The Lanthanum-Modified Zeolite for Efficient Removal of Glyphosate: Adsorption Behaviors and Mechanisms

Abstract

Glyphosate is one of the most extensively used organophosphorus herbicides; however, its excessive application and environmental residues have severely threatened aquatic ecosystems and human health. In this study, a highly efficient lanthanum-modified zeolite (LMZ) adsorbent was synthesized via a hydrothermal method, and its adsorption behaviors and underlying mechanisms for glyphosate removal were systematically investigated. LMZ exhibited exceptional adsorption performance over a broad pH range of 3.0–7.0, achieving a maximum adsorption capacity of 217.39 mg/g. The adsorption process was well described by the Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic models, indicating a monolayer chemisorption process. Notably, LMZ demonstrated remarkable adsorption selectivity and excellent regenerability, maintaining a high adsorption capacity even after five consecutive adsorption-desorption cycles. In practical application assessments with simulated wastewater, glyphosate removal efficiency exceeded 90% at an adsorbent dosage of 7.5 g/L. Furthermore, dynamic column experiments confirmed that LMZ could maintain effective continuous adsorption, highlighting its substantial application potential for treating glyphosate-contaminated wastewater. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Raman spectroscopic characterizations revealed that this outstanding adsorption capability is primarily driven by inner-sphere complexation induced by ligand exchange at the La-OH active sites.

Keywords

Lanthanum-modified zeolite / Glyphosate / Adsorption / Ligand exchange

References

[1] Meng W, Li X, Yu J, Xiao C, Hou H, Chi R, et al. Ferrihydrite-loaded water hyacinth-derived biochar for efficient removal of glyphosate from aqueous solution. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 57410-57422. DOI:10.1007/s11356-023-26612-2

[2] Matozzo V, Fabrello J, Marin MG. The Effects of Glyphosate and Its Commercial Formulations to Marine Invertebrates: A Review. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 399. DOI:10.3390/jmse8060399

[3] Benbrook CM. Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2016, 28, 3. DOI:10.1186/s12302-016-0070-0

[4] Liu R, Xie Y, Cui K, Xie J, Zhang Y, Huang Y. Adsorption behavior and adsorption mechanism of glyphosate in water by amino-MIL-101(Fe). J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2022, 161, 110403. DOI:10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110403

[5] Botten N, Wood LJ, Werner JR. Glyphosate remains in forest plant tissues for a decade or more. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 493, 119259. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119259

[6] Viti ML, Alves PAT, Mendes KF, Pimpinato RF, Guimarães ACD, Tornisielo VL. Translocation and Root Exudation of Glyphosate by Urochloa brizantha and its Transport on Sugarcane and Citrus Seedlings. Planta Daninha 2019, 37, e019183334. DOI:10.1590/s0100-83582019370100030

[7] Assalin MR, De Moraes SG, Queiroz SCN, Ferracini VL, Duran N. Studies on degradation of glyphosate by several oxidative chemical processes: Ozonation, photolysis and heterogeneous photocatalysis. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2009, 45, 89-94. DOI:10.1080/03601230903404598

[8] Koller VJ, Fürhacker M, Nersesyan A, Mišík M, Eisenbauer M, Knasmueller S. Cytotoxic and DNA-damaging properties of glyphosate and Roundup in human-derived buccal epithelial cells. Arch. Toxicol. 2012, 86, 805-813. DOI:10.1007/s00204-012-0804-8

[9] Feng D, Soric A, Boutin O. Treatment technologies and degradation pathways of glyphosate: A critical review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 742, 140559. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140559

[10] Chen X, Yao XW, Diao Y, Liu H, Chen ML, Feng NJ, et al. Simultaneous removal of triadimefon and dinotefuran by a new biochar-based magnesium oxide composite in water: Performances and mechanism. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 336, 126213. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2023.126213

[11] Yao XW, Chen X, Chen ML, Feng NJ, Tong LY, Yi YQ, et al. Removal of pesticide acetamiprid using KOH activated biochar derived from crayfish shell: Behavior and mechanism. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024, 186, 808-818. DOI:10.1016/j.psep.2024.04.076

[12] Kang R, Yu J, Li X, Guo L, Xiao C, Chi R, et al. Efficient treatment of glyphosate mother liquor by a coagulation and adsorption combined process. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 690, 133811. DOI:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.133811

[13] da Silva VEC, Tadayozzi YS, Putti FF, Santos FA, Forti JC. Degradation of commercial glyphosate-based herbicide via advanced oxidative processes in aqueous media and phytotoxicity evaluation using maize seeds. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 840, 156656. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156656

