Healthcare, smartphones, and the carbon footprint

Gloria Wu , Sahil Saini , Ethan Pan , Ivan Chim , Brian Hoang , Samson Nguyen , Mary Nguyen , Hrishi Paliath-Pathiyal

Global Health Economics and Sustainability ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 273 -284.

PDF (685KB)
Global Health Economics and Sustainability ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) :273 -284. DOI: 10.36922/ghes.8359
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
research-article

Healthcare, smartphones, and the carbon footprint

Author information +
History +
PDF (685KB)

Abstract

Smartphones are widely used by physicians and patients. The carbon footprint of healthcare devices is poorly documented. Physicians report an average daily smartphone usage of 1 - 5 h for activities, such as reviewing diagnostic information, capturing patient photographs, conducting telehealth consultations, and advancing their medical education. Meanwhile, patients generate billions of daily queries on Google and millions on ChatGPT, trends likely to increase as artificial intelligence (AI)-driven search engines and large language models (LLMs) become more sophisticated and accessible. To explore the associated environmental impact, we evaluated the average lifetime carbon emissions linked to smartphone usage and the energy costs of manufacturing selected smartphone models. Our data were sourced from publicly accessible databases, corporate 10-K statements, and corporate social responsibility reports available on company websites. We then validated these findings by using four types of LLMs, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude.ai, and Meta AI. We found that all LLMs produced carbon emission estimates that differed from those reported in the companies’ official corporate literature. In an era of rapid AI adoption, establishing reliable environmental metrics is essential for informed decision-making and responsible technology use.

Keywords

Carbon footprint / Smartphone / Large language models / Environmental sustainability / ChatGPT / Digital healthcare / Artificial intelligence

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Gloria Wu, Sahil Saini, Ethan Pan, Ivan Chim, Brian Hoang, Samson Nguyen, Mary Nguyen, Hrishi Paliath-Pathiyal. Healthcare, smartphones, and the carbon footprint. Global Health Economics and Sustainability, 2025, 3(3): 273-284 DOI:10.36922/ghes.8359

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

References

[1]

Alhur, A. (2024). Redefining healthcare with artificial intelligence (AI): The contributions of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Co-pilot. Cureus, 16(4):e57795. https://doi.org/10.1186/cureus.e57795

[2]

Alphabet, Inc. (2024). Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Available from: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1652044/000165204425000014/goog-20241231.htmsec.gov [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[3]

Amazon. com, Inc. (2024). Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Available from: https://www.sec.gov/archives/edgar/data/1018724/000101872425000004/amzn-20241231.htm [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[4]

Apple, Inc. (2024). Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended Sept. 28, 2024. Securities and Exchange Commission. Available from: https://www.sec.gov/archives/edgar/data/320193/000032019324000123/aapl-20240928.htm [Last accessed on 2025 May 16]. https://www.sec.gov/archives/edgar/data/320193/000032019324000123/aapl-20240928.htm

[5]

Apple, Inc. (2025). Environment. Available from: https://www.apple.com/environment [Last accessed on 2025 May 16]. https://www.apple.com/environment

[6]

Bonab, S.R., Haseli, G., & Ghoushchi, S.J. (2023). Digital technology and information and communication technology on the carbon footprint. In: Decision Support Systems for Sustainable Computing:Cognitive Data Science in Sustainable Computing. United States: Academic Press, p. 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-23597-9.00005-6

[7]

Boppana, V.R. (2024). Sustainability practices in IT infrastructure for healthcare. International Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 10(1):181-195. https://doi.org/10.53555/eijbms.v10i1.181

[8]

Cenci, M.P., Eidelwein, E.M., Scarazzato, T., & Veit, H.M. (2024). Assessment of smartphones’ components and materials for a recycling perspective: Tendencies of composition and target elements. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 26(3):1379-1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-024-01896-9

[9]

Chaffey, D. (2024). Search Engine Marketing Statistics 2024. Smart Insights. Available from: https://www.smartinsights.com/search-engine-marketing/search-engine-statistics [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[10]

Chapala, S., Hussein, M., Shirodkar, K., Iyengar, K.P., Vaishya, R., & Botchu, R. (2024). Digital screen usage amongst doctors: Demographics, patterns of use and effect of health parameters. Apollo Medicine, 21(2):112-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/09760016241290354

[11]

Chauhan, A., Rajput, V., Stanikzai, K., & Kumar, S. (2025). Understanding the global status of electronic wastes. In: Electronic Waste. 1sted. United States: CRC Press, p.9. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003582311

[12]

Cordella, M., Alfieri, F., & Sanfelix, J. (2021). Reducing the carbon footprint of ICT products through material efficiency strategies: A life cycle analysis of smartphones. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(2):448-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13119

[13]

Counterpoint, Research. (2025). US smartphone Market Share: Quarterly. Available from: https://www.counterpointresearch.com/insights/us-smartphone-market-share [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[14]

Drees, J. (2019). Google Receives More than 1 Billion Health Questions Every Day. Becker’s Hospital Review. Available from: https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/healthcare/information-technology/google-receives-more-than-1-billion-health-questions-every-day.html [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[15]

Eckelman, M.J., & Sherman, J. (2016). Environmental impacts of the U.S. health care system and effects on public health. PLoS One, 11(6):e0157014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157014

[16]

Eeckhout, L. (2024). The sustainability gap for computing: Quo vadis? Communications of the ACM, 67(4):78-86. https://doi.org/10.1145/3699595

[17]

Ericsson. (2022). Ericsson Mobility Report 2022. Available from: https://d110erj175o600.cloudfront.net/wp/content/uploads/2022/11/29180338/ericsson/mobility/report-november-2022.pdf [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[18]

European, Commission. (2015). Historic Climate Deal in Paris: EU Leads Global Efforts. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/news/articles/news_2015121201_en.htm [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[19]

Forti, V., Baldé C.P., Kuehr, R., & Bel, G. (2020). The Global E-Waste Monitor: Quantities, Flows and the Circular Economy Potential. Available from: https://www.itu.int/en/itu/d/environment/documents/toolbox/gem_2020_def.pdf [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[20]

Imanzadeh, M. (2024). Development of solid State electrolytes for next generation lithium-ion batteries. Eurasian Journal of Chemical Medicinal and Petroleum Research, 4(1):32-47. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15042203

[21]

IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021:The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 1st ed.ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[22]

IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022:Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[23]

Klier, T., & Linn, J. (2016). The effect of vehicle fuel economy standards on technology adoption. Journal of Public Economics, 133:41-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.11.002

[24]

Kögler, M., Paulick, K., Scheffran, J., & Birkholz, M. (2024). Sustainable use of a smartphone and regulatory needs. Sustainable Development, 32(6):6182-6200. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2995

[25]

Lang, G., Triantoro, T., & Sharp, J.H. (2024). Large language models as AI-powered educational assistants: Comparing GPT-4 and gemini for writing teaching cases. Journal of Information Systems Education, 35(3):390-407. https://doi.org/10.62273/YCIJ6454

[26]

Lee, M., Bin Mahmood, A.B.S., Lee, E.S., Smith, H.E., & Tudor Car, L. (2023). Smartphone and mobile app use among physicians in clinical practice: Scoping review. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth, 11(1):e44765. https://doi.org/10.2196/44765

[27]

Li, B., Liu, D., Zhang, L., Wu, Y., Ding, X., & Zeng, X. (2024). Challenges of E-waste dismantling in China. Toxics, 12(12):867. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12120867

[28]

Lövehagen, N., Malmodin, J., Bergmark, P., & Matinfar, S. (2023). Assessing embodied carbon emissions of communication user devices by combining approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 183:113422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113422

[29]

Mahat, P. (2021). Carbon Footprint of a Refurbished Smartphone Retailer and Carbon Handprint of Refurbished Iphone [Master’s Thesis, LUT University]. LUTPub. Available from: https://lutpub.lut.fi/handle/10024/163282 [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[30]

Marey, A., Saad, A.M., Tanas, Y., Ghorab, H., Niemierko, J., Backer, H., et al. (2025). Evaluating the accuracy and reliability of AI chatbots in patient education on cardiovascular imaging: A comparative study of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 56(2):37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-025-01452-x

[31]

Marosi, A.C., Farkas, A., & Lovas, R. (2018). An adaptive cloud-based IoT back-end architecture and its applications. In: 2018 26th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-based Processing (PDP). United States: IEEE, p. 513-520. https://doi.org/10.1109/PDP2018.2018.00087

[32]

Martela, J. (2019). Lifecycle of Mobile Phones [Master’s Thesis, Aalto University School of Chemical Engineering]. Available from: https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/server/api/core/bitstreams/d5b40a3a/7b8f/4df5/92c3/bb9dabd6758e/content [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[33]

Martin, M. (2021). Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2018 (ACS-49). U.S. Census Bureau. Available from: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/census/library/publications/2021/acs/acs-49.pdf [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[34]

Meta Platforms, Inc. (2024). Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Available from: https://www.sec.gov/archives/edgar/data/1326801/000132680125000017/meta-20241231.htm [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[35]

Paulick, K., Seidel, S., Lange, C., Kemmer, A., Cruz-Bournazou, M.N., et al. (2022). Promoting sustainability through next-generation biologics drug development. Sustainability, 14(8):4401. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084401

[36]

Pei, G. (2015). The Paris Agreement Adopted at the Climate Change Conference marks a historic Step in Global Climate Governance. People’s Daily, p.3.

