Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus helveticus L-6 by Electrostatic Spray Drying: Efficient Preparation and Characterization Analysis

Xiao-Ting Ye , Yin Zhang , Hao-Lun Huang , Xin Li , Hong-Yu Xu , Li-Juan Chai , Xiao-Juan Zhang , Jin-Song Shi , Zhen-Ming Lu , Zheng-Hong Xu

Food Bioengineering ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) : 182 -193.

PDF (3842KB)
Food Bioengineering ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) :182 -193. DOI: 10.1002/fbe2.70059
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus helveticus L-6 by Electrostatic Spray Drying: Efficient Preparation and Characterization Analysis
Author information +
History +
PDF (3842KB)

Abstract

Lactobacillus helveticus (L. helveticus) is a widely used probiotic valued for its applications in food fermentation. Dried bacterial inoculants, known for ease of transportation, stability, and flexible formulation, are increasingly favored. However, traditional spray drying, despite its continuous production mode, often results in significant loss of active components. In contrast, freeze-drying (FD) techniques, while preserving higher microbial viability, are limited by high energy costs and lengthy processing times. To address these challenges, this study employed an innovative electrostatic spray drying (ESD) technology for the preparation of L. helveticus inoculants. By optimizing microencapsulation techniques, heating temperature, and protective agents, a high-activity inoculant was developed using a novel spray-drying approach. The optimized inoculant achieved an initial survival rate of 82%, a production yield of 69.36%, residual moisture of 3.50%, water activity (aw) of 0.08, cell membrane integrity of 93.50%, and energy consumption of 7.5 kWh/L. After 3 months of storage at 4°C, survival rate remained at 79% with aw increasing to 0.22—well below the microbial growth threshold (aw 0.60)—and retained a smooth, crack-free microstructure. Fermentation performance analysis revealed that ESD-prepared inoculants outperformed freeze-dried inoculants. Although ESD extended the lag phase by 6 h compared to traditional liquid seed cultures, its fermentation efficiency remained comparable. This technology provides an efficient and standardized solution for large-scale production of L. helveticus in food fermentation, offering a promising alternative to conventional methods.

Keywords

bacterial agents / electrostatic spray drying / Lactobacillus helveticus

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiao-Ting Ye, Yin Zhang, Hao-Lun Huang, Xin Li, Hong-Yu Xu, Li-Juan Chai, Xiao-Juan Zhang, Jin-Song Shi, Zhen-Ming Lu, Zheng-Hong Xu. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus helveticus L-6 by Electrostatic Spray Drying: Efficient Preparation and Characterization Analysis. Food Bioengineering, 2026, 5 (2) : 182-193 DOI:10.1002/fbe2.70059

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Beaupeux, E., P. Jayaprakash, A. Dokmak, et al. 2024. “Electrostatic Spray Drying: Advantages for Thermosensitive Actives.” Chemical Engineering Research and Design 203: 688–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2024.02.016.

[2]

Chai, L. J., M. N. Shen, J. Sun, et al. 2020. “Deciphering the D-/l-Lactate-Producing Microbiota and Manipulating Their Accumulation During Solid-State Fermentation of Cereal Vinegar.” Food Microbiology 92: 103559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2020.103559.

[3]

Cui, N., C. Yu, F. Cao, et al. 2025. “Alleviating Effect and Mechanism of Lactobacillus helveticus ZJUIDS18 on Colitis Induced by DSS in Mice.” Food Bioscience 73: 107614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2025.107614.

[4]

Fredua-Agyeman, M.2024. “Surviving Process and Transit: Controlled Freeze Drying, Storage and Enteric Coated Capsules for Targeted Delivery of Probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus.” Heliyon 10: e28407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28407.

[5]

Guerrero Sanchez, M., S. Passot, S. Campoy, M. Olivares, and F. Fonseca. 2022. “Effect of Protective Agents on the Storage Stability of Freeze-Dried Ligilactobacillus Salivarius Cect5713.” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 106: 7235–7249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-12201-9.

