Heidegger’s Conception of Being-with (Mitsein ) and His Simple Designation of Social and Political Reality in the Black Notebooks

JIN Xiping

PDF(333 KB)
PDF(333 KB)
Front. Philos. China ›› 2016, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3) : 415-429. DOI: 10.3868/s030-005-016-0030-8
Orginal Article
Orginal Article

Heidegger’s Conception of Being-with (Mitsein ) and His Simple Designation of Social and Political Reality in the Black Notebooks

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Despite Heidegger insists that Being and Time cannot be read as a kind of existential philosophy, such interpretation still holds in some aspect, for in it, the main content is a special kind of phenomenology of life, even be called repeatedly as the foundation of the ontology of Being in general. The project of establishing an ontology of Being in general was ultimately never carried out. What Heidegger provides in Being and time is nothing but a phenomenology of life. It is peculiar that love and friendship as an important element of life is deliberately ignored. Such a deficiency of Heidegger, namely lacking love and friendship in fundamental ontology of Dasein, is probably the reason for his political fallacy during the II-World-War, notorious political mistake in his recent published Black Notebooks.

Keywords

phenomenology of life / I and we / Mitsein (Being-with) / simple designation / love / Heidegger’s political fallacy / Binswanger’s idea of love

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
JIN Xiping. Heidegger’s Conception of Being-with (Mitsein ) and His Simple Designation of Social and Political Reality in the Black Notebooks. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(3): 415‒429 https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-005-016-0030-8

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 Higher Education Press and Brill
PDF(333 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/