Interscalable material microstructure organization in performance-based computational design
Sevil Yazici
Interscalable material microstructure organization in performance-based computational design
Various parameters can be integrated in material-based computational design in architecture. Materials are the main driver of these processes and evaluated with the constraints related to the form, performance, and fabrication techniques. However, current methodologies mostly involve investigating already existing materials. Studies on computational material design, in which new materials are developed by designing their microstructures in response to the performative issues, are generally undertaken at the material scale, and not adopted to the architectural design process yet. To resolve this issue, the methodology titled Interscalable Material Microstructure Organization in Performance-based Computational Design (I2MO_PCD) is developed and presented in three stages, including (1) identification of different types of material microstructures, (2) computational material design, and (3) prototyping. Data-based material modelling and visualization, and algorithmic modelling techniques are utilized, followed by various performance simulations as a part of an iterative process. New microstructure organizations are designed computationally, organized under three main groups as linear-curvilinear, crystal and metaball-voronoi. The outcomes of different performance analyses, including structure, radiation, direct sun hours, acoustics and thermal bridge were compared. Thus, the role of geometrical organization of microstructures, scales and material types in different performance computations were identified, by designing and fabricating synthetic materials.
Material microstructure / Computational design / Performance computation / Architectural design
[1] |
Ashby, M.,F., 1999. Material Selection in Mechanical Design. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
|
[2] |
Bechthold, M., Weaver, J.C., 2017. Materials science and architecture. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17082.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Boddeti, N., Rosen, D.,W., Maute, K., Dunn, M.,L., 2019. Multiscale optimal design and fabrication of laminated composites. Compos. Struct. 228, 111366.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Bostanabad, R., Zhang, Y., Li, X., Kearney, T., Brinson, L.,C., Apley, D.,W., Liu, W.,K., Chen, W., 2018. Computational microstructure characterization and reconstruction: review of the state-of-the-art techniques. Prog. Mater. Sci. 95, 1- 41.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Brown, N.C., Mueller, C.T., 2019. Design variable analysis and generation for performance based parametric modeling in architecture. Int. J. Architect. Comput. 17 (1), 36- 52.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Cang, R., Xu, Y., Chen, S., Liu, Y., Jiao, Y., Ren, M.Y., 2017. Microstructure representation and reconstruction of heterogeneous materials via deep belief network for computational material design. J. Mech. Des. 139, 071404.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Castelo-Branco, R., Caetano, I., Leitao, A., 2022. Digital representation methods: the case of algorithmic design. Frontiers of Architectural Research 11, 527- 541.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Chatzikonstantinou, I., Sariyildiz, S., 2016. Approximation of simulation-derived visual comfort indicators in office spaces: a comparative study in machine learning. Architect. Sci. Rev. 59 (4), 307- 322.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Chen, Z., Wang, K., Giuliani, F., Atkinson, A., 2015. Microstructural characteristics and elastic modulus of porous solids. Acta Mater. 89, 268- 277.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Datta, S., Roy, B., Davim, J.P., 2016. Computational materials design: different concepts and aspects. In: Datta, S., Davim, J. (Eds.), Computational Approaches to Materials Design: Theoretical and Practical Aspects, vol. 1, pp. 1-12. P., chapter.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Doskar, M., Zeman, J., Rypl, D., Novak, J., 2020. Level-set based design of Wang tiles for modelling complex microstructures. Comput. Aided Des. 123, 102827.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Gramazio, F., Kohler, M., 2008. Digital Materiality in Architecture. Lars Müller Publishers, Baden, Switzerland.
|
[13] |
Groeber, M.A., Jackson, M.A., 2014. DREAM. 3D: a digital representation environment for the analysis of microstructure in 3D. IntegratingMaterials and Manufacturing Innovation 3, 5.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Hensen, J.L.M. ve Lamberts, R., 2011. Building Performance Simulation for Design and Operation. Spon Press, Abingdon-UK.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Kolarevich, B., ve Klinger, K., 2008. Manufacturing Material Effects Rethinking Design and Making Architecture. Routledge, New York, pp. 196-198.
|
[16] |
Ma, C., Zhang, Z., Luce, B., Pusateri, S., Xie, B., Rafiei, M.,H., Hu, N., 2020. Accelerated design and characterization of nonuniform cellular materials via a machine-learning based framework. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 40.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Mahdavi, A., 1999. A comprehensive computational environment for performance based reasoning in building design and evaluation. Autom. ConStruct. 8, 427- 435.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
McDowell, D.L., Pancal, J.H., Choi, H., Seepersad, C.C., Allen, J.K., ve Mistree, F., 2010. Integrated Design of Multiscale Multifunctional Materials and Products. Elsevier, Burlington-MA.
|
[19] |
Menges, A., 2016. Computational Material Culture, Architectural Design, pp. 76-83.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Oxman, N., 2010. Material-based Design Computation (PhD) Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
|
[21] |
Stieler, D., Schwinn, T., Leder, S., Maierhofer, M., Kannenberg, F., Menges, A., 2022. Agent-based modeling and simulation in architecture. Autom. ConStruct. 141, 104426.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Takano, N., Zako, M., 2000. Integrated design of graded microstructures of heterogeneous materials. Archieve of Applied Mechanics 70, 585- 596.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Tseranidis, S., Brown, N.C., Mueller, C.T., 2016. Data driven approximation algorithms for rapid performance evaluation and optimization of civil structures. Autom. ConStruct. 72, 279- 293.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Yazici, S., Tanacan, L., 2018. A study towards interdisciplinary research: a material-based integrated computational design model (MICD-m) in architecture. Architect. Sci. Rev. 61 (Nos. 1-2), 68- 82.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Yazici, S., Tanacan, L., 2020. Material-based computational design (MCD) in sustainable architecture. J. Build. Eng. 32 (November 2020) 101543.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Zhang, S., Vijayavenkataraman, S., Lu, W.F., Fuh, J.Y.H., 2019. A review on the use of computational methods to characterize, design, and optimize tissue engineering scaffolds, with a potential in 3D printing fabrication. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 107 b (issue 5), 1329- 1351.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |