Guangxi Colleges and Universities Key Laboratory of Data Analysis and Computation, School of Mathematics and Computing Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
1286391997@qq.com
Show less
History+
Received
Accepted
Published
Issue Date
Revised Date
2022-12-30
PDF
(384KB)
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate functional limit problem for path of a Brownian sheet, Chung's functional law of the iterated logarithm for a Brownian sheet is obtained. The main tool in the proof is large deviation and small deviation for a Brownian sheet.
Yonghong LIU, Ting ZHANG, Yiheng TANG.
Chung’s functional law of the iterated logarithm for the Brownian sheet.
Front. Math. China, 2022, 17(6): 1015-1024 DOI:10.1007/s11464-022-1030-1
The functional limit theorems for Brownian motion and Brownian sheet have been investigated by some scholars. Gao and Wang [2] studied the rate of convergence in the functional limit theorem for increments of a Brownian motion. Lucas [4] obtained Chung's type modulus of continuity for Brownian motion. Chen [1] studied Strassen's the law of the iterated logarithm for the two-parameter Wiener processes. Xu [8] studied quasi sure functional modulus of continuity for a two-parameter Wiener process in Hölder norm, and partial results of [8, Theorem 3.1] were generalized to case of fractional Brownian sheet [9, Theorem 1.2]. The study for Chung's limit theorems of Brownian sheet is complicated, and the result is a fewer. In the existing results, Talagrand obtained Chung's law of the iterated logarithm [6, Theorem 1.3], and Kuelbs and Li [3, Theorem 5.1] obtained Chung's functional law of the iterated logarithm for Brownian sheet in Hölder norm, but these results are rough. In this paper, Chung's law of the iterated logarithm for Brownian sheet is further studied, the more exact Chung's type law of iterated logarithm is obtained.
In this paper, let be Brownian sheet, , endowed with the uniform norm . Denote , , define a function by
Denote . We define .
The following theorems are main results of this paper.
Theorem 1.1For anywith , we have
Theorem 1.2 (1) Let a positive constant . For anywith , we have
(2) For anywith , we have
Where is a positive constant in Theorem 1.1 of [6].
Remark 1.1 In Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2, if , then
In this case, Theorem 1.3 in [6] can be seen as the corollary of (1.5).
2 Proofs of main results
In this section, Theorem 1.1 is proved by small deviations, Theorem 1.2 is proved by large deviations and small deviations.
2.1 Proof of Theorem 1.1
Our proofs are based on the following lemmas.
Lemma 2.1Let , , . Then we have
Proof Let and . We have
Lemma 2.1 is proved.
Lemma 2.2Forwith , there exists a , such that
Proof Let with , and choose , such that . We have
By Proposition 4.2 in [5], for , large enough, we have
Proof of (1.1) Let , , and let be defined as in Lemma 2.2, such that . Let , . Then for any , by definition of infimum, there exists a , such that . We have
By Lemma 2.1
moreover,
By the inequality , we have
which implies
By (2.3)−(2.7) and Lemma 2.2, we have
Since , (1.1) is proved.
The proof of (1.2) is similar to that of (1.1). Hereby omitted.
2.2 Proof of Theorem 1.2
Our proofs are based on the following lemmas.
Lemma 2.3 [7, Lemma 2.1] For any closed setand for any open set , we have
Lemma 2.4Let . Then we have
Proof Let. Then set is closed. For any , there exists a , such that . Since
by Lemma 2.3, we have
By Borel-Cantelli's lemma, Lemma 2.4 is proved.
Proof of (1.3) For large enough, there exists an increasing sequence such that . Then it is sufficient to show that: for any with ,
The proof of (2.8) is as follows. We have
First of all, we prove that
In fact,
by Lemma 2.4, is almost surely bounded, thus
Moreover, for , we have
which follows that
Second, we prove that
In fact,
Moreover
Similar to the proof of Lemma 2.4, we see that , , are almost surely bounded. We have:
Let
Then , thus . We need only to prove that
We have
For with , we have . Choose , such that . By Proposition 4.2 in [5] and Theorem 1.1 in [6], for large enough
thus
Which follows that
By Borel-Cantelli's lemma,
Hither, (2.8) is proved. It follows that (1.3) is proved.
The proof of (1.4) is similar to that of (1.3). Hereby omitted.
ChenB. On Strassen’s version of the law of the iterated logarithm for the two-parameter Wiener process. In: Asymptotic Methods in Probability and Statistics (Otawa, OW, 1997), Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1998, 343–358
[2]
Gao F, Wang Q. The rate of convergence in the functional limit theorem for increments of a Brownian motion. Statist Probab Lett2005; 73(2): 165–177
[3]
Kuelbs J, Li W V. Small ball estimates for Brownian motion and the Brownian sheet. J Theoret Probab1993; 6(3): 547–577
[4]
Lucas A. Fractales aléatoires de type Chung pour les accroissements du processus de Wiener. C R Acad Sci Paris Sér I1998; 326(9): 1123–1126
[5]
Monrad D, Rootzén H. Small values of Gaussian processes and functional laws of the iterated logarithm. Probab Theory Related Fields1995; 101(2): 173–192
[6]
Talagrand M. The small ball problem for the Brownian sheet. Ann Probab1994; 22(3): 1331–1354
[7]
Wang W. On Strassen-type theorem for the increments of two-parameter Wiener processes. Chinese Ann Math Ser A2001; 22(1): 27–34
[8]
Xu J. Quasi sure functional modulus of continuity for a two-parameter Wiener process in Hölder norm. J Math Anal Appl2016; 434: 501–515
[9]
Xu J, Miao Y, Liu J. Quasi sure functional limit theorem for increments of a fractional Brownian sheet in Hölder norm. Comm Statist Theory Methods2016; 45(5): 1564–1574
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Higher Education Press 2022
AI Summary 中Eng×
Note: Please be aware that the following content is generated by artificial intelligence. This website is not responsible for any consequences arising from the use of this content.