New method of evaluating spatial quality for innovation districts: A case study of Haidian and Chaoyang districts, Beijing

Abstract

Science and technology innovation has become the core driving force of urban development, and innovation spaces as the carriers of innovation activities have evolved continuously, forming the emerging model of innovation districts in recent years. However, the evaluation standard of innovation spaces has not changed with the evolution of the model, and the evaluation method that focuses on economic benefits still dominates the mainstream. As a result, the construction of innovation spaces around these indicators and guidelines lags behind the advanced level.

In this paper, we have systematically sorted out the relevant research progress of innovation districts, established a set of cases with global typicality, combined the dual attributes of “innovation characteristics + urban characteristics,” constructed a research framework for the spatial quality of innovation districts based on the dual perspectives of “innovation space,” and summarized the spatial quality evaluation model through analysis. We do an empirical study on Haidian District to find out how well innovation districts work in terms of space, find typical clusters, and come up with the most important aspects of their space quality. In order to observe the applicability of this method, it is also applied to the urban health check-up in Chaoyang District, Beijing. Through the expert seminar, the evaluation and analysis method of spatial quality of innovative urban areas is further verified and discussed. The results show that the integration of innovative urban areas and urban structures, and the collaborative development of innovative industries and high-quality spaces are the keys to promote the common development of innovative economy and cities. The new evaluation method can effectively measure the quality of innovation spaces, and has certain transferability.

Keywords

Innovation districts / Spatial quality / Evaluation method / Beijing practice

References

[1] Anne, T. , Robert, M.B. , 2018. Assessing your innovation district: A how-to guide [R/OL]. (2018-02-12)[2020-10-03].

[2] Asheim, B.T. , Coenen, L. , 2005. Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: comparing Nordic clusters. Res. Pol. 34 (8), 1173- 1190.

[3] Asheim, B.T. , Boschma, R. , Cooke, P. , 2011. Constructing regional advantage: platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Reg. Stud. 45 (7), 893- 904.

[4] Asheim, B.T. , Isaksen, A. , Trippl, M. , 2019. Advanced Introduction to Regional Innovation Systems. Routledge, London.

[5] Bathelt, H. , Malmberg, A. , Maskell, P. , 2004. Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 28 (1), 31- 56.

[6] Bian, L. , Tang, Y. , Shen, Z. , 2021. Chinese Urban Planning and Construction: from Historical Wisdom to Modern Miracles. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.

[7] Boschma, R. , 2005. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg. Stud. 39 (1), 61- 74.

[8] Bugliarello, G. , 2004. Urban sustainability: science, technology, and policies. J. Urban Technol. 11 (2), 1- 11.

[9] Camagni, R.P. , 1995. The concept of innovative milieu and its relevance for public policies in European lagging regions. Pap. Reg. Sci. 74 (4), 317- 340.

[10] Carlino, G.A. , 2012. Economies of Scale in Manufacturing Location: Theory and Measure. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY.

[11] Chesbrough, H. , 2003. The Era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 44 (3), 35- 41.

[12] China Urban Planning Design & Research Institute . (2023). 2023 China’s main city road network density and operation status monitoring report.

[13] Cooke, P. , Morgan, K. , 1994. The regional innovation system in Baden-Wurttemberg. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 9 (3-4), 394- 429.

[14] Darchen, S. , Tremblay, D.G. , 2010. What attracts and retains knowledge workers/students: the quality of place or career opportunities? The cases of Montreal and Ottawa. Cities 27 (4), 225- 233.

[15] Deng, Z. , 2017. On innovation square: concept, motive force and development path. Urban Development Research 24 (8), 42- 48.

[16] Deng, Z. , Chen, Y. , 2020. A study on the place-making of innovative districts. City Plan. 44 (4), 22- 30.

[17] Duan, D. , Du, D. , Liu, C. , 2016. Spatio-temporal evolution of urban innovation structure based on zip code geodatabase: an empirical study from Shanghai and Beijing. J. Geogr. Sci. 26 (12), 1707- 1724.

[18] Eisenhardt, K.M. , 1989. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14 (4), 532- 550.

[19] Esmaeilpoorarabi, N. , 2019. A Methodological Approach for Establishing Place Quality in Australian Innovation Districts [Doctoral Dissertation. Queensland University of Technology.

[20] Esmaeilpoorarabi, N. , Yigitcanlar, T. , Guaralda, M. , 2016. Place quality and urban competitiveness symbiosis? A position paper. Int. J. Knowl. Base. Dev. 7 (1), 4- 21.

[21] European Commission , 2023. European innovation scoreboard 2023 ([Report]).

[22] Ferretti, M. , Parmentola, A. , 2015. The Creation of Local Innovation Systems in Emerging Countries: the Role of Governments, Firms and Universities. Springer, New York, NY.

[23] Florida, R. , 2002. The economic geography of talent. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 92 (4), 743- 755.

[24] Florida, R. , 2005. Cities and the Creative Class. Routledge, New York, NY.

[25] Florida, R. , 2014. The rise of the creative class-revisited: Revised and expanded [M]. Basic Books (AZ).

[26] Florida, R. , 2017. The economic geography of talent. In: Economy. Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 305-317.