[37]

Rane, N., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2024). Gemini versus ChatGPT: Applications, performance, architecture, capabilities, and implementation. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence, 5(1):69-93. https://doi.org/10.48185/jaai.v5i1.1052

[38]

Ripple, W.J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T.M., Galetti, M., Alamgir, M., Crist, E., et al. (2017). World scientists’ warning to humanity: A second notice. BioScience, 67(12):1026-1028. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix125

[39]

Samsung, Electronics. (2024a). Corporate Sustainability Reports. Available from: https://csr.samsung.com/en-us/localmain.do [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[40]

Samsung, Electronics. (2024b). Sustainability Report 2024: A Journey Towards a Sustainable Future. Available from: https://www.samsung.com/global/sustainability/digital/library/customized-report [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[41]

Samsung, Electronics. (2025). Sustainability. Available from: https://www.samsung.com/global/sustainability [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[42]

Sau, S., George, D.D., Singh, R., Kohli, G.S., Li, A., Jalal, M.I., et al. (2025). Accuracy and quality of chatGPT-4o and google gemini performance on image-based neurosurgery board questions. Neurosurgical Review, 48(1):320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03472-7

[43]

Scheffran, J., Felkers, M., & Froese, R. (2020). Economic growth and the global energy demand. In: Green Energy to Sustainability. United States: Wiley, p.1-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119152057.ch1

[44]

Schneider, J., Meske, C., & Kuss, P. (2024). Foundation models. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 66(2):221-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-024-00851-0

[45]

Seif, R., Salem, F.Z., & Allam, N.K. (2024). E-waste recycled materials as efficient catalysts for renewable energy technologies and better environmental sustainability. Environmental Development and Sustainability, 26:5473-5508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02925-7

[46]

Shin, N., & Dedrick, J. (2021). Smartphones and Environmental Sustainability: A Country-Level Analysis. ECIS 2021 Research Papers in Communications of the Association for Information Systems. Vol. 176. p.1-16. Available from: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2021_rp/176 [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[47]

Słoma, M. (2013). Carbon footprint of electronic devices. In: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. Vol. 8902. P.890225. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2030271

[48]

Strzalkowski, P., Strzalkowska, A., Chhablani, J., Pfau, K., Errera, M.H., Roth, M., et al. (2024). Evaluation of the accuracy and readability of chatGPT-4 and google gemini in providing information on retinal detachment: A multicenter expert comparative study. International Journal of Retina and Vitreous, 10:61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-024-00579-9

[49]

Suckling, J., & Lee, J. (2015). Redefining scope: The true environmental impact of smartphones? The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(8):1181-1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0909-4

[50]

The, White House. (2015). Statement by the President on the Paris Climate Agreement. Available from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the/press/office/2015/12/12/statement/ president/paris/climate/agreement [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[51]

Tian, L., Guo, Y., & Song, Y. (2022). A method for calculating the life cycle carbon footprints of smartphones driven by scenarios. In: Xuan, J.S., & Wang, K. (eds.). Intelligent Manufacturing and Cloud Computing, Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering. Vol. 66. Amsterdam: IOS Press, p. 80-85. https://doi.org/10.3233/ATDE241336

[52]

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2024). Digital Economy Report 2024: Shaping an Environmentally Sustainable and Inclusive Digital Future. Available from: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/der2024_en.pdf [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[53]

Varughese, S., & Ahmed, R. (2021). Environmental and occupational considerations of anesthesia: A narrative review and update. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 133(4):826-835. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005504

[54]

Ventola, C.L. (2014). Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: Uses and benefits. P and T, 39(5):356-364.

[55]

Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., et al. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the sustainable development goals. Nature Communications, 11(1):233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y

[56]

White, M. (2010). Information anywhere, any when: The role of the smartphone. Business Information Review, 27(4):242-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382110390651

[57]

World Resources Institute. (2004). The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised ed.). Available from: https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/ghg-protocol-revised.pdf [Last accessed on 2025 May 16].

[58]

Wu, G., & Paliath-Pathiyal, H. (2024). Survey on Smartphone Usage and Carbon Footprint. California: Google Form survey.

[59]

Wu, T. (2024). Consumer awareness of smartphone carbon emissions: An international comparative study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 91:101908.

[60]

Yasny, J.S., & White, J. (2012). Environmental implications of anesthetic gases. Anesthesia Progress, 59(4):154-158. https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-59.4.154

PDF (685KB)

196

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/