Driving Factors of Copper Surface Restructuring During Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction

Abstract

Copper (Cu) is a uniquely versatile catalyst whose performance in reactions, such as the electrochemical CO₂ reduction reaction (CO₂RR) is intimately linked to the dynamic evolution of its surface under operating conditions. Rather than remaining structurally static, Cu undergoes continuous surface restructuring, forming new morphologies, facets, and defect structures that differ significantly from the as-prepared material. These transformations strongly influence catalytic activity and selectivity, yet the mechanisms governing them remain poorly understood. As a result, Cu surface restructuring has emerged as a “black box” phenomenon in electrocatalysis, marked by contradictory interpretations and a lack of predictive control. In this review, we examine six major factors proposed to drive Cu surface restructuring: (i) adsorbed hydroxyl species, (ii) applied potential, (iii) adsorbed CO intermediates, (iv) surface oxidation, (v) electrolyte composition, and (vi) current density. We discuss how each factor can modify surface energetics, atomic mobility, and local reaction environments, while emphasizing that these influences rarely act independently.

Keywords

Copper / Catalyst / CO2RR / Surface restructuring

References

[1] Nitopi S, Bertheussen E, Scott SB, Liu X, Engstfeld AK, Horch S, et al. Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO₂ reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 7610-7672. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705

[2] Lai W, Qiao Y, Wang Y, Huang H. Stability issues in electrochemical CO₂ reduction: Recent advances in fundamental understanding and design strategies. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2306288. DOI:10.1002/adma.202306288

[3] Yue Y, Wu Z, Ye Z, Li Z, Wang X, Xie K, et al. Identifying Cu reconstruction mechanism in CO₂ and CO electroreduction via Cu⁺ detection and in situ atomic force microscopy. Sci. China Mater. 2025, 68, 2381-2387. DOI:10.1007/s40843-025-3412-2

[4] Wang L, Chen J-L, Wang J, Dong Y-L, Xiong W-F, Li Z, et al. Stabilized Cu^δ+-OH species on Cu nanoparticles encapsulated in porous carbon nitride for electrocatalytic reduction of CO₂ to ethylene. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2026, 13, 1938-1945. DOI:10.1039/D5QI02105G

[5] Ahmed N, Luo W, Zhao R, Zhang Q, Wu D, Zheng X, et al. Role of Plasma in Catalyst Preparation and Modification for Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Precis. Chem. 2024, 3, 110-127. DOI:10.1021/prechem.4c00075

[6] Zhang W, Yang Y, Guo D, Liu L. Recent progress on copper catalysts with different surface states for CO₂ electroreduction. J. Energy Chem. 2024, 88, 10-27. DOI:10.1016/j.jechem.2023.09.002

[7] Zhang Z, Wei Z, Sautet P, Alexandrova AN. Hydrogen-induced restructuring of a Cu(100) electrode in electroreduction conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 19284-19293. DOI:10.1021/jacs.2c06188

[8] Eren B, Zherebetskyy D, Patera LL, Wu CH, Bluhm H, Africh C, et al. Activation of Cu(111) surface by decomposition into nanoclusters driven by CO adsorption. Science 2016, 351, 475-478. DOI:10.1126/science.aad8868

[9] Auer A, Andersen M, Wernig E-M, Hörmann NG, Buller N, Reuter K, et al. Self-activation of copper electrodes during CO electro-oxidation in alkaline electrolyte. Nat. Catal. 2020, 3, 797-803. DOI:10.1038/s41929-020-00505-w

[10] Wang Y, Wang Z, Dinh C-T, Li J, Ozden A, Golam Kibria M, et al. Catalyst synthesis under CO₂ electroreduction favours faceting and promotes renewable fuels electrosynthesis. Nat. Catal. 2020, 3, 98-106. DOI:10.1038/s41929-019-0397-1

[11] Wilde P, O’Mara PB, Junqueira JR, Tarnev T, Benedetti TM, Andronescu C, et al. Is Cu instability during the CO₂ reduction reaction governed by the applied potential or the local CO concentration? Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 4028-4033. DOI:10.1039/D0SC05990K

[12] Li M, Kuang S, Liu H, Fan Q, Zhang S, Ma X. Stabilizing Cu Catalysts for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction Using a Carbon Overlayer. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127, 3952-3959. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c08305

[13] Zhong D, Cheng D, Fang Q, Liu Y, Li J, Zhao Q. Understanding the restructuring and degradation of oxide-derived copper during electrochemical CO₂ reduction. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 470, 143907. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2023.143907

[14] Amirbeigiarab R, Tian J, Herzog A, Qiu C, Bergmann A, Roldan Cuenya B, et al. Atomic-scale surface restructuring of copper electrodes under CO₂ electroreduction conditions. Nat. Catal. 2023, 6, 837-846. DOI:10.1038/s41929-023-01009-z

[15] Mu S, Lu H, Wu Q, Li L, Zhao R, Long C, et al. Hydroxyl radicals dominate reoxidation of oxide-derived Cu in electrochemical CO₂ reduction. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3694. DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-31498-8

