RESEARCH ARTICLE

Locally risk-minimizing hedging strategies for unit-linked life insurance contracts under a regime switching Lévy model

  • Linyi QIAN 1,2 ,
  • Hailiang YANG 3 ,
  • Rongming WANG , 1,2,4
Expand
  • 1. School of Finance and Statistics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
  • 2. Research Center of International Finance and Risk Management, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
  • 3. Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • 4. School of Mathematics and System Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China

Received date: 15 Jul 2010

Accepted date: 20 Dec 2010

Published date: 01 Dec 2011

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

This paper extends the model and analysis in that of Vandaele and Vanmaele [Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2008, 42: 1128-1137]. We assume that parameters of the L′evy process which models the dynamic of risky asset in the financial market depend on a finite state Markov chain. The state of the Markov chain can be interpreted as the state of the economy. Under the regime switching L′evy model, we obtain the locally risk-minimizing hedging strategies for some unit-linked life insurance products, including both the pure endowment policy and the term insurance contract.

Cite this article

Linyi QIAN , Hailiang YANG , Rongming WANG . Locally risk-minimizing hedging strategies for unit-linked life insurance contracts under a regime switching Lévy model[J]. Frontiers of Mathematics in China, 2011 , 6(6) : 1185 -1202 . DOI: 10.1007/s11464-011-0100-6

1
Chan T. Pricing contingent claims on stocks driven by Lévy processes. The Annals of Applied Probability, 1999, 9(2): 504-528

2
Deshpande A, Ghosh M K. Risk minimizing option pricing in a regime switching market. Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 2008, 26: 313-324

DOI

3
F¨ollmer H, Schweizer M. Hedging of contingent claims under incomplete information. In: Davis M, Elliot R, eds. Applied Stochastic Analysis. Stochastic Monographs, Vol 5. New York: Gordon and Breach, 1991, 389-414

4
Föllmer H, Sondermann D. Hedging of non-redundant contingent claims. In: Hildenbrand W, Mas-Colell A, eds. Contributions to Mathematical Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1986, 205-223

5
Ghosh M K, Arapostathis A, Marcus S I. Ergodic control of switching diffusions. SIAM Journal of Contral and Optimization, 1997, 35: 1952-1988

DOI

6
Møller T. Risk-minimizing hedging strategies for unit-linked life insurance contracts. ASTIN Bulletin, 1998, 28: 17-47

DOI

7
Møller T. Risk-minimizing hedging strategies for insurance payment processes. Finance and Stochastics, 2001, 5(4): 419-446

DOI

8
Riesner M. Hedging life insurance contracts in a Lévy process financial market. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2006, 38: 599-608

DOI

9
Schweizer, M. Option hedging for semimartingales. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 1991, 37: 339-363

DOI

10
Schweizer M. Risk-minimizing hedging strategies under restricted information. Mathematical Finance, 1994, 4: 327-342

DOI

11
Schweizer M. A guided tour through quadratic hedging approaches. In: Jouini E, Cvitanić J, Musiela M, eds. Handbooks in Mathematical Finance: Option Pricing, Interest Rates and Risk Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 538-574

12
Vandaele N, Vanmaele M. A locally risk-minimizing hedging strategy for unit-linked life insurance contracts in a Lévy process financial market. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2008, 42: 1128-1137

DOI

Options
Outlines

/