Wittgenstein’s reconsideration of the transcendental problem —With some remarks on the relation between Wittgenstein’s “phenomenology” and Husserl’s phenomenology
ZHANG Qingxiong
Wittgenstein’s reconsideration of the transcendental problem —With some remarks on the relation between Wittgenstein’s “phenomenology” and Husserl’s phenomenology
The transcendental problem that obsessed the great Western philosophers such as Kant and Husserl should be, according to Wittgenstein, conceived as a matter of understanding a process of reasoning in which a conclusion follows necessarily from stated rules. Once these rules, regarded as a priori categories by Kant and as eidos and eidetic relations by Husserl, are demonstrated to be no more than the language usages or rules of language-games related to our forms of life, Kant’s transcendental idealism and Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology no longer have a leg to stand on.
/
〈 | 〉 |