REVIEW

Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries

  • Mohamad Kashef
Expand
  • 1 ALHOSN University, Abu Dhabi 38772, United Arab Emirates

Received date: 14 Nov 2015

Accepted date: 04 Mar 2016

Published date: 20 Jun 2016

Copyright

2016 2016 The Author. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Abstract

This is an analytical study of the intensely debated concept of urban livability. The paper examines different literature or theoretical streams that contribute to the debate related to the notion of livable cities. It juxtaposes academic constructs from architecture and urban planning fields with the popular culture and web indices that rank cities according to their living standards, services, and international appeal. The study offers a comparative analytical assessment of these diverse approaches and lays out a nuanced understanding of urban livability that draws on the richness and diversity embedded in design, planning, and current ranking tools. The paper ultimately aims to shed light on the configurations, conditions, and processes that may enhance the livability of various urban settings. It integrates such disparate views into an interdisciplinary perspective of urban livability. While the bulk of this paper analyses relates to North American, European, and Australian cities, the concepts discussed pertain to urban livability on a global scale.

Cite this article

Mohamad Kashef . Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries[J]. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2016 , 5(2) : 239 -253 . DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2016.03.003

Outlines

/