Evaluation of ground motion parameters and seismic response of reinforced concrete buildings from the Mw 6.9, 2011 Sikkim earthquake

Faisal Mehraj Wani , Jayaprakash Vemuri , Rajaram Chenna

Geohazard Mechanics ›› 2023, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) : 162 -178.

PDF (5657KB)
Geohazard Mechanics ›› 2023, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) :162 -178. DOI: 10.1016/j.ghm.2023.05.001
research-article

Evaluation of ground motion parameters and seismic response of reinforced concrete buildings from the Mw 6.9, 2011 Sikkim earthquake

Author information +
History +
PDF (5657KB)

Abstract

The continuous collision of the Eurasian plate and the Indian plate has resulted in several earthquakes in the Himalayan region. The 6.9 Mw 2011 Sikkim earthquake, which caused immense damage to the built environment in Sikkim, was triggered by an intraplate source on the overriding Eurasian plate. Strong ground motions from the earthquake were recorded at stations established by IIT Roorkee as part of the PESMOS program. In this paper, near-field and far-field ground motions from this earthquake were analyzed to evaluate their key characteristics and examine their time-frequency features by employing Fast Fourier Transforms (FFTs) and Continuous Wavelet Transforms (CWTs). A comparison between the ground motion parameters of near-field and far-field seismic waves highlights the distinct characteristics of near-field ground motions. Additionally, the impact of near-field and far-field ground motions on the seismic response of a code-compliant RC building is investigated. The re- sults from the non-linear time history analyses indicate that the roof displacements, drift ratio and strain induced in the frame elements are less than the code-prescribed maximum limits. Further, the demand and capacity levels for the RC frame elements were evaluated to compute the performance ratios. The results indicate that the extensive damage to reinforced concrete buildings in the 2011 Sikkim quake was primarily due to the non- engineered nature of the structures and also due to the non-compliance of the built structures to the seismic design code provisions.

Keywords

Fast fourier transform / Continuous wavelet transform / Near field / Far field / Ground motion parameters / 2011 Sikkim Earthquake / Reinforced Concrete Structures

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Faisal Mehraj Wani, Jayaprakash Vemuri, Rajaram Chenna. Evaluation of ground motion parameters and seismic response of reinforced concrete buildings from the Mw 6.9, 2011 Sikkim earthquake. Geohazard Mechanics, 2023, 1(2): 162-178 DOI:10.1016/j.ghm.2023.05.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

P.L. Narula, S.K. Acharyya, J. Banerjee (Eds.), Seismotectonic Atlas of India and its Environs, Geological survey of India, 2000.

[2]

R. Bilham, V.K. Gaur, P. Molnar, Himalayan seismic hazard, Science 293 (5534) ( 2001) 1442-1444, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062584.

[3]

P. Hazarika, M. Ravi Kumar, Seismicity and source parameters of moderate earthquakes in Sikkim Himalaya, Nat. Hazards 62 ( 2012) 937-952, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0122-8.

[4]

IS: 1893 ( Part1), Code of Practice for Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2016.

[5]

C.O. Allegre, V. Courtillot, P. Tapponnier, A. Hirn, M. Mattauer, C. Coulon, R. Xu, Structure and evolution of the Himalaya-Tibet orogenic belt, Nature 307 (5946) ( 1984) 17-22, https://doi.org/10.1038/307017a0.

[6]

P. Baccheschi, S. D'Amico, Subduction, volcanism, collision, orogenesis and faults: how do they shape the central Mediterranean region? J. Geodyn. 82 ( 2014) 1-4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2014.09.010.

[7]

L. Seeber, J.G. Armbruster, R. quittmeyer, Seismicity and continental subduction in the himalayan arc, in: H. K. Gupta, F.M. Delany (Eds.), Zagros, Hindu Kush, Himalaya, Geodynamic Evolution, Geodynamics Series, American Geophysical Union, Washington (DC), 1981, pp. 215-242, https://doi.org/10.1029/GD003p0215.

