Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be found at: https://www.sciepublish.com/article/pii/852, Figure S1: Textural characterization of SiO2, Ni/SiO2-IM, Ni/SiO2-AE and Ni/SiO2-AEH. (a) Adsorption-desorption isotherms and (b) pore size distributions; Figure S2: Characterization of Ni/SiO2-IM. (a) TEM image and (b) partial enlarged picture. Inset in (b) is the corresponding particle size distribution; Figure S3: H2-TPD profiles of Ni/SiO2-IM, Ni/SiO2-AE and Ni/SiO2-AEH; Figure S4: Catalytic performance of Ni/SiO2-AEH versus reaction temperature (0.2 g MA, 10 mg Ni/SiO2-AEH, 2.5 MPa H2, 3 h); Figure S5: Time courses for the catalytic conversion of vanillin over Ni/SiO2-AEH catalyst. Reaction conditions: 15 mg catalyst,152 mg vanillin, 10 mL dioxane, 100 °C, 2 MPa H2; Figure S6: Morphology characterization of spent Ni/SiO2-AE and Ni/SiO2-AEH catalysts: (a) SEM and (c) TEM images of Ni/SiO2-AE after four runs; (b) SEM and (d) TEM images of Ni/SiO2-AEH after six runs; Figure S7: Characterization of fresh and spent Ni/SiO2-AEH-800 catalyst. (a) TEM image and (b) partial enlarged picture of fresh Ni/SiO2-AEH-800 catalyst; (c) TEM image and (d) partial enlarged picture of Ni/SiO2-AEH-800 catalyst after three runs. Inset in (b) is the corresponding particle size distribution; Figure S8: (a) Recycling test of the Ni/SiO2-AEH-800 catalyst. Reaction condition: 10 mg catalyst, 250 mg MA, 2 mL 1,4-dioxane, 80 °C, 2.5 MPa H2, 3 h. (b) XRD patterns of fresh and spent Ni/SiO2-AEH-800 catalysts; Figure S9: TEM images of Cu/SiO2-IM (a, b). Inset in (b) is the particle size distribution; Figure S10: Physical characterization of Cu-based catalysts. (a) XRD patterns of Cu/SiO2-IM, Cu/SiO2-AE and Cu/SiO2-AEH; (b) FT-IR spectra of Cu/SiO2-IM, Cu/SiO2-AE and Cu/SiO2-AEH catalysts; (c) H2-TPR profiles of CuO/SiO2-IM, CuO/SiO2-AE and CuO/SiO2-AEH and (d) Cu 2p photoelectron spectrum of Cu/SiO2-IM, Cu/SiO2-AE and Cu/SiO2-AEH catalysts; Figure S11: The hydrogenation performance of MA over Cu-based catalysts. (a) Catalytic evaluation of Cu/SiO2, Cu/SiO2-AE and Cu/SiO2-AEH catalysts; Reaction conditions: 20 mg cat., 100 mg MA, 2 mL dioxane, 150 °C, 3 MPa H2, 3 h. (b) Catalytic performance of Cu/SiO2-AEH versus reaction temperature; Figure S12: Electron microscopic characterization of Cu/SiO2-AEH after fifth run. (a) TEM image, (b) HRTEM-HAADF image and (c-e) corresponding HRTEM-STEM mapping of Cu, Si and O; Figure S13: Electron microscopic characterization of Cu/SiO2-AE after fifth run. (a) TEM image, (b) HRTEM-HAADF image and (c-e) corresponding HRTEM-STEM mapping of Cu, Si and O; Figure S14: XRD patterns of (a) Cu8Ni2/SiO2-AE, (b) Cu8Ni2/SiO2-AEH, (c) Cu5Ni5/SiO2-AE, (d) Cu5Ni5/SiO2-AEH, (e) Cu2Ni8/SiO2-AE and (f) Cu2Ni8/SiO2-AEH; Figure S15: TEM images of (a) Cu8Ni2/SiO2-AE; (b) Cu8Ni2/SiO2-AEH; (c). Cu5Ni5/SiO2-AE; (d) Cu5Ni5/SiO2-AEH; (e) Cu2Ni8/SiO2-AE and (f) Cu2Ni8/SiO2-AEH and corresponding enlarged images (a′-f′); Figure S16: Reaction studies on MA hydrogenolysis. (a) Catalytic evaluation of (a′) Cu8Ni2/SiO2-AEH, (b′) Cu5Ni5/SiO2-AEH, (c′) Cu2Ni8/SiO2- AEH, (d′) Ni/SiO2- AEH, (e′) Cu8Ni2/SiO2-AE, (f′) Cu5Ni5/SiO2-AE, (g′) Cu2Ni8/SiO2-AE and (h′) Ni/SiO2-AE. Reaction conditions: 10 mg cat., 200 mg MA, 2 mL dioxane, 80 °C, 2 MPa H2, 2.5 h. (b) Catalytic evaluation of (a′) Cu8Ni2/SiO2-AEH, (b′) Cu5Ni5/SiO2-AEH, (c′) Cu2Ni8/SiO2-AEH and (d′) Ni/SiO2-AEH. Reaction conditions: 10 mg cat., 200 mg MA, 2 ml dioxane, 200 °C, 2 MPa H2, 2.5 h; Table S1: BET surface areas and pore structure parameters of Ni-based catalysts; Table S2: Characterization of active metal Ni in as-synthesized catalysts; Table S3: O 1s binding energy and surface Ni oxides proportion of as-synthesized Ni based catalysts; Table S4: Comparison of the catalytic performance of different reported MA hydrogenation catalysts; Table S5: Comparison of the catalytic performance of different reported vanillin HDO catalysts; Table S6: BET surface areas and pore structure parameters of Cu-based samples; Table S7: Characterization of active metal Cu in obtained catalysts.
Acknowledgments
This project is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province, China (No. 2024AFB205). The authors would like to highly appreciate Yong Wang, Shanjun Mao and Xuefeng Li from Zhejiang University for providing experimental facilities, valuable suggestions, as well as their critical discussions throughout this research.
Author Contributions
Experimental designing, data collection and analysis, writing manuscript, H.N.; supervision, Z.D., C.C. and S.H.; formal analysis, H.N.; investigation, H.N. and Z.D.; editing, S.H.; conceptualization, H.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Ethics Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.
Funding
This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province, China (No. 2024AFB205).
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.