Design and method considerations for equity-centered implementation science and practice: A PEDALs approach

Abstract

The persistent "know-do gap"-the lag between the development of evidence-based practices (EBPs) and their routine use in health systems-remains a barrier to achieving global health equity. Implementation science offers a pathway to bridge this gap, but without an explicit equity focus, it risks reinforcing existing disparities. In this perspective, we propose an equity-centered adaptation of the PEDALs model (Problem, Evidence-based practice, Determinants, Action, Long-term use, and scale) to guide more just and context-sensitive implementation efforts in global health. We describe how each stage of PEDALs can be used to embed equity considerations in implementation research and practice. These include identifying root causes of inequity-linked health problems (P), using both scientific and practice-based evidence while adapting or de-implementing interventions (E), engaging marginalized voices when analyzing barriers and facilitators (D), co-designing contextually grounded implementation strategies (A), and measuring long-term implementation outcomes through an equity lens (L), including attention to scalability, iterative learning, and proper design and methods (s). We highlight methodological considerations-such as hybrid designs, embedded and workflow-based research, and rapid and participatory methods-that support timely, relevant, and equitable implementation. Our model builds on the concept of “radical incrementalism” to emphasize steady, equity-driven change that is responsive to diverse settings, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This modified PEDALs-based approach offers a practical structure for design and methodological considerations in advancing equity-centered implementation science.

References

[1] Bauer MS, Kirchner J. Implementation science: what is it and why should I care? Psychiatry Res. 2020; 283: 112376.

[2] Brownson RC, Kumanyika SK, Kreuter MW, et al. Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity. Implement Sci. 2021; 16: 1-16.

[3] Organization WH. Health equity. 2010.

[4] Prentice KR, Beitelshees M, Hill A, et al. Defining health equity: a modern US perspective. iScience. 2024; 27(12): 111326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111326 [published Online First: 20241105].

[5] Jolles MP, Fort MP, Glasgow RE. Aligning the planning, development, and implementation of complex interventions to local contexts with an equity focus: application of the PRISM/RE-AIM Framework. Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1): 41.

[6] Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, et al. The updated consolidated framework for implementation research based on user feedback. Implement Sci. 2022; 17(1): 75.

[7] Beaton A, Manuel C, Tapsell J, et al. He Pikinga Waiora : supporting Māori health organisations to respond to pre-diabetes . Int J Equity Health. 2019; 18(1): 3.

[8] Xu D, Samu GC, Chen J. Advancing mental health service delivery in low-resource settings. Lancet Glob Health. 2024; 12(4): e543-e545. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00031-7

[9] Gustafson P, Abdul Aziz Y, Lambert M, et al. A scoping review of equity-focused implementation theories, models and frameworks in healthcare and their application in addressing ethnicity-related health inequities. Implement Sci. 2023; 18(1): 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01304-0

[10] Krumer-Nevo M. Poverty, social work, and radical incrementalism: current developments of the poverty-aware paradigm. Social Policy & Adm. 2022; 56(7): 1090-1102.

[11] Farmer P. An anthropology of structural violence. Curr Anthropol. 2004; 45(3): 305-325.

[12] Bailey ZD, Krieger N, Agénor M, et al. Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. lancet. 2017; 389(10077): 1453-1463.

[13] Platts K., Sanborn C., Lull M.E. Identifying Patterns in Health Care Disparities and Barriers to Health Care in Rural Tanzania. 2017.

[14] Durie M. Understanding health and illness: research at the interface between science and indigenous knowledge. Int J Epidemiol. 2004; 33(5): 1138-1143.

[15] Bauer MS, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, et al. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol. 2015; 3(1): 32.

[16] PM R. External validity of randomized controlled trials:" to whom do the results of this trial apply?". Lancet. 2005; 365: 382-393.

[17] Narrowing the Research-Practice Divide-Systems Considerations. The Learning Healthcare System: Workshop Summary. US: National Academies Press; 2007.

[18] Horn SD, Gassaway J. Practice-based evidence study design for comparative effectiveness research. Med care. 2007; 45(10): S50-S57.

[19] Nevo I, Slonim-Nevo V. The myth of evidence-based practice: towards evidence-informed practice. Br J Social Work. 2011; 41(6): 1176-1197.

