Geometric characterizations for variational minimizing solutions of charged 3-body problems

Abstract

We study the charged 3-body problem with the potential function being (-α)-homogeneous on the mutual distances of any two particles via the variational method and try to find the geometric characterizations of the minimizers. We prove that if the charged 3-body problem admits a triangular central configuration, then the variational minimizing solutions of the problem in the \frac{\pi }{2}-antiperiodic function space are exactly defined by the circular motions of this triangular central configuration.

Keywords

Charged 3-body problem / variational minimizer / geometric characterization

References

[1] Arnold V I.Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. Berlin: Springer, 1978

[2] Coti Zelati V. Periodic solutions for N-body type problems. Ann IHP Analyse non linéaire, 1990, 7(5): 477–492

[3] Gordon W. A minimizing property of Keplerian orbits. Amer J Math, 1977, 99(5): 961–971

[4] Hardy G, Littlewood J, Pólya G. Inequalities. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press, 1952

[5] Long Y. Lectures on Celestial Mechanics and Variational Methods. Preprint. 2012

[6] Long Y, Zhang S. Geometric characterizations for variational minimization solutions of the 3-body problem. Acta Math Sin (Engl Ser), 2000, 16: 579–592

[7] Meyer K, Hall G. Introduction to Hamiltonian Systems and the N-body Problems. Berlin: Springer, 1992

[8] Moeckel R. On central configurations. Math Z, 1990, 205: 499–517

[9] Perez-Chavela E, Saari D G, Susin A, Yan Z. Central configurations in the charged three body problem. Contemp Math, 1996, 198: 137–154

[10] Rabinowitz P, Periodic solutions of Hamiltonian systems. Comm Pure Appl Math, 1978, 31: 157–184

[11] Zhou Q, Long Y. Equivalence of linear stabilities of elliptic triangle solutions of the planar charged and classical three-body problems. J Differential Equations, 2015, 258: 3851–3879

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg