Integrating BIM and machine learning to predict carbon emissions under foundation materialization stage: Case study of China’s 35 public buildings

Abstract

For the significant energy consumption and environmental impact, it is crucial to identify the carbon emission characteristics of building foundations construction during the design phase. This study would like to establish a process-based carbon evaluating model, by adopting Building Information Modeling (BIM), and calculated the materialization-stage carbon emissions of building foundations without basement space in China, and identifying factors influencing the emissions through correlation analysis. These five factors include the building function type, building structure type, foundation area, foundation treatment method, and foundation depth. Additionally, this study develops several machine learning-based predictive models, including Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, and Neural Network. Among these models, XGBoost demonstrates a relatively higher degree of accuracy and minimal errors, can achieve the RMSE of 206.62 and R² of 0.88 based on testing group feedback. The study reveals a substantial variability carbon emissions per building’s floor area of foundations, ranging from 100 to 2000 kgCO₂e/m², demonstrating the potential for optimizing carbon emissions during the design phase of buildings. Besides, materials contribute significantly to total carbon emissions, accounting for 78%-97%, suggesting a significant opportunity for using BIM technology in the design phase to optimize carbon reduction efforts.

Keywords

Building foundations / Carbon emissions / Building information modeling / Machine learning / Sustainable architectural design

References

[1] Almetwally, A.A., Idrees, H.M., Hebeish, A.A., 2014. Predicting the tensile properties of cotton/spandex core-spun yarns using artificial neural network and linear regression models. J. Textil. Inst. 105 (11), 1221-1229.

[2] Ansah, M.K., Chen, X., Yang, H.X., Lu, L., Li, H., 2021. Developing a tier-hybrid uncertainty analysis approach for lifecycle impact assessment of a typical high-rise residential building. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 167, 105424.

[3] Asare, K.A.B., Ruikar, K.D., Zanni, M., Soetanto, R., 2020. BIM-based LCA and energy analysis for optimised sustainable building design in Ghana. SN Appl. Sci. 2 (11), 1855.

[4] Bai, L.H., 2019. Study on Public Building Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Prediction Model--Taking Office Buildings in Tianjin as Examples. Tianjin University (In Chinese).

[5] Chu, C., Boré, A., Liu, X.W., Cui, J.C., Wang, P., Liu, X., et al. 2022. Modeling the impact of some independent parameters on the syngas characteristics during plasma gasification of municipal solid waste using artificial neural network and stepwise linear regression methods. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 157, 112052.

[6] Crippa, J., Boeing, L.C., Caparelli, A.P.A., da Costa, M.d.R.deM.M., Scheer, S., Araujo, A.M.F., Bem, D., 2018. A BIM-LCA integration technique to embodied carbon estimation applied on wall systems in Brazil. Built Environ. Project AssetManage. 8 (5), 491- 503

[7] Ding, Z., Liu, S., Luo, L., Liao, L., 2020. A building information modeling-based carbon emission measurement system for prefabricated residential buildings during the materialization phase. J. Clean. Prod. 264, 121728.

[8] Dixit, M.K., Fernández-Solís, J.L., Lavy, S., Culp, C.H., 2010. Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: a literature review. Energy Build. 42 (8)， 1238-1247.

[9] Eastman, C.M., Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., Liston, K., 2011. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors. John Wiley & Sons.

[10] Ebrahimi, M., Sarikhani, M.R., Sinegani, A.A.S., Ahmadi, A., Keesstra, S., 2019. Estimating the soil respiration under different land uses using artificial neural network and linear regression models. Catena 174, 371-382.

[11] Gan, V.J.L., Deng, M., Tse, K.T., Chan, C.M., Lo, I.M.C., Cheng, J.C.P., 2018. Holistic BIM framework for sustainable low carbon design of high-rise buildings. J. Clean. Prod. 195, 1091-1104.

[12] GB/T 51366-2019, 2019. Calculation Standard for Carbon Emission from Buildings. Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China.

[13] Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Tookey, J., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Naismith, N., Azhar, S., Efimova, O., Raahemifar, K., 2017. Building Information Modelling (BIM) uptake: clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 75, 1046-1053.

[14] Gomes, C.M.A., Lemos, G.C., Jelihovschi, E.G., 2020. Comparing the predictive power of the CART and CTREE algorithms. Avaliação Psicológica 19 (1), 87-96.

[15] Hao, J., Ho, T.K., 2019. Machine learning made easy: a review of Scikit-learn package in Python programming language. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 44 (3), 348-361.

[16] Hawdon, D., Pearson, P., 1995. INPUT-OUTPUT simulations of energy, environment, economy interactions in the UK. Energy Econ. 17 (1), 73-86.

[17] Hosseinzadeh, A., Baziar, M., Alidadi, H., Zhou, J.L., Altaee, A., Najafpoor, A.A., Jafarpour, S., 2020. Application of artificial neural network and multiple linear regression in modeling nutrient recovery in vermicompost under different conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 303, 122926.

[18] Hussain, M., Zheng, B., Chi, H.L., Hsu, S.C., Chen, J.H., 2023. Automated and continuous BIM-based life cycle carbon assessment for infrastructure design projects. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 190, 106848

[19] IPCC, 2007. Climate change. Working group III: mitigation of climate change. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report 2007.

[20] ISO14044, 2006. Environmental Management Life Cycle Assessment Requirements and Guidelines, p. ISO140444.

[21] Jassim, H.S.H., Lu, W., Olofsson, T., 2017. Predicting energy consumption and CO2 emissions of excavators in earthwork operations: an artificial neural network model. Sustainability 9 (7), 1257.

[22] Leiphart, D.J., Hart, B.S., 2001. Case history: comparison of linear regression and a probabilistic neural network to predict porosity from 3-D seismic attributes in Lower Brushy Canyon channeled sandstones, southeast New Mexico. Geophysics 66 (5), 1349-1358.

[23] Li, X.-J., Zheng, Y.-d., 2020. Using LCA to research carbon footprint for precast concrete piles during the building construction stage: a China study. J. Clean. Prod. 245, 118754.

[24] Luo, W., Sandanayake, M., Zhang, G., 2019. Direct and indirect carbon emissions in foundation construction - two case studies of driven precast and cast-in-situ piles. J. Clean. Prod. 211, 1517-1526.

[25] Mao, C., Shen, Q., Shen, L., Tang, L., 2013. Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: two case studies of residential projects. Energy Build. 66, 165-176.

[26] Mao, X.K., 2018. Study on Building Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Prediction Model -Taking Residential Buildings in Tianjin as Examples. Tianjin University (In Chinese).

[27] Omrany, H., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Chang, R., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Rahimian, F.P., 2023. Applications of Building information modelling in the early design stage of highrise buildings. Autom. ConStruct. 152, 104934.

[28] Peng, C., 2016. Calculation of a building’s life cycle carbon emissions based on Ecotect and building information modeling. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 453- 465

[29] Pino-Mejias, R., Perez-Fargallo, A., Rubio-Bellido, C., Pulido-Arcas, J.A., 2017. Comparison of linear regression and artificial neural networks models to predict heating and cooling energy demand, energy consumption and CO2 emissions. Energy 118, 24-36.

[30] Protocol, K., 1997. Kyoto protocol. UNFCCC Website.

[31] Sandanayake, M., Zhang, G., Setunge, S., 2016. Environmental emissions at foundation construction stage of buildings - two case studies. Build. Environ. 95, 189-198.

[32] Sandanayake, M., Zhang, G., Setunge, S., 2019. Estimation of environmental emissions and impacts of building construction - a decision making tool for contractors. J. Build. Eng. 21, 173-185.

[33] Sandanayake, M., Zhang, G., Setunge, S., Luo, W., Li, C.-Q., 2017. Estimation and comparison of environmental emissions and impacts at foundation and structure construction stages of a building - a case study. J. Clean. Prod. 151, 319-329.

[34] Sharma, A., Saxena, A., Sethi, M., Shree, V., Varun, 2011. Life cycle assessment of buildings: a review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 15 (1), 871-875.

[35] Su, B., Huang, H.C., Ang, B.W., Zhou, P., 2010. Input-output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: the effects of sector aggregation. Energy Econ. 32 (1), 166-175.

[36] Tiryaki, S., Aydın, A., 2014. An artificial neural network model for predicting compression strength of heat treated woods and comparison with a multiple linear regression model. Construct. Build. Mater. 62, 102-108.

[37] Wang, D., Chang, F.H., 2023. Application of machine learning-based BIM in green public building design. Soft Comput. 27 (13), 9031-9040.

[38] Wang, H.N., Zhao, L., Zhang, H., Liu, P., Sun, B., Hou, K.M., 2022. Building information modeling assisted carbon emission impact assessment of prefabricated residential buildings in the design phase: case study of a Chinese building, 2022 Int. J. Photoenergy, 2275642.

[39] Williams, C.G., Ojuri, O.O., 2021. Predictive modelling of soils’ hydraulic conductivity using artificial neural network and multiple linear regression. SN Appl. Sci. 3, 1- 13

[40] Yan, H., Shen, Q., Fan, L.C.H., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., 2010. Green-house gas emissions in building construction: a case study of One Peking in Hong Kong. Build. Environ. 45 (4), 949-955.

[41] Zhang, X.C., Liu, K.H., Zhang, Z.H., 2020. Life cycle carbon emissions of two residential buildings in China: comparison and uncertainty analysis of different assessment methods. J. Clean. Prod. 266, 122037.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Author(s). Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd.