Zipfian interpretation of textbook vocabulary lists: comments on Xiao et al.’s Corpus-based research on English word recognition rates in primary school and word selection strategy

References

[1] Chujo,K., 2004. Measuring vocabulary levels of English textbooks and tests using a BNC lemmatised high fre-quency word list. Lang. Comput., 51(1):231–249.

[2] Feng,Z., 1998. Linguistics is the bridge between mathematics and humanities. Mod. Sci., (2):21–23 (in Chinese).

[3] Kilgarriff,A., 1995. BNC Database and Word Frequency Lists.

[4] Li,Q., He,S., 2010. Comparison between vocabulary in pri-mary school textbooks and English Curriculum Standards: a case study on New Standard and PEP. Teach. Res. Prim. Mid. Schools, (11):8–10 (in Chinese).

[5] Ministry of Education of China, 2011. English Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education. Beijing Normal University Press, Beijing (in Chinese).

[6] Nation,P., Waring, R., 1997. Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In: Schmitt, N., McCarthy, M. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p.6–19.

[7] van Heuven,W.J., Mandera, P., Keuleers,E. , , 2014. SUBTLEX-UK: a new and improved word frequency database for British English. Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 67(6): 1176–1190.

[8] Xiao,W., Wang,M., Zhen,W., , 2017. Corpus-based research on English word recognition rates in primary school and word selection strategy. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 18(3):362–372.

[9] Zipf,G.K., 1936. The Psychobiology of Language: an Intro-duction to Dynamic Philology. Routledge, Abingdon, UK.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Zhejiang University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg