Is there a need for new kitchen design? Assessing the adaptative capacity of space to enable circularity in multiresidential buildings

Abstract

This paper aims to contribute to the development of spatial criteria for adaptive capacity, which is identified as one important factor for the transition towards more circular housing design. The paper focuses on the kitchen, as an important function of the home which is connected to large resource flows and is exposed to frequent renovations and replacements. This paper identifies spatial characteristics of the kitchen and evaluates their potential to accommodate circular solutions focusing on adaptive capacity. As a first step, previous literature on the spatial characteristics of kitchens and indicators that support adaptability is reviewed. These are then used to develop an analytical framework to assess the adaptive capacity and circularity potential of 3624 kitchens in contemporary Swedish apartments. A qualitative approach in combination with quantitative methods is employed to analyse the selected sample. The main contributions of this paper include its spatial analytical framework, its descriptive presentation of contemporary kitchen and apartment designs, and its adaptive capacity assessment of the studied kitchens. The results point out that although the overcapacity of the floor area of kitchens and apartments can have significance for adaptability, it is not the only determinative spatial characteristics. The windows’ location and distribution, the number of door openings and traffic zones, the shafts’ location and accessibility from multiple rooms, the room typology and the kitchen typology can improve the adaptive capacity and circularity potential of kitchens and dwellings. The findings show that in contemporary floorplans advantageous design solutions connected to the identified spatial characteristics are not applied in a systematic way. Further research is necessary to define the exact measures of the individual spatial characteristics and their combined application in multiresidential floorplan design.

Key words： Adaptive capacity; Spatial criteria; Circular design; Kitchen design; Apartment floorplans; Multiresidential

References

1 Bafna, S., 2003. Space syntax: a brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environ. Behav. 35, 17–29.

2 Braide, A., 2019. Dwelling in Time: Studies on Life Course Spatial adaptability., Doktorsavhandlingar Vid Chalmers Tekniska Högskola. Ny serie. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, p. 4580.

3 Brkanić, I., Stober, D., Mihić, M., 2018. A comparative analysis of the spatial configuration of apartments built in osijek, Croatia, between 1930 and 2015. J. Asian Architect. Build Eng. 17, 23–30.

4 Caldenby, C., Nylander, O., Trygged, H., 2019. Rita bostäder: elva bostadsprojekt från KUB arkitekter: reflektioner kring en bostadsritarkultur. Arkitektur Media, Stockholm.

5 Cheshire, D., 2016. Building Revolutions: Applying the Circular Economy to the Built Environmnet. RIBA Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne.

6 Commission of European Communities, 2015. Closing the Loop – an EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy.

7 Commission of European Communities, 2014. Towards a Circular Economy: A Zero Waste Programme for Europe (Communicat).

8 Conejos, S., Langston, C., Smith, J., 2013. AdaptSTAR model: a climate-friendly strategy to promote built environment sustainability. Habitat Int. 37, 95–103.

9 Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2015. Growth within: a Circular Economy Vision for a Competitive Europe.

10 European Commission, 2019. The European Green Deal. Brussels.

11 European Commission Environment Directorate-General, 2017. LIFE and the Circular Economy. Life Environment.

12 Femenías, P., Geromel, F., 2019. Adaptable housing? A quantitative study of contemporary apartment layouts that have been rearranged by end-users. J. Hous. Built Environ. 35, 481–505.

13 Femenías, P., Holmström, C., Jonsdotter, L., Thuvander, L., 2016. Arkitektur. Materialflöden Och Klimatpåverkan I Bostäder.

14 Femenías, P., Holmström, C., Jönsson, H., 2018. Framtidens Klimatsmarta Och Hållbara Bostad (Stockholm).

15 Geldermans, B., Tenpierik, M., Luscuere, P., 2019. Circular and flexible indoor partitioning – a design conceptualization of innovative materials and value chains. Buildings 9, 1–24.

16 Geldermans, R.J., 2016. Design for change and circularity – accommodating circular material & product flows in construction. In: SBE16 Tallinn and Helsinki Conference; Build Green and Renovate Deep, pp. 301–311. The Author(s), Tallinn and Helsinki.

17 Geraedts, R., 2016. FLEX 4.0, A practical instrument to assess the adaptive capacity of buildings. Energy Proc. 96, 568–579.

