An evaluation approach to spatial identity in historic urban areas from a humanistic perspective

Abstract

Urban spatial identity, as the core content of a distinctive urban image and the representation of urban competitiveness and attraction, is critical to cities in the rapid development process. In view of maintaining and strengthening the spatial identity in a historic urban area, which is the key issue of urban construction in China at present, based on the literature review of Chinese urban spatial identity studies, three research paradigms are summarized: landscape, culture, and economy. Although the traditional evaluation method of spatial identity in historic urban areas has focused on the scarcity of characteristic resources, the relation-ship between characteristic resources and human beings has been ignored. Therefore, based on the declaration of the fundamental mechanism of urban spatial identity in historic urban areas, a new evaluation method was proposed considering four aspects, including object, subject, content, and indicators. The results indicated that the framework of evaluation and design, which is based on the assessment of the relationship between characteristic resources and human beings, is an effective strategy to improve the scientific evaluation of urban spatial identity. Our study has substantial implications for urban planners and managers in solving the urban identity crisis issue in historic urban areas.

Key words： Humanism; Historic urban area; Urban spatial identity; Environmental behavior; Public perception

References

1 Adewale, B., Ibem, E., Amole, S., et al., 2020. Place attachment in Nigerian urban slums: evidence from inner-city Ibadan. Cities 107, 102902.

2 Bai, X., Shi, P., Liu, Y., 2014. Society: realizing China’s urban dream. Nature 509 (7499), 158–160.

3 Belanche, D., Casaló, L., Flavián, C., 2017. Understanding the cognitive, affective and evaluative components of social urban identity: determinants, measurement, and practical consequences. J. Environ. Psychol. 50, 138–153.

4 Buhyoff, G., et al., 1978. Landscape architects’ interpretations of people’s landscape preferences. J. Environ. Manag. 6 (3), 255–262.

5 Buhyoff, G., Leuschner, W., Arndt, L., 1980. Notes: replication of a scenic preference function. For. Sci. 26 (2), 227–230.

6 Chen, Y., et al., 2017. On the cognition and pattern construction of historical and cultural city taking Huangshan City as an example. Urban Planning Forum (S2), 92–97 (in Chinese).

7 Choi, H., Reeve, A., 2014. Local identity in the form-production process, using as a case study the multifunctional administrative city project (Sejong) in South Korea. Urban Des. Int. 20 (1), 66–78.

8 Daniel, T., Boster, R., 1976. Measuring Landscape Esthetics: the Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. Usda Forest Service Research Paper Rm.

9 Duan, J., 2006. Urban Spatial Development Theory. Phoenix Science Press (in Chinese).

10 Duan, J., 2021. Urban design and cityscape: report of online seminar on territorial planning. China E-learning Academy For Leadership, Beijing.

11 Huang, J., et al., 2021. The image of the City on social media: a comparative study using „Big Data” and „Small Data” methods in the Tri-City Region in Poland. Landsc. Urban Plann. 206, 103977.

12 Hwang, K., 2014. Finding urban identity through culture-led urban regeneration. Journal of Urban Management 3 (1), 67–85.

13 Jiang, H., Zhang, S., 2009. Producing, duplication and characteristics extinction: an analysis on the crisis of city’s characteristic with the theory of production of space, 04 Urban Planning Forum 40–45 (in Chinese).

14 Jiang, D., 2007. Urban Form Vitality. Southeast University Press (in Chinese).

15 Kim, Y., 2018. Seoul’s Wi-fi hotspots: Wi-fi access points as an indicator of urban vitality. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. (72), 13–24.

16 Koolhaas, R., 2002. Junkspace. October (100), 175–190.

17 Li, B., 2008. Theory of environment-behavior and its development in environment-behavior studies. Architecture Journal (2), 30–33 (in Chinese).

18 Liang, H., 2014. Further discussion on Homo-Urbanicus: human-based urbanization. City Planning Review 38 (9), 64–75 (in Chinese).

19 Long, Y., et al., 2014. Fine-scale urban modeling and its opportunities in the „big data” era: methods, data and empirical studies, 03 Hum. Geogr. 29, 7–13 (in Chinese).

20 Lu, S., Shi, C., Yang, X., 2019. Impacts of built environment on urban vitality: regression analyses of Beijing and Chengdu, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 16 (23), 4592.

21 Lynch, K., 1960. The Image of the City. MIT Press.

22 Manahasa, E., Manahasa, O., 2020. Defining urban identity in a post-socialist turbulent context: the role of housing typologies and urban layers in Tirana. Habitat Int. 102, 102202.

