Performance of the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) in predicting mortality and resource utilization at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand

Thanat Tangpaisarn , Thummasorn Phurisetthasak , Marturod Buranasakda , Sukanya Khemtong , Praew Kotruchin , Pariwat Phungoen

Global Health Research and Policy ›› 2026, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 1 -5.

PDF (766KB)
Global Health Research and Policy ›› 2026, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) :1 -5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ghrp.2026.01.003
Research Article
research-article
Performance of the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) in predicting mortality and resource utilization at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand
Author information +
History +
PDF (766KB)

Abstract

Background: Effective triage in the emergency department (ED) is crucial for ensuring timely and appropriate care. The Emergency Severity Index (ESI) is a widely used triage system with strong predictive value for clinical outcomes. However, its performance in middle-income countries remains understudied, particularly in settings with variable resource availability, diverse patient populations, and inconsistent triage practices. This study aimed to assess in-hospital mortality across ESI levels and evaluate the ESI's diagnostic performance in predicting mortality among ED patients in Thailand.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand, including 331,182 ED patients from January 2016 to December 2021. Data on demographics, ESI level, comorbidities, and outcomes (mortality, ICU admission, and length of stay) were analyzed. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality across ESI levels 1–5, while secondary outcomes included ICU admission, hospital length of stay, and ED resource utilization.
Results: The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 0.6%. However, mortality was significantly higher among patients triaged as ESI level 1 (17%), compared with those at levels 2 (1.7%), 3 (0.3%), 4 (< 0.1%), and 5 (0%). ICU admission rates were highest among ESI level 1 patients (35%), followed by those at level 2 (9.8%), with rates declining as triage acuity decreased. ESI levels 1 and 2 demonstrated strong predictive performance for mortality, with a sensitivity of 82.1% and a negative predictive value of 99.9%. Patients classified as ESI level 1 had the highest utilization of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, including blood tests (93%), supplemental low-flow oxygen (36%), and mechanical ventilation (30%).
Conclusions: ESI level 1 was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality, ICU admissions, and resource utilization compared with other levels. These findings support the continued use of the ESI for ED triage, especially in middle-income setting hospitals.

Keywords

Emergency department triage / Emergency Severity Index / Middle-income country

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Thanat Tangpaisarn, Thummasorn Phurisetthasak, Marturod Buranasakda, Sukanya Khemtong, Praew Kotruchin, Pariwat Phungoen. Performance of the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) in predicting mortality and resource utilization at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand. Global Health Research and Policy, 2026, 11 (1) : 1-5 DOI:10.1016/j.ghrp.2026.01.003

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Tam HL, Chung SF, Lou CK. A review of triage accuracy and future direction. BMC Emerg Med. 2018; 18(1): 58.

[2]

FitzGerald G, Jelinek GA, Scott D, Gerdtz MF. Emergency department triage revisited. Emerg Med J EMJ. 2010 Feb; 27(2): 86-92.

[3]

Emergency Nurses Association (ENA) . Emergency Severity Index Handbook: Version 5 [Internet]. Schaumburg, Illinois: Emergency Nurses Association; 2023. Available from: 〈https://www.ena.org〉.

[4]

Gilboy N, Tanabe T, Travers D, Rosenau AM. Emergency Severity Index (ESI): A triage tool for emergency department care, version 4. Implementation Handbook 2012 Edition. AHRQ Publication No. 12-0014 . Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011.

[5]

Tanabe P, Gimbel R, Yarnold PR, Kyriacou DN, Adams JG. Reliability and validity of scores on The Emergency Severity Index version 3. Acad Emerg Med J Soc Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jan; 11(1): 59-65.

[6]

Phungoen P, Khemtong S, Apiratwarakul K, Ienghong K, Kotruchin P. Emergency Severity Index as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep; 38(9): 1854-1859.

[7]

Kemp K, Alakare J, Kätkä M, Lääperi M, Lehtonen L, Castrén M. Accuracy of Emergency Severity Index in older adults. Eur J Emerg Med J Eur Soc Emerg Med. 2022 Jun 1; 29(3): 204-209.

[8]

Grossmann FF, Nickel CH, Christ M, Schneider K, Spirig R, Bingisser R. Transporting clinical tools to new settings: cultural adaptation and validation of the Emergency Severity Index in German. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Mar; 57(3): 257-264.

[9]

Mistry B, Stewart De Ramirez S, Kelen G, et al. Accuracy and reliability of emergency department triage using the Emergency Severity Index: an international multicenter assessment. Ann Emerg Med. 2018 May; 71(5): 581-587.e3.

[10]

Hong KJ, Shin SD, Ro YS, Song KJ, Singer AJ. Development and validation of the excess mortality ratio-based Emergency Severity Index. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Oct; 30(8): 1491-1500.

[11]

Kwak H, Suh GJ, Kim T, et al. Prognostic performance of Emergency Severity Index (ESI) combined with qSOFA score. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct; 36(10): 1784-1788.

[12]

Raita Y, Goto T, Faridi MK, Brown DFM, Camargo CA, Hasegawa K. Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2019 Feb 22; 23(1): 64.

[13]

Klug M, Barash Y, Bechler S, et al. A gradient boosting machine learning model for predicting early mortality in the emergency department triage: devising a nine-point triage score. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan; 35(1): 220-227.

[14]

Asgarzadeh S, Ebadi A, Shahrbabaki AS, et al. National early warning score in predicting adverse outcomes for patients admitted to emergency department; a prognostic accuracy study. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024; 12(1): e1.

[15]

Pearce S, Marr E, Shannon T, Marchand T, Lang E. Overcrowding in emergency departments: an overview of reviews describing global solutions and their outcomes. Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Mar; 19(2): 483-491.

[16]

Obermeyer Z, Abujaber S, Makar M, et al. Emergency care in 59 low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Aug 1; 93(8): 577-586G.

[17]

Larthum K, Pearkao C. A study of quality of emergency patient triage at Srinagarind Hospital. NIGRC KKU Internet. 2017: MMP27.

[18]

Wunsupong S, Sumritrin S, Phaken C, Paralee P, Wunnajun S, Tangpaisarn T. Comparing the efficacy of patient triage in traditional and app-based at emergency department. J Nurs Sci Health. 2567; 47(4): 131-143.

[19]

Pourasghar F, Tabrizi J, Ala A, Jafarabadi M, Daemi A. Validity of the emergency severity index in predicting patient outcomes in a major emergency department. J Nurs Midwifery Sci. 2016 Feb; 3(1): 1-7.

[20]

Baumann MR, Strout TD. Triage of geriatric patients in the emergency department: validity and survival with the Emergency Severity Index. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Feb; 49(2): 234-240.

[21]

Wuerz R. Emergency Severity Index triage category is associated with six-month survival. Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8(1): 61-64.

[22]

Sookmee W, Liabsuetrakul T, Tantarattanapong S, Wuthisuthimethawee P. Emergency department length of stay and in-hospital mortality of non-traumatic patients in a university hospital. J Health Sci Med Res. 2023 Dec 15.

[23]

Torabi M, Mirafzal A, Rastegari A, Sadeghkhani N. Association of triage time shock index, modified shock index, and age shock index with mortality in emergency severity index level 2 patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan; 34(1): 63-68.

PDF (766KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/