18 Geraedts, R., Olsson, N.O.E., Hansen, G.K., 2017. Adaptability. In: Jensen, P.A., Voordt, T. Van der (Eds.), Facilities Management and Corporate Real Estate Management as Value Drivers: How to Manage and Measure Adding Value. Routledge, London/New York, pp. 159–183.

19 Geraedts, R.P., Remøy, H.T., Hermans, M.H., Van Rijn, E., 2014. Adaptive capacity of buildings: a determination method to promote flexible and sustainable construction. In: UIA2014 25th Int. Union Archit. World Congr. Archit. Otherwhere. Durban, South Africa, 3-7 August 2014.

20 Geraedts, R.P., Ruiterkamp, J., 2017. A business case for flexible housing: the feasibility of implementing flexibility measures in the housing market. J. Civ. Eng. Archit. 11.

21 Geromel, F., 2016. Owner-driven modifications of floor plans in modern Swedish apartments. XXX.

22 Gosling, J., Sassi, P., Naim, M., Lark, R., 2013. Adaptable buildings: a systems approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 7, 44–51.

23 Hagejärd, S., Ollár, A., Femenías, P., Rahe, U., 2020. Designing for circularity–addressing product design, consumption practices and resource flows in domestic kitchens. Sustainability 12, 1006.

24 Hallberg, G., Thiberg, A., 1985. Respektera baskraven. In: Thiberg, S. (Ed.), Bostadsboken: 22 Forskare Om Bostadsutformning., Statens Råd För Byggnadsforskning. Byggforskningsrå det, Stockholm, pp. 142–200.

25 Hand, M., Shove, E., Southerton, D., 2007. Home extensions in the United Kingdom: space, time, and practice. Environ. Plann. Soc. Space 25, 668–681.

26 Handcock, M.S., Gile, K.J., 2011. Comment: on the concept of snowball sampling. Sociol. Methodol. 41, 367–371.

27 Heidrich, O., Kamara, J., Maltese, S., Cecconi, F.R., Dejaco, M.C., 2017. A critical review of the developments in building adaptability. Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. 35, 284–303.

28 Hillier, B., 2008. Space and Spatiality: what the Built Environment Needs from Social Theory, vol. 36, pp. 216–230.

29 Hillier, B., 2007. Space Is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Space syntax, London.

30 Hillier, B., Hanson, J., 1984. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge Univ. Press.

31 Judson, E.P., Maller, C., Ellis, P., 2014. Housing Renovations and Energy Efficiency: Insights from Homeowners’ Practices, vol. 42, pp. 501–511.

32 Kendall, S., 1999. Open building: an approach to sustainable architecture. J. Urban Technol. 6, 1–16.

33 Khasreen, M.M., Banfill, P.F.G., Menzies, G.F., 2009. Life-Cycle assessment and the environmental impact of buildings: a review. Sustainability 1, 674–701.

34 Krantz-Jensen, H., 1963. Köksinredning och kökstyper. In: Bostaden. Svenska Slöjdföreningen, Stockholm, pp. 92–101.

35 Langston, C., Shen, L.Y., 2007. Application of the adaptive reuse potential model in Hong Kong: a case study of Lui Seng Chun. Int. J. Strat. Property Manag. 11, 193–207.

36 Lee, J., 2018. Det moderna köksrummet historia. In: Torell, U., Lee, J., Qvarsell, R. (Eds.), Köket : Rum För Drömmar, Ideal Och Vardagsliv under Det Långa 1900-Talet. Nordiska museets förlag, Stockholm, pp. 25–64.

37 Leupen, B., 2006. Polyvalence, a concept for the sustainable dwelling. Nord. J. Archit. Res. 19, 23–31.

38 Lind, H., Mjörnell, K., 2015. Social hållbarhet med fokus på bostadsrenovering – en antologi (Borås).

39 Maller, C., Horne, R., Dalton, T., 2012. Green renovations: intersections of daily routines, housing aspirations and narratives of environmental sustainability. Hous. Theory Soc. 29, 255–275.

40 Manum, B., 2009. The advantage of generality. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Space Syntax Symposium, pp. 1–14.

41 Manum, B., 2005. Generality versus specificity: a Study on the interior space of apartments. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Space Syntax Symposium.

42 National Board of Housing Building and Planning, 2020. Boverkets Byggregler (2011:6) – Föreskrifter Och Allmänna Råd. BBR.

