Revitalizing urban spaces: Ten key lessons from the “Viaduc des arts” adaptive reuse and placemaking

Abstract

This study focuses on the adaptive reuse and placemaking of the Viaduc des Arts, an obsolete viaduct in Paris, and examines its impact on the city’s economic, urban, cultural, and sustainable identities. It aims to showcase unconventional solutions applied to create an elevated linear park and a coherent commercial identity under the vaults while enhancing the district’s imageability and attractiveness.

Employing a mixed-methods approach, this study analyzes various action modes in architectural and urban regeneration, highlighting ten valuable lessons learned from the Viaduc des Arts rehabilitation. These lessons provide crucial insights into effective urban regeneration and placemaking strategies, emphasizing the need to update objectives and employ appropriate methodologies for future projects. The Viaduc des Arts serves as a paradigmatic case study, demonstrating the successful transformation of an obsolete viaduct into a commercial, vibrant cultural, and urban space, underscoring the importance of updating urban regeneration objectives.

Keywords

Elevated parks / Urban attractiveness / Industrial heritage / Urban identity / Cultural heritage / Building rehabilitation / Urban regeneration / Adaptive reuse strategies

References

[1] Abram, J. , 2007. Selected French projects. Architect. Des 77 (5), 90- 97.

[2] Alexander, C. , 2002. The Nature of Order: an Essay on the Art of Building and the Nature of the Universe, Book One, the Phenomenon of Life. Center for Environmental Structure, Berkeley, California.

[3] Andrade, M.J. , Jiménez-Morales, E. , Rodríguez-Ramos, R. , Martínez-Ramírez, P. , 2023. Reuse of Port industrial heritage in tourist cities: Shipyards as case studies. Frontiers of Architectural Research.

[4] APUR , 1982. Politique nouvelle de la rénovation urbaine, pp. 21-22. Paris Projet, N.

[5] APUR , 1988. L’aménagement de l’Est de Paris. In: Politique nouvelle de la rénovation urbaine, pp. 27-28. Paris Projet N.

[6] Arnaud, D. , 1995. Viaduc des Arts : Des artisans sous cellophane dans les vitrines de Daumesnil, Liberation.

[7] Association du Viaduc des Arts , 2022. Le Viaduc des Arts: Haut lieu de l’artisanat d’art à Paris. Le Viaduc des Arts Official Website.

[8] Ayala Moreno, A.A. , Ayala Moreno, J.P. , 2020. Reciclaje arquitectónico y urbano: Una breve introducción. MADGU. Mundo, Arquitectura. Diseño Gráfico Y Urbanismo 3 (5), 12.

[9] Bayliss, D. , 2007. The Rise of the creative city: culture and creativity in Copenhagen. Eur. Plann. Stud. 15 (7), 889- 903.

[10] BDMMA , 2015. Rapport D’activités 2015. Mairie de Paris, Direction de l’Attractivité et de l’Emploi. Techinical report.

[11] Ben Ghida, D. , 2014a. L’Excellence dans la Revitalisation Urbaine. Une Mise en Valeur Architectonique des Marchés de plein air à Busan. Int. J. Innovat. Appl. Stud. 7 (1), 239- 250.

[12] Ben Ghida, D. , 2014b. The urban identity recovery in Seoul: the case of the outdoor markets. In: Proceedings of the 13th Docomomo International Conference Seoul: Expansion and Conflict, Seoul 2014, pp. 227-231.

[13] Ben Ghida, D. , BenGhida, S. , 2017. La créativité dans la réhabilitation urbaine: Le Viaduc des Arts à Paris. Association Culturelle Franco-Coréenne 35 (2), 215- 243.

[14] Ben Ghida, D. , 2020. Augmented reality and Virtual reality: a 360° immersion into western history of architecture. Int. J. 8 (9), 6051- 6055.

[15] Ben Ghida, D. , 2023. Nanomaterials’ application in architectural façades in Italy. Appl Sci Eng Prog 16 (4), 6277.

[16] Ben Ghida, D. , BenGhida, S. , BenGhida, S. , 2024. Urban rejuvenation of traditional open-air markets. AIP Conf. Proc.

[17] Berger, P. , 1988. Le Viaduc des Arts, Paris. Patrick Berger Architect Official Website.

[18] Bouvier, B. , Mohrt, F. , 2015. Les zones touristiques internationales à Paris: Diagnostic initial sur les commerces. Technical report. APUR, Paris.

[19] Brander, L.M. , Koetse, M.J. , 2011. The value of urban open space: meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results. J. Environ. Manag. 92, 2763- 2773.

[20] Byrne, J.A. , 2021. Observation for data collection in urban studies and urban analysis. In: Baum, S. (Ed.), Methods in Urban Analysis. Cities Research Series. Springer, Singapore.

[21] Campbell, R. , 2003. A Paris Match? Boston Can learn something about creating new civic space from the city of light. N. Engl. J. Publ. Pol. 18 (2), 63-65. Article 6.

