Compliance with preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean delivery and its impact on surgical site infections: A national retrospective study of Jordan

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are significant complications following cesarean delivery, and preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is crucial for prevention. Limited data exist on PAP compliance in low- to middle-income countries such as Jordan. This study aimed to assess the compliance with PAP guidelines in women undergoing cesarean delivery in Jordan and evaluate its impact on the incidence of SSIs.
Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using electronic health records from 60,212 women who underwent cesarean delivery between 2015 and 2022 in 20 Ministry of Health hospitals in Jordan. PAP compliance was defined as the administration of cefazolin (1–2 g) within one hour before surgery for patients without penicillin allergy, or appropriate alternatives for those with an allergy, following USAID and MOH protocols. Multilevel logistic regression models with hospital code as a random effect were used to identify factors associated with PAP compliance and SSIs.
Results: Only 19.4% of patients received PAP as recommended. The monthly rate of women who received antibiotics increased slightly over time by an average of almost 1.0% per month (95% CI: 0.07–0.09; p < 0.001). Factors positively associated with receiving PAP included age, undergoing elective cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.60; 95% CI: 2.43–2.79; p < 0.001), and longer time between admission and surgery (aOR per hour: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.02–1.02; p < 0.001). Patients who received PAP had 41% lower odds of readmission due to SSIs (aOR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.39–0.89; p = 0.012). The monthly rate of SSIs decreased by approximately 1.6% over the study period (incidence rate ratio: 0.984; 95% CI: 0.979–0.989; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: PAP compliance in women undergoing cesarean delivery in Jordan is suboptimal, with less than one-fifth receiving prophylaxis per guidelines. Compliance with PAP is significantly associated with reduced SSIs. Interventions to improve PAP compliance, such as enhancing guideline awareness, implementing antibiotic stewardship programs, and improving preoperative planning, are urgently needed to enhance patient outcomes and reduce postoperative complications.

Keywords

Caesarean delivery / Surgical site infection / Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis / Compliance / Incidence rate / Risk factors / Jordan

References

[1] Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018; 392(10155): 1341-1348.

[2] Hatamleh R, Abujilban S, Al-Shraideh AJ, Abuhammad S. Maternal request for cesarian birth without medical indication in a group of healthy women: a qualitative study in Jordan. Midwifery. 2019; 79: 102543.

[3] Alfouzan W, Al Fadhli M, Abdo N, Alali W, Dhar R. Surgical site infection following cesarean section in a general hospital in Kuwait: trends and risk factors. Epidemiol Infect. 2019; 147: e287.

[4] Salem AF. Trends in caesarean section deliveries in Jordan from 1982 to 2017: retrospective analyses of annual hospital reports. East Mediterr Health J. 2021; 27(2): 195-201.

[5] Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016; 11(2): e0148343.

[6] Keag OE, Norman JE, Stock SJ. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2018; 15(1): e1002494.

[7] Mackeen AD, Khalifeh A, Fleisher J, et al. Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123(6): 1169-1175.

[8] Peleg D, Eberstark E, Warsof SL, Cohen N, Shachar IB. Early wound dressing removal after scheduled cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215(3): 388.e1-388.e5.

[9] Kawakita T, Landy HJ. Surgical site infections after cesarean delivery: epidemiology, prevention and treatment. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2017; 3(1): 12.

[10] Rifai RA. Rising cesarean deliveries among apparently low-risk mothers at university teaching hospitals in Jordan: analysis of population survey data, 2002-2012. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014; 2(2): 195-209.

[11] Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, et al. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2015; 123(5): 667.

[12] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event. Published 2025. Accessed May 14, 2026. 〈http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf〉.

[13] Molla M, Temesgen K, Seyoum T, Melkamu M. Surgical site infection and associated factors among women who underwent cesarean delivery in Debretabor General Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: hospital-based cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19(1): 317.

[14] Saeed KB, Corcoran P, Greene RA. Incisional surgical site infection following cesarean section: a national retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019; 240: 256-260.

[15] Le Doare K, O'Driscoll M, Turner K, et al. Intrapartum antibiotic chemoprophylaxis policies for the prevention of group B streptococcal disease worldwide: systematic review. Clin Infect Dis. 2017; 65(_2): S143-S151.

[16] Eckmann C, Aghdassi SJS, Brinkmann A, Pletz M, Rademacher J. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis: indications and modalities for the prevention of postoperative wound infection. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024; 121(7): 233.

[17] Jalil MHA, Hammour KA, Alsous M, et al. Noncompliance with surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines: a Jordanian experience in cesarean deliveries. Am J Infect Control. 2018; 46(1): 14-19.

[18] Karmila A, Zulkarnain M, Martadiansyah A, et al. The prevalence and factors associated with prophylactic antibiotic use during delivery: a hospital-based retrospective study in Palembang, Indonesia. Antibiot (Basel). 2021; 10(8): 1004.

[19] Fazaludeen Koya S, Ganesh S, Selvaraj S, Wirtz VJ, Galea S, Rockers PC . Antibiotic consumption in India: geographical variations and temporal changes between 2011 and 2019. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022; 4(5): dlac112.

[20] Mahmoudi L, Ghouchani M, Mahi-Birjand M, Bananzadeh A, Akbari A. Optimizing compliance with surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery at a referral teaching hospital in southern Iran: clinical and economic impact. Infect Drug Resist. 2019; 12: 2437-2444.

