Map composition generalized to coherent collections of maps

Herng Yi CHENG, Kang Hao CHEONG

PDF(180 KB)
PDF(180 KB)
Front. Math. China ›› 2015, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (3) : 547-565. DOI: 10.1007/s11464-015-0435-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Map composition generalized to coherent collections of maps

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Relation algebras give rise to partial algebras on maps, which are generalized to partial algebras on polymaps while preserving the properties of relation union and composition. A polymap is defined as a map with every point in the domain associated with a special set of maps. Polymaps can be represented as small subcategories of Set, the category of pointed sets. Map composition and the counterpart of relation union for maps are generalized to polymap composition and sum. Algebraic structures and categories of polymaps are investigated. Polymaps present the unique perspective of an algebra that can retain many of its properties when its elements (maps) are augmented with collections of other elements.

Keywords

Relation algebra / partial algebra / composition

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Herng Yi CHENG, Kang Hao CHEONG. Map composition generalized to coherent collections of maps. Front. Math. China, 2015, 10(3): 547‒565 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11464-015-0435-5

References

[1]
Belcastro S, Hull T C. Modelling the folding of paper into three dimensions using affine transformations. Linear Algebra Appl, 2002, 348: 273-282
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Börger R. Connectivity spaces and component categories. In: Categorical Topology, Proc Int Conf, Toledo/Ohio 1983. Sigma Ser Pure Math, 5. 1984, 71-89
[3]
Cheng H Y, Cheong K H. Designing crease patterns for polyhedra by composing right frusta. Comput-Aided Design, 2012, 44: 331-342
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Crvenković S, Dolinka I. Varieties of involution semigroups and involution semirings: a survey. Bull Soc Math Banja Luka, 2002, 9: 7-47
[5]
De Morgan A. On the syllogism: IV, and the logic of relations. T Cambridge Philos Soc, 1864, 10: 331-358
[6]
Dolinka I. Idempotent distributive semirings with involution. Internat J Algebra Comput, 2003, 13: 597-625
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Dugowson S. On connectivity spaces. Cah Topol Géom Différ Catég, 2010, 51: 282-315
[8]
Easdown D, Munn W D. On semigroups with involution. Bull Aust Math Soc, 1993, 48: 93-100
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Ésik Z, Bernátsky L. Equational properties of Kleene algebras of relations with conversion. Theoret Comput Sci, 1995, 137: 237-251
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Givant S. The calculus of relations as a foundation for mathematics. J Automat Reason, 2006, 37: 277-322
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Mac Lane S. Categories for the Working Mathematician. Berlin: Springer, 1978
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Maddux R D. The origin of relation algebras in the development and axiomatization of the calculus of relations. Studia Logica, 1991, 50: 421-455
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Muscat J, Buhagiar D. Connective spaces. Mem Fac Sci Eng, Shimane Univ Ser B Math Sci, 2006, 39: 1-13
[14]
Nummela E C. Cayley’s theorem for topological groups. Amer Math Monthly, 1980, 87: 202-203
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Reyes M L. Obstructing extensions of the functor spec to noncommutative rings. Israel J Math, 2012, 192: 667-698
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Tarski A. On the calculus of relations. J Symbolic Logic, 1941, 6: 73-89
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Taylor P. Practical Foundations of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(180 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/