[8]

J. Ni, M. Barazangi, Seismotectonics of the Himalayan collision zone: geometry of the underthrusting Indian plate beneath the Himalaya, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 89 (B2) ( 1984) 1147-1163, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB089iB02p01147.

[9]

J.R. Kayal, Microearthquake activity in some parts of the Himalaya and the tectonic model, Tectonophysics 339 (3-4) ( 2001) 331-351, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00129-9.

[10]

R. Pradhan, S.K. Prajapati, S. Chopra, A. Kumar, B.K. Bansal, C.D. Reddy, Causative source of Mw 6.9 Sikkim-Nepal border earthquake of September 2011: GPS baseline observations and strain analysis, J. Asian Earth Sci. 70 ( 2013) 179-192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.03.012.

[11]

V.C. Thakur, A.K. Mahajan, V. Gupta, Seismotectonics of 18 September 2011 Sikkim earthquake: a component of transcurrent deformation in eastern Himalaya, Himal. Geol. 33 (1) ( 2012) 89-96.

[12]

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us10007pfk/executive.

[13]

S.C. Dutta, P.S. Mukhopadhyay, R. Saha, S. Nayak, 2011 Sikkim earthquake at eastern himalayas: lessons learnt from performance of structures, Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng. 75 ( 2015) 121-129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.03.020.

[14]

H.B. Kaushik, K. Dasgupta, Assessment of seismic vulnerability of structures in Sikkim, India, based on damage observation during two recent earthquakes,J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27 (6) ( 2013) 697-720, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000380.

[15]

C.V.R. Murty, S.T.G. Raghukanth, A. Menon, R. Goswami, A.R. Vijayanarayanan, S.R. Gandhi, R. Pradeep Kumar, The Mw 6.9 Sikkim-Nepal border earthquake of september 18, 2011, EERI Newsletter, EERI Special Earthquake Report ( 2012) 1-14.

[16]

J.F. Hall, W.T. Holmes, P. Somers,Northridge earthquake, january 17, 1994, Preliminary reconnaissance report ( 1994) 87-93.

[17]

S.E. Chang, N. Nojima,Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: the 1995 Kobe earthquake in comparative perspective, Transport. Res. Pol. Pract. 35(6) (2001) 475-494, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00003-3.

[18]

T.C. Shin, T.L. Teng, An overview of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 91 (5) ( 2001) 895-913, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000738.

[19]

P.K. Malhotra, Response of buildings to near-field pulse-like ground motions, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam. 28 (11) ( 1999) 1309-1326, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11%3C1309::AID-EQE868%3E3.0.CO;2-U.

[20]

P.G. Somerville,Characterizing near fault ground motion for the design and evaluation of bridges, Proceedings of the 3rd National Seismic Conference and Workshop on Bridges and Highways 28 ( 2002, April) 137-148.

[21]

M. Leti, H. Bilgin, Damage potential of near and far-fault ground motions on seismic response of RC buildings designed according to old practices, Research on Engineering Structures and Materials 8 (2) ( 2022) 337-357, https://doi.org/10.17515/resm2022.392ea0123.

[22]

A. Emamikoupaei, A. Bigdeli, K.D. Tsavdaridis, Nonlinear seismic response of mid- rise modular buildings subjected to near-field ground motions, J. Constr. Steel Res. 201 ( 2023), 107696, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107696.

[23]

H. Moniri, Evaluation of seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings under near-field earthquakes, International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering 9 ( 2017) 13-25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-016-0145-6.

[24]

Y. Zhang, X. Ouyang, B. Sun, Y. Shi, Z. Wang, A comparative study on seismic fragility analysis of RC frame structures with consideration of modeling uncertainty under far-field and near-field ground motion excitation, Bull. Earthq. Eng. ( 2022) 1-33, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01254-2.

[25]

S. Antoniou, R. Pinho, F. Bianchi, SeismoSignal." Version 3. 2 42 ( 2022) 42.

[26]

S. Li, L.L. Xie, Progress and trend on near-field problems in civil engineering, Earthq. Sci. 20 (1) ( 2007) 105. https://doi:10.1007/s11589-007-0105-0.

