RESEARCH ARTICLE

Moments of discounted dividend payments in a risk model with randomized dividend-decision times

  • Zhimin ZHANG ,
  • Chaolin LIU
Expand
  • College of Mathematics and Statistics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China

Received date: 20 Feb 2014

Accepted date: 21 Oct 2016

Published date: 20 Feb 2017

Copyright

2016 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

We consider a perturbed compound Poisson risk model with randomized dividend-decision times. Different from the classical barrier dividend strategy, the insurance company makes decision on whether or not paying off dividends at some discrete time points (called dividend-decision times). Assume that at each dividend-decision time, if the surplus is larger than a barrier b>0, the excess value will be paid off as dividends. Under such a dividend strategy, we study how to compute the moments of the total discounted dividend payments paid off before ruin.

Cite this article

Zhimin ZHANG , Chaolin LIU . Moments of discounted dividend payments in a risk model with randomized dividend-decision times[J]. Frontiers of Mathematics in China, 2017 , 12(2) : 493 -513 . DOI: 10.1007/s11464-016-0609-9

1
Albrecher H, Cheung E C K, Thonhauser S. Randomized observation periods for the compound Poisson risk model: Dividends. Astin Bull, 2011, 41(2): 645–672

2
Albrecher H, Claramunt M M, M′armol M. On the distribution of dividend payments in a Sparre Andersen model with generalized Erlang(n) interclaim times. Insurance Math Econom, 2005, 37(2): 324–334

DOI

3
Avanzi B, Cheung E C K, Wong B, Woo J K. On a periodic dividend barrier strategy in the dual model with continuous monitoring of solvency. Insurance Math Econom, 2013, 52(1): 98–113

DOI

4
Choi M C H, Cheung E C K. On the expected discounted dividends in the Cram′er-Lundberg risk model with more frequent ruin monitoring than dividend decisions. Insurance Math Econom, 2014, 59: 121–132

DOI

5
De Finetti B. Su un impostazione alternativa della teoria collectiva del rischio. Transactions of the XVth International Congress of Actuaries, 1957, 2: 433–443

6
Gerber H U. An extension of the renewal equation and its application in the collective theory of risk. Scand Actuar J, 1970, 1970(3-4): 205–210

DOI

7
Gerber H U, Shiu E S W. Optimal dividends: Analysis with Brownian motion. N Am Actuar J, 2004, 8(1): 1–20

DOI

8
Kyprianou A E. Introductory Lectures on Fluctuations of L′evy Processes with Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006

9
Li S. The distribution of the dividend payments in the compound poisson risk model perturbed by diffusion. Scand Actuar J, 2006, 2006(2): 73–85

DOI

10
Li S, Garrido J. On ruin for the Eralng(n) risk process. Insurance Math Econom, 2004, 34: 391–408

DOI

11
Li S, Garrido J. On a class of renewal risk model with a constant dividend barrier. Insurance Math Econom, 2004, 35(3): 691–701

DOI

12
Lin X S, Willmot G E, Drekic S. The classical risk model with a constant dividend barrier: Analysis of the Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function. Insurance Math Econom, 2003, 33(3): 551–566

DOI

13
Tsai C C L. On the discounted distribution functions of the surplus process perturbed by diffusion. Insurance Math Econom, 2001, 28(3): 401–419

DOI

14
Tsai C C L. On the expectations of the present values of the time of ruin perturbed by diffusion. Insurance Math Econom, 2003, 32(3): 413–429

DOI

15
Tsai C C L, Willmot G E. A generalized defective renewal equation for the surplus process perturbed by diffusion. Insurance Math Econom, 2002, 30(1): 51–66

DOI

16
Yin C, Wen Y. Optimal dividend problem with a terminal value for spectrally positive L′evy processes. Insurance Math Econom, 2013, 53(3): 769–773

DOI

17
Yin C, Wen Y, Zhao Y. On the optimal dividend problem for a spectrally positive L′evy process. Astin Bull, 2014, 44(3): 635–651

DOI

18
Zhang Z. On a risk model with randomized dividend-decision times. J Ind Manag Optim, 2014, 10(4): 1041–1058

DOI

19
Zhang Z, Cheung E C K. The Markov additive risk process under an Erlangized dividend barrier strategy. Methodol Comput Appl Probab, 2016, 18(2): 275–306

DOI

Outlines

/