Factors Influencing the Transition to a Low-Carbon Energy Paradigm: A Systemic Literature Review

Abstract

Research concerning energy transition has grown at a high pace over the past decade, exploring a variety of topics. This paper provides a systematic literature review focused on the factors and policy routes that can support and expedite the transition to a low-carbon energy paradigm. The results of the bibliographic search follow a theoretical organizational lens and are grouped into four main categories – economic, technological, social, and policy. Key findings include the role of environmental policy as the crucial driver for progress, as well as the need for active participation from industry, economic, and policy agents, along with energy experts. In addition, the lack of literature regarding developing and lower-income nations is highlighted. A discussion and practical implications of the results are provided within the context of the four main categories and with a prosperous post-transition society in mind. Our findings are relevant for policymakers, administrators, and all stakeholders involved in integrating low-carbon initiatives and policies within their organizational structures.

Keywords

energy transition / institutional factors / policy instruments / systematic literature review

References

[1] Chishti, M. Z., & Patel, R. (2023). Breaking the climate deadlock: Leveraging the effects of natural resources on climate technologies to achieve COP26 targets. Resources Policy, 82, 103576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103576

[2] Dogan, E., Chishti, M. Z., Alavijeh, N. K., Tzeremes, P. (2022). The roles of technology and Kyoto Protocol in energy transition towards COP26 targets: Evidence from the novel GMM-PVAR approach for G-7 countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 181, 121756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121756

[3] Child, M., Koskinen, O., Linnanen, L., & Breyer, C. (2018). Sustainability guardrails for energy scenarios of the global energy transition. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 91, 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.079

[4] Chishti, M. Z., Sinha, A., Zaman, U., & Shahzad, U. (2023). Exploring the dynamic connectedness among energy transition and its drivers: Understanding the moderating role of global geopolitical risk. Energy Economics, 119, 106570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106570

[5] Fazey, I., Schäpke, N., Caniglia, G., Patterson, J., Hultman, J., van Mierlo, B., ..., & Wyborn, C. (2018). Ten essentials for action-oriented and second order energy transitions, transformations and climate change research. Energy Research & Social Science, 40, 54-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.026

[6] Hallin, A., Karrbom-Gustavsson, T., & Dobers, P. (2021). Transition towards and of sustainability-Understanding sustainability as performative. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1948-1957. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2726

[7] Shukla, A. R., Skea, J., Reisinger, A., Slade, R., Fradera, R., Pathak, M., Al Khourdajie, A., ..., & Vyas, P. (2022). Summary for Policymakers. In IPCC 2022: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 3-48. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.001

[8] Nurdiawati, A., & Urban, F. (2021). Towards deep decarbonisation of energy-intensive industries: A review of current status, technologies and policies. Energies, 14(9), 2408. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092408

[9] Kumar, A. (2021). Transition management theory-based policy framework for analyzing environmentally responsible freight transport practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294, 126209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126209

[10] van Ouwerkerk, J., Hainsch, K., Candas, S., Muschner, C., Buchholz, S., Günther, S., ..., & Bramstoft, R. (2022). Comparing open source power system models - A case study focusing on fundamental modeling parameters for the German energy transition. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161, 112331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112331

[11] Jenkins, K., Sovacool, B. K., & McCauley, D. (2018). Humanizing sociotechnical transitions through energy justice: An ethical framework for global transformative change. Energy Policy, 117, 66-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.036

[12] Klemeš, J. J., Fan, Y. V., Tan, R. R., & Jiang, P. (2020). Minimising the present and future plastic waste, energy and environmental footprints related to COVID-19. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 127, 109883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109883

[13] Sarkis, J., Cohen, M. J., Dewick, P., & Schröder, P . (2020). A brave new world: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for transitioning to sustainable supply and production. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 159, 104894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104894

[14] Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2017). The socio-technical dynamics of low-carbon transitions. Joule, 1(3), 463-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.018

[15] Chapman, A. J., & Itaoka, K. (2018). Energy transition to a future low-carbon energy society in Japan’s liberalizing electricity market: Precedents, policies and factors of successful transition. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 2019-2027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.011

[16] Pearson, P. J. G., & Foxon, T. J. (2012). A low carbon industrial revolution? Insights and challenges from past technological and economic transformations. Energy Policy, 50, 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.061

[17] Unruh, G. C. (2000). Understanding the carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12), 817-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7

[18] Balasubramanian, S., Shukla, V., Mangla, S., & Chanchaichujit, J. (2021). Do firm characteristics affect environmental sustainability? A literature review-based assessment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1389-1416. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2692

[19] Mio, C., Panfilo, S., & Blundo, B. (2020). Sustainable development goals and the strategic role of business: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3220-3245. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2568

