Substance use recovery: Global health perspectives and experiences

Jesús Molina-Fernández Antonio , María Arribas-Tiemblo Irene

Global Health Economics and Sustainability ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 69 -75.

PDF (681KB)
Global Health Economics and Sustainability ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 69 -75. DOI: 10.36922/ghes.3243
PERSPECTIVE ARTICLES
research-article

Substance use recovery: Global health perspectives and experiences

Author information +
History +
PDF (681KB)

Abstract

Addictive behavior treatment networks comprise harm-reduction services and recovery programs. Recovery is an approach toward interventions for addictive behavior that focuses on the individual’s empowerment, abilities, and life skills. Rehabilitation-oriented programs have evolved from traditional therapeutic communities to comprehensive services that are integrated into social and health networks and delivered by multidisciplinary professionals. This paper aims to analyze the development of recovery programs, drawing from quantitative and qualitative data from an action research approach. It also presents theoretical models and best practices for recovery. In summary, recovery-oriented programs must be integrated with harm-reduction networks, social and employment services, and health systems. Furthermore, as recovery is based on empowerment and peer social support, there is an urgent need to develop structured programs to address these issues. Moreover, there is a need to design and implement specific interventions for a broad range of populations and develop evaluation systems to assess the effectiveness and relevance of recovery-oriented programs.

Keywords

Addictive behaviors / Recovery / Treatment network

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jesús Molina-Fernández Antonio, María Arribas-Tiemblo Irene. Substance use recovery: Global health perspectives and experiences. Global Health Economics and Sustainability, 2025, 3(1): 69-75 DOI:10.36922/ghes.3243

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank T.C. San Patrignano, Triple R project partners, as well as Mirjana Vojinović, Darko Condic, and Sinisa Panic for their collaboration during the project.

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by “HOME/2014/ JDRU/AG/DRUG/7092 Triple R: Rehabilitation for Recovery and Reinsertion project.” Triple R Project was funded with the support of the European Commission. This publication reflects only the views of the author, and the European Commission is not liable of the information contained therein. European Commission had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Antonio Jesús Molina Fernández

Writing - original draft: All authors

Writing - review & editing: All authors

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study received approval from the UCM Deontological Research Commission (ethical approved project identification code is UCM PR2019_20_043).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data

Not applicable.

References

[1]

Barzanti M., Blixt C., Carrena S., DiRenzo M., Franzen A., & Molina A. (2017). Triple R Handbook on Social Reintegration of Recovered Drug Users. Rimini: EU/San Patrignano.

[2]

Best D. (2012). Addiction Recovery: A Movement for Personal Change and Social Growth in the UK. Pavilion: Brighton.

[3]

Best D., & Aston E. (2015). Long term recovery from addiction:Criminal justice involvement and positive criminology? In: RonelN., & SegevD., (Positive Criminology:eds.), Routledge Frontiers of Criminal Justice. UK: Routledge, p. 177-193.

[4]

Best D., Bliuc A.M., Iqbal M., Upton K., & Hodgkins S. (2017). Mapping social identity change in online networks of addiction recovery. Addiction Research and Theory, 26(3):163-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2017.1347258

[5]

Best D., Vanderplasschen W., & Nisic M. (2020). Measuring capital in active addiction and recovery: The development of the strengths and barriers recovery scale (SABRS). Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 15(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-020-00281-7

[6]

Boyle M., & Johnstone L. (2014). Alternatives to psychiatric diagnosis. Lancet Psychiatry, 1(6), 409-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70359-1

[7]

EMCDDA (Observatorio Europeo de las Drogas y las Toxicomanías). (2017). Respuestas Sanitarias y Sociales a Los Problemas Relacionados Con Las Drogas: Una Guía Europea. Luxemburgo: Oficina de Publicaciones de la Unión Europea.

[8]

Granfield R., & Cloud W. (2001). Social context and “natural recovery”: The role of social capital in the resolution of drug-associated problems. Substance Use and Misuse, 36(11):1543-1570. https://doi.org/10.1081/ja-100106963

[9]

Groshkova T., Best D., & White W. (2013). The assessment of recovery capital: Properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths. Drug and Alcohol Review, 32(2):187-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00489.x

[10]

Hall W., Carter A., & Forlini C. (2015). The brain disease model of addiction: Is it supported by the evidence and has it delivered on its promises? The Lancet Psychiatry, 2(1):105-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00126-6

[11]

Laespada T., & Iraurgi I. (2009). Reducción De Daños: Lo Aprendido De La Heroína. Deusto: Universidad de Deusto.

[12]

Leamy M., Bird V., Le Boutillier C., Williams J., & Slade M. (2011). Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, 199(6):445-452. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733

[13]

MacGregor S. (2012). Addiction recovery: A movement for social change and personal growth in the UK, by David Best, Brighton. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 19:351-352. https://doi.org/10.3109/09687637.2012.692594

[14]

Milkman H. & Wanberg K. (2012). Pathways to Self-Discovery and Change: A Guide for Responsible Living. United States: SAGE Publications.

[15]

Molina Fernández A., Saiz Galdós J., Cuenca Montesino M.L., Gil Rodríguez F., Mena García B., & Hansen Rodríguez G. (2022). Recovery programmes for intervention about substances abuse disorders: European good practices. Revista Española de Drogodependencias, 47(1):33-46. https://doi.org/10.54108/red.10003

[16]

Molina-Fernández A. (2023). La Recuperación de Adicciones en Europa: Teoría, Modelo y Métodos. De La Dependencia De Las Sustancias a La Recuperación De Las Personas. United States: Editorial Aula Magna, McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España.

[17]

National Institute on Drug Abuse. (1997). Preventing Drug Use Among Children and Adolescents: A Research-Based Guide. Bethesda: NIH.

[18]

Stevens E., Jason L.A., Ram D., & Light J. (2015). Investigating social support and network relationships in substance use disorder recovery. Substance Abuse, 36(4):396-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2014.965870

[19]

United Nations Office for Drugs and Crime. (2012). TREATNET Quality Standards for Drug Dependence Treatment and Care Services. Vienna: UNODC.

[20]

Vanderplasschen W., Vandevelde S., & Broekaert E. (2014). Therapeutic Communities for Addictions in Europe. Available Evidence, Current Practices and Future Challenges for Recovery Oriented Treatment in Therapeutic Communities for Drug Addicts. Lisbon, Portugal: EuropeanMonitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA).

[21]

White W., & Cloud W. (2008). Recovery capital: A primer for addictions professionals. Counsellor, 9(5):22-27.

[22]

Yates R. (2010). Tackling Addiction:Pathways to Recovery. London: Jessica Kingsley Publication.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (681KB)

223

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/