[16] Choi C, Kwon S, Cheng T, Xu M, Tieu P, Lee C, et al. Highly active and stable stepped Cu surface for enhanced electrochemical CO₂ reduction to C₂H₄ .Nat. Catal. 2020, 3, 804-812. DOI:10.1038/s41929-020-00504-x

[17] Li CW, Ciston J, Kanan MW. Electroreduction of carbon monoxide to liquid fuel on oxide-derived nanocrystalline copper. Nature 2014, 508, 504-507. DOI:10.1038/nature13249

[18] Mariano RG, McKelvey K, White HS, Kanan MW. Selective increase in CO₂ electroreduction activity at grain-boundary surface terminations. Science 2017, 358, 1187-1192. DOI:10.1126/science.aao3691

[19] Wang L, Chen Z, Xiao Y, Huang L, Wang X, Fruehwald H, et al. Stabilized Cu^δ+-OH species onin situreconstructed Cu nanoparticles for CO₂-to-C₂H₄ conversion in neutral media. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 7477. DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-52004-2

[20] Liu J, Gao N, Sui Y, Duan S, Jin K, Li S, et al. In SituRepair and Reconstruction of Copper Surface Enhanced Its Anti-Oxidation Properties and Stability for Deep Learning-Powered Anti-Counterfeiting Labels. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2500920. DOI:10.1002/adma.202500920

[21] Sun H, Wei Z, Fei L, Wei Z, Zhang Z, Sun M, et al. Balancing Electronic Structure and Surface Reconstruction of Cu-based Nanostructure for Iodide Oxidation Reaction. Chem. Commun. 2025, 61, 10997-11000. DOI:10.1039/D5CC02121A

[22] Li M, Curnan MT, Saidi WA, Yang JC. Uneven oxidation and surface reconstructions on stepped Cu(100) and Cu(110).Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 1075-1082. DOI:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04124

[23] Han Z, Han D, Chen Z, Gao J, Jiang G, Wang X, et al. Steering surface reconstruction of copper with electrolyte additives for CO₂ electroreduction. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3158. DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-30819-1

[24] Zhou H, Xi W, Yang P, Huang H, Tian J, Ratova M, et al. Electrolyte manipulation on Cu-based electrocatalysts for electrochemical CO₂ reduction. J. Energy Chem. 2024, 99, 201-222. DOI:10.1016/j.jechem.2024.07.055

[25] Fu J, Yin Q, Yao H, Hu H. Reconstruction of helmholtz plane to stabilize zinc metal anode/electrolyte interface. Energy Storage Mater. 2023, 59, 102774. DOI:10.1016/j.ensm.2023.102774

[26] Ma S, Hu H, Shen F, Chen Z, Hu J. Bicarbonate-Stabilized Cu₂O/Cu Heterointerfaces Enable Efficient Ethylene Electrosynthesis From Carbon Capture Solutions. Small 2025, 21, e11008. DOI:10.1002/smll.202511008

[27] Gan L, Zhang X, Guo L, Ajmal M, Jia R, Guo X, et al. Redirecting surface reconstruction of CoP-Cu heterojunction to promote ammonia synthesis at industrial-level current density. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 487, 150429. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2024.150429

[28] Sun J, Zhou S, Zhao Z, Qin S, Meng X, Tung C-H, et al. Deep reconstruction of a Mo-based electrocatalyst for high-performance water/seawater oxidation at ampere-level current density. Energy Environ. Sci. 2025, 18, 1952-1962. DOI:10.1039/D4EE04941A

[29] Kok J, Albertini PP, Leemans J, Buonsanti R, Burdyny T. Overcoming copper stability challenges in CO₂ electrolysis. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2025, 10, 550-563. DOI:10.1038/s41578-025-00825-y

[30] Zhang Q, Song Z, Sun X, Liu Y, Wan J, Betzler SB, et al. Atomic dynamics of electrified solid-liquid interfaces in liquid-cell TEM. Nature 2024, 630, 643-647. DOI:10.1038/s41586-024-07479-w

[31] Cai Z, Li L, Ding P, Pang D, Xu M, Xu Z, et al. High-valence Cu induced by photoelectric reconstruction for dynamically stable oxygen evolution sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 19295-19302. DOI:10.1021/jacs.4c04975

[32] Chen L, Pan T, Jin J, Yang X, Sun W, Wanyan Z, et al. Ultrasmall glutathione-protected Au/Cu and their alloy nanoclusters with specific ROS generation. Nanoscale 2026, 18, 712-717. DOI:10.1039/D5NR04022A

[33] Jin G, Chen P, Tong Y. Reconstructed Cu₂O@CuCo Heterostructure with Accelerated Hydrogenation Kinetics for Air Plasma-Derived Ammonia Synthesis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2026, 14, 1991-2000. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c10521

[34] Javed M, Akbar N, Ahmed N, Masood A, Khan AA, Alomayri T, et al. Electro-thermally assisted charge carrier dynamics and dielectric relaxation response of CuAl₂O₄ spinel aluminate. J. Alloys Compd. 2025, 1012, 178429. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.178429

[35] Javed M, Akbar N, Khan AA, Masood A, Ahmed N, Khan MJ, et al. Tailoring structural and optical properties of Cu(II)-induced MgAl₂O₄ nanoparticles and their response to toxic dyes under solar illumination. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 53532-53551. DOI:10.1007/s11356-024-34753-1

[36] Akbar N, Javed M, Ahmed N, Dong L, Abid R, Alomayri T, et al. Optimized multifunctional TbCrO₃/graphene oxide nanocomposites for synergistic photocatalytic dye degradation and electrocatalytic water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2026, 204, 153298. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.153298

[37] Dong L, Akbar N, Javed M, Ahmed N, Abid R, Haris H, et al. Anisotropic Al-doped ZnO@CoCr₂O₄ Heterostructures for Efficient Organic Pollutant Degradation and Water Splitting. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2026, 740, 140228. DOI:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2026.140228

[38] Dong L, Javed M, Moualhi Y, Akbar N, Ahmed N, Masood A, et al. Electrical Properties and Dielectric Relaxation Analysis of ZnAl₂O₄@ZnO Core-Shell Heterostructures. Precis. Chem. 2026, 4, 439-455. DOI:10.1021/prechem.5c00196

[39] Cheng D, Wei Z, Zhang Z, Broekmann P, Alexandrova AN, Sautet P. Restructuring and activation of Cu(111) under electrocatalytic reduction conditions. Angew. Chem. 2023, 135, e202218575. DOI:10.1002/ange.202218575

[40] Bhagat BR, Das B. Role of Cu^δ+ sites for a favorable electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction on CuSiO₃ surface. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2026, 13, 011410. DOI:10.1063/5.0284285

[41] Ding Q, Lin J, Li X, Dong Y, Bao Y, Liang H, et al. Surface reconstruction of copper(Ⅰ) sulfide electrode regulated electroreduction CO₂ selectivity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2025, 686, 162139. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.162139

[42] Jun M, Kundu J, Kim DH, Kim M, Kim D, Lee K, et al. Strategies to modulate the copper oxidation state toward selective C₂₊ production in the electrochemical CO₂ reduction reaction. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2313028. DOI:10.1002/adma.202313028

[43] Liu Q, Zang J, Ye W, Li L, Wang C, Jin J, et al. Universal Formation, Dynamics, and Reactivities of *CO_bridge Accompanying Spontaneous Reconstruction of Cu during Electrochemical CO₂ or CO Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 31497-31508. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5c03886

[44] Long C, Wan K, Chen Y, Li L, Jiang Y, Yang C, et al. Steering the reconstruction of oxide-derived Cu by secondary metal for electrosynthesis of n-propanol from CO. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 4632-4641. DOI:10.1021/jacs.3c11359

[45] Feng J, Wang X, Pan H. In-situreconstruction of catalyst in electrocatalysis. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2411688. DOI:10.1002/adma.202411688

[46] Choi W, Chae Y, Liu E, Kim D, Drisdell WS, Oh H-S, et al. Exploring the influence of cell configurations on Cu catalyst reconstruction during CO₂ electroreduction. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 8345. DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-52692-w

[47] Zhao Y, Dai Y, Bu Y. Advances in Cu-based Catalysts for Electroreduction of CO₂ to C₂H₄ in Flow Cells. Green Energy Environ. 2025, 10, 1648-1673. DOI:10.1016/j.gee.2025.01.003

[48] Masood A, Ahmed N, Shahid F, Mohd Razip Wee M, Patra A, Siow KS. Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Polymerization of Carvone: A Promising Approach for Antimicrobial Coatings.Coatings 2023,13, 1112. DOI:10.3390/coatings13061112

[49] Masood A, Ahmed N, Razip Wee MM, Patra A, Mahmoudi E, Siow KS. Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Polymerisation of D-Limonene and Its Antimicrobial Activity. Polymers 2023, 15, 307. DOI:10.3390/polym15020307

[50] Masood A, Ahmed N, Mohd Razip Wee MF, Haniff MASM, Mahmoudi E, Patra A, et al. Pulsed plasma polymerisation of carvone: Characterisations and antibacterial properties. Surf. Innov. 2023, 11, 339-351. DOI:10.1680/jsuin.22.00042

[51] Zang Y, Wang S, Sang J, Wei P, Zhang X, Wang Q, et al. Illustration of the intrinsic mechanism of reconstructed Cu clusters for enhanced CO₂ electroreduction to ethanol production with industrial current density. Nano Lett. 2024, 24, 7261-7268. DOI:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01239

[52] Kim I, Lee GB, Kim S, Jung HD, Kim JY, Lee T, et al. Unveiling the reconstruction of copper bimetallic catalysts during CO₂ electroreduction. Nat. Catal. 2025, 8, 697-713. DOI:10.1038/s41929-025-01368-9

[53] Liu J, Duan S, Chen A, Liu X, Tian C, Gao N, et al. Unveiling the valid active site of copper nano-electrocatalysts by surface reconstruction for enhanced nitrate reduction to ammonia. J. Energy Chem. 2026, 116, 339-346. DOI:10.1016/j.jechem.2026.01.001