Selective Interfacial Separation of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes by a Chelator-Engineered Deep Eutectic Solvent: Foil Liberation, Black-Mass Purity, and Process Windows

Paul Afreh , Zhiqin Qin , Lizhen Gao , Muhammad Tariq

Green Chem. Technol. ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 10023

PDF (5607KB)
Green Chem. Technol. ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) :10023 DOI: 10.70322/gct.2026.10023
Article
research-article
Selective Interfacial Separation of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes by a Chelator-Engineered Deep Eutectic Solvent: Foil Liberation, Black-Mass Purity, and Process Windows
Author information +
History +
PDF (5607KB)

Abstract

Direct recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries requires selective dissociation of the cathode coating on the aluminum current collectors while minimizing cross-contamination of the recovered fractions. In this study, a chelator-based deep eutectic solvent (ChelaDES) made of levulinyl hydroxamic acid, glyceric acid, and trimethyl (2-methoxyethyl) ammonium chloride was designed as a low-temperature solvent for the selective interfacial separation of LCO, LFP, and NCA cathodes. The method uses four complementary key performance indicators (KPIs) as interfacial separation performance measures: active material removal, mass removed per unit area, bare-Al exposure, and delamination severity score. LCO showed the fastest response, reaching 93.7% active-material removal and >99% bare-Al exposure at 90 °C for 60 min. NCA showed intermediate behavior, reaching approximately 92.5% removal and 82% bare-Al exposure, while LFP exhibited threshold-controlled delamination, reaching 90.8% removal but only 66% bare-Al exposure under the same conditions. Among the kinetic models tested, the PSO-Arrhenius model provided the best overall fit for process comparison, giving apparent activation energies of 25.5, 26.5, and 28.5 kJ·mol−1 for LCO, NCA, and LFP, respectively. A strong correlation was observed for all chemistries between the removed mass per area and bare-Al exposure, which proves to be a useful, rapid quantitative proxy of foil liberation. Further purification studies with SEM-EDXS, XPS, and TGA/DTG suggested that the recovered black mass contained minimal impurities with minimal Al/Cu carryover (<0.1 wt%) and that the aluminum foil remained largely intact. Process heatmaps define the chemistry-specific operating windows, demonstrating that selective interfacial weakening, not bulk dissolution, controls separation. The process, therefore, acts as an upstream selective delamination and purification step, producing cleaner recovered black mass while preserving the current collector.

Keywords

ChelaDES / Lithium-ion battery / Delamination / LCO / LFP / NCA / Fickian diffusion model / Avrami model / Sustainable recycling / Binder–metal coordination / Thermal delamination

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Paul Afreh, Zhiqin Qin, Lizhen Gao, Muhammad Tariq. Selective Interfacial Separation of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes by a Chelator-Engineered Deep Eutectic Solvent: Foil Liberation, Black-Mass Purity, and Process Windows. Green Chem. Technol., 2026, 3 (3) : 10023 DOI:10.70322/gct.2026.10023

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Dong Y, Ji H, Wu X, Zheng N, Wang J, Ji G, et al. Trends of sustainable recycling technology for lithium‐ion batteries: Metal recovery from conventional metallurgical processes to innovative direct recycling. MetalMat 2024, 1, e5. DOI:10.1002/metm.5

[2]

Reck BK, Graedel TE. Challenges in Metal Recycling. Science 2012, 337, 690-695. DOI:10.1126/science.1217501

[3]

Lo Sardo C, Cacciatore G, Cappuccino G, Aiello D, Napoli A. Spent Lithium Battery Recycling: Traditional and Innovative Approaches. Processes 2025, 13, 950. DOI:10.3390/pr13040950

[4]

Zheng X, Zhu Z, Lin X, Zhang Y, He Y, Cao H, et al. A Mini-Review on Metal Recycling from Spent Lithium Ion Batteries. Engineering 2018, 4, 361-370. DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2018.05.018

[5]

Buken O, Mancini K, Sarkar A. A sustainable approach to cathode delamination using a green solvent. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 27356-27368. DOI:10.1039/d1ra04922d

[6]

Xue Z, Yu D, Zhao X, Mu T. Upgrading of levulinic acid into diverse N-containing functional chemicals. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 5449-5468. DOI:10.1039/C9GC02415H

[7]

Padwal C, Pham HD, Jadhav S, Do TT, Nerkar J, Hoang LTM, et al. Deep Eutectic Solvents: Green Approach for Cathode Recycling of Li‐Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Sustain. Res. 2022, 3, 2100133. DOI:10.1002/aesr.202100133

[8]

Tran MK, Rodrigues MTF, Kato K, Babu G, Ajayan PM. Deep eutectic solvents for cathode recycling of Li-ion batteries. Nat Energy 2019, 4, 339-345. DOI:10.1038/s41560-019-0368-4

[9]

Cattaneo P, Callegari D, D’Aprile F, Quartarone E. A sustainable delamination approach for simultaneous separation and leaching of cathodes from end-of-life Li ion batteries. J. Power Sources Adv. 2025, 34, 100181. DOI:10.1016/j.powera.2025.100181

[10]

Somo TR, Mabokela TE, Teffu DM, Sekgobela TK, Ramogayana B, Hato MJ, et al. A Comparative Review of Metal Oxide Surface Coatings on Three Families of Cathode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries. Coatings 2021, 11, 744. DOI:10.3390/coatings11070744

[11]

Citarella A, Moi D, Pinzi L, Bonanni D, Rastelli G. Hydroxamic Acid Derivatives: From Synthetic Strategies to Medicinal Chemistry Applications. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 21843-21849. DOI:10.1021/acsomega.1c03628

[12]

Goudarzi J, Chen Z, Zhang G, Hu J, Zaghib K, Deng S, et al. Sustainable Recovery of Critical Metals from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Deep Eutectic Solvents. Batteries 2025, 11, 340. DOI:10.3390/batteries11090340

[13]

Hayagan N, Aymonier C, Croguennec L, Morcrette M, Dedryvère R, Olchowka J, et al. A holistic review on the direct recycling of lithium-ion batteries from electrolytes to electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2024, 12, 31685-31716. DOI:10.1039/D4TA04976D

[14]

Xia Y, Meng F, Xiao Y, Nie S, Lin W, Han Q, et al. Recent Advances on Eco-Friendly Techniques on Separating Active Materials from Current Collectors in Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 17, 50087-50102. DOI:10.1021/acsami.4c21822

[15]

Pang D, Wang H, Zeng Y, Han X, Zheng Y. Sustainable Recycling of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes: Life Cycle Assessment, Technologies, and Economic Insights. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 1283. DOI:10.3390/nano15161283

[16]

Wang J, Wang Y, Lyu Y, Mao J, Guo Z. Stage‐Specific Roles of Deep Eutectic Solvents in Recycling of Spent Lithium‐Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2026, 16, e06741. DOI:10.1002/aenm.202506741

[17]

Abbott AP, Capper G, Davies DL, Rasheed RK, Tambyrajah V. Novel solvent properties of choline chloride/urea mixtures. Chem. Commun. 2003, 39, 70-71. DOI:10.1039/b210714g

[18]

Smith EL, Abbott AP, Ryder KS. Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) and Their Applications. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11060-11082. DOI:10.1021/cr300162p

[19]

Zhang Q, De Oliveira Vigier K, Royer S, Jérôme F. Deep eutectic solvents: Syntheses, properties and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7108. DOI:10.1039/C2CS35178A

[20]

Paiva A, Craveiro R, Aroso I, Martins M, Reis RL, Duarte ARC. Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents-Solvents for the 21st Century. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1063-1071. DOI:10.1021/sc500096j

[21]

Li L, Zhang X, Li M, Chen R, Wu F, Amine K, et al. The Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Review of Current Processes and Technologies. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2018, 1, 461-482. DOI:10.1007/s41918-018-0012-1

[22]

Yan T, Wang H, Zhong S, Ma Q, Nie W, Guo X, et al. Thermal decomposition mechanisms and strategies for enhancing fluorine removal from polyvinylidene fluoride binders in Li-ion battery cathode materials. Mater. Today Commun. 2025, 49, 113824. DOI:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.113824

[23]

Harper G, Sommerville R, Kendrick E, Driscoll L, Slater P, Stolkin R, et al. Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Nature 2019, 575, 75-86. DOI:10.1038/s41586-019-1682-5

[24]

Liu S, Dong C, Che S, Ma G, Cheng G, Tian Y, et al. Graphene-coated current collectors for enhanced interfacial stability and electrochemical performance in LiFePO4||Li batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2025, 540, 147231. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2025.147231

[25]

He FR, Tian ZQ, Xiang W, Yang W, Zheng BP, Cai JY, et al. Insight into the Surface Reconstruction-Induced Structure and Electrochemical Performance Evolution for Ni-Rich Cathodes with Postannealing after Washing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 9160-9170. DOI:10.1021/acsami.2c15909

[26]

Baunach M, Jaiser S, Schmelzle S, Nirschl H, Scharfer P, Schabel W. Delamination behavior of lithium-ion battery anodes: Influence of drying temperature during electrode processing. Dry. Technol. 2016, 34, 462-473. DOI:10.1080/07373937.2015.1060497

[27]

Liang L, Zhang W, Zhao F, Denis DK, Zaman FU, Hou L, et al. Surface/Interface Structure Degradation of Ni‐Rich Layered Oxide Cathodes toward Lithium‐Ion Batteries: Fundamental Mechanisms and Remedying Strategies. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 7, 1901749. DOI:10.1002/admi.201901749

[28]

Veluchamy A, Doh CH, Kim DH, Lee JH, Shin HM, Jin BS, et al. Thermal analysis of LixCoO2 cathode material of lithium ion battery. J. Power Sources 2009, 189, 855-858. DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.07.090

[29]

Windisch-Kern S, Holzer A, Ponak C, Hochsteiner T, Raupenstrauch H. Thermal analysis of lithium ion battery cathode materials for the development of a novel pyrometallurgical recycling approach. Carbon Resour. Convers. 2021, 4, 184-189. DOI:10.1016/j.crcon.2021.04.005

[30]

Yang Y, Gao Y, Miao Y, Liang Y, Ren X. Research Progress on the Influence of Cathode Materials on Thermal Runaway Behavior of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Batteries 2025, 11, 373. DOI:10.3390/batteries11100373

[31]

Janisse A. Thermal Degradation and Evolved Gas Analysis of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathode Materials at Different States of Charge-TA Instruments. Available online: https://www.tainstruments.com/applications-notes/thermal-degradation-and-evolved-gas-analysis-of-lithium-ion-battery-cathode-materials-at-different-states-of-charge-ta495/ (accessed on 20 February 2026).

[32]

Feng E, Li P, Huang Z, Zan W, Wang T, Ren Z, et al. Ultrafast Material Separation by Electrochemical Delamination for Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries Recycling. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 16872-16883. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c06070

[33]

Ji Y. Sustainable Delamination of Cathode Materials from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University Graduate School, West Lafayette, IN, USA, 2022.

[34]

Mehrotra A, Berwal P, Lee Y, Yoh JJ. Anode-triggered thermal runaway in LiFePO4 cells under rapid heating: Rethinking interfacial stability. J. Power Sources 2025, 657, 238165. DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.238165

[35]

Preger Y, Barkholtz HM, Fresquez A, Campbell DL, Juba BW, Romàn-Kustas J, et al. Degradation of Commercial Lithium-Ion Cells as a Function of Chemistry and Cycling Conditions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 120532. DOI:10.1149/1945-7111/abae37

[36]

Diaz F, Wang Y, Moorthy T, Friedrich B. Degradation Mechanism of Nickel-Cobalt-Aluminum (NCA) Cathode Material from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries in Microwave-Assisted Pyrolysis. Metals 2018, 8, 565. DOI:10.3390/met8080565

[37]

Hölderle T, Baran V, Schökel A, Westphal L, Stelzer RU, Niewa R, et al. Understanding the Temperature-Induced Decomposition of Commercial Nickel-Cobalt-Aluminum Oxide (LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2) Electrodes. Batter. Supercaps 2025, 8, e202500421. DOI:10.1002/batt.202500421

[38]

Hsu M. Thermal Stability of Lithium Ion Battery Electrolyte. NETZSCH Analyzing & Testing. 18 August 2020. Available online: https://analyzing-testing.netzsch.com/en/blog/2020/thermal-stability-of-lithium-ion-battery-electrolyte (accessed on 20 February 2026).

[39]

Apeagyei AK, Grenfell JRA, Airey GD. Application of Fickian and non-Fickian diffusion models to study moisture diffusion in asphalt mastics. Mater. Struct. 2015, 48, 1461-1474. DOI:10.1617/s11527-014-0246-2

[40]

Zhokh A, Strizhak P. Crossover between Fickian and non-Fickian diffusion in a system with hierarchy. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 282, 22-28. DOI:10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.03.016

[41]

Oladoja NA. A critical review of the applicability of Avrami fractional kinetic equation in adsorption-based water treatment studies. Desalination Water Treat. 2016, 57, 15813-15825. DOI:10.1080/19443994.2015.1076355

PDF (5607KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