[20] Escoffery C, Lebow-Skelley E, Haardoerfer R, et al. A systematic review of adaptations of evidence-based public health interventions globally. Implement Sci. 2018; 13(1): 125.

[21] Wiltsey Stirman S, Baumann AA, Miller CJ . The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci. 2019; 14(1): 58.

[22] Miller CJ, Barnett ML, Baumann AA, et al. The FRAME-IS: a framework for documenting modifications to implementation strategies in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2021; 16(1): 36.

[23] Collins LM. Conceptual introduction to the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST). Optimization of behavioral, biobehavioral, and biomedical interventions: The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) . Springer; 2018: 1-34.

[24] Norton WE, Chambers DA. Unpacking the complexities of de-implementing inappropriate health interventions. Implement Sci. 2020; 15(1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0960-9

[25] Li Y, Xu J, Wang F, et al. Overprescribing in China, driven by financial incentives, results in very high use of antibiotics, injections, and corticosteroids. Health Aff. 2012; 31(5): 1075-1082. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0965

[26] Wushouer H, Yu J, Du K, et al. Evaluation of appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in primary healthcare institutions in China using proxy indicator. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024; 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101132

[27] Woodward EN, Matthieu MM, Uchendu US, et al. The health equity implementation framework: proposal and preliminary study of hepatitis C virus treatment. Implement Sci. 2019; 14(1): 26.

[28] Airhihenbuwa CO. Healing our differences: The crisis of global health and the politics of identity. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC; 2007.

[29] Yakovchenko V, Lamorte C, Chinman MJ, et al. Comparing the CFIR-ERIC matching tool recommendations to real-world strategy effectiveness data: a mixed-methods study in the Veterans Health Administration. Implement Sci. 2023; 18(1): 49.

[30] Yang F, Zhang TP, Tang W, et al. Pay-it-forward gonorrhoea and chlamydia testing among men who have sex with men in China: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 20(8): 976-982. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30172-9

[31] Sun H-T, Fan X-R, Gu Y-Z, et al. WeChat-based HIV e-report, a new approach for HIV serostatus requests and disclosures among men who have sex with men: prospective subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2023; 11: e44513.

[32] Li Y, Li J, Tucker JD, et al. Pay-it-forward as a strategy to increase vaccine uptake. BMC Glob Public Health. 2025; 3(1): 1-4.

[33] Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, et al. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. 2018; 6(11): e1196-e1252.

[34] Perez Jolles M, Lengnick-Hall R, Mittman BS . Core functions and forms of complex health interventions: a patient-centered medical home illustration. J General Intern Med. 2019; 34(6): 1032-1038.

[35] Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2011; 38(2): 65-76.

[36] Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Development of a theory-informed questionnaire to assess the acceptability of healthcare interventions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1): 279.

[37] Wolfenden L, Foy R, Presseau J, et al. Designing and undertaking randomised implementation trials: guide for researchers. bmj. 2021; 372.

[38] Stevens J, Mills SD, Millett M-L, et al. Design of a dual randomized trial in a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. Implement Sci. 2023; 18(1): 64.

[39] Ghaffar A, Langlois EV, Rasanathan K, et al. Strengthening health systems through embedded research. Bull World Health Organ. 2017; 95(2): 87. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.16.189126

[40] Oliver K, Innvar S, Lorenc T, et al. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14(1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-2

[41] Nevedal AL, Reardon CM, Opra Widerquist MA, et al. Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Implement Sci. 2021; 16(1): 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01111-5 [published Online First: 20210702].

[42] Kara N, Firestone R, Kalita T, et al. The betterbirth program: pursuing effective adoption and sustained use of the who safe childbirth checklist through coaching-based implementation in Uttar Pradesh, India. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017; 5(2): 232-243. https://doi.org/10.9745/ghsp-d-16-00411 published Online First: 20170627].

[43] Stetler CB, Mittman BS, Francis J. Overview of the VA quality enhancement research initiative (QUERI) and QUERI theme articles: QUERI series. Implement Sci. 2008; 3(1): 8.

[44] Kara N, Firestone R, Kalita T, et al. The betterbirth program: pursuing effective adoption and sustained use of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist through coaching-based implementation in Uttar Pradesh, India. Global Health Science Practice. 2017; 5(2): 232-243.