[22] Cardoso de Matos, A. , Lourencetti, F.D.L. , 2021. Reusing railway infrastructures in the spirit of circular theory. A contribution to an operational concept. Vitruvio International Journal of Architecture Technology and Sustainability 6 (1), 12- 23.

[23] Chartier, H. , De Stefani, C. , 2021. Reinventing retail to foster green & thriving neighborhoods. Reinventing cities, C40 Cities.

[24] Curtis, W. , 1986. Le Corbusier: Ideas and Form. Phaidon, Oxford.

[25] De Capua, A. , Errante, L. , 2019. Interpreting public space as a medium for urban liveability. AGATHÓN. International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design 6, 148- 161.

[26] De Medici, S. , De Toro, P. , Nocca, F. , 2020. Cultural heritage and sustainable development: impact assessment of two adaptive reuse projects in Siracusa, Sicily. Sustainability 12 (1), 311.

[27] Evans, G. , 2009. Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy. Urban Stud. 46 (5-6) , 1003- 1040.

[28] Ewing, R. , Handy, S. , Brownson, R.C. , Clemente, O. , Winston, E. , 2006. Identifying and measuring urban design qualities related to walkability. J. Phys. Activ. Health 3 (1), S223-S240.

[29] Feld, S. Basso, K, K. , 1996. Senses of Place. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.

[30] Gastil, R. , 2013. Prospect parks: walking the promenade planteé and the high line, studies in the history of gardens & designed landscapes. Int. Q. 33 (4), 280- 289.

[31] Gehl, J. , 2011. Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. Island Press, Washington, DC.

[32] Gehl, J. Svarre, B. , 2013. How to Study Public Life. Island Press, Washington, DC.

[33] Gibbons, S. , Overman, H. , Sarvimäki, M. , 2021. The local economic impacts of regeneration projects: evidence from UK’s single regeneration budget. J. Urban Econ. 122, 103315.

[34] Graziano, T. , 2014. Riconversione funzionale, verde urbano E gentrification: dalla promenade plantée di Parigi Alla high line Di New York. Riv. Geogr. Ital. 121, 45- 60.

[35] Grawitz, M. , 2000. Méthodes des sciences sociales, eleventh ed. Dalloz, Paris.

[36] Guatelli, I. , 2019. Heterotopic urban [A]destinations. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 603, 022035.

[37] Habraken, N.J. , Boekholt, J.T. , Thijssen, A.P. , Dinjens, P.J.M. , 1976. Variations: the Systematic Design of Supports. Laboratory of Architecture and Planning at MIT, Cambridge, MA.

[38] Hannigan, J. , 1998. Fantasy City: Pleasure and Profit in the Postmodern Metropolis, first ed. Routledge, New York.

[39] Harvey, D. , 1973. Social Justice and the City. University of Georgia Press, Georgia.

[40] Heathcott, J. , 2013. The Promenade Plantée: politics, planning, and urban design in postindustrial Paris. J. Plann. Educ. Res. 33 (3), 280- 291.

[41] Hoss, E. , Le Bourgeois, S. , Saadoun-Leray, E. , Beaupère, M. , Julliard, B. , Morel, J. , 2017. Créateurs et artisants d’arts. Semaest, Paris.

[42] Jacobs, J. , 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Vintage Books, New York.

[43] Jacobs, A. , Appleyard, D. , 1987. Toward an urban design manifesto. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 53 (1), 112- 120.

[44] Kang, C.D. , Cervero, R. , 2009. From elevated freeway to urban greenway: land value impacts of the CGC project in Seoul, Korea. Urban Stud. 46, 2771- 2794, 2009.

[45] Keith, S. , 2022. A green urban connection: the elevated railway gardens of Paris and New York. In: Salmon, C. (Ed.), Paris in the Americas: Yesterday and Today, first ed. Venom Press, Delaware, pp. 151-166.

[46] Landry, C. , Greene, L. , Matarasso, F. , Bianchini, F. , 1996. The art of regeneration: urban renewal through cultural activity. Comedia: Stroud.

[47] Lee, S.H. , Ben Ghida, D. , 2017. Cast-in-place architectonic concrete in South Korea: methods and specifications. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 8 (1), 820- 829.

[48] Lee, J. , Sohn, K. , 2014. Identifying the impact on land prices of replacing at-grade or elevated railways with underground subways in the Seoul metropolitan area. Urban Stud. 51, 44- 62, 2014.

[49] Lee, J.Y. , Anderson, C.D. , 2013. The restored cheonggyecheon and the quality of life in Seoul. J. Urban Technol. 20 (4), 3- 22.

[50] Lim, H. , Kim, J. , Potter, C. , Bae, W. , 2013. Urban regeneration and gentrification: land use impacts of the Cheonggye Stream Restoration Project on the Seoul’s central business district. Habitat Int. 39, 192- 200.

[51] Loughran, K. , 2014. Parks for profit: the high line, growth machines, and the uneven development of urban public spaces. City Community 13, 49- 68.