43 Ness, D.A., Xing, K., 2017. Toward a resource-efficient built: a literature review and conceptual model. J. Ind. Ecol. 21, 572–592.

44 Nowakowski, P.N., 2015. Designing kitchens for small domestic spaces przemyslaw. In: A, M., S, C. (Eds.), Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Access to the Human Environment and Culture. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 340–351.

45 Nylander, O., 2020. Dyrare och mindre ytor. In: Caldenby, C., Hallemar, D. (Eds.), Tiotalets Svenska Bostad, pp. 22–39. Arkitektur förlag.

46 Nylander, O., 2018. Svensk Bostadsarkitektur : Utveckling Från 1800-tal till 2000-tal., 2. uppl. ed. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

47 Nylander, O., Krause, J., Fronko, D., 2002. Architecture of the Home. Wiley-Academy.

48 Ollár, A., 2021. Spatial Design for Circularity: Exploring Spatial Aspects in Housing Design with Focus on the Kitchen. Technical Report: Lic (Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology): 2021:1. Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering.

49 Ollár, A., Femenías, P., Rahe, U., Granath, K., 2020. Foresights from the Swedish kitchen: four circular value opportunities for the built environment. Sustain. Times 12, 1–21.

50 Örnhall, H., 2019. Bostadsbestämmelser 2019 (AB Svensk Byggtjänst).

51 Pinder, J., Schmidt, R., Saker, J., 2013. Stakeholder perspectives on developing more adaptable buildings. Construct. Manag. Econ. 31, 440–459.

52 Ranney, E.M., 1949. Kitchen Planning Standards. Univrsity of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois.

53 Regeringskansliet, 2020. Cirkulär Ekonomi [WWW Document].

54 Rockow, Z.R., Ross, B., Black, A.K., 2019. Review of methods for evaluating adaptability of buildings. Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. 37, 273–287.

55 Ross, B.E., Chen, D.A., Conejos, S., Khademi, A., 2016. Enabling adaptable buildings: results of a preliminary expert survey. Procedia Eng. 145, 420–427.

56 Shove, E., Watson, M., Hand, M., Ingram, J., 2007. The Design of Everyday Life. Berg, New York.

57 Sinclair, B.R., Mousazadeh, S., Safarzadeh, G., 2012. Agility, adaptability + appropriateness: conceiving, crafting & constructing an architecture of the 21st century. Enq. A J. Archit. Res. 9.

58 Slaughter, E.S., 2001. Design strategies to increase building flexibility. Build. Res. Inf. 29, 208–217.

59 Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2016. Urban Europe: Statistics on Cities, Towns and Suburbs, the European Territory. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

60 Statistics Sweden, 2021a. Population in the Country, Counties and Municipalities on 31 December 2020 and Population Change in 2020 [WWW Document].

61 Statistics Sweden, 2021b. Population Statistics [WWW Document].

62 Statistics Sweden, 2020a. Increased Numbers of New Dwellings in Multi-Dwelling Buildings [WWW Document].

63 Statistics Sweden, 2020b. Number of Completed Dwellings [WWW Document].

64 Statistics Sweden, 2019. Nearly 5 Million Dwellings in Sweden [WWW Document].

65 Tervo, A., Hirvonen, J., 2019. Solo dwellers and domestic spatial needs in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. Finland. Hous. Stud. 1–20.

66 Thiberg, A., 2007. Kök: Planering Och Utformning, SIS Handbok. SIS förlag, Stockholm.

67 Thiberg, A., 1994. Kök: en bok för den som planerar, bygger eller bygger om (Konsumentverket).

68 Till, J., Schneider, T., 2005. Flexible housing: the means to the end. Archit. Res. Q. 9, 287–296.

69 van Stijn, A., Gruis, V., 2019. Towards a circular built environment: an integral design tool for circular building components. Smart Sustain. Built Environ. 9, 635–653.

70 West, B.N., Emmitt, S., 2004. Functional design? An analysis of new speculative house plans in the UK. Des. Stud. 25, 275–299.

71 Willén, M., 2012. Berättelser Om Den Öppna Planlösningens Arkitektur. Sekel, Lund.

72 Word Economic Forum, 2016. Shaping the Future of Construction: A Breakthrough in Mindset and Technology (Geneva).

73 Wouterszoon Jansen, B., vanStijn, A., Gruis, V., van Bortel, G., 2020. A circular economy life cycle costing model (CE-LCC) for building components. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 161, 104857.