[27] Heaphy, L. , Wiig, A. , 2020. The 21st century corporate town: the politics of planning innovation districts. Telematics Inf. 54, 101459.

[28] Huang, B. , 2012. Spatial Evolution of Beijing’s Cultural and Creative Industries [Doctoral Dissertation. Peking University].

[29] Hutton, T.A. , 2004. The new economy of the inner city. Cities 21 (2), 89- 108.

[30] Jin, Y. , 2021. Innovation ecology in Boston. Globe 2021 (3), 18.

[31] Katz, B. , Wagner, J. , 2014. The Rise of Innovation Districts: A New Geography of Innovation in America [R]. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.

[32] Kim, M. , 2013. Spatial qualities of innovation districts: how third places are changing the innovation ecosystem of Kendall square [doctoral dissertation, MIT].

[33] Kloosterman, R.C. , Trip, J.J. , 2011. Planning for quality? J. Urban Des. 16 (4).

[34] Levy, P.R. , Gilchrist, L.M. , 2014. Downtown rebirth: documenting the live-work dynamic in 21st century U.S. Cities. Philadelphia, PA: the international downtown association by the Philadelphia center city district.

[35] Lu, D. , 2022. Research on the Spatial Quality Evaluation Method and Development Path of Innovation Districts. Doctoral dissertation. Tsinghua University.

[36] Malmberg, A. , Maskell, P. , 2006. Localized learning revisited. Growth Change 37 (1), 1- 18.

[37] Maskell, P. , 2001. Knowledge creation and diffusion in geographic clusters. Int. J. Innovat. Manag. 5 (2), 213- 237.

[38] McCann, E.J. , 2004. Best places: interurban competition, quality of life and popular media discourse. Urban Stud. 41 (10), 1909- 1929.

[39] Moulaert, F. , Sekia, F. , 2003. Territorial innovation models: a critical survey. Reg. Stud. 37 (3), 289- 302.

[40] Pancholi, S.A. , 2018. A Conceptual Approach for Place Making in Knowledge and Innovation Spaces: Case Investigations from Brisbane. Doctoral dissertation. Queensland University of Technology, Melbourne and Sydney.

[41] Pancholi, S. , Yigitcanlar, T. , Guaralda, M. , 2015. Place making facilitators of knowledge and innovation spaces: insights from European best practices. Int. J. Knowl. Base. Dev. 6 (3), 215- 240.

[42] Pancholi, S. , Yigitcanlar, T. , Guaralda, M. , 2017. Governance that matters. J. Place Manag. Dev. 10 (1), 73- 87.

[43] Ren, J. , Liu, X. , 2018. The concept, practice and enlightenment of “innovation district” in the United States. International Urban Planning 33 (6), 49- 56.

[44] Rothwell, J. , 2013. The Hidden STEM Economy [Report]. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.

[45] Sun, Y. , Sun, T. , Xi, Q. , 2017. Influence factors and spillover effect of the innovation agglomeration in Beijing. Geography Research 36 (12), 2419- 2431.

[46] Tavassoli, S. , Jienwatcharamongkhol, V. , Arenius, P. , 2023. Colocation of entrepreneurs and new firm survival: role of new firm founder’s experiential relatedness to local entrepreneurs. Entrep. Theory Pract. 47 (4), 1421- 1459.

[47] Tripp S , 2020. New Empirical Evidence: How One Innovation District Is Advancing the Regional Economy[R/OL]. (2020-03-12) [2021-10-09].

[48] Vespa, J. , Lewis, J.M. , Kreider, R.M. , 2013. America’s Families and Living Arrangements: 2012. Population Characteristics. United States Census Bureau.

[49] Wagner, J. , Katz, B. , Osha, T. , 2019. The Evolution of Innovation Districts: the New Geography of Global Innovation [R]. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.

[50] WIPO , 2023. Global innovation index 2023 ([Report]).

[51] Wu, S. , 2014. R&D mode and innovation performance of enterprises within innovative cities. Sci. Res. Manag. 35 (1), 33- 40.

[52] Xu, K. , Sun, T.Y. , Ye, L. , 2020. The Formation and characteristics of innovation districts and a review of relevant researches. Urban Planning Forum (6), 110- 117.

[53] Yigitcanlar, T. , 2014. Innovating urban policymaking and planning mechanisms to deliver knowledge-based agendas: a methodological approach. Int. J. Knowl. Base. Dev. 5 (3), 253- 270.

[54] Yigitcanlar, T. , Dur, F. , 2013. Making space and place for knowledge communities: lessons for Australian practice. Australas. J. Reg. Stud. 19 (1), 36- 63.

[55] Yigitcanlar, T. , Velibeyoglu, K. , Martinez-Fernandez, C. , 2008. Rising knowledge cities: the role of urban knowledge precincts. J. Knowl. Manag. 12 (5), 8- 20.

[56] You, J. , Lu, C. , Song, Y. , 2015. Development Status and Enlightenment of the Evaluation Index System of Global Innovative Cities [Report]. Shanghai Science and Technology Development Research Center, Shanghai.

[57] Zhang, A. , Wang, H. , 2021. Beijing’s "Jinke new district" attracts phoenix (Beijing Daily).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd.

审图号：GS京（2025）0092号