Efficient Removal of Glyphosate from Aqueous Solution by Cerium Dioxide Loaded Biochar

Bo Zuo , Ruipu Wang , Jia Wang , Junxia Yu , Xiaodi Li , Li Guo , Yuchi Chen , Qingbiao Zhao , Chunqiao Xiao , Ruan Chi

Green Chem. Technol. ›› 2025, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 10002

PDF (1795KB)
Green Chem. Technol. ›› 2025, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) :10002 DOI: 10.70322/gct.2025.10002
Article
research-article
Efficient Removal of Glyphosate from Aqueous Solution by Cerium Dioxide Loaded Biochar
Author information +
History +
PDF (1795KB)

Abstract

Glyphosate,which is one of the most widely used organophosphorus herbicides, poses athreat to the surrounding water environment. Traditional adsorbents weredepicted to have poor capacities to eliminate it. CeO2 embraces the potentialto adsorb glyphosate efficiently. However, suitable carbonaceous composites were necessary to beemployed as its support. In this paper, water hyacinth was used as theprecursor to prepare CeO2-loadedbiochar (CeO2/WHBC),which was employed to remove glyphosate from the aqueous solution viaadsorption. The results showed that CeO2/WHBC-3 illustrated the best adsorptionperformance for glyphosate with the capacity of 126.3 mg·g, which was preparedwith per mmol CeO2 loaded of 0.2 g WHCB. Static adsorption experimentsdemonstrated that glyphosate adsorption at different solution pH valuesfollowed the Langmuir isotherm model and quasi-second order kinetic model,indicating that the adsorption was monolayer adsorption and that the adsorbent'ssurface active sites primarily controlled the rate. Coexisting ion interferenceexperiments showed that common cations (K+, Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+) and anions (Cl-, NO3-, SO42-) both promotedglyphosate adsorption on the CeO2/WHBC-3 surface. Moreover, the prepared sorbent maintaineda high adsorption capacity after five adsorption-desorption cycles. Dynamicadsorption experiments showed that the CeO2/WHBC-3 packed column could efficientlyremove glyphosate from aqueous solutions, even at high concentrations and fastflow rates. Zeta potentials and XPS analysis revealed that the adsorptionmechanism of CeO2/WHBC-3for glyphosate is mainly through electrostatic adsorption and metalcomplexation.

Keywords

Waterhyacinth / Biochar / Glyphosate / Adsorption / CeO2

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Bo Zuo, Ruipu Wang, Jia Wang, Junxia Yu, Xiaodi Li, Li Guo, Yuchi Chen, Qingbiao Zhao, Chunqiao Xiao, Ruan Chi. Efficient Removal of Glyphosate from Aqueous Solution by Cerium Dioxide Loaded Biochar. Green Chem. Technol., 2025, 2(1): 10002 DOI:10.70322/gct.2025.10002

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgment

The authors express gratitude to the Joint Fund of National Natural Science Foundation (U24A2094), Hubei Natural Science Foundation Innovation and Development Joint Fund (2024AFD138), Hubei Three Gorges Laboratory Open Fund (SK240009) and Graduate Education Teaching Reform project of Wuhan Institute of Technology (NO. 2023JYXM09).for providing financial support for this study.

Author Contributions

B.Z.: Writing-original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Datacuration, Conceptualization. R.W.: Validation, Investigation. J.W.: Writing—review& editing, Formal analysis, Data curation. J.Y.: Writing—review & editing. Project administration, Funding acquisition. X.L.: MethodologyFormal analysis. L.G.: Resources. Y.C.: Resources. Q.Z.: Resources. C.X.: Resources. R.C.: SupervisionResources, Project administration.

Ethics Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Funding

The work is funded by Joint Fund of National Natural Science Foundation (U24A2094), Hubei Natural Science Foundation Innovation and Development Joint Fund (2024AFD138), Hubei Three Gorges Laboratory Open Fund (SK240009) and Graduate Education Teaching Reform project of Wuhan Institute of Technology (NO. 2023JYXM09).

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

[1]

Khoury GA, Gehris TC, Tribe L, Torres Sanchez RM, dos Santos Afonso M. Glyphosate adsorption on montmorillonite: An experimental and theoretical study of surface complexes. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 50, 167-175. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2010.07.018.

[2]

Diel JC, Franco DSP, Igansi AV, Cadaval TRS, Jr ., Pereira HA, Nunes IS, et al. , Pereira HA, Nunes IS, et al. Green synthesis of carbon nanotubes impregnated with metallic nanoparticles: Characterization and application in glyphosate adsorption. Chemosphere 2021, 283, 131193. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131193.

[3]

Liu R, Xie Y, Cui K, Xie J, Zhang Y, Huang Y. Adsorption behavior and adsorption mechanism of glyphosate in water by amino-MIL-101(Fe). J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2022, 161, 110403. doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110403.

[4]

Herath GAD, Poh LS, Ng WJ. Statistical optimization of glyphosate adsorption by biochar and activated carbon with response surface methodology. Chemosphere 2019, 227, 533-540.

[5]

Rallet D, Paltahe A, Tsamo C, Loura B. Synthesis of clay-biochar composite for glyphosate removal from aqueous solution. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09112. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09234

[6]

Sen K, Mondal NK. Statistical optimization of glyphosate adsorption by silver nanoparticles loaded activated carbon: Kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamics. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2021, 16, 100547. doi: 10.1016/j.enmm.2021.100547.

[7]

Sittiwong J, Hiruntrakool K, Rasrichai A, Opasmongkolchai O, Srifa P, Nilwanna K, et al. Insights into glyphosate adsorption on Lewis acidic zeolites from theoretical modelling. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2022, 341, 112083. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.112083.

[8]

Zavala-Robles K, Ramos-Ibarra J, Franco Rodriguez N, Zamudio-Ojeda A, Cavazos-Garduño A, Serrano-Niño J. Assessment of chitosan-based adsorbents for glyphosate removal. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 2024, 59, 62-71. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2023.2291980.

[9]

Doan THY, Nguyen TTT, Kieu TT, Hoang DT, Vu TLC, Le TS, et al. Modification of bio-zeolite greenly synthesized from rice husk and application in adsorptive removal of herbicide glyphosate. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2024, 316, 129108. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.129108.

[10]

Ma CM, Yang BY, Hong GB. Husk of Agarwood Fruit-Based Hydrogel Beads for Adsorption of Cationic and Anionic Dyes in Aqueous Solutions. Molecules 2021, 26, 1437. doi: 10.3390/molecules26051437.

[11]

Diao ZH, Chu W. FeS2 assisted degradation of atrazine by bentonite-supported nZVI coupling with hydrogen peroxide process in water: Performance and mechanism. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 142155. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142155.

[12]

Pan X, Gu Z, Chen W, Li Q. Preparation of biochar and biochar composites and their application in a Fenton-like process for wastewater decontamination: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 142104. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142104.

[13]

Shi W, Wang H, Yan J, Shan L, Quan G, Pan X, et al. Wheat straw derived biochar with hierarchically porous structure for bisphenol A removal: Preparation, characterization, and adsorption properties. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 289, 120796. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.120796.

[14]

Zhang F, Wang X, Yin D, Peng B, Tan C, Liu Y, et al. Efficiency and mechanisms of Cd removal from aqueous solution by biochar derived from water hyacinth (Eichornia crassipes). J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 153, 68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.043.

[15]

Yao XW, Chen X, Chen ML, Feng NJ, Tong LY, Yi YQ, et al. Removal of pesticide acetamiprid using KOH activated biochar derived from crayfish shell: Behavior and mechanism. Process Saf. Environ. 2024, 186, 808-818. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2024.04.076.

[16]

Wang J, Liao ZW, Ifthikar J, Shi LR, Chen ZQ, Chen ZL. One-step preparation and application of magnetic sludge-derived biochar on acid orange 7 removal via both adsorption and persulfate based oxidation. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 18696-18706. doi: 10.1039/C7RA01425B.

[17]

Wang J, Liao ZW, Ifthikar J, Shi LR, Du YN, Zhu JY, et al. Treatment of refractory contaminants by sludge-derived biochar/persulfate system via both adsorption and advanced oxidation process. Chemosphere 2017, 185, 754-763. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.084.

[18]

Wang J, Shen M, Gong Q, Wang XH, Cai JY, Wang SL, et al. One-step preparation of ZVI-sludge derived biochar without external source of iron and its application on persulfate activation. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 714, 136728. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136728.

[19]

Wang J, Cai JY, Zhou XQ, Wang SQ, Luo F, Yang L, et al. Accelerating of Fe2+ regeneration in Fenton reaction by biochar: Pivotal roles of carbon defects as electron donor and shuttle. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 354, 128945. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.128945.

[20]

Yan L, Dong FX, Lin X, Zhou XH, Kong LJ, Chu W, et al. Insights into the removal of Cr(VI) by a biochar-iron composite from aqueous solution: Reactivity, kinetics and mechanism. Environ. Technol. Inno. 2021, 24, 102057. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.102057.

[21]

Dong FX, Yan L, Zhou XH, Huang ST, Liang JY, Zhang WX, et al. Simultaneous adsorption of Cr(VI) and phenol by biochar-based iron oxide composites in water: Performance, kinetics and mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 125930. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125930.

[22]

Chen X, Yao XW, Diao Y, Liu H, Chen ML, Feng NJ, et al. Simultaneous removal of triadimefon and dinotefuran by a new biochar-based magnesium oxide composite in water: Performances and mechanism. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 336, 126213. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.126213.

[23]

Ban SE, Lee EJ, Lim DJ, Kim IS, Lee JW. Evaluation of sulfuric acid-pretreated biomass-derived biochar characteristics and its diazinon adsorption mechanism. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 348, 126828. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126828.

[24]

Chu G, Zhao J, Huang Y, Zhou D, Liu Y, Wu M, et al. Phosphoric acid pretreatment enhances the specific surface areas of biochars by generation of micropores. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 240, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.003.

[25]

Mood SH, Ayiania M, Jefferson-Milan Y, Garcia-Perez M. Nitrogen doped char from anaerobically digested fiber for phosphate removal in aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 2020, 240, 124889. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124889.

[26]

Jin H, Capareda S, Chang Z, Gao J, Xu Y, Zhang J. Biochar pyrolytically produced from municipal solid wastes for aqueous As(V) removal: Adsorption property and its improvement with KOH activation. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 169, 622-629. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.06.103.

[27]

Wang J, Shen M, Wang HL, Du YS, Zhou XQ, Liao ZW, et al. Red mud modified sludge biochar for the activation of peroxymonosulfate: Singlet oxygen dominated mechanism and toxicity prediction. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 740, 140388. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140388.

[28]

Mood SH, Ayiania M, Cao H, Marin-Flores O, Milan YJ, Garcia-Perez M. Nitrogen and magnesium Co-doped biochar for phosphate adsorption. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2024, 14, 5923-5942. doi: 10.1007/s13399-021-01404-1.

[29]

Jiang X, Ouyang Z, Zhang Z, Yang C, Li X, Dang Z, et al. Mechanism of glyphosate removal by biochar supported nano-zero-valent iron in aqueous solutions. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 547, 64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.03.041.

[30]

Huang Y, Li S, Chen J, Zhang X, Chen Y. Adsorption of Pb(II) on mesoporous activated carbons fabricated from water hyacinth using H3PO4 activation: Adsorption capacity, kinetic and isotherm studies. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 293, 160-168. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.12.123.

[31]

Fu H, Ma S, Zhao P, Xu S, Zhan S. Activation of peroxymonosulfate by graphitized hierarchical porous biochar and MnFe2O4 magnetic nanoarchitecture for organic pollutants degradation: Structure dependence and mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 360, 157-170. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.207.

[32]

Chen Q, Zheng J, Yang Q, Dang Z, Zhang L. Insights into the Glyphosate Adsorption Behavior and Mechanism by a MnFe2O4@Cellulose-Activated Carbon Magnetic Hybrid. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 15478-15488. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b22386.

[33]

Wang J, Cai JY, Wang SQ, Zhou XQ, Ding XT, Ali J, et al. Biochar-based activation of peroxide: Multivariate-controlled performance, modulatory surface reactive sites and tunable oxidative species. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 428, 131233. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131233.

[34]

Wu B, Lo IMC. Surface Functional Group Engineering of CeO2 Particles for Enhanced Phosphate Adsorption. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 4601-4608. doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b06812.

[35]

Qian H, Yang J, Hu B, Zhang B, Wang Y, Liu J. Partially reduced CeO2/C@CNT with high oxygen vacancy boosting phosphate adsorption as CDI anode. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 306, 122557. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122557.

[36]

Ioannou ME, Pouroutzidou GK, Chatzimentor I, Tsamesidis I, Florini N, Tsiaoussis I, et al. Synthesis and Characterization of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles: Effect of Cerium Precursor to Gelatin Ratio. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 2676. doi: 10.3390/app13042676.

[37]

Deng S, Liu H, Zhou W, Huang J, Yu G. Mn-Ce oxide as a high-capacity adsorbent for fluoride removal from water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 1360-1366.

[38]

Mayakaduwa SS, Kumarathilaka P, Herath I, Ahmad M, Al-Wabel M, Ok YS, et al. Equilibrium and kinetic mechanisms of woody biochar on aqueous glyphosate removal. Chemosphere 2016, 144, 2516-2521. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.07.080.

[39]

Herath I, Kumarathilaka P, Al-Wabel MI, Abduljabbar A, Ahmad M, Usman ARA, et al. Mechanistic modeling of glyphosate interaction with rice husk derived engineered biochar. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2016, 225, 280-288. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.01.017.

[40]

Diel JC, Franco DSP, Nunes IS, Pereira HA, Moreira KS, Burgo TAL, et al. Carbon nanotubes impregnated with metallic nanoparticles and their application as an adsorbent for the glyphosate removal in an aqueous matrix. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105178. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105178.

[41]

Naghdi S, Brown E, Zendehbad M, Duong A, Ipsmiller W, Biswas S, et al. Glyphosate Adsorption from Water Using Hierarchically Porous Metal-Organic Frameworks. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2213862. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202213862.

[42]

Wang H, Zhong Y, Yu H, Aprea P, Hao S. High-efficiency adsorption for acid dyes over CeO2 xH2O synthesized by a facile method. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 776, 96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.228.

[43]

Wang Y, Chen X, Yan J, Wang T, Xie X, Yang S. Efficient removal arsenate from water by biochar-loaded Ce3+-enriched ultra-fine ceria nanoparticles through adsorption-precipitation. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 794, 148691. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148691.

[44]

Wang Y, Xie X, Chen X, Huang C, Yang S. Biochar-loaded Ce3+-enriched ultra-fine ceria nanoparticles for phosphate adsorption. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 396, 122626. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122626.

[45]

Yi Y, Luo J, Fang Z. Magnetic biochar derived from Eichhornia crassipes for highly efficient Fenton-like degradation of antibiotics: Mechanism and contributions. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106258. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106258.

[46]

Yue X, Zhang T, Yang D, Qiu F. Direct separation of phosphate under highly acidic conditions using MnO2@CeO2 nanowires membrane. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2022, 177, 108986. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2022.108986.

[47]

Kumaran C, Baskaran I, Sathyaseelan B, Senthilnathan K, Manikandan E, Sambasivam S. Effect of doping of iron on structural, optical and magnetic properties of CeO2 nanoparticles. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2022, 808, 140110. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2022.140110.

[48]

Ko YG, Do T, Chun Y, Kim CH, Choi US, Kim JY. CeO2-covered nanofiber for highly efficient removal of phosphorus from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 307, 91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.060.

[49]

Joshy D, Chakko S, Ismail YA, Periyat P. Surface basicity mediated rapid and selective adsorptive removal of Congo red over nanocrystalline mesoporous CeO2. Nanoscale Adv. 2021, 3, 6704-6718. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.060.

[50]

Zhou RY, Yu JX, Chi RA. Selective removal of phosphate from aqueous solution by MIL-101(Fe)/bagasse composite prepared through bagasse size control. Environ. Res. 2020, 188, 109817. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109817.

[51]

Yamaguchi NU, Bergamasco R, Hamoudi S. Magnetic MnFe2O4-graphene hybrid composite for efficient removal of glyphosate from water. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 295, 391-402. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.051.

[52]

Yu P, Li X, Zhang X, Zhou H, Xu Y, Sun Y, et al. Insights into the glyphosate removal efficiency by using magnetic powder activated carbon composite. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 254, 117662. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117662.

[53]

Tran HN, You SJ, Hosseini-Bandegharaei H, Chao HP. Mistakes and inconsistencies regarding adsorption of contaminants from aqueous solutions: A critical review. Water Res. 2017, 120, 88-116. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.014.

PDF (1795KB)

11

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/