[20] Wood, G., Finnegan, J. J., Allen, M. L., Allen, M. M., Cumming, D., Johan, S., ..., & Tanaka, S. (2020). The comparative institutional analysis of energy transitions. Socio-Economic Review, 18(1), 257-294. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwz026

[21] Zaman, U., Chishti, M. Z., Hameed, T., & Akhtar, M. S. (2023). Exploring the nexus between green innovations and green growth in G-7 economies: Evidence from wavelet quantile correlation and continuous wavelet transform causality methods. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28982-z

[22] Chishti, M. Z., Dogan, E., & Zaman, U. (2023). Effects of the circular economy, environmental policy, energy transition, and geopolitical risk on sustainable electricity generation. Utilities Policy, 82, 101585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101585

[23] Farrukh, M., Meng, F., Wu, Y., & Nawaz, K. (2020). Twenty-eight years of business strategy and the environment research: A bibliometric analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2572-2582. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2521

[24] Ceipek, R., Hautz, J., Mayer, M. C. J., & Matzler, K. (2019). Technological diversification: A systematic review of antecedents, outcomes and moderating effects. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(4), 466-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12205

[25] Blok, V., Long, T. B., Gaziulusoy, A. I., Ciliz, N., Lozano, R., Huisingh, D., ..., & Boks, C. (2015). From best practices to bridges for a more sustainable future: Advances and challenges in the transition to global sustainable production and consumption: Introduction to the ERSCP stream of the special volume. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.119

[26] Pinkse, J., & Kolk, A. (2010). Challenges and trade-offs in corporate innovation for climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 261-272. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.677

[27] Wang, L., & Zheng, J. (2019). Research on low-carbon diffusion considering the game among enterprises in the complex network context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.297

[28] Zhao, R., Zhou, X., Jin, Q., Wang, Y., & Liu, C. (2017). Enterprises’ compliance with government carbon reduction labelling policy using a system dynamics approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.096

[29] del Río González, P. (2009). The empirical analysis of the determinants for environmental technological change: A research agenda. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 861-878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.004

[30] Kiefer, C. P., del Río González, P., & Carrillo-hermosilla, J. (2019). Drivers and barriers of eco-innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2246

[31] Yang, L., Li, F., & Zhang, X. (2016). Chinese companies’ awareness and perceptions of the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS): Evidence from a national survey in China. Energy Policy, 98, 254-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.039

[32] Wang, F., Cheng, Z., Keung, C., & Reisner, A. (2015). Impact of manager characteristics on corporate environmental behavior at heavy-polluting firms in Shaanxi, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 707-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.059

[33] Scarpellini, S., Marín-Vinuesa, L. M., Portillo-Tarragona, P., & Moneva, J. M. (2018). Defining and measuring different dimensions of financial resources for business eco-innovation and the influence of the firms’ capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 258-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.320

[34] Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A. N. (2019). Role of big data analytics in developing sustainable capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 1264-1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.199

[35] Wu, Q., Zhang, X., Sun, J., Ma, Z., & Zhou, C. (2016). Locked post-fossil consumption of urban decentralized solar photovoltaic energy: A case study of an on-grid photovoltaic power supply community in Nanjing, China. Applied Energy, 172, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.013

[36] Nilsson, M., & Nykvist, B. (2016). Governing the electric vehicle transition: Near term interventions to support a green energy economy. Applied Energy, 179, 1360-1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.056

[37] Pitkänen, K., Antikainen, R., Droste, N., Loiseau, E., Saikku, L., Aissani, L., ..., & Thomsen, M. (2016). What can be learned from practical cases of green economy? -Studies from five European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 666-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.071

[38] Wan Ahmad, W. N. K., Rezaei, J., Sadaghiani, S., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2017). Evaluation of the external forces affecting the sustainability of oil and gas supply chain using Best Worst Method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 242-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.166

[39] Capasso, M., Hansen, T., Heiberg, J., Klitkou, A., & Steen, M. (2019). Green growth: A synthesis of scientific findings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 390-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.013

[40] Le, T. H., & Nguyen, C. P. (2019). Is energy security a driver for economic growth? Evidence from a global sample. Energy Policy, 129, 436-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.038

[41] Johnstone, P., Stirling, A., & Sovacool, B. (2017). Policy mixes for incumbency: Exploring the destructive recreation of renewable energy, shale gas ‘fracking,’ and nuclear power in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 33, 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.005

[42] Darmani, A., Arvidsson, N., & Hidalgo, A. (2016). Do the strategic decisions of multinational energy companies differ in divergent market contexts? An exploratory study. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.009

[43] Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., Tan, A. R., Gradmann, A., & Srebotnjak, T. (2016). Key drivers for unsustainable resource use: Categories, effects and policy pointers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132, 13-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.038

[44] Midttun, A. (2012). The greening of European electricity industry: A battle of modernities. Energy Policy, 48, 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.049

[45] Moradi, A., & Vagnoni, E. (2018). A multi-level perspective analysis of urban mobility system dynamics: What are the future transition pathways? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 231-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.002

[46] Purkus, A., Hagemann, N., Bedtke, N., & Gawel, E. (2018). Towards a sustainable innovation system for the German wood-based bioeconomy: Implications for policy design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3955-3968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.146

[47] Masini, A., & Menichetti, E. (2013). Investment decisions in the renewable energy sector: An analysis of non-financial drivers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(3), 510-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.08.003

[48] OECD. (2020). OECD business and finance outlook 2020: Sustainable and resilient finance. France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eb61fd29-en

[49] Marti-Ballester, C. P. (2019). The role of mutual funds in the sustainable energy sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1107-1120. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2305

[50] Stokes, L. C., & Breetz, H. L. (2018). Politics in the U.S. energy transition: Case studies of solar, wind, biofuels and electric vehicles policy. Energy Policy, 113, 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.057

[51] Jin, J., & Han, L. (2018). Assessment of Chinese green funds: Performance and industry allocation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1084-1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.211

[52] Ng, A. W. (2018). From sustainability accounting to a green financing system: Institutional legitimacy and market heterogeneity in a global financial centre. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 585-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.250

[53] Lee, C., Wang, F., & Chang, Y. (2023). Does green finance promote renewable energy? Evidence from China. Resources Policy, 82, 103439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103439

[54] Dijk, M., Wells, P., & Kemp, R. (2016). Will the momentum of the electric car last? Testing an hypothesis on disruptive innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 105, 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.013

[55] Guo, P., Kong, J., Guo, Y., & Liu, X. (2019). Identifying the influencing factors of the sustainable energy transitions in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 757-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.107

[56] Pasimeni, M. R., Petrosillo, I., Aretano, R., Semeraro, T., de Marco, A., Zaccarelli, N., & Zurlini, G. (2014). Scales, strategies and actions for effective energy planning: A review. Energy Policy, 65, 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.027

[57] Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1620-1635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004

[58] Hultman, N. E., Malone, E. L., Runci, P., Carlock, G., & Anderson, K. L. (2012). Factors in low-carbon energy transformations: Comparing nuclear and bioenergy in Brazil, Sweden, and the United States. Energy Policy, 40, 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.064

[59] Kang, M. J., & Hwang, J. (2016). Structural dynamics of innovation networks funded by the European Union in the context of systemic innovation of the renewable energy sector. Energy Policy, 96, 471-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.017

[60] Ghisetti, C., & Pontoni, F. (2015). Investigating policy and R&D effects on environmental innovation: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 118, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.009

[61] Cherry, C., Hopfe, C., MacGillivray, B., & Pidgeon, N. (2017). Homes as machines: Exploring expert and public imaginaries of low carbon housing futures in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 23, 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.011

[62] de Jesus, A., Antunes, P., Santos, R., & Mendonça, S. (2018). Eco-innovation in the transition to a circular economy: An analytical literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 2999-3018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.111

[63] Firnkorn, J., & Müller, M. (2012). Selling mobility instead of cars: New business strategies of automakers and the impact on private vehicle holding. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(4), 264-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.738

[64] Mat, N., Cerceau, J., Shi, L., Park, H. S., Junqua, G., & Lopez-Ferber, M. (2016). Socio-ecological transitions toward low-carbon port cities: Trends, changes and adaptation processes in Asia and Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 362-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.058

[65] Olazabal, M., & Pascual, U. (2015). Urban low-carbon transitions: Cognitive barriers and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 336-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.047

[66] Sun, H., Edziah, B. K., Sun, C., & Kporsu, A. K. (2019). Institutional quality, green innovation and energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 135, 111002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111002

[67] Roelich, K., Bale, C. S., Turner, B., & Neall, R. (2018). Institutional pathways to municipal energy companies in the UK: Realising co-benefits to mitigate climate change in cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 727-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.002

[68] Spickermann, A., Grienitz, V., & von der Gracht, H. A. (2014). Heading towards a multimodal city of the future: Multi-stakeholder scenarios for urban mobility. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 201-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.036

[69] Bohnsack, R., Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2015). Catching recurring waves: Low-emission vehicles, international policy developments and firm innovation strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 98, 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.020

[70] Pasaoglu, G., Harrison, G., Jones, L., Hill, A., Beaudet, A., & Thiel, C. (2016). A system dynamics based market agent model simulating future powertrain technology transition: Scenarios in the EU light duty vehicle road transport sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.028

[71] Naqvi, A., & Stockhammer, E. (2018). Directed technological change in a post-Keynesian ecological macromodel. Ecological Economics, 154, 168-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.008