[27]

D.L. Wells, K.J. Coppersmith, New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, Bull.Seismol. Soc. Am. 84 (4) ( 1994) 974-1002, https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0840040974.

[28]

W.J. Silva, I.G. Wong, R.B. Darragh, A.M. Rogers, T.J. Walsh, W.J. Kochelman, G.R. Priest, Engineering characterization of earthquake strong ground motions in the Pacific Northwest, Assessing earthquake hazards and reducing risk in the Pacific Northwest 1560 ( 1998) 313-324.

[29]

S.L. Kramer, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Pearson Education India, 1996.

[30]

A. Arias, Measure of Earthquake Intensity, Massachusetts Inst. of Tech., Cambridge.Univ. of Chile, Santiago de Chile, 1970.

[31]

G.W. Housner, Intensity of Ground Motion during Strong Earthquakes, 1952.

[32]

J.L. Von Thun, Earthquake ground motions for design and analysis of dams,Earthquake engineering and soil dynamics II-recent advances in ground-motion ( 1988).

[33]

J.W. Guam'an, Empirical Ground Motion Relationships for Maximum Incremental Velocity, Doctoral dissertation, University of Notre Dame), 2010.

[34]

D.C. Rai, G. Mondal, V. Singhal, N. Parool, T. Pradhan, 2011 Sikkim earthquake: effects on building stocks and perspective on growing seismic risk,in: Proceedings of 15th, 2012.

[35]

K. Rajendran, C.P. Rajendran, N. Thulasiraman, R. Andrews, N. Sherpa, The 18 september 2011, North Sikkim earthquake, Curr. Sci. ( 2011) 1475-1479. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24080227.

[36]

M.L. Sharma, B.K. Maheshwari, Y. Singh, A. Sinvhal, Damage pattern during Sikkim, India earthquake of September 18, 2011, in:Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. 28, 2012, September. Lisbon, Portugal.

[37]

S. Tambe, R. Kumar, M.L. Arrawatia, A.K. Ganeriwala, How safe are our rural structures? Lessons from the 2011 Sikkim earthquake, Curr. Sci. ( 2012) 1392-1397. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24107796.

[38]

IS 13920: 2016, Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces-Code of Practice, 2016.

[39]

F. Fabio, S. Enrico, C. Filip, A Fiber Beam-Column Element for Seismic Response Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures, University of California, Berkeley, 1991.

[40]

T.H. Lee, K.M. Mosalam, Probabilistic fiber element modeling of reinforced concrete structures, Comput. Struct. 82 (27) ( 2004) 2285-2299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.05.013,2285.

[41]

J. Li, E.H. Yang, Probabilistic-based assessment for tensile strain-hardening potential of fiber-reinforced cementitious composites, Cement Concr. Compos. 91 ( 2018) 108-117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.05.003.

[42]

S. Antoniou, R. Pinho, Seismostruct-seismic analysis program by Seismosoft, Technical manual and user manual ( 2022).

[43]

J.B. Mander, M.J. Priestley, R. Park, Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete, J. Struct. Eng. 114 (8) ( 1988) 1804-1826, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).

[44]

M. Menegotto, Method of analysis of cyclically loaded RC plane frames, including changes in geometry and non-linear behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending,in: IASBE Preliminary Reort for Symposium on Resistance and Ultimate Deformablility of Structures Acted on by Well-Difined Repeated, 1973, pp. 15-22.

[45]

A. Ghobarah, A.S. Elnashai, Contribution of vertical ground motion to the damage of RC buildings, in: Proceedings of the Eleventh European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, AA Balkema, Rotterdam, 1998, September, pp. 9-13.

[46]

B. Shrestha,Vertical ground motions and its effect on engineering structures: a state-of-the-art review, in: Proceeding of International Seminar on Hazard Management for Sustainable Development in Kathmandu, 2009, November,pp.29-30. Nepal.

[47]

S.A. Freeman, Response spectra as a useful design and analysis tool for practicing structural engineers, ISET J. Earthq. Technol. 44 (475) ( 2007) 25-37.