[6]

Hu, L., S. Huang, T. Xiong, and F. Peng. 2025. “Enhancing the Viability of Spray-Dried Limosilactobacillus Fermentum Using Quercetin-Integrated Encapsulation: Physicochemical, Metabolic, and Transcriptomic Insights.” Journal of Food Science 90: e70293. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.70293.

[7]

Huang, S., S. Méjean, H. Rabah, et al. 2017. “Double Use of Concentrated Sweet Whey for Growth and Spray Drying of Probiotics: Towards Maximal Viability in Pilot Scale Spray Dryer.” Journal of Food Engineering 196: 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.10.017.

[8]

Huang, T., Z. M. Lu, M. Y. Peng, et al. 2022. “Constructing a Defined Starter for Multispecies Vinegar Fermentation via Evaluation of The Vitality and Dominance of Functional Microbes in an Autochthonous Starter.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 88: e02175-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02175-21.

[9]

Jayaprakash, P., C. Gaiani, J. M. Edorh, et al. 2023. “Comparison of Electrostatic Spray Drying, Spray Drying, and Freeze Drying for Lacticaseibacillus Rhamnosus GG Dehydration.” Foods 12: 3117. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12163117.

[10]

Lapsiri, W., B. Bhandari, and P. Wanchaitanawong. 2012. “Viability of Lactobacillus plantarum TISTR 2075 in Different Protectants During Spray Drying and Storage.” Drying Technology 30: 1407–1412. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2012.684226.

[11]

Li, M., M. Shen, J. Lu, et al. 2022. “Maillard Reaction Harmful Products in Dairy Products: Formation, Occurrence, Analysis, and Mitigation Strategies.” Food Research International 151: 110839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110839.

[12]

Moneeb, A. H. M., T. Mehany, M. A. Abd-Elmonem, et al. 2024. “Probiotic Lactobacillus Strains as Protective Adjunct Cultures Against Fungal Growth and Toxin Production in Hard Cheese.” LWT 213: 117057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.117057.

[13]

Mulcahy, E. M., C. W. Park, M. Drake, D. M. Mulvihill, and J. A. O'Mahony. 2018. “Enhancement of the Functional Properties of Whey Protein by Conjugation With Maltodextrin Under Dry-Heating Conditions.” International Journal of Dairy Technology 71: 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12411.

[14]

Oshiro, M., T. Zendo, Y. Tashiro, and J. Nakayama. 2023. “Cyclic Pairwise Interaction Representing a Rock–Paper–Scissors Game Maintains the Population of the Vulnerable Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Within a Multispecies Sourdough Microbiome.” Microbiology Spectrum 11: e01370-23. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01370-23.

[15]

Oxley, J. D., C. Castilla-Gutierrez, S. R. Collazos, et al. 2024. “Comparison of Energy Consumption and Probiotic Stability With Pilot Scale Drying Processes.” LWT 211: 116937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116937.

[16]

Patiño, R. D. J., and A. Torrejón-Cabello. 2025. “Survival Of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Yeasts to Encapsulation Process Comparing Spray Drying to Electrostatic Spray Drying.” Applied Food Research 5: 100756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2025.100756.

[17]

Peighambardoust, S. H., A. Golshan Tafti, and J. Hesari. 2011. “Application of Spray Drying for Preservation of Lactic Acid Starter Cultures: A Review.” Trends in Food Science and Technology 22: 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2011.01.009.

[18]

Santivarangkna, C., U. Kulozik, and P. Foerst. 2008. “Inactivation Mechanisms of Lactic Acid Starter Cultures Preserved by Drying Processes.” Journal of Applied Microbiology 105: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03744.x.

[19]

Sardar, D., I. Morol, J. Bari, A. Sarkar, and A. Habib. 2025. “Optimization of Cryoprotectants and Storage Temperatures for Preserving Viability and Probiotic Properties of Lyophilized Bacterial Strains From Chicken Gut.” PLoS One 20, no. 7: e0328216. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328216.