[72] de Jesus, A., & Mendonça, S. (2018). Lost in transition? Drivers and barriers in the eco-innovation road to the circular economy. Ecological Economics, 145, 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001

[73] Spangenberg, J. H., & Lorek, S. (2019). Sufficiency and consumer behaviour: From theory to policy. Energy Policy, 129, 1070-1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.013

[74] Geels, F. W., Schwanen, T., Sorrell, S., Jenkins, K., & Sovacool, B. K. (2018). Reducing energy demand through low carbon innovation: A sociotechnical transitions perspective and thirteen research debates. Energy Research & Social Science, 40, 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.003

[75] Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., Jewell, J., Brutschin, E., & Sovacool, B. (2018). Integrating techno-economic, socio-technical and political perspectives on national energy transitions: A meta-theoretical framework. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.015

[76] Guo, L. L., Qu, Y., & Tseng, M. L. (2017). The interaction effects of environmental regulation and technological innovation on regional green growth performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 894-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.210

[77] Cai, Y., & Aoyama, Y. (2018). Fragmented authorities, institutional misalignments, and challenges to renewable energy transition: A case study of wind power curtailment in China. Energy Research & Social Science, 41, 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.021

[78] Dasgupta, S., & de Cian, E. (2018). The influence of institutions, governance, and public opinion on the environment: Synthesized findings from applied econometrics studies. Energy Research & Social Science, 43, 77-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.023

[79] Dumas, M., Rising, J., & Urpelainen, J. (2016). Political competition and renewable energy transitions over long time horizons: A dynamic approach. Ecological Economics, 124, 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.019

[80] Burke, M. J., & Stephens, J. C. (2018). Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. Energy Research & Social Science, 35, 78-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018

[81] Brisbois, M. C. (2019). Powershifts: A framework for assessing the growing impact of decentralized ownership of energy transitions on political decision-making. Energy Research & Social Science, 50, 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.003

[82] Ford, R., Walton, S., Stephenson, J., Rees, D., Scott, M., King, G., ..., & Wooliscroft, B. (2017). Emerging energy transitions: PV uptake beyond subsidies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 138-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.007

[83] Inderberg, T. H. J., Tews, K., & Turner, B. (2018). Is there a prosumer pathway? Exploring household solar energy development in Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 42, 258-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.006

[84] Graziano, M., Billing, S. L., Kenter, J. O., & Greenhill, L. (2017). A transformational paradigm for marine renewable energy development. Energy Research & Social Science, 23, 136-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.008

[85] Opeyemi, A., Uchenna, E., Simplice, A., & Evans, O. (2019). Renewable energy, trade performance and the conditional role of finance and institutional capacity in sub-Sahara African countries. Energy Policy, 132, 490-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.012

[86] Knopf, B., Nahmmacher, P., & Schmid, E. (2015). The European renewable energy target for 2030: An impact assessment of the electricity sector. Energy Policy, 85, 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.05.010

[87] Ydersbond, I. M., & Korsnes, M. S. (2016). What drives investment in wind energy? A comparative study of China and the European Union. Energy Research & Social Science, 12, 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.003

[88] Zhao, Z. Y., & Chen, Y. L. (2018). Critical factors affecting the development of renewable energy power generation: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 466-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.254

[89] Schanes, K., Jäger, J., & Drummond, P. (2019). Three scenario narratives for a resource-efficient and low-carbon Europe in 2050. Ecological Economics, 155, 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.02.009

[90] Yin, H., Zhao, J., Xi, X., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Evolution of regional low-carbon innovation systems with sustainable development: An empirical study with big-data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, 1545-1563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.001

[91] Bleischwitz, R., & Bader, N. (2010). Policies for the transition towards a hydrogen economy: The EU case. Energy Policy, 38(10), 5388-5398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.041

[92] Sequeira, T. N., & Santos, M. S. (2018). Renewable energy and politics: A systematic review and new evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 553-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.190

[93] Borghesi, S., Cainelli, G., & Mazzanti, M. (2015). Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 44(3), 669-683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.014

[94] Trencher, G., Healy, N., Hasegawa, K., & Asuka, J. (2019). Discursive resistance to phasing out coal-fired electricity: Narratives in Japan’s coal regime. Energy Policy, 132, 782-796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.020

[95] Laakso, S., Berg, A., & Annala, M. (2017). Dynamics of experimental governance: A meta-study of functions and uses of climate governance experiments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 8-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.140

[96] Hillman, J., Axon, S., & Morrissey, J. (2018). Social enterprise as a potential niche innovation breakout for low carbon transition. Energy Policy, 117, 445-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.038

[97] Turnheim, B., & Nykvist, B. (2019). Opening up the feasibility of sustainability transitions pathways (STPs): Representations, potentials, and conditions. Research Policy, 48(3), 775-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.002