[48]

M. Biot,Theory of elastic systems vibrating under transient impulse with an application to earthquake-proof buildings, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 19 (2) ( 1933) 262-268, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.19.2.262.

[49]

G.W. Housner, Behavior of structures during earthquakes, J. Eng. Mech. Div. 85 ( 1959) 109-129, https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0000102.

[50]

N.M. Newmark, J.A. Blume, K.K. Kapur, Seismic design criteria for nuclear power plants, J. Power Div. 99 ( 1973) 287-303, https://doi.org/10.1061/JPWEAM.0000753.

[51]

L. Danciu, G.A. Tselentis, Engineering ground-motion parameters attenuation relationships for Greece, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97 (1B) ( 2007) 162-183, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050087.

[52]

M.A. Ifan, S. Mathew, J. Vemuri, Wavelet analysis of far-field ground motions from the Mw 7.6 2005 kashmir earthquake, in: Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering: Select Proceedings of VCDRR 2021, Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2021, pp. 11-23, 978-981-16-4616-.

[53]

F.M. Wani, M. Mujtaba Moid, K. Chandrakanth Reddy, J. Vemuri, R. Chenna,Wavelet analysis of near-field ground motions from the Mw 7.6 1999 chi-chi earthquake in taiwan,in: Recent Advances in Materials, Mechanics and Structures: Select Proceedings of ICMMS 2022, Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2022, pp. 311-319, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3371-4_28.

[54]

D.M. Etter, D.C. Kuncicky, D.W. Hull,Introduction to MATLAB, vol. 4, Prentice Hall, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002.

[55]

R. Sehhati, A. Rodriguez-Marek, M. ElGawady, W.F. Cofer, Effects of near-fault ground motions and equivalent pulses on multi-story structures, Eng. Struct. 33 (3) ( 2011) 767-779, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.032.

[56]

S.F. Ghahari, H. Jahankhah, M.A. Ghannad, Study on elastic response of structures to near-fault ground motions through record decomposition, Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng. 30 (7) ( 2010) 536-546, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.01.009.

[57]

J.J. Bommer, P.J. Stafford, J.E. Alarco'n, Empirical equations for the prediction of the significant, bracketed, and uniform duration of earthquake ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 99 (6) ( 2009) 3217-3233, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080298.

[58]

J.C. Foschaar, J.W. Baker, G.G. Deierlein, Preliminary assessment of ground motion duration effects on structural collapse, in: 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, WCEE, Lisbon, Portugal. Portugal, 2012, September.

[59]

R. Chandramohan, J.W. Baker, G.G. Deierlein, Quantifying the influence of ground motion duration on structural collapse capacity using spectrally equivalent records, Earthq. Spectra 32 (2) ( 2016) 927-950, https://doi.org/10.1193/122813eqs298mr2.

[60]

H. Akoglu, User's guide to correlation coefficients, Turkish journal of emergency medicine 18 (3) ( 2018) 91-93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001.

[61]

J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Routledge, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587.

[62]

K. Toki, T. Sato, J. Kiyono, Identification of structural parameters and input ground motion from response time histories, Dob. Gakkai Ronbunshu 1989 (410) ( 1989) 243-251, https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej.1989.410_243.

[63]

J.X. Zhao, H. Xu, A comparison of VS 30 and site period as site-effect parameters in response spectral ground-motion prediction equations, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103 (1) ( 2013) 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110251.

[64]

D.C. Rai, G. Mondal, V. Singhal, N. Parool, T. Pradhan, 2011 Sikkim earthquake: effects on building stocks and perspective on growing seismic risk,in: Proceedings of 15th, 2012.

[65]

S. Chopra, J. Sharma, A. Sutar, B.K. Bansal,Estimation of source parameters of M w 6.9 Sikkim Earthquake and modeling of ground motions to determine causative fault, Pure Appl. Geophys. 171 ( 2014) 1311-1328, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-013-0722-6.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (5657KB)

47

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/