[52] Loiola, L.E. , 2016. Viaduc des Arts, promenade plantée. Um recorte sobre a produção de espaço público em Paris, vol. 16. Minha Cidade, São Paulo, p. 189, 02, Vitruvius.

[53] Lynch, K. , 1960. The Image of the City. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[54] Lynch, K. , 1981. A Theory of Good City Form. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[55] Mairie de Paris 12e , 2017. Le Viaduc des Arts. Paris City Hall Official Website.

[56] Meade, M. , 1996. Parisian promenade. Architect. Rev. 1195, 52- 55.

[57] Morancho, A.B.A. , 2003. Hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landsc. Urban Plann. 66, 35- 41.

[58] Norberg-Schulz, C. , 1980. Genius Loci: towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. Rizzoli, New York.

[59] Porter, W.L. , 1992. Architecture and culture: lessons from the past? J. Architect. Educ. 46 (1), 46- 48.

[60] Poudyal, N.C. , Hodges, D.G. , Merrett, C.D. , 2009. A hedonic analysis of the demand for and benefits of urban recreation parks. Land Use Pol. 26, 975- 983.

[61] Real, E. , 2015. Reconversions. L’architecture industrielle réinventée. InSitu 26. N.

[62] Région Île-de-France , 2017. Une nouvelle politique régionale pour le patrimoine. Dossier de presse, Paris, Région Île-de-France.

[63] Reichl, A.J. , 2016. The High Line and the ideal of democratic public space. Urban Geogr. 37 (6), 904- 925.

[64] Rönn, M. , 2011. Architectural quality in competitions. A dialogue based assessment of design proposals. FormAkademisk 4 (1).

[65] Salehi, M. , Taheri, S. , Shabani, A. , 2023. Regenerating historical districts through tactical urbanism: a case study of sarpol neighborhood in Isfahan Province, Iran. Frontiers of Architectural Research 12 (6), 1234- 1245.

[66] Sasaki, M. , 2010. Urban regeneration through cultural creativity and social inclusion: rethinking creative city theory through a Japanese case study. Cities 27, S3-S9.

[67] Schellini, M. , BenGhida, S. , Ben Ghida, D. , Romanelli Assumpção, F. , 2023. Academic philistinism? The challenges of contemporary artistic research inside academia. Semi-Structured interviews with visual art students in Brazil. Arte, Individuo Soc. 35 (3), 1081- 1099.

[68] Sepe, M. , 2014. Urban transformation, socio-economic regeneration and participation: two cases of creative urban regeneration. Int. J. Urban Sustain. Dev. 6 (1), 20- 41.

[69] Sim, J. , Bohannon, C.L. , Miller, P. , 2020. What park visitors survey tells us: comparing three elevated parks-the high line, 606, and high bridge. Sustainability 12 (1), 121.

[70] Semaest , 2012. Opérations d’aménagement. Promenade plantée. Viaduc des Arts. ZAC Chalon, 1850-2006). Technical report, N. 3467W, Archives de Paris.

[71] Semaest , 2021. Le Viaduc des Arts. Press Kit, Semaest: Paris.

[72] Semaest , 2023. Nos missions. Semaest Official Website.

[73] Semaest , 2018. Promenade plantée (12e). Semaest Official Website.

[74] Serag El Din, H. , Shalaby, A. , Farouh, H.E. , Elariane, S.A. , 2013. Principles of urban quality of life for a neighborhood. HBRC Journal 9 (1), 86- 92.

[75] Stuber, F. , 1979. Collective spaces in their historical urban context. Monumentum 18- 19, 15- 23.

[76] Tajima, K. , 2003. New estimates of the demand for urban green space: implications for valuing the environmental benefits of Boston’s big dig project. J. Urban Aff. 25, 641- 655.

[77] Tuan, Y. , 1977. Space and Place: the Perspective of Experience. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.

[78] UNESCO , 2011. Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape. UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Paris.

[79] Venturi, R. , 1966. Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture. Museum of Modern Art, New York.

[80] Ville de Paris , 2020. Les projets de renouvellement urbain : GPRU, NPNRU. City of Paris Official Website.

[81] Ville de Paris , 2021. De Bastille à Vincennes par la coulée verte. Official website the City of Paris.

[82] Wesselman, D. , 2017. Programming difference on rotterdam’s hofbogen. In: Lindner, C., Rosa, B. (Eds.), Deconstructing the High Line: Postindustrial Urbanism and the Rise of the Elevated Park. Rutgers University Press, pp. 141-158.

[83] Yung, E.H. , Chan, E.H. , 2012. Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: towards the goals of sustainable, low carbon cities. Habitat Int. 36 (3), 352- 361.

[84] Zevi, B. , 1964. Michelangiolo in prosa, l’Architettura. Cronache e storia 9, 99.

[85] Zukin, S. , 1989. Loft Living. Culture and Capital in Urban Change. Rutgers University Press, New York.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd.

审图号：GS京（2024）2327号