[14] Chen Y, Chen WJ, Huang Y, Li J, Zhong J, Zhang W, et al. Insights into the microbial degradation and resistance mechanisms of glyphosate. Environ. Res. 2022, 215, 114153. DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2022.114153

[15] Martins-Gomes C, Silva TL, Andreani T, Silva AM. Glyphosate vs. Glyphosate-Based Herbicides Exposure: A Review on Their Toxicity. J. Xenobiot. 2022, 12, 21-40. DOI:10.3390/jox12010003

[16] He Q, Zhao H, Teng Z, Wang Y, Li M, Hoffmann MR. Phosphate removal and recovery by lanthanum-based adsorbents: A review for current advances. Chemosphere 2022, 303, 134987. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134987

[17] Wu Y, Li X, Yang Q, Wang D, Xu Q, Yao F, et al. Hydrated lanthanum oxide-modified diatomite as highly efficient adsorbent for low-concentration phosphate removal from secondary effluents. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 231, 370-379. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.059

[18] Huang W, Zhu Y, Tang J, Yu X, Wang X, Li D, et al. Lanthanum-doped ordered mesoporous hollow silica spheres as novel adsorbents for efficient phosphate removal. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 8839. DOI:10.1039/c4ta00326h

[19] Jin H, Lin L, Meng X, Wang L, Huang Z, Liu M, et al. A novel lanthanum-modified copper tailings adsorbent for phosphate removal from water. Chemosphere 2021, 281, 130779. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130779

[20] Jia Z, Zeng W, Xu H, Li S, Peng Y. Adsorption removal and reuse of phosphate from wastewater using a novel adsorbent of lanthanum-modified platanus biochar. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2020, 140, 221-232. DOI:10.1016/j.psep.2020.05.017

[21] Fotsop CG, Lieb A, Scheffler F. Highly efficient removal and separation of Sr²⁺, Co²⁺, In³⁺ and Ni²⁺ in single and mixed ion systems on low-cost Zeolite, and its stability analysis: DFT and experimental investigations. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2026, 25, 100986. DOI:10.1016/j.ceja.2025.100986

[22] Sivalingam S, Sen S. Sono-assisted Adsorption of As(V) from Water by Rice-Husk-Ash-Derived Iron-Modified Mesoporous Zeolite Y: A Cradle-to-Cradle Solution to a Problematic Solid Waste Material. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 14073-14087. DOI:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01785

[23] Chang Z, Yan Y, Bai L, Guo N, Xing Z, Lu C. Synthesis and Characterization of NaX Zeolite from Coal Gangue and Its Efficacy in Cd and Pb Remediation in Water and Soil. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 51237-51252. DOI:10.1021/acsomega.4c07708

[24] Zhao M, Zhou X, Li J, Li F, Li X, Yu J, et al. Efficient removal of phosphate and fluoride from phosphogypsum leachate by lanthanum-modified zeolite: Synchronous adsorption behavior and mechanism. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 113294. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2024.113294

[25] Xie J, Wang Z, Fang D, Li C, Wu D. Green synthesis of a novel hybrid sorbent of zeolite/lanthanum hydroxide and its application in the removal and recovery of phosphate from water. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 423, 13-19. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2014.02.020

[26] Li X, Zhang Z, Xie Q, Wu D. Effect of algae on phosphorus immobilization by lanthanum-modified zeolite. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 276, 116713. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116713

[27] Zavareh S, Farrokhzad Z, Darvishi F. Modification of zeolite 4A for use as an adsorbent for glyphosate and as an antibacterial agent for water. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 155, 1-8. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.02.043

[28] Guo Y, Yu J, Li X, Guo L, Xiao C, Chi R, et al. Selective recovery of glyphosine from glyphosate mother liquor using a modified biosorbent: Competitive substitution adsorption. Environ. Res. 2022, 215, 114394. DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2022.114394

[29] Shi W, Fu Y, Jiang W, Ye Y, Kang J, Liu D, et al. Enhanced phosphate removal by zeolite loaded with Mg-Al-La ternary (hydr)oxides from aqueous solutions: Performance and mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 357, 33-44. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.003

[30] He Y, Lin H, Dong Y, Wang L. Preferable adsorption of phosphate using lanthanum-incorporated porous zeolite: Characteristics and mechanism. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 426, 995-1004. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.272

[31] Koilraj P, Sasaki K. Selective removal of phosphate using La-porous carbon composites from aqueous solutions: Batch and column studies. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 317, 1059-1068. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2017.02.075

[32] He Y, Lin H, Dong Y, Liu Q, Wang L. Simultaneous removal of ammonium and phosphate by alkaline-activated and lanthanum-impregnated zeolite. Chemosphere 2016, 164, 387-395. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.110

[33] Lai KC, Hiew BYZ, Lee LY, Gan S, Thangalazhy-Gopakumar S, Chiu WS, et al. Ice-templated graphene oxide/chitosan aerogel as an effective adsorbent for sequestration of metanil yellow dye. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 274, 134-144. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.048

[34] Wu FC, Tseng RL, Juang RS. Initial behavior of intraparticle diffusion model used in the description of adsorption kinetics. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 153, 1-8. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2009.04.044

[35] Qiu H, Liang C, Yu J, Zhang Q, Song M, Chen F. Preferable phosphate sequestration by nano-La(III) (hydr)oxides modified wheat straw with excellent properties in regeneration. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 315, 345-354. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2017.01.043

[36] Acelas NY, Martin BD, López D, Jefferson B. Selective removal of phosphate from wastewater using hydrated metal oxides dispersed within anionic exchange media. Chemosphere 2015, 119, 1353-1360. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.02.024

[37] Wang J, Wu L, Li J, Tang D, Zhang G. Simultaneous and efficient removal of fluoride and phosphate by Fe-La composite: Adsorption kinetics and mechanism. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 753, 422-432. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.177

[38] Yang Y, Deng Q, Yan W, Jing C, Zhang Y. Comparative study of glyphosate removal on goethite and magnetite: Adsorption and photo-degradation. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 352, 581-589. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.058

[39] Kovács N, Maász G, Galambos I, Gerencsér-Berta R, Mihály J, Tombácz E. Glyphosate/AMPA adsorption on magnetite under different conditions: The effect of pH and electrolytes. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 393, 123674. DOI:10.1016/j.molliq.2023.123674

[40] Waiman CV, Arroyave JM, Chen H, Tan W, Avena MJ, Zanini GP. The simultaneous presence of glyphosate and phosphate at the goethite surface as seen by XPS, ATR-FTIR and competitive adsorption isotherms. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 498, 121-127. DOI:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.03.040

[41] Wang Y, Li H, Zhao Y, Qi M, Wang L, Feng J. Phosphate recovery from wastewater via vivianite crystallization using separable ferrous modified biochar beads. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 498, 155453. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2024.155453

[42] Liu D, Li Y, Liu C, Zhou Y. Facile preparation of UiO-66@PPy nanostructures for rapid and efficient adsorption of fluoride: Adsorption characteristics and mechanisms. Chemosphere 2022, 289, 133164. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133164

[43] Su Y, Cui H, Li Q, Gao S, Shang JK. Strong adsorption of phosphate by amorphous zirconium oxide nanoparticles. Water Res. 2013, 47, 5018-5026. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.044

[44] Hena S, Patil KS, Leinecker N, Bhatelia T, Shah M. Effect of algal organic matter on adsorption of glyphosate using coconut shell-activated carbon. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2025, 22, 100754. DOI:10.1016/j.ceja.2025.100754

[45] Xie X, Xie Y, Zuo K, Wu J, Fu S, Li W, et al. Nanosized lanthanum peroxide-loaded biochar composites for simple and effective glyphosate removal from wastewater: Behavior and mechanisms. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 447, 141451. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141451

[46] Yan W, Jing C. Molecular Insights into Glyphosate Adsorption to Goethite Gained from ATR-FTIR, Two-Dimensional Correlation Spectroscopy, and DFT Study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 1946-1953. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.7b05643

[47] Ruano G, Pedano ML, Albornoz M, Fuhr JD, Martiarena ML, Zampieri G. Deprotonation of the amine group of Glyphosate studied by XPS and DFT. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 567, 150753. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150753

[48] Khoury GA, Gehris TC, Tribe L, Torres Sánchez RM, dos Santos Afonso M. Glyphosate adsorption on montmorillonite: An experimental and theoretical study of surface complexes. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 50, 167-175. DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2010.07.018

[49] Zhang L, Liu Y, Wang Y, Li X, Wang Y. Investigation of phosphate removal mechanisms by a lanthanum hydroxide adsorbent using p-XRD, FTIR and XPS. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 557, 149838. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149838

[50] Liu Y, Yu JX, Guo L, Song G, Li X, Xiao C, et al. Insight into a novel circulation system combined with coordination leaching and biosorption for Cu(II) efficient recycling from electroplating sludge. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 334, 125948. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2023.125948