[20]

Sun, H., X. Hua, M. Zhang, et al. 2020. “Whey Protein Concentrate, Pullulan, and Trehalose as Thermal Protective Agents for Increasing Viability of Lactobacillusplantarum Starter by Spray Drying.” Food Science of Animal Resources 40: 118–131. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e94.

[21]

Sun, H., M. Zhang, Y. Liu, et al. 2021. “Improved Viability of Lactobacillus plantarum Embedded in Whey Protein Concentrate/Pullulan/Trehalose Hydrogel During Freeze Drying.” Carbohydrate Polymers 260: 117843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117843.

[22]

Swe, Z. M., T. Chumphon, M. Panya, K. Pangjit, and S. Promsai. 2022. “Evaluation of Nano-Wall Material for Production of Novel Lyophilized-Probiotic Product.” Foods 11: 3113. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11193113.

[23]

Xu, Y., M. Dong, H. Xiao, et al. 2024. “Advances In Spray-Dried Probiotic Microcapsules for Targeted Delivery: A Review.” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 64: 11222–11238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2023.2235424.

[24]

Yuan, S., J. Wang, G. Wang, et al. 2025. “Development and Protective Mechanism of a Freeze-Drying Protectants Against Freeze-Drying for Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum W1.” Food and Bioproducts Processing 151: 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2025.03.018.

[25]

Yuan, Y., F. Liu, M. Chen, E. Krystalli, V. Giatrakou, and F. Zhong. 2023. “Mechanism Analysis of Calcium-Induced Low Freeze-Drying Survival of Probiotic Encapsulated in Alginate.” Food Hydrocolloids 145: 109065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109065.

[26]

Yuan, Y., M. Yin, L. Chen, F. Liu, M. Chen, and F. Zhong. 2022. “Effect Of Calcium Ions on The Freeze-Drying Survival of Probiotic Encapsulated in Sodium Alginate.” Food Hydrocolloids 130: 107668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107668.

[27]

Yuan, Y., M. Yin, Q. Zhai, and M. Chen. 2024. “The Encapsulation Strategy to Improve the Survival of Probiotics for Food Application: From Rough Multicellular to Single-Cell Surface Engineering and Microbial Mediation.” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 64: 2794–2810. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2126818.

[28]

Zhang, L., C. Zhang, M. Song, et al. 2023. “Characterization of Lactobacillus Rhamnosus Gg and Its Effects on Improving the Fermentation Quality of Silages as A Novel Inoculant.” Animal Feed Science and Technology 304: 115724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2023.115724.

[29]

Zhang, Z., J. Lv, X. Wang, et al. 2025. “Lactobacillus Helveticus Mitigates Diarrhea and Inflammation Induced by Enterotoxigenic E. Coli Through Rebalance of Gut Microbiota.” Current Research in Food Science 11: 101147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2025.101147.

[30]

Zhang, Z., S. Peng, X. Sun, et al. 2020. “A Novel Insight to Screen the Optimal Spray-Drying Protectants and Parameters for Manufacturing Lactic Acid Bacteria Preparations.” Drying Technology 38: 1843–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2019.1674323.

[31]

Zhao, J., X. Zeng, Y. Xi, and J. Li. 2024. “Recent Advances in the Applications of Lactobacillus Helveticus in the Fermentation of Plant-Based Beverages: A Review.” Trends in Food Science & Technology 147: 104427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104427.

[32]

Zhao, L., J. Chen, X. Wei, et al. 2025. “Response of Alcohol Fermentation Strains, Mixed Fermentation and Extremozymes Interactions on Wine Flavor.” Frontiers in Microbiology 16: 1532539. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1532539.

[33]

Zhong, X., Z. Min, Q. Yu, A. S. Mujumdar, and D. Yu. 2025. “Food Drying for Low-Carbon and Future Food: A Review on the Sustainability of Drying Technology.” Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 24: e70310. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.70310.

Rights & permissions

2026 The Author(s). Food Bioengineering published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology.

PDF (3842KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