[21] Ali N, Hamouda R, Tarek R, et al. Non-adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines: findings from a mixed-methods study in a developing country. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2025; 14(1): 89.

[22] Medicines, Technologies, and Pharmaceutical Services (MTaPS) Program . Expanding implementation of protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment in Jordan's hospitals. Published 2023. Accessed May 25, 2026. 〈https://www.mtapsprogram.org/news-blog/expanding-implementation-of-protocols-for-antibiotic-prophylaxis-and-treatment-in-jordans-hospitals/〉.

[23] Alahmadi YM, Alharbi RH, Aljabri AK, Alofi FS, Alshaalani OA, Alssdi BH. Adherence to the guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in a Saudi tertiary care hospital. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020; 15(2): 136-141.

[24] Sefah IA, Denoo EY, Bangalee V, Kurdi A, Sneddon J, Godman B. Appropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in a teaching hospital in Ghana: findings and implications. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022; 4(5): dlac102.

[25] Parulekar L, Soman R, Singhal T, Rodrigues C, Dastur F, Mehta A. How good is compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in a tertiary care private hospital in India? A prospective study. Indian J Surg. 2009; 71(1): 15-18.

[26] Zupan AZ, Beovic B, Gomiscek B. Compliance of antibiotic surgical prophylaxis with the recommendations in the UKC Ljubljana. Zdr Vestn. 2018; 87(3-4).

[27] Martzivanou EC, Psarras K, Monioudis P, et al. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis: an educative intervention significantly increases compliance. J Clin Med Res. 2021; 13(3): 170.

[28] Saied T, Hafez SF, Kandeel A, et al. Antimicrobial stewardship to optimize the use of antimicrobials for surgical prophylaxis in Egypt: a multicenter pilot intervention study. Am J Infect Control. 2015; 43(11): e67-e71.

[29] Abubakar U, Syed Sulaiman S, Adesiyun A. Utilization of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis for obstetrics and gynaecology surgeries in Northern Nigeria. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018; 40(5): 1037-1043.

[30] Alemkere G. Antibiotic usage in surgical prophylaxis: a prospective observational study in the surgical ward of Nekemte referral hospital. PLoS One. 2018; 13(9): e0203523.

[31] Romero Viamonte K, Salvent Tames A, Sepulveda Correa R, Rojo Manteca MV, Martin-Suarez A . Compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in caesarean delivery: a retrospective, drug utilization study (indication-prescription type) at an Ecuadorian hospital. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021; 10(1): 12.

[32] Abdel-Aziz A, El-Menyar A, Al-Thani H, et al. Adherence of surgeons to antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in a tertiary general hospital in a rapidly developing country. Adv Pharmacol Pharm Sci. 2013; 2013(1): 842593.

[33] Zapf MA, Kothari AN, Markossian T, et al. The weekend effect in urgent general operative procedures. Surgery. 2015; 158(2): 508-514.

[34] Cortegiani A, Gregoretti C, Neto A, et al. Association between night-time surgery and occurrence of intraoperative adverse events and postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Anaesth. 2019; 122(3): 361-369.

[35] Legesse Laloto T, Hiko Gemeda D, Abdella SH . Incidence and predictors of surgical site infection in Ethiopia: prospective cohort. BMC Infect Dis. 2017; 17(1): 119.

[36] Gomaa K, Abdelraheim AR, El Gelany S, Khalifa EM, Yousef AM, Hassan H. Incidence, risk factors and management of post cesarean section surgical site infection (SSI) in a tertiary hospital in Egypt: a five-year retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21(1): 634.

[37] Rezaei AR, Zienkiewicz D, Rezaei AR. Surgical site infections: a comprehensive review. J Trauma Inj. 2025; 38(2): 71.

[38] Adaji JA, Akaba GO, Isah AY, Yunusa T. Short versus long-term antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial. Niger Med J. 2020; 61(4): 173-179.

[39] Hodgson K, Morris J, Bridson T, Govan B, Rush C, Ketheesan N. Immunological mechanisms contributing to the double burden of diabetes and intracellular bacterial infections. Immunology. 2015; 144(2): 171-185.

[40] Amirah A, Harahap J, Willim HA, Suroyo RB, Henderson AH . Effect of comorbidities on the incidence of surgical site infection in patients undergoing emergency surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med Res. 2024; 16(7-8): 345.

[41] Abuhammad S, Mukattash TL, Alazzam SI, et al. Caesarean section delivery from maternal perspective: an exploratory study in Jordan. Int J Clin Pract. 2021; 75(8): e14349.

[42] Hou J, Long X, Wang X, et al. Global trend of antimicrobial resistance in common bacterial pathogens in response to antibiotic consumption. J Hazard Mater. 2023; 442: 130042.

[43] Hatamleh R, Abujilban S, AbuAbed AASA, Abuhammad S. The effects of a childbirth preparation course on birth outcomes among nulliparous Jordanian women. Midwifery. 2019; 72: 23-29.

[44] Barimani B, Ahangar P, Nandra R, Porter K. The WHO surgical safety checklist: a review of outcomes and implementation strategies. Perioper Care Oper Room Manag. 2020; 21: 100117.