23 Malik, S., Willett, C., Hu, B., 2013. Global obesity: trends, risk factors and policy implications. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 9 (1), 13–27.

24 Norberg Schulz, C., 1979. Genius Loci: towards a Phenomenology of Architecture (Rizzoli).

25 Pan, C., Zhou, J., Huang, X., 2021. Impact of Check-In Data on Urban Vitality in the Macao Peninsula. Scientific Programming, p. 7179965.

26 Qi, K., 2001. Urban Architecture. Southeast University Press (in Chinese).

27 Rossi, A., 1984. The Architecture of the City. The MIT Press.

28 Scott, M., Parkinson, A., Waldron, R., Redmond, D., 2020. Planning for historic urban environments under austerity conditions: insights from post-crash Ireland. Cities 103, 102788.

29 Shan, J., 2007. Urban culture and traditional culture, regional culture and cultural diversity. Cultural Relics in Southern China 2–28, 02.

30 Sheng, Q., et al., 2018. The application of web-open data in the space syntax analysis on commercial centers. N. Archit. (6), 10–12 (in Chinese).

31 Shi, N., 2005. Editor’s note: people-oriented. City Planning Review 29 (2), 1 (in Chinese).

32 Soil Conservation Service, 1978. Procedure to Establish Priorities in Landscape Architecture. SCS Tech Release.

33 Thuiller, W., 2007. Climate change and the ecologist. Nature 448 (7153), 550–552.

34 Tweed, C., Sutherland, M., 2007. Built cultural heritage and sustainable urban development. Landsc. Urban Plann. 83 (1), 62–69.

35 Wang, J., 2019. Inclusiveness and sharing, explicit and implicit mutual learning, livability predicted: historical prospect and contemporary creation of urban vitality. City Planning Review 43 (12), 9–16 (in Chinese).

36 Wang, J., 2012. Problems and solutions in the protection of historical urban areas. Frontiers of Architectural Research 1 (1), 40–43.

37 Wang, H., Wang, Y., 2007. Urban green space system plan molds city characteristics. Chinese Landscape Architecture 23 (9), 90–94 (in Chinese).

38 Wu, W., Niu, X., 2019. Influence of built environment on urban vitality: case study of shanghai using mobile phone location data. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 145 (3), 04019007.

39 Xie, S., Gu, K., Zhang, X., 2020. Urban conservation in China in an international context: retrospect and prospects. Habitat Int. 95, 102098.

40 Yaldız, E., Aydın, D., Sıramkaya, S., 2014. Loss of city identities in the process of change: the city of Konya-Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 140, 221–233.

41 Yang, B., et al., 2013. Reflections on featured urban space, 03 City Planning Review 37, 11–16 (in Chinese).

42 Yang, J., Hu, X., 2013. Approaches and techniques for planning of urban space identity, 06 City Planning Review 37, 68–75 (in Chinese).

43 Yang, J., 2015. Protection of urban historical environment and traditional style, 05 Shanghai City Planning Review 18–22 (in Chinese).

44 Yin, C., Qian, X., 2020. The spatial production of simulacrascape in urban China: economic function, local identity and cultural authenticity. Cities 104, 102806.

45 Yu, B., 2003. Town flavor resources are prerequisites, and its methods of the evaluation. Architectural Journal (11), 66–68 (in Chinese).

46 Yu, K., 1991. Landscape sensitivity and its threshold evaluation. Geogr. Res. 10 (2), 38–51 (in Chinese).

47 Zhang, J., 2009. Research on Lake-type Scenic Area Planning Based on Landscape Sensitivity. Northeast Forestry University (in Chinese).

48 Zhang, S., 2012. The integral protection of historic city: rethinking under the international proposal of historic urban landscape. Beijing Planning Review (6), 27–30 (in Chinese).

49 Zhu, D., 2016. Cognition, expression, and planning exploration of urban characteristics: a case study of Jiangsu Province. City Planning Review 40 (7), 65–73 (in Chinese).

50 Ziyaee, M., 2018. Assessment of urban identity through a matrix of cultural landscapes. Cities 74, 21–31.

51 Zhang, W., Jiang, Z., Wei, G., 2011. A new town upon a historic site, a great event in a small town: a research on special urban spatial scale based on the case of general urban design for the new county seat of Beichuan. City Planning Review 35 (S2), 43–46 + 52. (in Chinese).