Approaching Laozi : Comparing a Syncretic Reading to a Synthetic One

Thomas Michael , CHEN Yazhou

Front. Philos. China ›› 2017, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 10 -25.

PDF (311KB)
Front. Philos. China ›› 2017, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 10 -25. DOI: 10.3868/s030-006-017-0002-5
Orginal Article
Orginal Article

Approaching Laozi : Comparing a Syncretic Reading to a Synthetic One

Author information +
History +
PDF (311KB)

Abstract

Is Laozi a syncretic text whose primary body of ideas were cobbled together from multiple and various sources, none of which can reasonably be identified as Daoist, or is it a synthetic text whose ideas emerged from a single source that for all intents embodies the core elements of a tradition that meets the standards of inclusion for a tradition of early Daoism? The present work examines the key points of Hongkyung Kim’s sophisticated account of Laozi’s origins as a syncretic text. It then goes on to present the key points of what would have to be involved in its original circulations as a synthetic text. It concludes by suggesting a middle ground that is able to explain why an originally synthetic Laozi is all too easily read by modern scholars as a syncretic text.

Keywords

Laozi / Dao De Jing / early Daoism / Lüshi Chunqiu / yangsheng / Hongkyung Kim

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Thomas Michael, CHEN Yazhou. Approaching Laozi : Comparing a Syncretic Reading to a Synthetic One. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(1): 10-25 DOI:10.3868/s030-006-017-0002-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Brill

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (311KB)

1338

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/