Assumptions of Gain Preference and Choice of Action by States in International Legislation: From the Perspective of International Relations

Zhiyun Liu

PDF(343 KB)
PDF(343 KB)
Front. Law China ›› 2010, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3) : 342-375. DOI: 10.1007/s11463-010-0102-4
research-article
research-article

Assumptions of Gain Preference and Choice of Action by States in International Legislation: From the Perspective of International Relations

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Upon entry into the vision of scholars in international relations, game theory has quickly become an effective approach to analyzing international conflicts and cooperation, and has been broadly adopted by neo-realism and neo-liberalism, which are two dominating aspects in the current theories of international relations. The former argues that the states participating in the game always follow relative gains, hence achieving a pessimistic conclusion on international cooperation, while the latter argues that the states participating in the game always follow absolute gains and deduces an optimistic prospect for international cooperation, which provides a useful way to analyze the confrontation and cooperation of states in international legislative game. Of course, it is aware that gain preference and choice of action by states in international legislative game are also conditioned by other factors.

Keywords

gain preference / game theory / international law / international organization

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhiyun Liu. Assumptions of Gain Preference and Choice of Action by States in International Legislation: From the Perspective of International Relations. Front Law Chin, 2010, 5(3): 342‒375 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11463-010-0102-4

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Thomson Reuters
PDF(343 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/