and the ability to analyze the complex interplay of factors influencing landslide hazards quantitatively. The methodology involves rigorous pre-processing and integrating spatial data, including landslide event occurrences as the dependent variable and ten independent parameters influencing landslide susceptibility. These parameters encompass elevation, slope aspect, slope degree, distance to roads, land use patterns, geomorphology, lithology, drainage density, lineament density, and rainfall distribution. Feature extraction and selection techniques are employed to effectively model the complex interactions between these factors and landslide occurrences. This process identifies the most relevant variables influencing landslide susceptibility, enhancing the model's predictive capabilities. The state-of-the-art ANNs are trained using historical landslide occurrence data and the selected influencing factors, enabling the development of a robust and accurate landslide susceptibility model. The performance of the developed model is rigorously evaluated using a comprehensive suite of metrics, including accuracy, precision, and the Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Preliminary results indicate that the ANN-based landslide susceptibility model outperforms traditional zonation methods, demonstrating higher accuracy and reliability in predicting landslide-prone areas. The resulting Landslide Susceptibility Map (LSM) categorises the study area into five distinct hazard zones, ranging from very high (664.1 km²), high (598.9 km²), moderate (639.7 km²), low (478.9 km²) and to very low (170.9 km²). Notably, the eastern and central regions of the district emerge as particularly vulnerable to landslide occurrences. The study's findings have far-reaching implications for disaster risk reduction efforts, land-use planning, and sustainable development strategies in the ecologically sensitive Nilgiri District and beyond.

Keywords

Landslide susceptibility mapping / Artificial neural networks / Geospatial modeling / Feature importance analysis / Risk management strategies

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

[1] K. Terzaghi, Mechanism of Landslides, 1950.

[2] P. Tsangaratos, I. Ilia, Landslide susceptibility mapping using a modified decision tree classifier in the Xanthi Perfection, Greece, Landslides 13 (2016) 305-320.

[3] L.M. Highland, P. Bobrowsky, An Illustrated Landslide Handbook for Developing Nations, 2008.

[4] L.M. Highland, P. Bobrowsky, The Landslide Handbook-A Guide to Understanding Landslides ( No. 1325), US Geological Survey, 2008.

[5] L. Ayalew, H. Yamagishi, The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan, Geomorphology 65 (1-2) (2005) 15-31.

[6] S. Mondal, S. Mandal, Landslide susceptibility mapping of Darjeeling Himalaya, India using index of entropy (IOE) model, Applied Geomatics 11 (2019) 129-146.

[7] C.J.F. Chung, A.G. Fabbri, Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping, Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 65 (12) (1999) 1389-1399.

[8] A. Clerici, S. Perego, C. Tellini, P. Vescovi, A procedure for landslide susceptibility zonation by the conditional analysis method, Geomorphology 48 (4) (2002) 349-364.

[9] P. Confuorto, D. Di Martire, D. Infante, A. Novellino, R. Papa, D. Calcaterra, M. Ramondini, Monitoring of remedial works performance on landslide-affected areas through ground-and satellite-based techniques, Catena 178 (2019) 77-89.

[10] A. Dikshit, R. Sarkar, B. Pradhan, S. Segoni, A.M. Alamri, Rainfall induced landslide studies in Indian Himalayan region: a critical review, Appl. Sci. 10 (7) (2020) 2466.

[11] A. Akgun, C. Kıncal, B. Pradhan, Application of remote sensing data and GIS for landslide risk assessment as an environmental threat to Izmir city (west Turkey), Environ. Monit. Assess. 184 (2012) 5453-5470.

[12] P. Aleotti, R. Chowdhury, Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives, Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 58 (1) (1999) 21-44.

[13] A. Ozdemir, T. Altural, A comparative study of frequency ratio, weights of evidence and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping: sultan Mountains, SW Turkey, J. Asian Earth Sci. 64 (2013) 180-197.

[14] X. Chen, W. Chen, GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessment using optimized hybrid machine learning methods, Catena 196 (2021) 104833.

[15] A. Merghadi, A.P. Yunus, J. Dou, J. Whiteley, B. ThaiPham, D.T. Bui, B. Abderrahmane, Machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility studies: a comparative overview of algorithm performance, Earth Sci. Rev. 207 (2020) 103225.

[16] N. Kardani, A. Zhou, M. Nazem, S.L. Shen, Improved prediction of slope stability using a hybrid stacking ensemble method based on finite element analysis and field data, J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 13 (1) (2021) 188-201.

[17] D.T. Bui, P. Tsangaratos, V.T. Nguyen, N. Van Liem, P.T. Trinh, Comparing the prediction performance of a Deep Learning Neural Network model with conventional machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment, Catena 188 (2020) 104426.

[18] D. Van Dao, A. Jaafari, M. Bayat, D. Mafi-Gholami, C. Qi, H. Moayedi, B.T. Pham, A spatially explicit deep learning neural network model for the prediction of landslide susceptibility, Catena 188 (2020) 104451.

[19] Z. Fang, Y. Wang, L. Peng, H. Hong, Integration of convolutional neural network and conventional machine learning classifiers for landslide susceptibility mapping, Comput. Geosci. 139 (2020) 104470.

[20] R. Liu, X. Yang, C. Xu, L. Wei, X. Zeng, Comparative study of convolutional neural network and conventional machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility mapping, Rem. Sens. 14 (2) (2022) 321.

[21] G.D. Bathrellos, H.D. Skilodimou, V. Zygouri, I. Koukouvelas, Landslide: a recurrent phenomenon? Landslide hazard assessment in mountainous areas of central Greece, Z. Geomorphol. 63 (1) (2021) 95-114, https://doi.org/10.1127/zfg/2021/0670.

[22] W. Chen, X. Xie, J. Wang, B. Pradhan, H. Hong, D.T. Bui, J. Ma, A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility, Catena 151 (2017) 147-160.

[23] G.D. Bathrellos, H.D. Skilodimou, K. Chousianitis, A.M. Youssef, B. Pradhan, Suitability estimation for urban development using multi-hazard assessment map, Sci. Total Environ. 575 (2017) 119-134.

[24] P. Jaiswal, C.J. van Westen, V. Jetten, Quantitative assessment of landslide hazard along transportation lines using historical records, Landslides 8 (2011) 279-291.

[25] S.S. Chandrasekaran, R. Sayed Owaise, S. Ashwin, R.M. Jain, S. Prasanth, R.B. Venugopalan, Investigation on infrastructural damages by rainfall-induced landslides during November 2009 in Nilgiris, India, Nat. Hazards 65 (2013).